Steps to World Rule: First, Destroy Humanity

Guest Post by Todd Hayen

It has always been astounding to me that people think for even a second that their government makes decisions to help the people—that has never been the case.

If a government’s decision helps anyone it is always an after effect…or an afterthought or a collateral unintended benefit. The primary intent is for power, control, and money…to satisfy individual pursuits and goals of the global narcissistic/god-complex elite.

Anyone (which turns out to be most everyone) who supports this and thinks their government, or their nation, is operating in the people’s interest is signing their own death warrant.

“Don’t be so negative, Dr. Todd, there are good things in life too!”

Oh my yes, there are: newborn babies, sunsets, oceans, art, music, forests, waterfalls, sex with your lover, dogs…millions of things. But that is not what I am writing about right now. I am writing about the thing, and group of things, that will wipe all of that good stuff off the face of the earth. Sure, sure, sure, it won’t be forever. Good will prevail, but it could be a million years before it all comes back if we let it go now. And I think it is worth the fight to preserve what we’ve got.

Needless to say, people have always followed leaders. I am not an anthropologist, but I would take a guess that even in primitive times there were leaders of tribes, chiefs, kings, queens, or whatever. I would also guess that this arrangement probably worked well more often than not. Societies were close knit; if a leader went bonkers it was probably easier to just push him or her off a cliff somewhere. And considering how different things were back then, there probably was not as much incentive to be selfish, power hungry, wampum hungry, or weird in other ways. I also would guess this complacent sort of culture, if there ever was such a thing, did not last very long.

I’m sure adjacent tribes had some things the neighbors wanted, and sure the all too human trait of wanting power over others did not take too long to appear. Being the Grand Poobah of many people had to have the same allure it has today. Wars broke out, discrimination certainly reared its ugly head (“that tribe over there has longer necks than we do, let’s kill them!”), and of course truly important issues caused conflicts, like need for food, water, etc.

Things were a lot worse back in history than today in a lot of ways. But things along these lines did actually get better, in my humble opinion, during a brief period in the West. The establishment of a new country with fresh ideals was a sight for sore eyes back in the late 1700’s. I don’t think anything like it, on that particular scale, had been attempted in the human experience post antiquity (which we, regardless of what we have been told, know very little about). It indeed was a grand experiment—the new colonies in North America shedding the shackles of the tyranny of King George III of England.

The new fledgling country created a Constitution that was truly inspiring at the time. The checks and balances incorporated in that government was also inspiring, and did hold itself together fairly well for quite some time. Of course there are always problems, as there would be with anything brave and novel. But it all hung together fairly well for a bit of time.

I’ll stop there with the history lesson, which may not be all that accurate anyway, but I think you get the picture. Even if you disagree that the new United States of America was an exciting bit of work, you probably can agree that putting one man, or woman, in charge of a lot of people, has never gone all that well. Before the presidency of the United States, there were of course Kings and Queens. Even the US was concerned about having a single person at the head of the executive branch of government, lest it be too much like a monarchy. Some continue (many actually) to believe that the US form of government is still the best, and if certain things are readjusted, the US will continue to be the greatest country in the world.

I digress.

Wherever you are on that fence, you must agree that things are rather different now than what the founding fathers envisioned. Why? That would take a book, or several, to address. Point here is that we can no longer trust this system to be objective, compassionate, fair, benevolent, and not self-serving and destructive. In fact, it seems that the system itself is selling out to foreign interests, and the actual sovereignty of the nation is threatened, and this threat is largely coming from within.

We see this with other nations as well, basically handing over their sovereign rights as a nation to the likes of the WHO, or the UN, or even the WEF. What we see is much like watching a Sci-Fi motion picture where the bad guys are stripping a nation of everything that makes it the “representation of the people” into a personal self-serving slave to unelected powers.

What does this mean? Well, when you really think about it, there is no way this sort of global take over could ever be in the best interests of other human beings living on the planet. Even if you could have a benevolent world power (which is an oxymoron, in my opinion) you would, just by its nature, have to rule in very broad strokes, i.e., everything you implemented would have to be implemented for the good of the majority. That leaves quite a few people out. The hundreds of diverse cultures and the billions of humans that make them up would have to be reduced down to manageable attributes—becoming more and more like each other.

What does this sound like? If you thought “prison” you win the prize. Look at cultures like North Korea, and you will get some idea of what would be happening. And it is worse than that, because North Korea did not start out as a diverse culture—unlike the diversity of the entire globe.

And all that assuming this world system is benevolent, which it most certainly is not. Of course they present themselves as benevolent, and much like all fictional evil leaders (as well as the real ones throughout history), they may even believe they are benevolent. But any world leader(s) will have to focus on the destruction of humanity before they can accomplish any sort of world control over its inhabitants. That is simply the nature of the beast. I’ll say it again: any world leader(s) will have to focus on the destruction of humanity before they can accomplish any sort of world control over its inhabitants. No two ways about it.

And of course, in our modern age, this destruction of humanity is quite a bit more complex than literally whipping people into compliance like they did in the old days. Right now (and this will probably change) most of the psyop is accomplished either through the carrot enticement and then ruling with the stick, or through fear (stick first, carrot as a reward for compliance.)

It is the same game.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
ryan
ryan
June 3, 2023 6:55 am

The quality of a nation is dependent upon the quality of its people. By quality of people, I refer to characteristics such as morals, responsibility, knowledge and sense of sovereignty. Ideally a nation would have such high quality people that a ruler/government would be unnecessary. Presently, there are far too many people in the west who are of low quality, if of any quality at all. These low quality people are those upon whom governments/dictators thrive because of their lack of morals, sense of self interest, ignorance and lack of individuality. Thus they are a ball and chain upon the ankles of higher quality individuals. It seems unrealistic that it would ever be possible to convert this mass of low quality people into high quality people. Therefore, lets hope that the Destruction of Humanity involves the removal of the bulk of idiots, leaving the seed of quality to rear itself in a future generation.

The Central scrutinizer
The Central scrutinizer
  ryan
June 3, 2023 8:12 am

So, are we becoming better people? Or are we the same old people, just a lot more pissed off? Good luck turning this around. The horse has taken the bit in his teeth.

anonymous
anonymous
  ryan
June 3, 2023 8:24 am

“there are far too many people in the west who are of low quality, if of any quality at all. ”
lol.
They are of superior quality in the east, elsewhere? Where?
Men (and women) are exactly the same everywhere on this planet.
People like to blanket describe most leadership as ‘the cream rises to the top’.
As I always say, ‘so does scum’. Ever boil a pot of soup meat? The hotter it gets the more scum there is.
Control and running others while they are so screwed up is the norm for psychopaths. And leadership positions particularly politics, attracts them all. They never give up control easily and are usually moved on to another position of control because of their ‘stellar character’ of a dubious nature.

ryan
ryan
  anonymous
June 3, 2023 9:14 am

I guess that one could infer from the governments elsewhere in the world, that those places too are populated with low quality people. I speak of the west only because I live here and this region is my primary concern.
One of the founding fathers replied when asked what type of government the people had: “A republic, if you can keep it.” My point is that high quality people will not allow the rulers to rule. Whether or not those rulers wish to relinquish power or not is irrelevant.

Atom
Atom
  anonymous
June 3, 2023 6:24 pm

No, they are not. But there are very, very few who fit the definition of worthiness. And there is only One who can qualify worthiness. “All the world wondered after the beast.” If you can answer that, you’ll know what the final curtain will look like. But you’ll fail.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  ryan
June 3, 2023 3:58 pm

Why do so few people think this through?
It is too late to change our heading.
This Country is going to fail.
God is angry.
Prepare accordingly.

The Central scrutinizer
The Central scrutinizer
June 3, 2023 8:09 am

Funny thing about sticks and carrots…they are both conveniently shaped to accommodate shoving up a tyrant’s ass….sideways.

flash
flash
June 3, 2023 10:26 am

Get crackin’ Christians, Deep Shekels must be saved!!!

comment image

anonym
anonym
  flash
June 3, 2023 4:24 pm

Insane. Or evil? I am for the moment voting insane, because plainly, they are sawing off the branch they are sitting on.

Anthony Aaron
Anthony Aaron
  flash
June 3, 2023 8:42 pm

We should be so lucky …