Authored by Beege Welborn via HotAir.com,
We’re all done for.
Bet you forgot.
A reminder from United Nations climate envoy @GretaThunberg that the world will end in seventeen days due to the burning of fossil fuels.#ClimateEmergency #ClimateScam pic.twitter.com/x5ghoHuOrn
— Tony Heller (@TonyClimate) June 4, 2023
I’m trying to decide how to handle it if it goes badly for Greta’s side – you know. Like, we’re all still here?
I’d use “The Great Disappointment,” but The Millerites already stole that one. At least I have a couple weeks to think of something snappy.
In the meantime, how we lookin’?
Contrary to the hyperbole on the evening broadcast and the Weather Channel’s penchant for naming every breeze that goes by, we are not in bad shape at all.
Screencap @_ClimateCraze
Although the media has upped their graphics game to match the current CLIMATE EMERGENCY. Red makes everything more dramatic, so maybe the Luddites will pay attention to our shrieking now.
I saw that Jazz had done a piece on those poor Irish cows the climate loons want to slaughter – what happens to those touchy feely Kerry Gold commercials then?
The idea is not really catching on with the Irish themselves, either. “The Green Party’s got to go” is not a ringing endorsement for your reelection prospects.
Then I listened to Australian Alan Jones asking basically the same question.
Why? Why are we doing ANY of this?
Carbon dioxide is .04% of a percent of the atmosphere. That is over the whole world. Human beings create only 3% of that .04% over the whole world. In Australia human beings, manufacturers, factories, cows breaking wind, bush fires, are responsible for 1.3% of the 3% of the .04%. Is anyone seriously suggesting that we should stand the economy on its head, force up energy prices, damage businesses, jeopardize employment because .04% of the atmosphere is carbon dioxide?
Well, yes, they are, all over the world, and they want your cows dead, too. For Science™ that two papers as recently as a year and a half ago said was pretty much manufactured bunk.
Two important papers have recently been published that question the extent to which humans are causing global warming by burning fossil fuel and releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The works will of course be ignored by mainstream media outlets, but they represent further evidence that a more nuanced view of human-caused or anthropogenic warming is gaining traction among scientists, tired of working within the political constraints of ‘settled’ science.
In a paper to be published next month in the journal Health Physics, three physics professors led by Kenneth Skrable from the University of Massachusetts examine the atmospheric trail left by CO2 isotopes and conclude that the amount of CO2 released by fossil fuel burning between 1750 and 2018 was “much too low to be the cause of global warming”.
Three carbon isotopes are found in the atmosphere, 12C, 13C and 14C. The latter is produced by cosmic rays and is in a constant state of activity but the other two are contained in the gas entering the atmosphere. The carbon in living matter has a slightly higher proportion of 12C. Although only about 4% of CO2 entering the atmosphere every year is produced by human activity, it is said very slightly to alter the balance of the other atmospheric isotopes. As a result it is often used as ‘proof’ that rising CO2 levels are primarily the result of fossil fuel burning.
But the Massachusetts team found that claims of the dominance of anthropogenic fossil fuel in the isotope record have involved the ‘misuse’ of 12C and 13C statistics to validate such suggestions. They conclude that the assumption that the increase in atmospheric CO2 is dominated by or equal to the anthropogenic component is “not settled science”.
Furthermore, they go on to state: “Unsupported conclusions of the dominance of the anthropogenic fossil component of CO2 and concerns of its effect on climate change and global warming have severe potential societal implications that press the need for very costly remedial actions that may be misdirected, presently unnecessary, and ineffective in curbing global warming.”
Yet, here we are. And “ignored” by the media? They never saw the light of day. When you’re going as far as controlling people’s thermostats remotely, choosing their mode of transportation when you allow them to travel, and killing their livestock at will, oh, hay-yull, no! No one gets to read anything remotely like those papers from reputable actual scientists (without a ™). Narrative, narrative, narrative whilst crush any and all dissent.
The fellow in this video was fired by Al Gore for basically asking, “Where’s the beef evidence?”
It’s a cabal.
Speaking of mainstream media outlets taking their climate marching orders, I saw the neatest course offering from AFP, the European news bureau today. I am so tempted…
Sounds like me, doesn’t it?
I can see me now, introducing myself in my best Bond voice to all those Bond villains at Davos,
WELBORN – BEEGE WELBORN. CLIMATE DISINFORMATION DETECTIVE
Maybe I could take the course and even make up a Mary Poppins song about it.
I’ll clear it with Ed first.
But I’d better hurry – we only have two weeks left.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
How much pollution is released in burning a human body? Asking for some future friends.
I guess fire is cheaper than rope, but I like the cut of your jib.
Not really, but it was never about the money.
About 2,000,000 btu/hr worth just from the unit.
Results may vary, depending on, um, body “composition”
But I don’t think that’s what you meant, right?
Burning a human body can release various pollutants into the air, as the human body is composed of organic matter. When a body is burned, the process typically involves the combustion of fats, proteins, and other organic compounds present in the body. This combustion can result in the release of pollutants such as carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PM), and other potentially harmful substances.
The exact amount and composition of pollutants released during the burning of a human body can vary depending on several factors, including the temperature of the fire, the duration of the burning process, and the presence of any additional materials or substances used in the process.
It’s important to note that burning a human body outside of controlled and regulated crematoriums or other authorized facilities is illegal in most jurisdictions. These facilities have systems in place to minimize and control the release of pollutants, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations and standards.
If you have specific concerns or questions related to this topic, it is advisable to consult with professionals or authorities in your local area who are knowledgeable about regulations and protocols surrounding cremation or other related practices.
Not even a sarcasm tag at the end. LOL
Rhetorical was the intent but thanks for the info. Yes, crematoria are heavily regulated and are truly NOT a real source of any significant pollution in this day and age. Indeed, the toxicity of the body, the presence of mercury fillings, heavy metals from vaccines, and toxic waste leftovers from pharmaceutical metabolism surely make things worse that just the normal non-polluted bag of flesh.
Yep. DEP regulates every machine manufactured and installed w/yearly inspections.
1600-2000 degree secondary chamber temps. result in clear effluent. Not much survives to atmosphere.
Sounded like an AI answer and the name is AI Walt.
Remember Rush Limbaugh’s Al Gore Armageddon Clock?…In 2006, Al Gore said the world was supposed to end in 10 years so Rush set a countdown clock to hold Gore to this prediction, which proved to be yet another lie by globalists getting rich off the climate change scam.
https://dailycaller.com/2016/01/02/limbaughs-al-gore-armageddon-clock-about-to-hit-zero-after-ten-years
Not one of these doomsday predictions ever come true:
According to people like Gore and Greta, we’re always just a few years away from the end of world.
🙄
It has been 10 – 12 years for the past 30+ years and they keep booting it out another 10 years as the deadline nears.
NOT disagreeing, but you might check your math. LONGER!
Peace, L.
In the past, science was a method for expanding our knowledge base. Today, science is a belief system; a religion. The difference is that with the Scientific Method you may challenge any scientific theory at any time. With a belief system or religion, you may not challenge any of its beliefs. It’s time to eradicate the religion of science and reintroduce the Scientific Method.
The local Sinclair Broadcasting affiliate (NBC) announced this morning that the Artic will be ice-free (again!) by 2030.
NBC, Leading With Lies since June 19, 1926.
Greta says”that the world will end in seventeen days due to the burning of fossil fuels”.
Prepper Duck says”Nuke the gay/baby whales”.
It’s all a matter of perspective.
Personally I am busy preparing for the next ice age, which is overdue by historical data. I am giving the current warm period until January, then the big chill hits. If you don’t have your igloo built and a supply of blubber by
then, I doubt you will make it.
Greta is in real peril.
No, no, no! SAVE those big fat funky whales. KILL the seals!
Greta may be correct. Looks like it may already be starting.
?ve=1&tl=1
Oh darn, CONgress might choke to death………
I doubt we get that lucky.
has that ignorant cunt died yet?
Why not combine climate alarmism with tyranny story book hours?
Just add some drag queen dancers exposing their genitals and you have a winner!
For the believer in Jesus Christ, climate change is no different than telling us aliens are going to invade.
Aliens are already invading, mostly at the southern border, but from the north too!
Over/under on her gender reassignment surgery?
You know it’s coming.
I’m liking her odds!
Who promoted that rotten little twat to Oracle of Delphi status? I didn’t get that memo.
she is autistic with a big mouth.
“14 Days To ‘Midnight’
Think about that. She needs a new clock, at least.