CNN Under Fire For Overtly Hostile Treatment Of Sanders In Iowa Debate

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

CNN has long been criticized for what many view as overtly hostile coverage of Sen. Bernie Sanders that goes back to the 2016 election where the CNN openly seemed to favor Hillary Clinton in her bid for the nomination.

Yet, even for the most hardened critics of the network, yesterday’s debate in Des Moines was breathtaking in its unrelentingly negative questions of Sanders followed up relative softballs to others like Sen. Amy Klobuchar. However the lowest moment of this or any debate this year occurred when CNN reporter Abby Phillips made Sanders repeat his outright denial of the allegation by Elizabeth Warren that he told her that no woman could be president and then immediately stated that Sanders did make the comment in her next question to Warren. In watching with a room filled with people who are not affiliated with Sanders, Phillips’ statement led to loud gasps and Sanders himself seemed dumbfounded on stage by the bias shown by the CNN reporter. Later, Warren pointedly refused to shake the hand of Sanders.

In the debate, Sanders repeatedly and unequivocally stated that he never made the statement. While some have built up the allegations as a type of political MeToo moment, many remain skeptical for the very reasons that Sanders stated. It seems entirely at odds with Sanders’ numerous statements and actions over the years, including his standing aside for Warren herself when she indicated that she wanted to run in 2016. Moreover, it would have been perfectly insane to go to a meeting where Warren just discussing her next run for president and make such a clearly untrue and self-destructive statement. Even if Sanders believed such sexist tripe, why would he make the comment to a possible opponent who was clearly going to run? It would also been moronic since, when he made the statement, Clinton had already beaten Trump in the popular votes by millions. Why would Sanders say something that was proven to be demonstrably untrue in the last election? The point is not that Sanders is telling the truth and Warren is lying. Rather the point is that there is no reason to just reject the position of Sanders as clearly false as Phillips appeared to do last night.

Even in her set up, Phillips seemed to reject Sanders’ earlier denials of the story:

“Senator Sanders, CNN reported yesterday, and Senator Warren confirmed in a statement, that in 2018, you told her that you did not believe that a woman could win the election. Why did you say that?”

While Sanders made these points and repeatedly denied the allegation, Phillips left many of us confused when, literally just after he again denied the story, she asked him again if he denied the story. Some in the audience laughed at the weird follow up but that was followed by gasps when Phillips then turned to Warren and said “Senator Warren, what did you think when Senator Sanders told you a woman could not win the election?”

Phillips then turned to Klobuchar and asked her how she felt about people making such comments to female candidates.

I am not personal friends with Sanders but I have had dealings with him for many years both in hearings and on the Hill. I have always admired him as a person and I have never had reason to question his veracity or integrity. I have also never heard anyone suggest that he was not entirely supportive of women’s rights.

The decision of Warren not to shake Sanders’ hand does not bode well for the next few weeks. The sudden raising of this allegation when Warren is struggling to break out of pack in Iowa was obviously a concern by neutral observers. While Warren says that she is shocked by the story, she did not previously raise it and still last night would shake the hand of Sanders.

Whatever the outcome of this conflict between Sanders and Warren, CNN may have the most to answer for after the debate. CNN has often voiced the view of the DNC and Democratic establishment, particularly in seemingly repeating talk points against Trump. Indeed, in 2016, a CNN figure, Donna Brazile, was found to have leaked questions to Hillary Clinton’s campaign and then denied the story by falsely alleging that her emails were hacked. In the last couple weeks, there have been stories of DNC figures and establishment figures moving (again) against Sanders to prevent him from securing the nomination. The only people who have raised bias as often as Trump supporters are Sanders supporters. Just this week, this bias was raised before the debate by Sanders people on the air. CNN responded with clearly biased questions and one moderator all but calling Sanders a liar.

If the other questions were equally heavy handed to the other candidates, this would just be a case of hard hitting questioning. However there was a notably slanted quality to the questions. Thus, Biden was asked about this vote on Iraq in a good question but was not confronted on his false statements that he opposed the war in Iraq. Likewise, CNN hit repeatedly at Sanders not giving hard figures for his health plan but did not press people like Warren on her clearly unsupported projections of revenue to support her plan.

While Warren refused to shake the hand of Sanders, she had every reason to shake the hand of CNN and Phillips. The debate left many of us with the feeling of another setup in the Democratic primary debates.

The problem is that the bias was so open and frankly gross that it could have the opposite effect in pushing people toward (not away) from Sanders.

And we note that Andrew Yang wasn’t even in the debate.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
CCRider
CCRider
January 15, 2020 10:38 am

The Bigs are really sweating the Bern. I’m enjoying the spectacle. He has become the new disrupter. Think the MIC and big pharma want him at the head of the ticket? I wonder how they’ll screw him out of the nomination again. Fun to watch-kind of a parlor game type of entertainment.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  CCRider
January 15, 2020 10:59 am

The out-of-power party seems to go the the “next in line” and it usually turns into a mistake.

Dole, Gore, Kerry, McLame, Mittens, HiLIARy, The Bern?

walter johnson
walter johnson
January 15, 2020 10:55 am

DNC… Demented New Communists? Bernie scares the tweedle out of the Democrat crime syndicate. He’s their creation in a way, and like Frankenstein’s monster, has escaped their control. Their mistake was allowing him to run as a democrat, though his and their underlying ideologies are essentially the same. They want it hidden, he wants it out front. How shall they escape this pickle?

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
January 15, 2020 10:56 am

If you are woke, you MUST believe the woman. No woman would ever claim to be Native American to enhance her resume, would she?

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  TN Patriot
January 15, 2020 11:19 am

Or claim to be black, just to get a job with the NAACP?

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  TN Patriot
January 15, 2020 2:33 pm

Anyone who sides with Warren over Sanders is an antisemite.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Iska Waran
January 15, 2020 2:37 pm

But if they side with The Bern over Warren, they are a misogynist and if they don’t support Buttgig, they are a homophobe. We already know the dems are RACISS because they did not support the black candidates.

Hank
Hank
January 15, 2020 11:16 am

The media are choosing up sides. Wapo is staffed by Bernie bros and CNN favors Princess Grey Beaver.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
  Hank
January 15, 2020 11:20 am

Fauxcahontas
Liawatha
…..

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
January 15, 2020 11:21 am

Nice to watch the “left” feed on itself. Pretty much mimics the “right” during the 2016 cycle.

Trapped in Portlandia
Trapped in Portlandia
January 15, 2020 11:28 am

You gotta love the Dems. If Warren is the nominee, Bernie’s supporters will stay home on election day and mutter to themselves: FU Pocahontas. If Bernie is the nominee, Dem. woman will stay home on election day and say: FU woman hater.

For a party that is anti-gun, the Dems sure have an affinity for circular firing squads.

TC
TC
  Trapped in Portlandia
January 15, 2020 1:34 pm

Sorry, but it’s only conservatives who have the integrity to stay home on election day. Most liberals would gladly pull the lever for Satan himself as long as he was running on the Democrat ticket. All this drama is just theater to give the rubes the illusion of choice.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  TC
January 15, 2020 2:01 pm

A lot of The Bern’s supporters stayed home in ’16. If they nominate Buttgig, I expect a lot of African Americans to sit this one out. Blacks do not like homos.

Jdog
Jdog
January 15, 2020 12:32 pm

The Democrats are so deplorable they cannot even stand each other….

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
January 15, 2020 2:44 pm

I watched some of the libs’ arguments on the Twittersphere. I think most libs realize that Warren is a lying psychopath. I saw a lot of #NeverWarren tweets. I think she just killed what was left of her campaign with that backstabbing hatchet job. My guess is that Sanders will come in first place in IA, NH & NV – which should put him in contention in SC against Slow Joe Biden. And I think Sanders will do surprisingly well with blacks in SC because a lot of smart young (“woke”) black people will point out to their elders the many times Biden has been against black interests – as currently understood.

The other thing Sanders could do is change his first name to Colonel after the Nevada caucus.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
January 16, 2020 12:12 am

Bernie should have just called her a cunt.