“Toto, I Don’t Think We’re in Kansas Anymore”

Guest Post by Jeff Thomas

Recently, an American colleague commented to me, “We no longer live in a democracy but a dictatorship disguised as a democracy.”

Is he correct? Well, a dictatorship may be defined as “a form of government in which absolute authority is exercised by a dictator.”

The US today is not be ruled by dictatorship (although, to some, it may well feel that way.)

But, if that’s the case, what form of rule does exist in the US?

At its formation, the founding fathers argued over whether the United States should be a republic or a democracy. Those founders who later formed the Federalist Party felt that it should be a democracy – rule by representatives elected by the people. Thomas Jefferson, who created the Democratic Republican Party, argued that it should be a republic – a state in which the method of governance is democracy, but the principle of governance is that the rights of the individual are paramount.

He argued that, “Democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty one percent can vote away the rights of the other forty nine.”

At that time, Benjamin Franklin has been credited as saying, “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.”

Very well stated.

As Americans still legally vote, and it may well be that the voting is not altogether rigged, the US could be regarded as a democracy. Of course, to be accurate, it could also be defined as a bureaucracy – rule by officialdom, and/or a plutocracy – rule by the very rich. Both of these descriptions are undeniably accurate.

Another question that’s hotly debated is what sort of “ism” the US is living under. There’s a visible trend in new candidates to openly promote socialism. Historically, socialism has always been an excellent way to gain votes, as the socialist promises largesse to the average man that government will provide by robbing the rich. Not surprisingly, the average voter would find this prospect very attractive.

Socialist candidates in the US today base their argument for socialism on the premise that “capitalism has failed,” and that premise is providing them with great headway. They claim that prosperity for the American people is almost non-existent; that the middle class is shrinking and the small upper class is growing ever-richer.

These claims are undeniably true… but not because capitalism has failed.

Vladimir Lenin stated that “Fascism is capitalism in decay.” He was quite correct. Fascism is a slow cancer that eats away at an economy. It transfers wealth to the largest, most politically influential corporations. Yet, the concept of fascism is greatly misunderstood today. Most anyone who decries fascism will describe symptoms such as jackboots and swastikas, but fail to offer an actual definition.

For a definition, we might ask Benito Mussolini, the father of national fascism. He stated, “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.”

By defining the term, we can conclude that the US is no longer a capitalist country and hasn’t been one for a long time. The US began its slide into fascism in a major way around the time that income tax and the Federal Reserve were created – in 1913. These measures were the brainchild of the largest bankers of the day and the Fed still remains under the power of the major banks.

Over the last century, the Deep State, which is corporatist in origin, has grown and has done a first rate job of introducing a combination of socialism and fascism, a bit at a time. This has slowly destroyed the economy, education and the national moral compass, not to mention achieving the utter corruption of the political system.

By contrast, capitalism is a free-market system, in which the economy, unfettered by the interference of governments, finds its own level at any given time. It fluctuates naturally, based upon supply and demand, each correcting the other with regularity.

But government edicts operate with force and permanence, constricting the natural flow of money, goods and services. Over time, regulations pile on top of regulations until the system becomes dysfunctional.

Socialism, by its very nature, is a central restrictive force on the free market. Its logical conclusion is very visible in Venezuela today, where government regulation has produced such a stranglehold on the economy that it’s broken down in every way, resulting in dire poverty and even starvation.

But, as stated above, in the US, the Deep State has been thorough in its presentation of the US economy as a capitalist economy. In doing so, they’ve provided the encouragement of full socialism in the political realm.

In the near future, the economy will begin to collapse under the weight of growing fascism and socialism. However, the blame will be laid at the feet of capitalism.

In my belief, the majority of Americans will be fooled into thinking that capitalism is the problem and that socialism will save the day. During the coming financial crisis, they’ll dive in with both feet.

Voters, even many of those who are moderate, will support socialist candidates. The first national election that occurs after the crisis has begun will result in an overwhelming victory for socialist and other leftist candidates. The next president will provide a plethora of socialist “solutions” to counter “the damage done by capitalism.”

But such a prediction does not require a crystal ball. This has happened many times before. The Athenian Republic ran into the same problem. The Roman Republic also deteriorated in this manner. As stated by Aristotle, “Republics decline into democracies and democracies decline into despotisms.”

Quite so. It’s a natural progression.

And so, it shouldn’t be surprising if the more imaginative American were to observe, worriedly, “Toto, I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore.”

He would most certainly be correct. Like the flag in the image above, the founding principles have been turned upside down and the rights of Americans have been shredded. “America,” as a concept, no longer exists in the USA. Its vestiges remain, but soon, they too will be on the way out.

Liberty always exists somewhere in the world, but it does tend to change location from time to time.

Perhaps a final quote from late eighteenth century America would be of benefit – one from Thomas Paine.

“My country is wherever liberty lives.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Gypsy Woman
Gypsy Woman
March 27, 2019 2:58 pm

” what form of rule does exist in the US”?

All depends on who you are.

Old Krank
Old Krank
  Gypsy Woman
March 27, 2019 6:34 pm

I’d say it’s a combination of corporatism and retardism; the Cliff Notes version of fascism.

Pequiste
Pequiste
March 27, 2019 3:08 pm

“…if that’s the case, what form of rule does exist in the US?”

– Jeff Thomas

In answer to the question I would like to provide the short answer taken directly from Mike Judge: “Idiocracy”.

Old Shoe
Old Shoe
March 27, 2019 3:25 pm

I contend that most white Americans living in America today aren’t Americans at all. They could give a shit less about their heritage and the sacrifices of previous generations that got them to this comfortable place in time. I’ve more in common with a low IQ Wal Mart type that believes in God & Country than I do a white collar successful suburbanite that let’s his children rule over him. As a whole, this Nation deserves to reap the whirlwind. We’ve turned away from all that’s right and just in some vague pursuit of self pleasure. Time’s just about up.

BB
BB
  Old Shoe
March 27, 2019 4:02 pm

Old shoe ,you are right × 10 . Most white people are just like most niggers. All they care about is what can government do for me. After the next financial collapse the America of old will be gone forever. Most whites will not fight for their heritage because most don’t care to know our history or the sacrifices of previous generations. They think this comfortable lifestyle just fell out of the sky and landed on us . That and our so called ” leaders ” are treasonous bastards who are under the control of Jews who hate white people. I guess I don’t have much hope for the future of our nation. We could easy end up like the Russians in the 1920s .

Mad as Hell
Mad as Hell
  BB
March 27, 2019 5:23 pm

In that same vein – “Perhaps a final quote from late eighteenth century America would be of benefit – one from Thomas Paine.
“My country is wherever liberty lives.””

So, the question of the hour is: Where does liberty now live? Most of the western world is run the same way. And the countries that have not complied with the US, tend to get “liberated” by force. Where does one go that they can live in liberty now?

grace country pastor
grace country pastor
  Mad as Hell
March 28, 2019 8:43 am

Liberty is wherever you are.

geo
geo
  BB
April 1, 2019 3:43 am

No Christian Tsar to ritualic murder Him and His Family…

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 27, 2019 5:19 pm

If one is going to study and discuss Fascism, then one has to consider the what role intellectual property has in all of this. Tech lifts us all out of the stone age. From the wheel & fire, to the computer and atomic bomb, every new invention changes our world and the way we function in it.

It is natural that smart people will rise to the top, because our intellect is our greatest survival tool. Our intellect is our strength and only the strong survive. As far as the weak minded, they will have to resort to other means, perhaps good looks or some other quality that can win over the heart of an successful intelligent person.

Anyway, corporations and their intellectual property is what lifts us all out of the stone age. It is what also makes us enslaved to them. Thus, it is very easy for the smart people who own the intellectual property we rely on for our survival to have a great influence over government. Of course they will marry each other and become openly or covertly fascist., as per the definition provided in the article.

As far as capitalism, due to competition, one must be mindful to seek new innovations that will either cut costs or win more market share. As we all can see, corporations often view labor as one of their biggest expenses, and they do everything imaginable to reduce these labor cost. We have reached a point that tech is allowing business to cut labor cost through robotics. If this trend continues it will either drive us into socialism or a violent revolution. People will not lay down and die to preserve an ideology that is crushing them. I wouldn’t go as far to say people want socialism, however they will accept it if their back are against a wall…..”Build the wall”!!!???

“People, if given the choice between anarchy and dictatorship, will always choose dictatorship because anarchy is the worst dictatorship of all”

Likewise, people, if given the choice between starvation, revolution or socialism, what do you think they will pick?

My answer is people will always take the path of least resistance.

Donna
Donna
  Anonymous
March 27, 2019 6:23 pm

Robots should then be taxed by govt as human employees and benefits awarded to humans.

Honest and true perspective of the way human survival works. Good post.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Donna
March 27, 2019 7:07 pm

Hey, I nearly came up with the same solution as you did. My idea was to make it the law that a business cannot own a robot. Only employees can own a robot, which they could in turn lease out to business. There is one thing though. Robots are very efficient and fast, so they can get through a great deal of work in a short time. This may cause a work shortage. So, I’m not sure it is a solution that will get us out of the woods.

Austrian Peter
Austrian Peter
  Anonymous
March 27, 2019 9:29 pm

But everything takes energy and this is the stuff that is becoming short in supply. Check out ‘ERoEI’ and you will find that we are at the edge of the energy surplus cliff. Not long to go now until we regress into the 19th century.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Austrian Peter
March 27, 2019 10:17 pm

molten salt reactors look promising.

geo
geo
  Anonymous
April 1, 2019 3:45 am

Business rules… I mean, the khazarian mafia[s].

geo
geo
  Anonymous
April 1, 2019 3:57 am

You say:
“corporations and their intellectual property is what lifts us all out of the stone age..”
Who invented the dead concept to make it equal with the living human ???
And WHY?
To hide the usurpers, corrupted money bastards and let them free…
Who invented “intelectual property”?
From where the one gets an idea and what is really creating except using in a different way the NATURAL everything?
And you call this “smart people”!
No, is not IQ, is the theft deal to “work” your trust and corrupt you.
This is evil side of the thinking, not the community, good one.

Iconoclast421
Iconoclast421
March 28, 2019 4:12 pm

The US is like a high school. You have your class president and a committee or two. But the real power rests with the principal, the superintendent, and their army of administrators. The only difference is that US citizens don’t know about the principal or the superintendent. All knowledge of these is carefully hidden, and the mechanisms for how this knowledge is hidden are also hidden. So the people mistakenly believe that Trump, their class president, runs the school, and that congress passes meaningful laws or at least passes laws that serve the people.

Mszyslak
Mszyslak
March 28, 2019 7:54 pm

“At its formation, the founding fathers argued over whether the United States should be a republic or a democracy. Those founders who later formed the Federalist Party felt that it should be a democracy – rule by representatives elected by the people. Thomas Jefferson, who created the Democratic Republican Party, argued that it should be a republic – a state in which the method of governance is democracy, but the principle of governance is that the rights of the individual are paramount.”

Does anyone know of a source or or citation for these definitions? I have never, in 50 years, heard these terms defined this way.

None Ya Biz
None Ya Biz
March 30, 2019 10:54 am

What I find discouraging is how people use the English language. People use capitalism to mean a free market economy. The first thing one must understand completely is that all systems systems of government are capitalistic! What differs is who controls the capital.

A free market means the ownership and control of capital lies with the individual and is protected by private property rights. The government exist only to enforce private property rights. Currently there is not one government in existence that meets this minimal framework.

A fascist system requires control of capital by the government but ownership by the individual. This actually is the best of both systems as far as the state is concerned. They get to control the capital and tax the individual for ownership of it. Note, in this system there is a form of private property right. The state will prosecute anyone that steals, destroys or uses fraud to obtain capital merely because the state is actually the ultimate hidden owner of the capital. Stealing or destroying the capital from the individual is the state’s job and they HATE competition. Yes, dear reader, the state considers your body to be capital. This is why the modern state prosecutes murder. The murderer has deprived the state of the potential revenue from the individual (slave) killed.

The Communism system infers ownership and control of all capital by the proletariat. Which can work when there are is a small group of people that agree to all the rules of the commune. The problem comes when James who is super productive resents Bill who is not but still gets an equal share of the production. Envy is at work here James envies Bill’s appearance of an easier life and Bill envies James’ seeming ease at being super productive!

Both fascism and communism are forms of socialism. Both seek to use the excuse of the collective good for the state ownership and or control of capital.

Governments around the world are generally fascist with the amount of capital control varying in each individual state. Some exert more control over capital than others. A prime example of this in the united States is zoning law. If the government can control what you can do with your so called private property, then what is the use of being the owner? If you really own property why would you need the consent/permission of a group of tyrannical busy bodies to make changes to it? Likewise, fail to render property tax to the same group and find out who really owns and controls property.

Until people in the united States really understand the differences with these systems, there will just be more of the same. There is no such thing as a free lunch! Someone always pays! Even the FSA pays with their dependence on the state which steals to give them what they demand. What individuals pay may be hidden but none the less…