Benefits vs. Costs and COVID-19

Guest Post by Walter E. Williams

Benefits vs. Costs and COVID-19

One of the first lessons in an economics class is everything has a cost. That’s in stark contrast to lessons in the political arena where politicians talk about free stuff. In our personal lives, decision-making involves weighing costs against benefits. Businessmen make the same calculation if they want to stay in business. It’s an entirely different story for politicians running the government where any benefit, however minuscule, is often deemed to be worth any cost, however large.

Related to decision-making is the issue of being overly safe versus not safe enough. Sometimes, being as safe as one can be is worthless. A minor example: How many of us before driving our cars inspect the hydraulic brake system for damage? We’d be safer if we did, but most of us just assume everything is OK and get into our car and drive away. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that 40,000 Americans lose their lives each year because of highway fatalities. Virtually all those lives could be saved with a mandated 5 mph speed limit. Fortunately, we consider costs and rightfully conclude that saving those 40,000 lives aren’t worth the costs and inconvenience of a 5 mph mandate.

With the costs and benefits in mind, we might examine our government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The first thing to keep in mind about any crisis, be it war, natural disasters or pandemics, is we should keep markets open and private incentives strong. Markets solve problems because they provide the right incentives to use resources effectively. Federal, state and local governments have ordered an unprecedented and disastrous shutdown of much of the U.S. economy in an effort to slow the spread of the coronavirus.

There’s a strictly health-related downside to the shutdown of the U.S. economy ignored by our leadership that has been argued by epidemiologist Dr. Knut Wittkowski, formerly the head of the Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design at Rockefeller University in New York City. Wittkowski argues that the lockdown prolongs the development of the “herd immunity,” which is our only weapon in “exterminating” the novel coronavirus — outside of a vaccine that’s going to optimistically take 18 months or more to produce.

He says we should focus on shielding the elderly and people with comorbidities while allowing the young and healthy to associate with one another in order to build up immunities. Wittkowski says, “So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible, and then the elderly people, who should be separated, and the nursing homes should be closed during that time, can come back and meet their children and grandchildren after about 4 weeks when the virus has been exterminated.” Herd immunity, Wittkowski argues, would stop a “second wave” headed for the United States in the fall. Dr. David L. Katz, president of True Health Initiative and the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center, shares Wittkowski’s vision. Writing in The New York Times, he argued that our fight against COVID-19 could be worse than the virus itself.

The bottom line is that costs can be concealed but not eliminated. Moreover, if people only look at the benefits from a particular course of action, they will do just about anything, because everything has a benefit. Political hustlers and demagogues love promising benefits when the costs can easily be concealed. By the way, the best time to be wrong and persist in being wrong is when the costs of being wrong are borne by others.

The absolute worst part of the COVID-19 pandemic, and possibly its most unrecoverable damage, is the massive power that Americans have given to their federal, state and local governments to regulate our lives in the name of protecting our health. Taking back that power should be the most urgent component of our recovery efforts. It’s going to be challenging; once a politician, and his bureaucracy, gains power, he will fight tooth and nail to keep it.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
April 22, 2020 8:04 am

Based on her looks, she’s a Democrat. Which means Trump could win again based on this type of tyrannical bull.

flash
flash
April 22, 2020 8:06 am

Yes….Benefits !!!

STILL NOT TIRED OF WINNING!!!

Trump says he will sign executive order halting immigration on Wednesday
© The White House

President Trump will sign an executive order halting immigration into the U.S. on Wednesday, he announced in an early morning tweet.

“I will be signing my Executive Order prohibiting immigration into our Country today,” he said.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/494041-trump-says-he-will-sign-executive-order-halting-immigration

Wait. WHAT?

Tucker: Trump’s Immigration “Ban” Still Allows Corporations to Import Cheap Foreign Labor

As we highlighted yesterday, the draft executive order contains broad exemptions for “refugees,” “essential workers” and a number of other categories of people.

That’s a far cry from temporarily suspending all immigration to the United States, as Trump’s initial tweet suggested.

Now CNN reports that the “ban” will “apply only to people seeking green cards, will last 60 days and won’t affect workers entering the country on a temporary basis.”

Tucker Carlson responded to the news by suggesting it was a slap in the face to the millions of Americans now facing economic hardship due to the coronavirus lockdown.

https://summit.news/2020/04/22/tucker-trumps-immigration-ban-still-allows-corporations-to-import-cheap-foreign-labor/

comment image

Steve
Steve
April 22, 2020 8:15 am

Don’t cha’ think the Demonrats are intentionally inflicting as much pain as possible on citizens to use it against Trump in the coming election?
All the pain endured by us will be spun and used as evidence that it was Trumps’s policies and admin that were to blame. “Look at the economic damage he caused America……”.
That’s my take.

Anonymous
Anonymous
April 22, 2020 9:19 am

Should we

Eliminate the 5th amendment because someone may use it to get away with crime?
Ban all politicians because they may lie?
Ban all laws because someone may break them?
Ban homeschooling because someone may abuse their child?
Ban all schools and female teachers because women may seduce our young boys?
Ban all cars because someone may have a wreck?
Ban breathing because it releases carbon monoxide?

These insane questions and thought process relate specifically to the ideology the we should Ban all guns because someone may use them nefariously?

If certain people are so specifically focused on this one insane point they must have a nefarious reason. Therefore, we must ban this ideology of “what if” stupid thought. If laws and bans worked we could simply ban the virus and end this lockdown in 2020. Stupid is as stupid does.

Jdog
Jdog
April 22, 2020 12:55 pm

So what do you value a human life at? Give me a number you would sacrifice a member of your family for……

Dan
Dan
  Jdog
April 22, 2020 2:38 pm

The article was about cost vs benefits. That’s the kind of analysis you (well, most of us) do without even thinking about it.

A lot of foods carry the risk of giving a person an infection (e.g. e coli, salmonella) or can cause health issues (obesity, diabetes) or allergic reactions which can kill.

So, would you dare feed your family and take a risk on one of those things happening to them? Are you willing to sacrifice them on the altar of good nutrition?