Range Reduction

Guest Post by Eric Peters

All electric cars come standard with range anxiety – having to think about how far you can go before the car comes to a stop  . . . and what you’ll do while you wait for it to recharge.

If you can find a place to recharge.

But Elon Musk’s electric cars offer a unique “feature” their owners didn’t know they paid for:

Range reduction.

Not because the batteries are running low – but because Elon decided to reduce how far they can go.

Well, now they know!

To keep more Teslas from burning up while recharging -an embarrassing as well as fatal problem with Teslas – the company recently transmitted a “software update” to its Model S and X vehicles that limits how much charge the battery will accept.

The reduced charge capacity translates as reduced range –  as 40 miles less than advertised (and paid for, by the people who bought the cars).

This is no small thing given that 40 miles can be the difference between making it home – and making a long pit stop.

Still, better than being burned to death in a mobile crematorium.

Thousands of cars have been gimped by the update, according to a lawsuit filed in federal court by unhappy Model S owner by David Rasmussen.

“Under the guise of ‘safety’ and increasing the ‘longevity’ of the batteries  . . . Tesla fraudulently manipulated its software with the intent to avoid its duties and legal obligations to customers to fix, repair, or replace the batteries  . .  . Tesla knew were defective,” the lawsuit claims.

In plain language: Rather than admit there is a problem with the batteries that makes charging them to full capacity a fire hazard – and replace potentially millions of dollars’ worth of batteries – Tesla decided on the free (to Tesla) “update.”

Which costs its owners not just range and time – but also resale value. A car that can’t go as far as advertised being worth less.

The industry trade publication Automotive News interviewed another Tesla S owner, Nick Smith of Orlando, FL who says his car will no longer charge beyond 90 percent of its former capacity after being “updated” by Tesla.

In real-world terms, this amounts to a 30 percent reduction in the car’s range when charging at a “fast” charger, where the “fast” charging is already limited to 80 percent of the battery pack’s capacity . . . to avoid damaging the battery.

Thus, if the car started out with a theoretical 208-265 mile best case range – as touted by Tesla for Smith’s and Rasmussen’s cars – the “updated” range is now 146 and 185.5 miles, respectively.

Best case. Because an EV’s actual range is heavily dependent on how – and where the car is driven. EVs driven harder lose range faster – just like a non-electric car, except that the non-electric car can recover 100 percent of its range in 5 minutes, without risking a fire.

“It’s as if you take your car to the shop and you have a 20 gallon tank but now you have a 10 gallon tank without your knowledge or permission,” Smith told Automotive News.

Which brings up another interesting feature that comes standard with all Teslas – not just the “affected” Model S and X models named in the lawsuit:

Collective ownership of “your” Tesla.

Which is never really your Tesla because Elon and his minions always have access to it – and can control it – at their whim – via “updates” sent over the air which you’re forced to accept else be disconnected from the collective, which means your Tesla will no longer be “supported” by Tesla.

Since software – and “updates” – control everything a Tesla does, effectively, Tesla continues to control their car for as long as you own it.

Including how far – or not – it can go.

Tesla can “update” the range to zero if it wishes to brick their car. Any time they want to.

For any reason at all. A four-wheeled version of being de-platformed. But Tesla will continue to be monetized.

You can perhaps see where this is all headed. And why electric cars are being pushed so lustily by not just Tesla. The prospects for controlling mobility in ways never before feasible have just become very possible.

As thousands of Tesla owners have just been discovering.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
BSHJ
BSHJ
August 11, 2019 3:52 pm

Ha….Ha (but the ‘owners’ still think they look ‘cool’ riding in one)

pb
pb
  BSHJ
August 11, 2019 6:27 pm

They think they are “cutting edge”.

The U.S. is a Donkey Show
The U.S. is a Donkey Show
August 11, 2019 4:34 pm

Comrades,

Tesla will not be allowed to fail. Anything Tesla does or doesn’t do doesn’t matter. This is where Starfckr wins.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
August 11, 2019 5:50 pm

Its like the Borg on Star Trek – you will be assimilated….resistance is futile.

It is bad enough that automatic updates happen on my phone and my computer. No fucking way would I tolerate that bullshit on something that holds my life in its hands when I am driving down the road.

pb
pb
August 11, 2019 6:26 pm

In technical terms this is far worse than the Dieselgate nonsense. Electric cars are a swindle.

Rick T
Rick T
August 11, 2019 10:29 pm

As soon as I heard Tesla unlocked extra range to help cars get out of Florida ahead of a hurricane I knew what Elon giveth, Elon can take away.. No F-ing Teslas for me. Hybrids, yes, but BEVs? Never.

Anonymous
Anonymous
August 12, 2019 7:55 am

The government will love them. Perhaps force us all to buy them?

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
August 12, 2019 11:44 am

Eric thinks Tesla buyers give a shit about how far they can drive. They don’t. Rich people buy Teslas to virtue signal. Middle class virtue signalers buy Nissan Leafs.

Tesla owners only want to be able to drive around the neighborhood, go to the grocery store, and drop their kids off at school and soccer practice. That allows all their neighbors to know that they are rich, but they care about the environment.

However, Eric is right about the government’s motives on electric cars. Those motives are a bit more sinister.

Anonymous
Anonymous
August 12, 2019 3:37 pm

Glad I didn’t rush into buying one, it will be cheaper when the battery has had its end of life. And now I don’t think my 300 trip will be worth the fire insurance.

Iconoclast421
Iconoclast421
August 12, 2019 4:51 pm

It doesn’t even do anything to address the problem. Any bump you hit could be the one that disturbs the delicate lattice in just the right way to form just the right dendrite in just the right place that causes the whole thing to erupt into flames. It’s batshit insanity. It’s like driving around with a barrel of nitroglycerin in your back seat. Sure, it might be just fine, chances are it will be just fine sitting there, but do you really want to fuck with it?