A More or Less Perfect Union

Guest Post by Walter E. Williams

A More or Less Perfect Union

“A More or Less Perfect Union” is a three-part series, produced by Free to Choose Network, that will air on various PBS stations across the nation starting in February. The documentary is a personal exploration of the U.S. Constitution by Justice Douglas Ginsburg, who served on the U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit and is now a senior justice on the court. Ginsburg explores the U.S. Constitution and features interviews with and gains the perspectives from constitutional experts of all political views — liberal, conservative and libertarian.

He examines the key issues of liberty in the U.S. both from a historical and contemporary perspective. Among those issues are freedom of the press and religion, slavery and civil rights, the Second Amendment, separation of powers and the number of ways that the Constitution’s framers sought to limit the power of the federal government.

The first episode is titled “A Constitution in Writing.” It examines the contentious atmosphere that arose among the delegates in that hot, humid Philadelphia summer of 1787. State delegates were sent to Philadelphia to work out the problems of the Articles of Confederation, which served as the first Constitution of the 13 original states. This part of the documentary examines some of the efforts to deal with the problems of the Articles of Confederation while maintaining its guiding principle to preserve the independence and sovereignty of the states.

It also examines the compromises and struggles that led to the document we know as the U.S. Constitution. Some of the framers, particularly the Anti-Federalists, led by Patrick Henry, saw the Constitution as defective and demanded amendments be added that contained specific guarantees of personal freedoms and rights and clear limitations on the federal government’s power. They swore that they would never ratify the Constitution unless it contained a Bill of Rights.

The second episode is titled “A Constitution for All.” One major emphasis of this episode is the examination of the Supreme Court decisions that undermined racial justice both for slaves and later ex-slaves for a century after the Civil War. Several constitutional scholars discuss how the courts and states ignored and weakened the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, known collectively as the Civil War Amendments, which were designed to ensure equality for recently emancipated slaves.

There is also discussion of Bill of Rights guarantees to people accused of a crime. There is more exploration into the Bill of Rights guarantees of free speech, religious freedom and the notion that “due process of law” be part of any proceeding that denies a citizen “life, liberty or property.” This forced the government to compensate citizens when it takes private property for public use.

Episode three, “Our Constitution at Risk,” examines the many ways that our Constitution is under assault today. It points out that the framers would be shocked by how all three branches of government have grown as a result of what we the people demand from our elected representatives. There’s a discussion about how some of our Bill of Rights guarantees mean absolutely nothing today, namely the 9th and 10th Amendments, which reaffirm personal liberty by specifically limiting the federal government to its “enumerated powers.”

“A More or Less Perfect Union” is not just a bunch of academics and constitutional experts preaching. It features interviews with everyday Americans weighing in with their visions on the rule of law, the branches of government and the debate over originalism. There’s a companion book titled “Voices of Our Republic,” edited by Ginsburg. It is a collection of thoughts about the Constitution from judges, journalists, and academics. It includes the thoughts of Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Neil Gorsuch and Sandra Day O’Connor, publisher Arthur Sulzberger, professor Alan Dershowitz, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, and historians Joseph Ellis and Ron Chernow, along with Jack Nicklaus, Gene Simmons and many others.

The most important audience for “A More or Less Perfect Union” is high school and college students. For it is they who stand a good chance of losing the liberties that made our nation the greatest and freest on earth.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
M G
M G
February 12, 2020 6:54 am

I have always wanted to know Gene Simmons’ jurisprudent assessment of the Bill of Rights.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
  M G
February 12, 2020 9:37 am

Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Lib), Arthur Sulzberger (Pub NYT), Arnold Schwarzenegger (Lib), Joseph Ellis (Pulitzer Prize), Ron Chernow (Pulitzer Prize), Jack Nicklaus and Gene Simmons (Kiss) and others (like OJ Simpson, Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi?).

M G
M G
  robert h siddell jr
February 12, 2020 12:16 pm

If only Ace Frehley had joined the discussion!

M G
M G
  robert h siddell jr
February 12, 2020 12:18 pm

I made the snide remark and am now wondering when we decided our entertainers’ opinions mattered so damn much their opinions have to inform ours in every venue?

Why isn’t a Kardashian represented?

gatsby1219
gatsby1219
February 12, 2020 7:08 am

Seems simple to understand “shall not be infringed”.

But here we are…

flash
flash
February 12, 2020 7:24 am

Democrats have won the popular vote 6 of the last 7 elections.
They won a record landslide in 2018. Demographics are a freight train carrying them into the future. The GOPs actions will accelerate their collapse. The future belongs to Democrats if they work hard & focus on 2020. https://t.co/Rrvm39xi4n

— Joe Scarborough (@JoeNBC) February 10, 2020

comment image

Hardscrabble Farmer
Hardscrabble Farmer
  flash
February 12, 2020 7:55 am

Amazing to me that after all this time he still doesn’t understand how the American political system works.

Wasn’t he a congressman once upon a time?

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
  Hardscrabble Farmer
February 12, 2020 8:42 am

Yes, a republican from the very conservative panhandle of FL. I think some questions regarding fidelity caused him to lose his seat.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
  TN Patriot
February 12, 2020 9:44 am

Leon & Gadsden (Tallahassee) are Leftist.

flash
flash
  Hardscrabble Farmer
February 12, 2020 9:59 am

He understands. Obfuscation, disinformation and graft is the how the cartel operates and even though Joe Scuzbucket is out of office, as a media whore, he still serves the interests of America’s most successful criminal organization.

comment image

Bolsheviks play the long game. Always have.

Anonymous
Anonymous
February 12, 2020 7:51 am

The constitution applies s to those that signed it……I dont recall signing it myself……therefore it doesn’t apply to me.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
  Anonymous
February 12, 2020 9:48 am

Do you think the same logic applies to God’s Laws? How about the laws of any other country you might be in?

Morongobill
Morongobill
  Anonymous
February 12, 2020 10:39 am

Use that line when you stand up before a judge.

Abe Froman
Abe Froman
February 12, 2020 12:38 pm

You don’t need anyone to explain what the constitution means. Jefferson said so himself in 1823 in a letter to William Johnson:

“On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed. ”

Jefferson says to look at the men who wrote the constitution and the time they wrote it, and that’s where you get what they meant.

However Jefferson also realized that laws, including the constitution, are meant to be straightforward and easy to understand – to prevent people from twisting words to mean whatever they want. From the same letter to William Johnson:

“Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties which may make anything mean everything or nothing at pleasure.”

The idea of anyone – academics, lawyers, even the supreme court – “interpreting” the constitution goes fully against the ideals of the men who wrote it.

“[T]he opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves, in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch. ” (letter to Abagail Adams, 1804)

edit: forgot to say William Johnson was a supreme court justice, appointed by Jefferson in 1804.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
February 12, 2020 1:54 pm

I do trust Walter William’s assessment of a program, but I most certainly do NOT trust PBS to air anything that might undermine their anti-freedom agenda. And frankly, the inclusion of idiots like Arnold and Gene Simmons worries me more, and most folks trust the opinion of “celebrities” more than they do scholars who have studied the Constitution all of their lives. I might give it a watch.

Jdog
Jdog
February 12, 2020 2:55 pm

If PBS is doing it, it will be pure liberal propaganda.