Guest Post by Steve Kirsch
New data from the ONS in the UK shows a 52X increase in all-cause mortality if you got two jabs compared to the unvaccinated. Might explain why informed kids aren’t rushing to get jabbed.
Click the image below to read the story.
The key part are the stats on all-cause mortality which I’ve always said is the elephant in the room:
10–14-year-olds, on the other hand, run the risk of dying almost by a factor of ten following the first dose while the second dose brings a 51.8 times greater risk of death than if they had remained un-jabbed.
I’ve applied to speak at the upcoming FDA and CDC meetings and would like to use this in my oral testimony.
If you can find an error in the analysis or can explain why the all cause mortality is dose dependent, let me know in the comments below.
Comment from Robert
@Steve Kirsch: To answer your questions, I downloaded the spreadsheet database from ONS and ran the numbers myself (simple enough). I replicated the results reported by LifeSiteNews, so their calculations are correct (assuming the ONS data are correct–see Dr. Fenton’s group on that). You can view the calculations and download the spreadsheet from my Microsoft OneDrive public folder here: https://1drv.ms/u/s!AndbPKOlZp6xgrl7eePhR9DESmu1Dw?e=nIs5LL. Look at the Table 9 tab.
However, I have a few concerns:
(1) As others have mentioned, some of the numbers are based on very small subsets. For example, the extreme case of double-jabbed 10-14 y/o’s having 52x risk is founded on the following data: 1678 person-years (PY) with 4 non-COVID deaths, resulting in a rate of 238.4 non-COVID deaths per 100,000 PY. Compare that to the unvaccinated 10-14 y/o’s, where 1,094,711 PY and 94 non-COVID deaths resulted in a rate of 4.6. The ratio is where the 52x comes from. But I submit that the statistical uncertainty around 238.4 is much higher than around 4.6, due to the huge difference in PYs.
(2) Note that there were no non-COVID deaths in either age group in the group that was double-vaxxed <21 days ago. If deaths are vax-related, VAERS data would suggest a concentration in the first few days after vaccination, not an absence in the first 21 days and then a concentration afterwards. This raises questions as to how many of the >21 day deaths are truly vax-related.
(3) Keep in mind that the UK vaccinated the most vulnerable first. I don’t know how these doses were distributed in Beta vs. Delta waves, but that could affect COVID death rates. However, in all these groups, COVID deaths were extremely low, except for the 15-19 y/o’s. It is puzzling that so many more of them died than the unvaxxed 10-14 y/o’s. That again makes me wonder about sample sizes and reliability.
(4) Overall, it would be ideal if more recent data were available since the vaccination of this age group only began recently in the general population, and that would enable larger PYs and thus statistical reliability.
I do think the trends merit further investigation, for sure. I just wouldn’t hang my hat on them just yet.
As to your second question, someone above provided a link to a video by Dr. Bhakdi:
Dr. Bhakdi discusses Burkhardt’s work in this video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHIT55iM4Zv9/. He says the t-lymphocytes attack the organs because the organs are expressing the spike proteins, and that is what the t-lymphocytes were trained to attack. Bhakdi says that it gets worse with increasing number of vaccinations, though 4 of the people had only had 1 injection. He says the blood vessels become leaky due to the first vaccine, and then with the second vaccination the mRNA leaks through the leaky blood vessels into the organs.
Additionally, the following may be of interest:
1. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.23.21268276v1 — showing the increased myocarditis risk with 2nd vs. 1st jab of Pfizer or Moderna. Earlier paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0?fr=operanews. They reported “there was an increase in the risk of myocarditis within a week of receiving the first dose of both adenovirus and mRNA vaccines, and a higher increased risk after the second dose of both mRNA vaccines.” They suggested that “vaccine mediated expression of SARS-CoV-2 surface spike protein on the surface of cardiomyocytes could potentially trigger an immunologic response resulting in organ-specific cell death[19,20].” If that is the mechanism, one can easily envision that the immunologic response might be stronger upon introduction of spike proteins from the second jab. One could imagine such immunologic responses not being limited to cardiomyocytes, but could contribute to increased mortality after the second jab from other damaged systems. Note that myocarditis could be subclinical and undetected, but then cause death of young athletes well past 21 days; such deaths could contribute to the anomaly noted above, where deaths are 0 at <21 days but elevated >21 days. Unfortunately, the database doesn’t provide descriptions of individual causes of death. (Further speculation on autoantibody generation, and an argument against a more generalized immunological reaction vs. one limited to the heart, is given here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-021-00662-w?s=09).
2. Dr. Campbell reviews an Israeli study showing 56 of 62 cases of post-vax myocarditis came after the second shot.
The reason wasn’t given.
3. JAMA published this study showing increased rate of myocarditis after 2nd jab. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788346. I list these just in case you need references to the higher incidence of myocarditis post-2nd-jab.
4. In Spring 2021, the German government recommended people under 60 not receive the second dose of Astra-Zeneca due to risk of blood clots (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/german-vaccine-commission-says-people-under-60-shouldnt-receive-astrazeneca-second-dose/ar-BB1fdyFb?li=BBnb7Kz). Since Astra-Zeneca was heavily used in the UK, that could be another reason for the deaths in doubly vaxxed young people in the ONS database. (Again, doesn’t explain, but German government support for higher risk after 2nd jab).
5. This paper says, “the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development and use of this new class of vaccines.” https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256520v1. Furthermore, “With this in mind, we also assessed the production of IFN-α by immune cells of the volunteers after vaccination. Although the concentrations of IFN-α were below the detection limit of the assay for most of the stimuli, we observed a significant reduction in the production if IFN-α secreted after stimulation with poly I:C and R848 after the administration of the second dose of the vaccine (Figure 1H, 1I). This may hamper the initial innate immune response against the virus, as defects in TLR7 have been shown to result in and increased susceptibility to COVID-19 in young males (Van Der Made et al., 2020). These results collectively demonstrate that the effects of the BNT162b2 vaccine go beyond the adaptive immune system and can also modulate innate immune responses.” To the extent post-vax deaths are related to infections/cancers/etc., perhaps this enhanced suppression of the innate immune system after 2 doses plays a role.
Hope this helps. (I’m a chemist, not biologist or medical person, so do your own due diligence on these observations which are based on my reading of the literature).
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
That’s how you know it’s working.
If it takes 52 times as many children dying to save one obese octogenarian, it’s worth it.
This is absolutely insane, not that it hasn’t been known to be more harmful to children but to this level is just plain nuts. What happened to ‘if it saves just one child?’
If you don’t realize this is about population reduction yet you are a freaking idiot!
I have a bit of a question of approach, in general. Would appreciate your opinions:
Yesterday, I was planning to sign up our children for a sports activity. In the city where it would take place, there is a mask mandate for municipal buildings (town hall, library), but not for businesses.
As always, I sent them an email asking about their current mask policy. (my personal policy is that I will not mask my children for any reason).
They emailed me back their “Covid policy”, which states not only that everybody has to be masked while inside the building, but also that any child aged 12 and older (which my children are not) must be fully vaccinated, as well as all employees being fully vaccinated.
Obviously, we will not participate in this activity, for the masks alone, but I also will not spend my dollars in businesses with such an overreaching vaccine policy.
My question is, should I write an email back explaining our reasons of not participating and telling them how ludicrous and unethical I find their policy?
Or should I just not sign up and call it a day, knowing that I will not change their minds anyway?
Is this a case where being a grey man is better? Or is that cowardice?
Of note, one of the people owning the business is a local pediatrician, because he was a former competetive athlete in that sport. Go figure… (tells you how much pediatricians actually care about children)
If you send an email, just tell them that you don’t agree with their mandates and won’t be sending any business their way. Be succinct. It will still get the message across. They won’t do anything, but you said your piece. Good luck in whatever you choose to do.
I sent them an email, giving them “a piece of my mind”. It wasn’t succinct (sorry, Leah). We’ll see what if anything they write back.
No need to be sorry, Svarga. Please let us know how they respond, if they do.
Years ago I used to do this long, extended comedy bit for myself.
It started like this-
You have a consumer experience that is less than satisfactory- like you did. My first one was with J&J Band-Aids, the fabric strip kind. I noticed that the adhesive they were using had changed and that the band aids didn’t stay stuck. I was building an addition onto our home at the time and would get cuts and splinters and want to keep them protected so that was my go to brand. But they’d start unsticking and have to be changed over an over and it wasn’t cheap.
I wrote a letter to them- don’t remember what department- and gave them a piece of my mind along with a couple of their band aids- some still in the wrapper, a couple of the ones that had come unglued (you could tell they’d barely been worn).
I got a letter back. It basically told me that they made the best band aids, they rigorously tested them in the laboratory, and that they were sorry that I had experienced “adhesion failure” due to “misunderstanding the product”.
Awesome. Now I not only had a snide and insulting letter, but a name and a position of the person who wrote it, so I fired off a response. I’d only been out of comedy for a year so my heckler skills were still pretty sharp and that’s what this was, a three day delayed response. It was scathing and it made sure to hit on every weakness in the excuse letter. And personal.
The next response from the target was an angry retort- clearly written while upset- that insulted me, questioned my intelligence, accused me of being ungrateful, etc.
The motherload.
So I wrote another one in return. Calm. Rational. Deeply hurt. Confused. Sad. I sent it back to her. And the CEO, and about fifty other executive officers of the company with a cc list appearing at the bottom to all recipients. Including my attorney.
I love getting mail and the next week was the jackpot. I got apologies from everyone except the Chairman of the Board, extended well wishes for a long and happy life, assurances that no one thought I was “an ungrateful consumer” or “an ignorant man”. I got cases and cases of J&J products delivered by UPS for the next month and we still have a cache of medical supplies like gauze and tape (hopefully the kind with good adhesive, I haven’t tapped into that supply to this day) and enough band aids to last me well into middle age.
I kept copies of all those letters including my first one to J&J and put them in a scrap book. And I did the same with the collection of letters from the Trenton Times exchange. And the one with PSE&G, A local Ford Dealership and the auto manufacturer that supplied them with cars, etc. etc.
I liked doing it because it honed my writing, taught me how to be vague enough as to sound insulting, but when pressed could be taken as innocent entreaties for fair treatment and how to go for the jugular when they fired back a nasty response. By the time I grew bored of that I had enough to put together a book- even had a killer title- The Cockroach Letters, based on the infamous Pullman Car story from the 19th century.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/the-bedbug-letter/
Sorry for the Snopes link but there doesn’t seem to be much about the original story out there on the Interwebz.
So to make a long story short, Hell Yes! write them a letter and get a name and then respond when they respond (because thy will, they always do, because they are righteous and you are an annoying bedbug to them) go right back at them and collect them all. You will win fun prizes and get all kinds of apologies from all kinds of honchos and poobahs when you make sure they see the kinds of things their employees write to people who love their company/product/service, like you.
Honk! Honk!
Great band aid story HSF. I’ve had a band aid story in my head for decades. It goes like this.
Many years ago, probably in the 20’s some guy on the factory floor at the band aid factory came up with a brilliant idea to put a little piece of string in each band aid making it easier and faster to open. Brilliant idea they said. It helped that company corner the market on band aids so they gave the guy a raise, a promotion, and even a gold watch when he retired.
Many decades later some bean counter at the company said, hey why are we spending all this money on string. If we get rid of all the string we can cut the cost of packaging band aids by more than 50%. By making one side of each band aid package 1cm shorter we’ll also save on the cost of that 1cm times millions of band aids.
Brilliant idea they said. So they gave the guy a raise, a promotion, and after they finished pillaging the company and sold it to private equity–a golden parachute.
Are you being sarcastic? Does not mesh with stoicism? Or does it?
But great band aid story.
“A box of band aids is a once in a lifetime purchase. When you die, you should have leftover band aids for generations to come.”
That gif will never get old. My thoughts are that bandaid failures are in another league from experimental shot and mask mandates. Still, hopeful that people wake up. If they respond to Svarga, how do you think they will respond, HSF?
A night of good sleep sometimes clears out the toxins and allows memories to emerge. Due to an unexpected financial hardship, I was unable to attend the university to which I was accepted. The tuition was paid for and non refundable. My dad sent a straightforward note describing the situation and was denied. This did not make him happy. He was out two house payments.
After a couple of days, he sat down with his black, felt tip pen and started writing in his beautiful penmanship. He was determined to get his money back. It took three hours of his time because he wanted to find just the right words. When I asked if profanity was included, he smiled and responded that this was not the time.
The letter was two pages. The tuition package included a season of football tickets. Dad included them in the envelope and concluded the letter by telling the university that we would not be using them.
A couple weeks later, he received a full refund, and the football tickets.
We debated whether it was the two pages, or that last sentence around the football tickets. Maybe a bit of both.
Every evil piece of crap pushing these to children needs to be locked up and fed a diet of water & gruel for the rest of their natural lives.