IDIOT OF THE DAY – RACHEL MADDOW

According to the socialist agenda of gender-confusion and pedo-grooming, that thing is one of their early experiments in gender-confusion that succeeded. Assuming you can call that thing a success just because it is able to pass itself off as a woman.

You’ve obviously not seen photos of Lori Lightfoot … or Maxine Waters … or Madonna v. 2.0 … and, reaching back a couple of decades, the ‘Queen of Plastic Surgery’, Phyllis Diller v. 29.3.9 …

Only a woman could see someone accurately describing reality as making fun.

I suppose that the real culprit you’re looking for is Nature or God.

Her look conveys her inner torment/unease/disquiet/confusion/whatever you want to call it. That’s how physigonomy works. If you see a person limping and you notice, you are being cruel, you’re just observant. And you would likely be able to conclude that the person with the limp is either has suffered a long term problem such as a poorly healed bone, a congenital defect, or a recent sprain, etc.

Our bodies reflect our state. Faces are part of our bodies. Eyes, for example, though very small in relation to the rest of the body, often show you a great deal more about the current state of health and fitness. That’s why cops always shine a light in them. It lets them know if there are drugs or alcohol in the system, if the person is trying to conceal their motives, etc.

In that short clip I can easily identify a number of mannerisms and tics that reveal the inner state of mind- talking out of the side of her mouth (an age old adage refering to someone who is not straightforward) and in this case, is a reality. The constant gesticulation of the hands is both deictic- using her hands to prove that what she is saying is true, as well as an emphasis, a form of underlying the word or meaning conveyed. It is a practiced gesture rather than a spontaneous one (watch her in other contexts, like where she is comfortable interviewing someone she knows and it doesn’t occur).

And more than that there is the head motions. When she speaks of Trump, for example, she uses the negatory head shake that signifies NO, while she leans in heavily when she says that her network wouldn’t want to ‘knowingly broadcast untrue things’, one of the surest way to identify someone trying to secure your confidence. When it’s a close friend or associate it feels natural, the heads coming close together in affection, but when it’s someone trying to swindle you or get over, it looks weird, like a drunk at a bar.

Thye other thing that stands out is that shye is covering a news story, and she is- ostensibly- a journalist. There is zero objectivity in this coverage when it comes to her face. She is very sad about it, she looks disapproving, and she doesn’t want you to think anything other than “this is very bad”.

Compare her mannerism to say a Walter Cronkite or Chet Huntley. Thyese guys are completely neutral with maybe the excpetion of the JFK assasination. You can’t tell what they feel about the story, they just convey the content.

Go back and look and see if you recognize these things.

Surpassed only by her viewers.