Why Putin’s Winter Offensive Will Prompt US Entry Into the War

Guest Post by Mike Whitney

The war in Ukraine is not a Call of Duty fantasy. It is an enlargement of the human tragedy that NATO’s eastward expansion created. The victims do not live in North America. They live in a region that most Americans can’t find on a map. Washington urged the Ukrainians to fight. Now Washington must urge them to stop.” Colonel Douglas MacGregor, The American Conservative

Volodymyr Zelensky did not fly across the Atlantic so he could deliver a speech to the US Congress. That was not the purpose of his trip. The real objective was to produce a galvanizing event that would create the illusion of broad-based public support for the war. That is why the speech was broadcast on all the mainstream media channels and that is why Congress repeatedly greeted Zelensky with raucous applause. Once again, the cadres of voracious elites who control the political levers of power in America, are determined to drag the country to war, which is why they portray a cross-dressing “thug in a gym suit” as a Churchillian figure of unshakable principles. It’s all public relations. It’s all an attempt to garner support for a conflict which will soon involve young American men and women who will be asked to die so that wealthy elites can maintain their grip on global power.

Zelensky’s trip to Capitol Hill was timed to coincide with Putin’s winter offensive, which is expected to crush the Ukrainian Armed Forces and bring the war to a swift end. The Biden administration understands the situation but does not have weaponry or manpower to impact the outcome. That doesn’t mean, however, that Washington doesn’t have a plan for prolonging the conflict or beefing up its combat forces. It does have a plan, that is evident by the way the administration has rejected negotiations at every turn. What that tells us is that Washington is still committed to defeating Russia whatever the cost. In practical terms, that means that the US must create an incident that will serve as a justification for escalation. The incident could be related to Zelensky’s unexpected trip to Washington or, perhaps, it could be linked to the detonation of a nuclear device somewhere in Ukraine. Check out this excerpt from an article at RT:

The risk of Kiev attempting to build a so-called ‘dirty bomb’ remains, a senior Russian diplomat has said….

“Ukraine has the potential necessary to make a ‘dirty bomb,’ it doesn’t take much effort. Especially since Ukraine has been a nation advanced in nuclear technology since the Soviet times, [and] has many technologies and expertise,” Mikhail Ulyanov told journalists on Wednesday, as quoted by RIA Novosti…

General Igor Kirillov, the commander of the Russian military branch responsible for protecting troops from weapons of mass destruction, claimed in October that Kiev was “at the final stage” of producing a dirty bomb.” (“Radioactive threat from Kiev persists – Moscow“, RT)

The means by which a false flag is carried out, is completely irrelevant. What matters is that — according to political analyst John Mearsheimer– “The United States is in this to win”, that is, the US foreign policy establishment is not prepared to let the Russian army prevail in Ukraine and impose its own settlement. They’re going to find a way to intensify the conflict and bring foreign troops into the theater. That’s the objective, and that’s what they’ll do once they’ve figured out an excuse for escalation. Bottom line: The US is not going to throw in the towel and call it quits. This is a long-term project that could drag on for years if not decades.

Political analyst Kurt Nimmo thinks that NATO might join the fighting. Here’s a short blurb from Nimmo’s latest at Global Research:

If Olga Lebedeva and Pravda.ru can be believed, NATO is on the verge of entering the war in Ukraine.

“Such announcements were heard from officials of the Polish Ministry of Defence, the General Staff of the NATO alliance, officers of the French army and (of course) the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence,” according to Lebedeva.

“The main reason would be the very next Russian general offensive that NATO is planning and which according to it would decimate the Ukrainian army not only in the Donbass but also on the Kiev side (many Russian units are in combat situation in Belarus at the borders with Ukraine),” explains Rusreinfo.ru, a Russian website.

But NATO has always been very clear: Ukraine CANNOT LOSE. For Washington, the only solution would therefore be for NATO forces to enter Ukraine, hoping that this will end the Russian offensive. The calculation is that Vladimir Putin will not want to directly face NATO with the possible (nuclear) consequences, and will therefore then retreat.” (“NATO Decides to Attack Russia in Ukraine– Ukraine is unable to defeat Russia. The next step is for direct NATO involvement“, Kurt Nimmo, Global Research)

Nimmo could be right but, maybe not. It appears to me that NATO is hopelessly divided on the issue. A number of NATO countries will not join in a war against Russia regardless of the circumstances or the amount of pressure from the White House. The more likely scenario was presented by Colonel Douglas MacGregor who laid it out in an article at The American Conservative on Tuesday. Here’s what he said: .

The Biden administration’s unconditional support for the Zelensky regime in Kiev is reaching a strategic inflection point not unlike the one LBJ reached in 1965… Like South Vietnam in the 1960s, Ukraine is losing its war with Russia… The real danger now is that Biden will soon appear on television to repeat LBJ’s performance in 1965, substituting the word “Ukraine” for “South Vietnam”:

“Tonight, my fellow Americans I want to speak to you about freedom, democracy, and the struggle of the Ukrainian people for victory. No other question so preoccupies our people. No other dream so absorbs the millions who live in Ukraine and Eastern Europe… However, I am not talking about a NATO attack on Russia. Rather, I propose to send a U.S. led coalition of the willing, consisting of American, Polish, and Romanian armed forces into Ukraine, to establish the ground equivalent of a “no-fly zone.” The mission I propose is a peaceful one, to create a safe zone in the Western most portion of Ukraine for Ukrainian Forces and refugees struggling to survive Russia’s devastating attacks…”

NATO’s governments are divided in their thinking about the war in Ukraine. Except for Poland and, possibly, Romania, none of NATO’s members are in a rush to mobilize their forces for a long, grueling war of attrition with Russia in Ukraine. No one in London, Paris, or, Berlin wants to run the risk of a nuclear war with Moscow. Americans do not support going to war with Russia, and those few who do are ideologues, shallow political opportunists, or greedy defense contractors.” (“Washington is Prolonging Ukraine’s Suffering“, Colonel Douglas MacGregor, The American Conservative)

This, I think, is the much more plausible scenario. The Biden Administration will enlist a handful of countries that agree to troop deployments to west Ukraine ostensibly for humanitarian reasons. At the same time, they will allow disparate Ukrainian forces to continue the random shelling of Russia-controlled areas as well as locations on Russian soil. There will undoubtedly be an effort to control the skies over west Ukraine (no-fly zone) and to conduct attacks on Russian formations in the east. Most important, vital supplylines from Poland will remain open to accommodate the flow of men, munitions and lethal weaponry to the front. MacGregor appears to anticipate these developments given his comments at the beginning of the article. Here’s what he said:

During a speech given on November 29, Polish Vice-Minister of National Defense (MON) Marcin Ociepa said: “The probability of a war in which we will be involved is very high. Too high for us to treat this scenario only hypothetically.” The Polish MON is allegedly planning to call up 200,000 reservists in 2023 for a few weeks’ training, but observers in Warsaw suspect this action could easily lead to a national mobilization.

Meanwhile, inside the Biden administration, there is growing concern that the Ukrainian war effort will collapse under the weight of a Russian offensive. And as the ground in Southern Ukraine finally freezes, the administration’s fears are justified. In an interview published in the Economist, head of Ukraine’s armed forces General Valery Zaluzhny admitted that Russian mobilization and tactics are working. He even hinted that Ukrainian forces might be unable to withstand the coming Russian onslaught.” (“Washington is Prolonging Ukraine’s Suffering“, Colonel Douglas MacGregor, The American Conservative)

The plan to lure Russia into a war in Ukraine goes back at least a decade. And what we know now from comments by former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, is that Washington never sought a peaceful resolution to the conflict but worked tirelessly to install a Russia-hating regime in Kiev that would help it to prosecute its war on Russia. The gathering of nearly 600,000 Russian combat troops in or around Ukraine threatens to derail Washington’s strategy and end the war on Russia’s terms. Washington can’t allow that to happen. It cannot allow the world to see that it was beaten by Russia. Thus, Washington must pursue the only option left to them, the deployment of US troops to Ukraine.

Perhaps, cooler heads will prevail and the administration will pull back from the brink, but we think that is highly unlikely. We think the decision has already been made: We think the United States is going to war with Russia.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
34 Comments
ken31
ken31
January 2, 2023 3:56 pm

I never thought I would grow as hostile to conservatives as I am to liberals, but I never realized how radically left wing conservatives are.

This article is going to be out of date considering https://www.zerohedge.com/military/huge-death-toll-after-us-supplied-himars-leveled-russian-barracks-donetsk-possibly

kfg
kfg
  ken31
January 2, 2023 4:50 pm

Neo-Conservatives are not conservatives, hence the neo prefix.

What they are are 60s era progressives, but who are also war hawks. They started out as Democrats who flipped sides when the Democrats became the anti-Vietnam war party.

All they are trying to conserve, all they have ever been trying to conserve, is war with Russia and China.

lamont cranston
lamont cranston
  kfg
January 2, 2023 5:03 pm

Sen. “Scoop” Jackson (D-Boeing) was the Godfather of the “War Democrats”, who are today’s Neocons.

Melty
Melty
January 2, 2023 4:18 pm

Unfortunately I have a step kid over there in the Army. If he wasn’t involved, I tell Putie to light their asses up

Let the world burn
Let the world burn
  Melty
January 3, 2023 6:01 am

As if you have any control over this issue.

B_MC
B_MC
January 2, 2023 4:20 pm

Making sense of NATO strikes against Russia

I submit that there is only one thing which the Russians have not done yet, and that is the fullscale combined arms operation the Russian General Staff is obviously preparing. And since this major offensive is almost certain to happen, the only thing which such NATO strikes could affect is the timing of the attack. And since there is no way that these NATO (pinprick) strikes could delay the Russian offensive, their only possibly goal would be to make it happen sooner.

Why would NATO want the Russian offensive sooner rather than later?

Conclusion:

NATO is trying really hard to force the Russians into a “NATO schedule” and out of their planned schedule. An added beneficial side-effect from such “for optics only” strikes is to give the morons in Congress a rationale to put even more money into the US MIC.

https://thesaker.is/making-sense-of-nato-strikes-against-russia/

Ghost
Ghost
  B_MC
January 3, 2023 9:37 am

Also, Andrei Martynov and The Duran’s excellent discussion of the insanity of “Force Structure” and the lunatics in the asylum…

comment image

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D23V6UzS3P4

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 2, 2023 4:26 pm

It’s all an attempt to garner support for a conflict which will soon involve young American men and women who will be asked to die so that wealthy elites can maintain their grip on global power.

And American men and women willing go off to die? Fuck ’em. Nothing but mercenaries paid to kill for the goals of TPTB.

zappalives
zappalives
  Anonymous
January 2, 2023 5:31 pm

Did you come up with that all by yourself or did one of your other anonymous alter egos on this site write that ?
Must be at least 10 anonymous here………..all from the same sick little you.
Think is………..most commenters here are hip to your multiple accounts.
You need mental help boy !

Anonymous
Anonymous
  zappalives
January 2, 2023 7:50 pm

Must be at least 10 anonymous here………..all from the same sick little you.

LOL. You claim to know as true, what I know is not true.

So, explain how it is you know I have multiple accounts. (I don’t)

And when you have done that, please explain your logic process for me having multiple accounts,…….as Anonymous.

Then;

Think is………..most commenters here are hip to your multiple accounts.

And they know this how? And you know they know this how?

Pretty sure you are and idiot and a liar, but I leave room for you to show otherwise. Please do.

Two if by sea.
Two if by sea.
  Anonymous
January 2, 2023 10:03 pm

I don’t give a shit that you’re an Anon and I care even less that you’d argue over it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Two if by sea.
January 3, 2023 12:27 am

Wait, are you zappalives? Kind of looks like you forgot to change accounts when responding. If so, the irony is hilarious.

Papers to prove it
Papers to prove it
  zappalives
January 2, 2023 8:07 pm

“You need mental help boy !”

Hmmm. NOT sure just HOW ta respond, conflicted/torn; Toss-Up.
1) Don’t eye no it.
2) Tell me ’bout it.

Hardly get 2, MAYBE 3 sessions in. They Keep “Dying Suddenly”.

Hope Springs Eternal. When eye tried to call the medical group to schedule another session, the Receptionists tried to cover, said it was the “Safe & Effective” shots, but just between You and me?

Oh never mind. ANYONE who commits suicide, ESPECIALLY in front of an extremely fragile client, probably couldn’t help me. Anyhow.

a.h.'s Mommy, rachel levine
a.h.'s Mommy, rachel levine
  Anonymous
January 2, 2023 7:50 pm

“Nothing but mercenaries paid to kill for the goals of TPTB.”

Ohhh, i see. Kinda Whiskey Rebellion II-ish?

Flagrante Delicto
Flagrante Delicto
January 2, 2023 5:13 pm

“thug in a gym suit” as a Churchillian figure ?

Oy Vey, my heart grew 3x that day.

Newfound respect for just how GENDER fluid he, she, it was in those Stiletto’s.

Absolutely NO Idea! Drunken alcoholic ta Boot, (No Pun Intended) Too.

Billy the Kid
Billy the Kid
  Flagrante Delicto
January 2, 2023 6:41 pm

Now we know why the fag demoncrats and neocunts love him so much… Mitch the bitch,Lindsey the fag graham, Chuck the Cuk Schumer and Biden the incestuous pedo must have hard ons everytime they watch this dusgusting shit.

Steve Z.
Steve Z.
January 2, 2023 5:42 pm

Of course the US will increase its commitment to the war in Ukraine. Those in charge (really in charge) need a plan to issue more debt. If this year’s spending doesn’t eclipse last years spending, the whole financial system collapses. The debt must increase vastly over the previous year to keep the wheels greased and everything afloat. Another must is to keep the proles scared and distracted surrendering ever more freedoms and more control over them.

Jdog
Jdog
January 2, 2023 5:44 pm

There is little to no chance that NATO or the US is going to directly declare war on Russia. That is simply stupid.
The US and NATO equipped and trained a couple hundred thousand Ukraine military soldiers in NATO tactics and all the intelligence they could provide. They then moved this force to the borders of Donbas and in the early days of the war the Russians annihilated them along with the Ukrainian air force and advanced all the way to Kiev before pulling back.
The US had 2 objectives when they began this alliance with the Neo-Nazi Ukrainian’s. One was to weaken Russia economically by involving them in a well funded war, and then imposing sanctions upon them. The second was to accuse Russia of war crimes, and to use those accusations as grounds to remove Russia from the UN and thereby nullify Russia’s ability to veto the US on UN resolutions and actions. Both of these objectives are steps to a larger objective which is to gain control of Russia’s huge wealth of natural resources.
The first was only partly successful, the war has caused Russia to spend billions of dollars but that expense has been offset at least partly by the increase in oil prices. The Ukrainian army has been reduced to a fraction of what it was, and it’s best soldiers have been lost. Russia has amassed at least 300K troops along the front, and have a massive amount of tanks and artillery waiting for the ground to freeze before they advance. What is left of the Ukraine army does not have a chance. The sanctions have hurt Europe and therefore NATO more than they have hurt Russia, which is a strategic loss.
The US plan to plant a dirty bomb in Ukraine and blame the Russians was foiled when Russia made the plan public. They were also able to foil the plan to cause a nuclear leak at Zaporizhzhia power station by calling in IAEA to confirm it was Ukraine who was shelling the plant using US weapons.
The logical course for NATO now is to propagandize the next invasion of Russia this winter. There is no way to stop Russia militarily, so they will attempt to turn their military victories into acts of inhumane war crimes with a massive propaganda campaign much like what we saw with COVID. They will then use that propaganda blitz to justify expelling Russia from the UN achieving one of their two goals and gaining complete control of the UN.

Martelshammer
Martelshammer
  Jdog
January 2, 2023 6:07 pm

Err…..having been to Ukraine and Russia many times….the ground has been frozen for a while now…..jus sayin. There won’t be a Russia offensive…..Putin is likely gone in a matter of months if he is sick as indicated……The Russia military is not going to start WWIII if Vlad is on the way out. Now having been to the Ukraine……..they are by far the most corrupt folks I have ever dealt with. They are total scum, human trafficking, drugs, the bioweapon research, the Billions diverted (with 10% to Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Kerry and Mittens)….its a grift for the elites…they don’t really want a war either they are making too much money. So there will be some stalemate and if Putin goes the new leader will keep enough territory to declare victory…..we will keep rolling in the humanitarian aid to rebuild Ukraine and the grift will continue. NATO did just enough to let Putin know he can’t win….but neither can Ukraine and that’s my point….not really about NATO expansion world domination its just plain old corruption on a massive scale and other people’s kids get to do the dying.

EasyCo.
EasyCo.
  Martelshammer
January 2, 2023 6:36 pm

Ground HAS NOT be frozen.

There is a warm front that has kept it muddy.

Martelshammer
Martelshammer
  EasyCo.
January 2, 2023 7:11 pm

Putin is not invading again……he can’t, not material and Uks have too much of our better gear and most importantly satellite intel for targeting. So even in Vlad hangs in there and doesn’t get taken out he will just posture and consolidate what he has gained. I could see a serious “attack” as a feint to cover China going into Taiwan…..as it is we are way off balance with too much invested in Ukraine and not enough assets in place for the real fight that is coming in Taiwan……our so called Leaders in the West are focused on stealing above all else…..all about the Benjamins. Ukraine not ever going to be part of NATO and that was the real red line for Russia…..we wouldn’t tolerate an alliance between Mexico and China (or anybody else)…..but Putin is in a precarious position domestically so I don’t think the fight is coming. The circle will be squared with money and territory and nobody is nuking anybody.

m
m
  Martelshammer
January 3, 2023 11:19 am

I said about 6 months ago:
Putin is dying from five different cancers as we speak!

WARNING: This post may contain traces of sarcasm.

Jdog
Jdog
  m
January 3, 2023 11:42 pm

Not to mention another five different venereal diseases, and a brain tumor. That is, if you believe the MSM…

Jdog
Jdog
  Martelshammer
January 3, 2023 11:37 pm

The ground has not been frozen. Anyone who know dick about Winter warfare knows the ground does not freeze hard until late January / early February when tracked vehicles can travel without turning the roads into mud slogs causing massive problems.
Russia did not amass that amount of force on the front as a bluff. Russian do not bluff. Without an invasion, this situation will continue to bleed Russia for years to come as trade and sanctions cannot be dealt with until a military resolution is in place.
Support for the war is already declining in Europe and the US as Ukraine has cost both billions of dollars they really not afford. The European public is not willing to suffer hundreds of dollars a month for heating bills and being unable to feed their families for a bunch of Neo Nazis, Gangsters, and prostitutes.
If you believe Putin cannot win, you don’t know shit about the situation. Putin never wanted to defeat Ukraine when this thing started, he made his goals clear. He expected that after being beaten so decidedly in the beginning that Ukraine would negotiate, but Biden would not allow it even though Zelenski showed interest.
Putin then realized the only way for Russia to end this is to totally defeat Ukraine, as illogical as that seems to him . He has conscripted and additional 300K troops, along with his regular forces which gives Russia between 500K-600K available for deployment. The amount of tanks and artillery the Russian army has is staggering, it dwarfs the US and NATO combined, which is why NATO always counted on massive air power to offset it. Russia in turn developed the best anti air systems in the world of offset NATO numerical superiority in air power. Russia’s military was built to defeat NATO in Ukraine and Poland, and when it comes time to do so, it will roll through Ukraine like shit through a goose. At that point the west will cry foul and demand Russia be expelled from the UN. The question thin will be will China give the US the middle finger and veto their power play.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Jdog
January 4, 2023 12:00 am

The question thin will be will China give the US the middle finger and veto their power play.

Depends if the US will let them have Taiwan without a fuss.

m
m
  Jdog
January 3, 2023 11:17 am

>to remove Russia from the UN and thereby nullify Russia’s ability to veto the US on UN resolutions and actions

Because China would then fold like a cheap lawn chair??

Jdog
Jdog
  m
January 4, 2023 12:02 am

That’s the rub. China could veto, and logically should if they are allies, or the US could offer a deal to not oppose China taking Taiwan in exchange if they sell out Russia. I believe China is too smart to do that though, it would leave them isolated against the west.
I think it is more probable that with Argentina and Iran applying to join BRICS and Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey also planning to apply for membership in the association, they could form a trading block and possibly form a new currency that would compete with both the UN and the petrol-dollar.
4th turnings are times of great changes and shifts in the powers that control the world.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Jdog
January 3, 2023 11:51 pm

There is little to no chance that NATO or the US is going to directly declare war on Russia.

If for no other reason, because the USA no longer “declares” war.

Sneaky that. Can’t lose if you never were at war……

WilliamtheResolute
WilliamtheResolute
January 2, 2023 6:20 pm

Congress needs to insist that the little Nazi Zelinsky be given the Pizer booster every time he gets U.S. money…we could end this…suddenly.

Visayas Outpost
Visayas Outpost
January 2, 2023 7:19 pm

Call me crazy, but I do believe the US already entered that war. Hello, Himars. Special ops on the ground since inception. “Training”, yeah.

Guest
Guest
January 2, 2023 8:33 pm

Also an Agrarian Minister…

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Guest
January 2, 2023 9:33 pm
ursel doran
ursel doran
January 3, 2023 12:12 am

“The U.S. under its prevailing political conditions is incapable and unwilling to abide by a multipolar world.
Such a world of peaceful relations is fundamentally anathema to Washington.
Hence its warmongering record is out on its own compared with any other nation in history.
Russia’s stand in Ukraine has exposed the world’s warmonger. And that defiant stand is marking the end of presumed U.S. hegemony.”
https://strategic-culture.org/news/2022/12/30/2022-the-year-that-marked-end-of-america-hegemony/

GW
GW
January 3, 2023 7:27 pm

If the conclusion of this article is true, then bark and grass will be the primary cuisine for those few of us left around in 2024.