How the FDA justified rejecting an EUA for fluvoxamine

Guest Post by Steve Kirsch

The drug works great. But the FDA doesn’t want anyone to know that. Why? Because they are corrupt.

Doctor Submits Fluvoxamine EUA Application to FDA | MedPage Today

Summary

Fluvoxamine has a systematic review and meta-analysis published in a top medical journal. You cannot get any better than that. It’s the “gold standard” of medical evidence.

So when a group of scientists applied for an EUA for fluvoxamine, what did the FDA do? They rejected the drug for “insufficient evidence” just like they always do for ivermectin.

Everyone is stunned, but nobody is surprised. How can the FDA say a drug which meets the “gold standard” of evidence has “insufficient evidence”?

The FDA approved Molnupiravir which was less effective. Why not fluvoxamine?

ICER, a non-profit known as the nation’s drug pricing watchdog, did a review of the evidence and determined that fluvoxamine evidence is superior to Molnupiravir.

It can’t be more clear than this. The reason is pure corruption.

But I know something else that few other people know, thanks to a source at the NIH: the NIH was planning to approve fluvoxamine months ago, but they got a call from the FDA telling them not to.

This is how science works today.

This post was written to memorialize the corruption.

Background documents

  1. Original Boulware EUA application
  2. JAMA systematic review and meta analysis It doesn’t get any better than this. This is the “gold standard of evidence based medicine”
  3. FDA official fluvoxamine rejection
  4. Article about the rejection (Stat News)
  5. Article about the fluvoxamine rejection (The Verge)
  6. NIH is still unsure whether fluvoxamine should be used to treat COVID (article I did after the TOGETHER trial). The NIH wrote a bullshit rejection because the FDA told them not to approve it.
  7. The ICER independent review showed fluvoxamine is more effective than Molnupiravir:

Using fluvoxamine

Read this article I wrote about using fluvoxamine correctly for COVID. It is an amazing drug and is a very simple safe way to avoid long-haul COVID symptoms.

Taking apart the FDA’s argument

These people never called the researchers whose trials they claimed showed no effect.

The trials that were abandoned for futility weren’t getting events because the patients were given standard of care meds. So there were too few events in the placebo group and they weren’t recruiting fast enough. So the drug had no chance of working (since there were no events), so the trial was stopped for futility, NOT because the drug doesn’t work. All the researchers are convinced the drug works.

Fluvoxamine has at least a 30% hospitalization and death benefit.

Expect similar things to happen when Eiger applies for an EUA for interferon lambda, a drug with a 89% efficacy in phase 3 trials.

It’s not about the science. It never was.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
flash
flash
May 17, 2022 7:42 am

Don’t overthink this. The answer is simple. They want you dead. Can it be any clearer?

“When you’re dead, you won’t own anything and this makes us oligarchs happy ” Klaus “Rectum” Schwab

Oldtoad of Green Acres
Oldtoad of Green Acres
  flash
May 17, 2022 8:59 am

Oh, come on, think about this a little. Not dead, well mostly, just ripe for the adjunct follow-up medicines to cure what the first injurious prescribed toxins caused. Cause an illness, like an engineered spike protein modified Corona cold virus, prescribe a mildly Stericidal mRNA not a vaxx, then a wha-la, like magic a great market arises for the plethora of cures for the manufactured problem.
All right, I do admit, 500,000 excess deaths is a little excessive, but the follow up market for the permanently damaged is even bigger.

Warren
Warren
  Oldtoad of Green Acres
May 17, 2022 9:14 pm

If and once the virus mutates so that ADE comes into play 500,000 excess deaths will be miniscule in comparison. Vander Bossche said that would start to happen within two months, he said it on May 1, so within 6 weeks.
And he said it would be multiple variants, so no option for a single vaccine this time.
It’s going to be a big Shit Sandwich.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 17, 2022 9:18 am

FDA = Federally Dictated Annihilation.

[əˌnīəˈlāSHən]
NOUN
complete destruction or obliteration:

B_MC
B_MC
May 17, 2022 10:29 am

It’s not about the science. It never was.

“The first of these two commentaries on clinical research publications appeared in 2009, the second in April of this year.” (2015)

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine” (1).

More recently, Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, wrote that “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness” (2).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4572812/#b2-cvj_10_1011

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 17, 2022 11:50 am

SSRI’s are absolutely not safe.

Jdog
Jdog
May 17, 2022 3:27 pm

Health care in America is now officially a criminal organization.

TN Patriot
TN Patriot
May 17, 2022 7:49 pm

FDA approval is nothing more than “business deal made”. Somebody is not offering enough “incentive” to get the deal made

Warren
Warren
May 17, 2022 9:02 pm

Remember how the FDA. took PepsidAC and Zyrtec off the market in mid 2020, for “evaluation”? Turned out that Pepsid and Zyrtec and their generic counterparts were reducing the severity of Covid, Couldn’t have a OTC therapeutic out there before the snake venom shots received their EUA, then after the EUAs were given they were returned to the stores with modified label instructions.

In Spain some of the elder care homes started a regime of Zyrtec and Claritin as a therapeutic, and antibiotics for severe cases, the ones that did that lost zero patients to the covid. Zip zilch none.