Will there be Nuclear Weapons?

Guest Post by Martin Armstrong

The people never benefit from war. We are the instruments of those in power no matter what the government.  There are people who are brainwashed and hate Russia and are demonizing Putin because that is propaganda needed to create war. They are incapable of critical independent thought. There are people trolling social media pretending to be people who are really just the Deep State pushing hatred of all Russians to justify the objective of war. The attack on the Nord Stream Pipeline came interestingly as a key target week.

If the intelligent people bothered to verify all facts before making rash decisions, they would see that the Neocons who spread this hatred have been anti-Russia and praying for war ever since the USSR fell in 1991. ANYONE who claims Russia is evil and America wears the white hat is simply either stupid or a promoter of war for the Deep State. Anyone with 10% of a brain knows well that ALL GOVERNMENTS engage in propaganda – it is NEVER one-sided.

Politico published back in 2008 a record showing that John McCain was always anti-Russian long before Putin ever came to power. It does not matter who is the head of Russia – it never has. Now they pretend Russia would be OK if Putin is removed. That is the typical propaganda always changing to support the same objective. These people are playing a very dangerous game for the hardliners are still there behind Putin and blowing up the pipelines has now shown Russia that this is a war intended to defang and declaw the bear assuming they would even allow it to still breathe. That means that pushed up against the wall, Russia will have no choice but to use at least tactical nuclear weapons.

It was the assassination of the Archduke that launched World War I. That entire region is stained with hatred that goes back centuries. This hatred of the Russian people is merely an extension not so different from the hatred of Catholics in England that resulted in the civil war and the beheading of King Charles I. We are once again looking at drawing the entire world into a conflict that will stain the entire globe with the blood of soldiers and civilians for centuries to come, China will end up siding with Russia as will North Korea, and parts of the Middle East. Just as World War I was over an assassination, the hatred in Ukraine will draw in the world over a patch of land occupied by Russians for centuries. Everyone’s lifestyle will be irrevocably altered by the cheers and the drums beating for war.

I have all the declassified documents and history is entirely different than the propaganda we are led to believe. NATO offered to absorb Russia in 1991. That is what sparked the coup against Gorbachev on August 18th, 1991. The hardliners saw that as the surrender of Russia to the USA – total defeat. That is when Yeltsin stood up on the tank and pleaded with the troops not to support the coup. The military then backed down and support for the coup collapsed.

My sources have always been incredible. I do not make shit up and I do not rely on my opinion. I even have the documents that show Robert Maxwell, the father of Ghislaine the girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein, supported the coup by cutting a deal backed by Israel if the generals agreed to release all the Jews so they could migrate to Israel. He amazingly fell off his yacht and didn’t know how to swim. Bet you didn’t know that one either. Robert Maxwell was at least a double agent and possibly a triple agent. He met with Russian leaders often. Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide when the guards fell asleep and the video cameras didn’t work that time.  Endless coincidences no doubt. Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide when the guards fell asleep and the video cameras didn’t work that time.  Endless coincidences no doubt.

Russia must die in the minds of the Neocons. They will not be satisfied by anything else. The Neocons funded the Taliban in Afghanistan, which was a proxy war against Russia. They then used the weapons against Americans.

The Neocons funded the Chechen terrorists and I have the declassified documents of Yeltsin telling Obama this had to stop. Obama tried to invade Syria because Assad refused to allow Qatar to build a pipeline to Europe. McCain was there at Maidan to support the Ukrainian Revolution and promised support for the Neo-Nazis to attack the Donbas.

Anyone who is pushing the narrative that it’s all Putin and we must wage war against him is preaching the agenda for the Deep State. They have their fake people on social media and direct the mainstream media to push their agenda. As I have said, war is just an extension of politics. The people have NOTHING to gain from war. The best we can achieve is to come home unharmed to a family that is still there.

As Henry Kissinger warned, the Donbas should have been let go. Why fight for land occupied by Russians anyhow? This makes no practical sense unless we look at this as war is just an extension of politics and this is not about the Donbas or even Ukraine. This is simply a thirst for war and it is always the leaders who create war – not the common people on both sides. This is simply a grudge match and we are in the middle.

So the answer is simple. There is no other outcome but war and it will unleash at the least tactical nuclear weapons. The Ukrainian people should understand that they are the cannon fodder and nobody gives a damn about them or their country. This is all about the USA v Russia. You can ignore the facts. As Hermann Goring said: “the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism.” There are no peacemakers left anymore! This is not about supporting the USA or Russia. This is about supporting the people who are always the victims.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
m
m
October 2, 2022 8:56 am

I’m much more optimistic than Martin:
I only give it a 50% chance that nukes will be used over the next few years.

Dr. Zedder Strangelove
Dr. Zedder Strangelove
  m
October 2, 2022 9:13 am

I give it 90% chance we see a small example of a dirty bomb in a populated city by Feb. 2023. Then as most people have been trained to wear paper masks. They will escalate it to you can’t leave the house without a full on respirator. Paper suits are going to be the new “in” thing.

Guest
Guest
October 2, 2022 9:27 am

Relax. A nuclear attack (if they exist) isn’t even needed. Set off little/big bomb and SAY it’s nuclear. It could even be a regular bomb with a mushroom cloud however that’s not needed either as they can do images of one.
And all the rest…fallout, etc. A man made tsunami could be thrown in for affect. We could have discussion for years- is it real or fake? It floors me no bigger name writers discuss the possibility of a fake nuclear attack after going through a fake pandemic. I guess the thinking is no one would stoop that low.
The same result if fake or real.
it is very reminiscent of a killer virus, except it seems even more people are programmed for nuclear threats than ‘pandemics’. Plus a guy who rides a bear, and swims in iceberg water, may just do it to protect his people. The ultimate propaganda tool.

Captain_Obviuos
Captain_Obviuos
  Guest
October 2, 2022 3:25 pm

This is what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki: actual evidence shows only fire bombs (specifically napalm) and mustard gas was used. I know people will not take my word for this, so I will direct you to this book, available for free on archive.org, because its author does not care about profit only truth: https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited/

Palmer clearly shows that there was no way we had any enriched Plutonium or Uranium by 1945, nor did we have the technology then to provide a stable casing in which to house these highly volatile, unstable elements (the second they touch oxygen, it’s like Wite-Out on paper). There is simply no way we dropped atomic bombs on Japan; read the evidence for yourself, please.

Also, it is not only impossible but improbable also that there are nukes which have just been sitting around in their silos since the ’50’s, or even today. U-238 is the most unstable element used in atomic bombs, and it can only be obtained by enriching it down to a usable state, U-235, which is the one supposedly used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki; but it, like any enriched element, will not stay in an unnatural state, without decaying, for long. Not to mention the extremely delicate operation it takes still to this day to extract bomb elements.

I will stop now. Just please read the book and be red-pilled.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Captain_Obviuos
October 2, 2022 3:44 pm

U-235, which is the one supposedly used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki; but it, like any enriched element, will not stay in an unnatural state, without decaying, for long.

Define LONG.

U235 has a half life of about 700M years.

Captain_Obviuos
Captain_Obviuos
  Anonymous
October 2, 2022 4:23 pm

2.3.1 Radioactive half-life and activity. The exact time at which an individual nucleus will decay is unpredictable, but the probability that it will decay within a certain time period can be determined, and this is a fixed and characteristic property of the isotope in question. Isotopes of the same element will differ slightly in solubility etc., which may cause them to be differentially enriched or depleted for example in soil samples or in biological samples. Therefore, with such samples, two isotopes of the same element that belong to the same decay chain may still differ slightly in activity; this does apply to 235U and 238U. (238U has a half-life of 4.47B years itself.)

I would define that as long.

The half-life of 238U, at 4.47 billion years, is much longer than those of all intermediate species. This has the interesting consequence that the activities, that is, the number of decays per unit of time, of all chain members in a natural, undisturbed uranium ore sample will be virtually equal. To see why, assume that you start with a sample of pure 238U. As the uranium undergoes Alpha-decay with very low, virtually constant activity, its daughter nuclide (234Th, an isotope of thorium) will accumulate. 234Th has a half-life of only 24 days and will therefore decay rapidly; it can accumulate only until its own decay rate reaches the rate of its formation, which is of course identical with the activity of 238U. The same principle applies to all of the other decay intermediates, including the uranium isotope 234U, which is formed two Beta-decays downstream of 234Th. Therefore, in natural uranium, the activities of 238U and 234U should be equal, even though 234U is less abundant.

Which would make the half-life of 234U also >/= to 238U. And yet none of these isotopes (and for sure not 235U) were found in either Japanese bomb site in sufficient quantities to have derived from an atomic weapon.

Boogieman
Boogieman
October 2, 2022 9:31 am

“The common people on both sides” Who actually fights these wars constructed by the power elites?

Dan
Dan
October 2, 2022 10:54 am

“My sources have always been incredible.” Freudian slip? Doesn’t inspire much confidence.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Dan
October 2, 2022 12:18 pm

People have no idea what words mean these days. They think they do, but they never bother to actually find out if they are correct. (see “literally”)

incredible adjective (DIFFICULT TO BELIEVE)

Definition of incredible : too extraordinary and improbable to be believed

Simple root “credible”. Add “in”, the opposite. (there I go assuming people know what “credible” means or understand the operation of the “in” prefix)

Svarga Loka
Svarga Loka
October 2, 2022 4:39 pm

ARE there nuclear weapons.

Fify

Ghost
Ghost
October 2, 2022 7:39 pm