The First Libertarian?

Guest Post by Jeff Thomas

Most libertarians count Murray Rothbard as one of their mentors. They will know that Rothbard’s primary mentors were Ludwig Von Mises and Friedrich Hayek. But Rothbard dug deeper in his search for libertarian thinking. Here is a little-seen paper that he wrote in 1967:

The first libertarian intellectual was Lao-tzu, the founder of Taoism. Little is known about his life, but apparently he was a personal acquaintance of Confucius in the late sixth century BC and like the latter came from the state of Sung and was descended from the lower aristocracy of the Yin dynasty.

Unlike the notable apologist for the rule of philosopher-bureaucrats, however, Lao-tzu developed a radical libertarian creed. For Lao-tzu the individual and his happiness was the key unit and goal of society. If social institutions hampered the individual’s flowering and his happiness, then those institutions should be reduced or abolished altogether. To the individualist Lao-tzu, government, with its “laws and regulations more numerous than the hairs of an ox,” was a vicious oppressor of the individual, and “more to be feared than fierce tigers.”

Government, in sum, must be limited to the smallest possible minimum; “inaction” was the proper function of government, since only inaction can permit the individual to flourish and achieve happiness. Any intervention by government, Lao-tzu declared, would be counterproductive, and would lead to confusion and turmoil. After referring to the common experience of mankind with government, Lao-tzu came to this incisive conclusion: “The more artificial taboos and restrictions there are in the world, the more the people are impoverished… The more that laws and regulations are given prominence, the more thieves and robbers there will be.”

The wisest course, then, is to keep the government simple and for it to take no action, for then the world “stabilizes itself.” As Lao-tzu put it, “Therefore the Sage says: I take no action yet the people transform themselves, I favor quiescence and the people right themselves, I take no action and the people enrich themselves…”

Lao-tzu arrived at his challenging and radical new insights in a world dominated by the power of Oriental despotism. What strategy to pursue for social change? It surely was unthinkable for Lao-tzu, with no available historical or contemporary example of libertarian social change, to set forth any optimistic strategy, let alone contemplate forming a mass movement to overthrow the State. And so Lao-tzu took the only strategic way out that seemed open to him, counseling the familiar Taoist path of withdrawal from society and the world, of retreat and inner contemplation.

I submit that while contemporary Taoists advocate retreat from the world as a matter of religious or ideological principle, it is very possible that Lao-tzu called for retreat not as a principle, but as the only strategy that in his despair seemed open to him. If it was hopeless to try to disentangle society from the oppressive coils of the State, then he perhaps assumed that the proper course was to counsel withdrawal from society and the world as the only way to escape State tyranny.

It would seem that little has changed in 2500 years. The drive by some individuals to control others is clearly a permanent condition in every era. The only remaining question is how to deal with it.

In my belief, the number of libertarians will always be few. Just as there will always be those who will stop at nothing in seeking to control others, the great majority of people will always respond like Pavlov’s dogs to the empty promise of greater security, in trade for diminished freedom. Even a country that begins with a people determined to control their own lives and create their own destiny will, over generations, succumb to the empty promises. The deterioration may take one hundred years, two hundred years, or even longer, but historically, every culture eventually gives way, bit by bit, to the empty promises and becomes completely dominated. In the end, each country collapses in economic ruin—the people having lost the desire to produce, as the leaders have bled them dry.

But there is one saving grace to this historical pattern. After a collapse, it all has to start over. Parasitic leaders become anathema. The country begins anew. Those who are productive lead the way, and liberty becomes the byword.

This being the case, anyone who is inspired to believe in the libertarian principle has two choices if he lives in a country that is in the final, most oppressive stages: he can either remain there, swimming against an overwhelming tide, or he can vote with his feet. He can seek out other locations—those that are in the early stages of development, where the residents think as he does, where he is not a threat to “the system” but, by being a libertarian, is actually swimming with the tide.

Certainly, as we can see above, this is what Lao-tzu concluded over 2500 years ago (and that was before his government had the ability to fly a drone over his house.)

Of course, today, we have more options than Lao-tzu. Not only is transportation so good that we can fly anywhere in the world, but the Internet keeps us posted on the information we need to learn of locations in the world that might suit our liking better than the one we presently reside in. There are unquestionably those out there who prefer to be proles—to accept an Orwellian existence. For those who do not—those of a more libertarian bent—the good news is that there are choices—many of them. A better life elsewhere.

Here are a few closing comments from Lao-tzu that I’m fond of, taken from his Tao Te Ching. They further exemplify the fact that the problem of the libertarian is perennial. All that remains is whether we have the wisdom to effect the solution—to seek out those locations in the world that offer a better alternative.

Those in power are meddlesome …

The greater the restrictions and prohibitions,
The more people are impoverished.
The more advanced the weapons of the state,
The darker the nation …

Thus the virtuous attend to contracts
while those without virtue collect taxes …

Act before things exist

Manage them before there’s disorder

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
The blind who will not see
The blind who will not see
May 6, 2019 3:45 pm

We can have less criminals if we no longer prohibit rape, robbery and murder too.

Much less government yes, but stupid government no.

The unfortunate truth is the reason there are so many regulations and laws on the books is that so many people are always looking for a loophole to get away with something crooked or ignorant.

If people left to their own devices were generally honest, respectful and responsible we wouldn’t need any laws at all.

Good luck with that one.

And whoever said life was all about being happy?

God seems to much prefer holiness.

The blind who will not see
The blind who will not see
  The blind who will not see
May 6, 2019 4:00 pm

If the gooberment wants citizens that are honest, respectful and responsible, maybe the political leaders should ALL try leading by example first.

splurge
splurge
  The blind who will not see
May 6, 2019 6:00 pm

There is no profit in that for the politicians or government.

splurge
splurge
  The blind who will not see
May 6, 2019 6:02 pm

God seems to much prefer holiness

Though thankfully god doesn’t seem to expect it from us.

grace country pastor
grace country pastor
  The blind who will not see
May 6, 2019 10:51 pm

Good point, not blind!

Romans 6:14-15 KJB… “For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace. What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.”

1 Corinthians 6:12 KJB… “All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.”

1 Corinthians 10:23 KJB… “All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.”

Galatians 3:24-25 KJB… “Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.”

It’s good to be an adult Christian not under the schoolmaster of the law.

Jailers And Gags
Jailers And Gags
  The blind who will not see
May 6, 2019 11:12 pm

I think the claim is not for zero laws, but for a minimized amount of “petty” laws.

The claim is not that “rape, robbery and murder” should not fall under any laws/punishmets/ammends. They all violate the non-agression principle and have real victims.

Laws that have no victim, like getting a ticket for not wearing a seat belt because “it’s the law”, (along with literally thousands of other petty regulations that have morphed into “law”) could be minimized for better functioning government and society.

No one said life was “all about being happy”.

A certain “god damn piece of paper” does say it’s a fair pursuit though, along with life and liberty.

bigfootmm
bigfootmm
  Jailers And Gags
May 7, 2019 2:14 am

Sensible, logical, and accurate, Jailer and Gags.

The blind who will not see
The blind who will not see
  Jailers And Gags
May 7, 2019 10:07 am

Petty nanny state laws like seat belts, cell phones and helmet laws trying to protect us from ourselves are certainly a product of control freak gooberment and revenue enhancement tactics.

Not a fan of mere possession laws either with firearms and dangerous items if not a conficted felon or court deemed mentally ill.

Possession apart from criminal use or criminal intent to use is b.s.

Not so much a fan of the carte blanche right to pursue happiness depending on the specific pursuit.
Much bigger fan of right over wrong and good over bad.

The bible trumps the constitution every time whenever a conflict or contradiction arises.

KeyserSusie
KeyserSusie
May 6, 2019 5:28 pm

I am reminded of the Tao of Pooh. And the uncarved block pregnant with possibilities.

“According to Lao-tse, the more man interfered with the natural balance produced and governed by the universal laws, the further away the harmony retreated into the distance. The more forcing, the more trouble.”

“To Lao-tse, the world was not a setter of traps but a teacher of valuable lessons.”

“From the taoist point of view, the natural result of this harmonious living is happiness. You might say that happy serenity [as opposed to Buddhist attachment and suffering] is the most noticeable characteristic of the Taoist personality, and a subtle sense of humor is apparent even in the most profound Taoist writings, such as the twenty-five-hundred-year-old Tao Te Ching. In the writings of Taoism’s second major writer, Chuang-tse (JUANGdsuh), quiet laughter seems to bubble up like water from a fountain.”

Truth in my lies, mirth in my eyes. Uncola does it swell and our resident comedian’s insightful humor at times drolls sardonic in its pithy path.

“In other words, you might say that there is more to Knowing that just being correct. As the mystical poet Han-shan wrote:

“A scholar named Wang
Laughed at my poems.
The accents are wrong.
He said,
Too many beats;
The meter is poor,
The wording impulsive.

I laugh at his poems,
As he laughs at mine.
They read like
The words of a blind man
Describing the sun.””

Diogenes’ Dung
Diogenes’ Dung
May 7, 2019 2:48 am

When I rode with Poncho Villa, we knew him as Lao Tse.

We would contemplate his wisdom while watering our horses.

Whenever we did something stupid, our horses would bolt for the nearest stream.

https://youtu.be/ATOMxWhU3gU

TC
TC
May 7, 2019 7:43 am

There’d be a lot more Libertarians if the Libertarian Party was serious, but unfortunately it is not. The irony of a party built of hands-off kind of people is that it’s really easy to subvert into something meaningless in the political arena.