Ethics And Authority

Guest Post by The Zman

Ethics are a system of moral values dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation. They can be highly personal, derived from your understanding of the world, but even personal ethics tend to correspond with public ethics. Every society has to have a set of unwritten rules that govern behavior. Otherwise, you don’t have a society. You have a collection of competing strangers. Those public ethics, the moral framework of society, must rest upon authority to give them vigor.

For most of human history, public morality was rooted in the stories and legends of the people, which described their gods and the role of the gods. At other times, the moral authority was the ruler, who took on a supernatural role in society. In Europe, after the fall of the Roman Empire, the Church filled the role of moral authority, along with the evolving social structure. The feudal system established roles and duties for people within the system. Those duties to your station were part of the moral order.

This connection between ethics and authority is what has always haunted atheism, which denies the most common source of moral authority. In fact, atheism is mostly a negative identity, so the atheist invests heavily in attacking the moral authority of Christianity. Oddly, they suffer the same defect in logic as evolution deniers. When they do try to conjure a godless moral code, they inevitably slam into the old problem of Hume’s law. That is, they try to derive an ought from an is.

The struggle atheists have conjuring a moral code without the authority of religion on which to base it gets to a more fundamental problem of western liberalism. A central thesis of liberalism is universalism, the notion that there is one set of rules that are the best for all people everywhere in all times. That means the moral code that comes along with the universal political order must also be universal and timeless. Such a code, of course, cannot answer the question, on whose authority?

This is the heart of the clash between liberal democracy and Islam. When the Mohammedan is told that homosexuals should be allowed to parade in the streets, he asks “upon what authority are you saying this?” The liberal cannot answer, as he acknowledges no authority other than a mystical will of the people. The Mohammedan in contrast has his religion, his imam and the traditions handed down to him. In order to accept liberalism, he must abandon his god and his ancestors.

This is the problem vexing the West. In a liberal democracy, no one can ever know who is in charge, as that runs counter to the basics of democracy. In theory, decisions are made by fifty percent plus one vote. When the vote is secret, no one can truly know who rules over them. The fact that powerful interests manipulate the system in order to get the results that favor them at the expense of society adds to the mystery. People keep voting, expecting a certain result, only to get the opposite.

Of course, the inevitable war on religion that is a natural part of democracy means the other source of authority is slowly eroded. The recent case of the Congresswomen holding orgies in her office is a good example. Otherwise sensible people like Congressman Matt Gaetz are baffled as to why this women resigned, because there is no longer a moral order in America to rationalize such things. In a Christian nation or even a Muslim one, Representative Gaetz would not so confused.

It is only through the shared belief in an authoritative common morality where custom becomes a habit of mind. You cannot have ethics without authority, so when custom and religion are abandoned, as required of democracy, you inevitably abandon any sense of a shared moral order. Eventually, the people, even their leaders, have no reason to support the basics of society. A world of atomized individuals can only be controlled with force and the cost exceeds the benefit

Of course, humans cannot live without a moral order. We have evolved over a very long time to be a part of a community. That means being part of a shared moral order. The void left by democracy’s obliteration of social and religious authority is filled by all sorts of fads and spasms masquerading as morality. It is how we quickly move from celebrating homosexuals as perfectly normal to demanding gay men put on sundresses and begin taking hormone therapy. Morality without authority is chaos.

In this regard, the crisis in the West is due to a lack of moral authority. Democratic systems rest on the assumption that everyone is in charge, which is another way of saying no one is in charge. Since there is always someone in charge, those holding power work to conceal this reality. Instead of powerful men standing before the public as leaders, they hire servants to run for office. Once in office, those servants do as their told, regardless of what they said to the public to secure their office.

The charade of democracy inevitably spills into the culture as a war on any institution that could provide a basis for moral authority. It is not an accident that as democracy spread in the West, religion collapsed. Then it was local civic institutions and then finally the family. The waves of vulgar depravity that have swept the popular culture meet no resistance, because there is no authority for resisting it. There is no answer to why this stuff should not be tolerated, so it spreads like a cancer.

In fairness, the cultural devastation that comes with democracy is more of a dynamic than a causal relationship. The West was already in decline when liberal democracy took root and it was that decline that allowed it to spread. The dynamic between politics and culture is both a symptom and cause of the decline. The fanaticism and insanity of the current age is really just the final spasms of a society that has been in decline for generations. Democracy is the suicide pill for a people out of reasons to live.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao
October 30, 2019 2:23 pm

Something I heard from my ole pop starting about 50 yrs ago, went something like ‘if you want to test a man’s character, give him authority’.

Nowadays ?

Ethics and Authority = Oil and Water

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum

KeyserSusie
KeyserSusie
  ordo ab chao
October 30, 2019 3:21 pm

Ethics and Authority + Justice and Retribution

I have been preoccupied thinking about Justice and Retribution. If I were a proper writer I would conjure up something.

Any takers out there?

M G
M G
  KeyserSusie
October 30, 2019 3:59 pm

Is this like a logic problem where we determine if the passive, but completely non-soluble Ethics and Authority blend can be added to the much more volatile Justice and Retribution catalyst without igniting the Final and Irreversible Solution.

Of course, I may be multiplying when I should have been integrating.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 30, 2019 3:13 pm

Thoughts:
This article needs to be read, understood, and accepted by the liberal parents who think no harm results from Storytime With Tranny’s.
But they won’t, and the degradation will only worsen.

Elsewhere was read a snippet of information that some in the LGB crowd want to distance themselves from the Transgender crowd.
I’ve wondered, and thought of asking a lesbian if she’s ok with being lumped in with bisexual whores and mental cases who disagree with the plumbing they were born with, doing insane things to try and change naturally born body parts & traits to conform with their warped mind’s ideas for altering nature.
What God created physically, being hijacked by an erroneous mental psyche.

If a group is behind this societal erosion, with a definitive motive, then the poison tactics being implemented are achieving notable results.

Some would say horrific, frightening, and disturbing, as alternate adjectives.

Change Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’ to
“Depraved New World Order”

In my opinion.
But then again, I’m a dude who likes & desires chicks, so, they’d say I’m biased, old school, and Traditionalist.
-Besides a whole batch of other labels targeted for skewering with their pitchforks.
Halloween is right around the corner. How fitting.

doug
doug
October 30, 2019 3:43 pm

How do we regain the status of a free Republic?

Articles of Confederation
Articles of Confederation
  doug
October 30, 2019 11:34 pm

Reset and work to bridge the gap to something better. But you have to make sure that when the tree falls, someone’s there with a rope around the canopy to guide its fall in the right direction.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 30, 2019 3:52 pm

Interesting to step outside ourselves. And view ourselves as a memeplex.

Z does a great job following the line of thinking to a conclusion.

Donkey
Donkey
October 30, 2019 5:00 pm

That was great Z.

M G
M G
  Donkey
October 30, 2019 8:34 pm

It was. Zman’s got his groove back. (Yes, EC, in case you are on grammar patrol… I saw the “their” where it should have been “they’re” but got so distracted by Whosie Susie’s equation for happiness (Ethics and Authority + Justice and Retribution) I forgot to criticize Z.

You do it.

KaD
KaD
October 31, 2019 10:11 am

It seems to me there’s an enormous chance for abuse with this idea. https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/connecticut-state-police-roll-out-firearms-sniffing-dogs/

flash
flash
October 31, 2019 10:44 am

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

John Adams