“We are witnessing the final downfall of the West.” Emmanuel Todd.
Emmanuel Todd is a prominent and brilliant French intellectual: a historian, a demographer, and an anthropologist. He is one of France’s last independent thinkers, a category that has become a rarity… while we… pic.twitter.com/IQ4NPGalAY
— Emmanuel Hemmerlé (@HanShanEH) January 14, 2024
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
This jackass couldn’t be more wrong. The fall of the West began with Protestantism which not only unleashed usury i.e. debt slavery( muh capitalism) upon the entire world, but gave us the chozenite worship aka dispensationalism which has lead to perpetual war for the fun of killing Christians and profit. You might call it a blood libel revenge plus profit.
The Reformation was a money-lender psyop which broke the unity of the Church and unleashed the demon of tens of thousand of blasphemous interpretations of the Holy Word, according to muh feels…and here we are at the end of the West. Thank a dimwitted Protestant.
Torquemada did nothing wrong.
A Catholic predicted this.
One of the most important history books you will ever read.
Philip II: (1527-1598)
William Thomas Walsh
“It did not occur to the kings that if the money-lenders ever got
power enough, if they ever got from under the public-spirited
repression of the Church, they would destroy their own masters.
Kings were not generally as far-sighted as money-changers, and
much less so than priests. This is not to deny that clerics sometimes
condoned usury and profited by it, or that some kings repressed it.
Human affairs are never so simple as that. But there was a line of
cleavage: the Church on one side hostile to usury, the kings
compelled to make use of it on the other.
As the moral influence of the Church was weakened in the
political and economic spheres, in consequence of a series of
calamities for which she was not to blame—the Black Death, the
papal exile at Avignon, the Great Schism, the return of paganism
with the Renaissance—usury began to accumulate wealth and to
organize its influence. With canny insight it threw its influence, by
and large, against the power of Church and State, supporting now
one, now the other, until, by a see-saw process, it succeeded in
weakening both.
It early identified itself with the forces of heresy in religion and
liberalism in politics, until Protestantism at last gave money-lending a certificate of respectability, until a Lord Bacon could write a serious defense of it, and Harrison (in Holinshed) must chronicle the capitulation of the new Protestant England to “usury, a trade brought in by the Jews, but now perfectly practised almost by every
Christian, and so commonly that he is accompted but for a fool that
doth lend his money for nothing.”5 ”
https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=1889B28539B7506D637C3D5605BFD2A0
So basically, you are saying capitalism is the root of all evil.
Got it.
Basically, I’m saying that capitalism is just another Satanic distraction from your God given purpose here on earth. Dig a little deeper.
“I do not believe that this primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact. For nature and constitution and vision divide us from all of you forever . . . I have no doubt that when Germany and England and America will long have lost their present identity or name or purpose, we shall still be strong in ours . . . We have joined your capitalistic world in deliberate emulation and rivalry: yet Jewish socialism and Jewish socialists are the banner bearers of the world’s “armies of liberation.” . . . But you feel our disruptive difference most keenly, most resentfully, in our deliberate efforts to change your social system. Seen in the dazzling lights of your desires and needs our ideal is repellently morose . . . Because your chief institution is the social structure itself, it is in this that we are most manifestly destroyers. We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands.”
You Gentiles
By Samuel, Maurice, 1895-1972
https://archive.org/details/YouGentiles
“Untouched by the breath of God, unrestricted by human conscience, both capitalism and socialism are repulsive.” — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Stop falling for that bullshit (from both nihilists from the right, and leftist ‘fighters’ against it), that capitalism is a philosophy which a whole society can be based on.
It’s not, capitalism is just an economic framework, and without a separate, overarching moral framework (Christianity might be a good choice) capitalism goes nowhere.
Whatever capitalism is or isn’t, it was coined by Karl Marx.
Too many short bus riders imagine this economic system was created for their benefit. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
Under the freedom of trade the whole severity of the laws of political economy will be applied to the working classes. Is that to say that we are against Free Trade? No, we are for Free Trade, because by Free Trade all economical laws, with their most astounding contradictions, will act upon a larger scale, upon a greater extent of territory, upon the territory of the whole earth; and because from the uniting of all these contradictions into a single group, where they stand face to face, will result the struggle which will itself eventuate in the emancipation of the proletarians.
Engels, To Free Trade Congress at Brussels (1847)
“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control. … Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”
~ Larry P. McDonald
U.S. Congressman, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets
in “Introduction” to The Rockefeller File, by Gary Allen (1975)
https://archive.org/details/TheRockefellerFile
Flash bitches and cries like a little girl and hides behind his “god” , but he still lives here. Go somewhere that it’s better you fucking coward. You don’t even know where it’s better do you?
Oh… you do? THEN GO THERE.
All your copy/paste interweb bullshit is not going to change anyone’s mind so why waste time here? GO WHERE IT’S BETTER or STFU !
Bingo. Stop using the pejorative “Capitalism”. It is free market trade. It is what happens when groups of people each with different talents, materials and needs get together.
No. Basically he just admitted to being a fucking Catholic. That’s what I got out of it.
Flash thinks god put every human on this earth to fulfill some mysterious purpose that he won’t share. I’m assuming that whatever that purpose is, would be for the betterment of mankind.
How has that been working out? Humans are the problem. Who created humans? Who created all the systems and religions and “isms”? Humans.
Flash constantly lashes out and shows nothing but hatred, anger (which is rooted in fear) and intolerance. How very Christian.
Why would somebody who KNOWS he is going to heaven when he dies and could save others by spreading the gospel by showing love and tolerance(like Jesus) be this way?
Flash…”God gives us a choice to be good or evil”.
Okay, so it’s contest or some kind of amusement for him to wager on with Satan?
I’ll take evil assholes for the majority and give you ten points.
Now you understand the mind of God. You are indeed a special creation.
No one is more special than you, buddy.
Tolerance is not a Christian virtue. If you weren’t retarded you would understand that . Tolerance of evil has done more to suppress freedom than any good it has ever done.
“Fucking Catholic” My how Christian of you Fedbot. FWIW, I lean more towards the Eastern Orthodox side, but I’ve conversed with a few Catholics and find them to have a better grasp of understanding scripture, than all ya’ll Israel worshipping EvangiBoomerRaptureTards combined… so yes, I would attend a Catholic Church before a heretical Fundy Church.
In the future, try to focus more on Christ and less on non- scriptural rapture/Chozenite nonsense. You’ll be in a better place for eternity. Bet on it.
I have yet to find anyone better at explaining scripture than
Father Spyridon. He is a treasure.
Looks like a biker that listens to Metallica to me.
If he doesn’t convince you, he’ll push your face in.
You haven’t heard John MacArthur then.
There is no heresy greater than dispensationalism .It is in fact blasphemy .Send John MacArthur another check to continue his ministry of lies.
Any real Christian is going to have deeper and more thorough Biblical knowledge than the average Evangeliboomer. The Lutheran Divine Service is scripture from beginning to end, for example.
That brother you are always linking irks me, not because he is wrong (he usually is correct), but because he rarely uses scripture, which isn’t very Biblical.
The purpose of the teacher is to explain, and not further confuse.
That was exactly my point.
I, by far, prefer capitalism to any other form of economy I have seen in my lifetime.
Capitalism serves those who create the capital. They say what is and ain’t capital and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it. You’re debt money slave like all the rest, but if pretending you’re being served floats your boat, by all means, imagine on.
You pretend like your are not intimately involved with the “system” like the rest of us, even if we don’t like it.
You have never used debt to buy anything or pay taxes or voted or used anything that was built or created that was funded by taxes? Please…..
Mr. internet big talker…..you are a hypocrite and your god knows it.
Will you be able to copy/paste wherever you go when you die? If not, how will you entertain yourself?
The difference between you and me is I understand the inevitable consequences of debt based money, but unlike like you, I refuse to worship it…may the copy and paste gods be with you, bruh.
“Capitalism is a value-decoding machine. Its objective is to completely decode society of any values that impede the free flows of capital, rendering everything and everyone a de facto commodity, transforming societies into markets. It can adapt to totalitarianism and other varieties of despotism when necessary, but left to its own devices, or … you know, granted dominion over the entire Earth, and every creeping thing that creeps upon it, it sets about decoding and destabilizing values, destabilizing value and meaning itself, until, ultimately, everything means anything, or nothing, or whatever the market determines it means or is worth at any given moment.”
CJ Hopkins : The War On Reality (Revisited)
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/hopkins-war-reality-revisited
The rules were precise and invariable. Money attracted money, accumulating always in the same places, going by preference to the scoundrelly and the mediocre. When, by an inscrutable exception, it heaped up in the coffers of a rich man who was not a miser nor a murderer, it stood idle, incapable of resolving itself into a force for good, however charitable the hands which fain would administer it. One would say it was angry at having got into the wrong box and avenged itself by going into voluntary paralysis when possessed by one who was neither a sharper nor an ass.
It acted still more strangely when by some extraordinary chance it strayed into the home of a poor man. Immediately it defiled the clean, debauched the chaste, and, acting simultaneously on the body and the soul, it insinuated into its possessor a base selfishness, an ignoble pride; it suggested that he spend for himself alone; it made the humble man a boor, the generous man a skinflint. In one second it changed every habit, revolutionized every idea, metamorphosed the most deeply rooted passions.
It was the instigator and vigilant accomplice of all the important sins. If it permitted one of its detainers to forget himself and bestow a boon it awakened hatred in the recipient, it replaced avarice with ingratitude and re-established equilibrium so that the account might balance and not one sin of commission be wanting.
But it reached its real height of monstrosity when, concealing its identity under an assumed name, it entitled itself capital. Then its action was not limited to individual incitation to theft and murder but extended to the entire human race. With one word capital decided monopolies, erected banks, cornered necessities, and, if it wished, caused thousands of human beings to starve to death.
And it grew and begot itself while slumbering in a safe, and the Two Worlds adored it on bended knee, dying of desire before it as before a God.
”
— J.-K. Huysmans, Là-Bas
Capitalism by definition is based on “debt money”?
You should check your premises.
For the masses , yes…for the elite creators, no.
capitalism (n.)
1854, “condition of having capital;” from capital (n.1) + -ism. The meaning “political/economic system which encourages capitalists” is recorded from 1872 and originally was used disparagingly by socialists. The meaning “concentration of capital in the hands of a few; the power or influence of large capital” is from 1877.
[The term capital] made its first appearance in medieval Latin as an adjective capitalis (from caput, head) modifying the word pars, to designate the principal sum of a money loan. The principal part of a loan was contrasted with the “usury”—later called interest—the payment made to the lender in addition to the return of the sum lent. This usage, unknown to classical Latin, had become common by the thirteenth century and possibly had begun as early as 1100 A.D., in the first chartered towns of Europe. [Frank A. Fetter, “Reformulation of the Concepts of Capital and Income in Economics and Accounting,” 1937, in “Capital, Interest, & Rent,” 1977]
https://www.etymonline.com/word/capitalism
Inasmuch as one cannot have rapturetardation sans the two gospels/Chozenites inheriting the earth , one cannot have capitalism without usury. The two are joined at the hip.
Utopia of Usurers
G. K. Chesterton, Aidan Mackey
An engaging work sure to appeal to both scholars and students for the depth of its thought and the freshness of its claims, this is a two-part book by one of the 20th century’s greatest writers. The first part is a coherent analysis of the theory, effects, and claims of capitalism. The second is a lengthy collection of articles from Chesterton’s vast journalistic output. The author challenges the fundamental tenets of capitalism without favoring socialism or Marxism by providing a philosophical analysis of the pitfalls, drawbacks, and falsehoods regarding capitalism and its inevitability. This is must reading for any serious investigation into anti-capitalist thought. It is also an exemplary text of how Christian principles and thinking apply to the socioeconomic world.
https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=C5842C5F0665B2F2C9BE720F309C190E
“The new community which the capitalists are now constructing will be a very complete and absolute community; and one which will tolerate nothing really independent of itself.”
― G.K. Chesterton, Utopia of Usurers
“It cannot be too often repeated that what destroyed the Family in the modern world was Capitalism. No doubt it might have been Communism, if Communism had ever had a chance, outside that semi-Mongolian wilderness where it actually flourishes. But, so far as we are concerned, what has broken up households and encouraged divorces, and treated the old domestic virtues with more and more open contempt, is the epoch and Power of Capitalism. It is Capitalism that has forced a moral feud and a commercial competition between the sexes; that has destroyed the influence of the parent in favour of the influence of the employer; that has driven men from their homes to look for jobs; that has forced them to live near their factories or their firms instead of near their families; and, above all, that has encouraged, for commercial reasons, a parade of publicity and garish novelty, which is in its nature the death of all that was called dignity and modesty by our mothers and fathers.”
― G.K. Chesterton
Nice pile of quotes.
And you believe all that?
I believe you don’t know capitalism from your sock puppet boyfriend. Prove me wrong.
flash, yer a fuckin moron. You have no idea who I am or what I am about. I have my own business and absolutely no debt, no credit cards, no bank account, Texas land, faith and peace of mind.
And I doubt I could have any of that under any other economic system ever devised. So, yeah, I am all about Capitalism.
Sit down and shut the fuck up.
It ain’t all about you, Dug. There are entire countries destroyed via the power of capital in a few hands and you’re next. Try to look beyond your fat beer belly.
“There are entire countries destroyed via the power of capital”
Yer starting to sound communist, dude. Even our poor have more than the “middle class” of other nations.
No beer belly. I don’t drink. Just an old country boy.
Do you believe government thugs work for free, Dug?
flash is more right than wrong. We can never have a free market with a central bank + fiat.
Capitalism is a Marxist term that we have foolishly agreed to use. Being able to invest one’s money in various places and enterprises is an element of freedom, but capital shouldn’t be an end to itself. What we should want – and what has produced the prosperity you’ve witnessed – is free markets. At this point, we have powerful “Capital”, but no free markets – or, hardly any free market for major things. Media is consolidated, social media companies effectively cancel anyone who disagrees with the narrative. Arms manufacturers buy politicians and take billions in government largesse to produce small amounts of ineffective weaponry. That last part is an unexpected good thing, as it reduces America’s ability to push other countries around. And don’t even get me started on healthcare and health insurance.
In economics, capital can be defined as the physical or financial resources used to produce value in an economy. The tangible, physical, part of capital still exists, but there is no means of accurate price discovery because the financial part now is just binary code.
“It’s worth whatever somebody will pay for it” only works now because the “money” borrowed to buy it is fake and the asset bought with it is now an asset.
Fractional reserve banking will be the death of capitalism.
Nope, lack of morals will be the death of capitalism.
m for moron: Seriously? That’s like saying the leading cause of death is life. No shit Sherlock.
Sorry I got a little too specific for you, deep thinker.
Please enlighten us with more of your existential wisdom!
Seriously, moran? Give us some more over-specific bullshit of yours, like the leading cause of death is cells stopping to work. Or ‘fractional reserve banking’ -which in itself doesn’t even include fiat currency– is the cause of everything.
That will sure help to steer the ship in the right direction!
A market controlled by debt based capital can never be free. Those without capital have no way of entering, much less competing.
Post WWI Germany bartered itself out of hyper-inflation.
“ World War II ended the “depression.” The same Bankers who in the early 30’s had no loans for peacetime houses,food and clothing, suddenly had unlimited billions to lend for Army barracks, K-rations and uniforms! A nation that in 1934 couldn’t produce food for sale, suddenly could produce bombs to send free to Germany and Japan!… Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 and on, accounting for its startling rise from the depression to a world power in 5 years. Germany financed its entire government and war operation from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt, and it took the whole Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the
German power over Europe and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers. Such history of money does not even appear in the textbooks of public (government) schools today. ”
Sheldon Emry
Billions For Bankers, Debts for the People
https://archive.org/details/Billions20for20the20bankers
I don’t disagree about the disproportionate wealth in the hands of a few. But how do you rectify it? War again? End the Fed?
What’s the plan, Stan
Outside of Divine Intervention, I haven’t a clue, but few shure’ it won’t be capital. The trillions in capital already created has proven that absolutely. I’d be willing to give Christian Nationalism a go, but I don’t see that happening, ever. We’re either our brothers keeper’s or we’re not and if not, then it’s everyman for himself…and the latter is where capitalism has delivered us today. Goodluck with that.
You believe [true] capital can be created out of thin air? 😂 🤣
You’re still so stuck in the Western lies, you don’t even realize it any more!
Are we talking about [true] capital or the currency you used to pay your crack habit with?
You imagination not withstanding, the capital i.e. monies that funds the global economy is backed by nothing.
We get it, bubba…nevertheless real value can still be bought with fiat capital….as of now, but as we’ve seen throughout history , that is subject to change.
Your crack-induced imagination notwithstanding, capital -in the original meaning- can only be built by true savings [i.e. the difference between your production and your consumption] – which rules out any debt-based crap.
ha ha ha …where’d you pull that definition from…your over-stretched crack can ?
capitalism
noun
cap·i·tal·ism ˈka-pə-tə-ˌliz-əm ˈkap-tə-
: an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market
“When I say “Capitalism,” I commonly mean something that may be stated thus: “That economic condition in which there is a class of capitalists, roughly recognizable and relatively small, in whose possession so much of the capital is concentrated as to necessitate a very large majority of the citizens serving those capitalists for a wage.” This particular state of things can and does exist, and we must have some word for it, and some way of discussing it. But this is undoubtedly a very bad word, because it is used by other people to mean quite other things. Some people seem to mean merely private property. Others suppose that capitalism must mean anything involving the use of capital.”
GK Chesterton The Outline of Sanity
Muaaahaaahahaha!
Let’s make this a “class” thingy again, defining the classes in any way I want to – that will surely sort everything out!! 😂 🤣
Flash,
We can’t deny that Protestantism arose because Catholic prelates had given such grave scandal. The current antipope continues that tradition. Savonarola called it out – although he remained Catholic to the end.
“in all things God works for good for those who love Him, who have been called according to His purpose”. Romans 8:28
“no one can say, ‘Jesus is Lord’ except by the Holy Spirit”. 1 Cor 12:3
Not to mention how many serious doctrinal errors Rome has always had because they refuse to learn Biblical languages.
Protestantism arose because the money-lenders fomented a color revolution against the Church, using well funded militias to attack, rape and murder Catholics , while the spoils of Catholic Church property was divided up among the money lenders. It didn’t become Protestant community property either, but private estates for the well heeled thieves. Schools were closed and the tens of thousands of people who lived, worked the land and fed their families were turned out to beg in the streets. Rape, murder, pillage, fire, homelessness and mass starvation was and is the fruit of Protestant tree.
I am not Catholic, nor have ever been, but I’ve read enough history to understand that the Reformation did not arise out of thin air. It was stoked by money-lender wealth and via their control of the printing press. Same as now…money and press are their two most powerful weapons.
Read this book and then come back and say , the Church was attacked and shattered due to ” indulgences”. I dare you.
https://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=1889B28539B7506D637C3D5605BFD2A0
Ok this post above was intriguing…book ordered…expensive…but I will comment back in a couple of weeks or so…bookmark me…
You should do a book report.
God sent the Reformation, because Rome would not repent of its idolatry.
If you’re saying that all Catholics go to hell due to divine judgment then you are no better a Christian than the twisted Chozenite worshipping rapturetards.
Now tell us about the ‘enlightenment.’
https://vatican.com/The-Vatican-Bank/
‘The Vatican Bank is different from many other ordinary banks. The bank does not lend money, and it does not make direct investments. The bank receives money as deposits and then invests it in government bonds, some corporate bonds and in the inter-banking market where it deposit with other banks for a slightly higher interest rate than it receives. The bank contributes 55 million euros to the Vatican budget, making it one of its most crucial economic pillars’
So…it lends to governments expecting interest/increase . Hmm.
Not sure how that squares with ‘ Lev 25:37
Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.’
Maybe one of those men with funny hats could explain it to me..
Humanity is fallen and much of what is preached, including the Protestant , is rarely practiced. Read some Church history before spewing inane gibberish.
I wonder what corporations they invest in as they buy their bonds(loan them credit ‘debt based currency units’)? And I wonder what nations owe them interest on the loans they originated by buying their bonds? I remember a story about moneychangers when I read ‘inter-banking market where it deposits with other banks for a slightly higher interest rate’.
The dispensational heresy was almost 300 years after the reformation. And Lutherans are nothing like that hot mess branch called Calvinism (or Reformed, now).
Wasn’t Rome carving out usury exemptions for Jews all along? Was Charlemagne Protestant?
All of you internecine Christians would do well to study 1st John and who it is he is addressing and talking about.
Protestantism was birthed in degenerate heresy and soon as they tired of murdering Catholics , they began murdering other sects, by drowning, burning and beheading. Lovely lot, those guys.
There are literally thousands of crazy protestant stories…do some research.
“The 25-year-old John of Leiden was subsequently recognized as Matthys’ religious and political successor, justifying his authority and actions by claiming visions from heaven. His authority grew until eventually he proclaimed himself the successor of David and adopted royal regalia, honors, and absolute power in the new “Zion”. There were now in the town at least three times as many women of marriageable age as men, so he made polygamy compulsory,[3] and he himself took sixteen wives. (John is said to have beheaded Elisabeth Wandscherer in the marketplace for refusing to marry him, though this act might have been falsely attributed to him after his death.) Meanwhile, most of the residents of Münster were starving as a result of the year-long siege.
After lengthy resistance, the city was taken by the besiegers on June 24, 1535, and John of Leiden and several other prominent Anabaptist leaders were captured and imprisoned. In January 1536, John of Leiden, Bernhard Knipperdolling and one more prominent follower, Bernhard Krechting, were tortured and executed in the marketplace of Münster. Their bodies were exhibited in cages which hung from the steeple of St. Lambert’s Church. The bones were removed later, but the cages hang there still.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnster_rebellion
But I can find you thousands of Roman crazy stories, as well. Did it escape you that the OT and NT, aside from being about Jesus Christ, are once long series of “the church” sliding into error, heresy, and apostacy? Did you miss where Jesus said he is not returning before the Great Apostacy (often translated rebellion) takes place within the church?
That is not to say that Protestants are necessarily those things, but if they are, Rome was those things first at one point in time or another.
There will always be a faithful remnant until they are taken up and this world is no more.
There is no human organization, spiritual, commercial or political that is beyond corruption. I’m saying everything good the Catholic church built over a period of 1200 years has been systematically torn down by Protestants, in just over 500 years, in their incessant obsession of re-interpreting the word of God.
Didn’t mean to post that twice, the page crashed when I hit the button the first time.
Not that you have the desire or ability to comprehend (perhaps someone here does) but dispensationalism does not equal “Jew worship” and to say such a thing is purely ignorant. Certain men might worship the Jew but a system of study does not. Proper study of scripture reveals Gods varied dealings with mankind over time. While God does not change, the ways in which He deals with mankind does. The very existence of a “new” testament replacing the “old” demonstrates and proves the concept. That is the essence of dispensational study, its focus upon God and His doings, not man.
A dispensational look at the Bible from start to finish.
Been there, done that, heretic.
Every EvangiBoomerRaptureTard I know adheres to God bless those who bless Israel, never taking into account who Israel might be or John 14:6. I reject the fake name Jew, but all dispensationalist put the fake nation Israel on a pedestal, while deliberately ignore the teaching of Christ.
Dispensationalism is Satan introducing confusion into the word of God.
You couldn’t be more wrong as usual. You are entitled to your ignorance…
1 Corinthians 14:38 KJB… “But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.”
Project much, bruh?
This is the definition of irony.
Too true, brother.
There is absolutely no way to hold dispensational views and dodge the Jew worship accusation. It is simply not possible. Dispensationalism necessarily elevates Jews above Jesus Christ Himself.
I think there is a strong argument for dispensationalism being outside the faith, but people more sensitive to not wanting to err in another direction graciously describe it as error.
Dispensationalism has chozenite fingerprints all over it… i.e. two gospels , one for Gentiles and one for chozenites , which allow for the Christians to be wafted off to heaven leaving a messiah to lead the Chozenites in victory against and subsequently enslavement of all goyim left behind. It is merely a tool to use, abuse and eventually destroy the Christian people and EvangiBoomerRaptureTards are all in, which is why I despise their nonsense. They are aiding Satan in corrupting God’s word, thus they become the enemy of Christ.
I’m only halfway though, but so far a pretty good discussion on the subject .
I’m holding that very view right now so your opinion is in error. I am a mid-Acts dispensationalist and believe, at the same time, that todays Israel is the synagogue of satan.
Congratulations k31, this is the most idiotic statement ever to be made about dispensational Bible study.
Every rule has the exception.
Thank you flash, but I’m not all that exceptional.
luther had the good sense to know that jews are cancer.
Luther only adopted that opinion after the Chozenites pissed in his porridge once they had used his glorious reformation to rape, rob and pillage the church , setting themselves of nicely on grand estates. ….and all Luther got for his degeneracy was a sloppy nun and a couple barrels of stale ale.
Modern Lutherans apologizing for that work do not understand how badly Luther let himself be used by Jewry. They are an utterly wicked people.
I think that’s a shameful way to talk about Martin Luther and his wife, btw.
It’s a historical fact. Luther was a notorious drunk and a corrupted nuns whom had taken vows to God as did Martin Luther. The long term damage he and radical ilk have done to the Christian church leave me with zero respect for the man and his wife of dubious lineage.
I am prone to discount anything or anybody French, but this guy pretty much nails it.
I would also add that the less people have to struggle to survive and the more leisure time they have, they will become, lazy, narcissistic, entitled and eventually find ways to fuck things up or just let things and situations, go to hell, by neglect.
All of the accumulated knowledge over time and look where we are now, the same shit over and over and round and round…..nothing ever changes, even with all this “technology!”
Humans ain’t all that and all of history proves it.
Big, giant, perpetual, dick swinging contest that’s coming to an end soon, one way or another.
Yeah, but won’t it be grand to be there and witness when all their dicks just fall off?
“Humans ain’t all that”
Hell, a majority ain’t even all there.
Imma’ though voting oar harder. Let the fire cleanse…..
Excellent video.
I agree, I would only add the American ruling class is the State, the State has deemed itself to be our religion. (IMHO the State has no morals, only laws that apply when the State says they apply.)
Even her royal highness Michelle Obama recently talked about how great Government is and what it does for us.
His royal highness…FIFY.
Totally unrelated to the fall of the West is his hat tip to the Progressive moral orthodoxy, culled from the bowls of curated revisionist history…
I’m just a midwit so I miss the sort of academic nuance, as the NPR fags call it, that the brilliant ones so often employ to assert a thesis that simultaneously relies upon several of the favored constructions of godless post-modernism while also indicting the antecedents of post-modern thought without any irony.
Or maybe that’s just a French thing. Like that cocktail of sour grape passive-aggressive elitism bittered with distilled post-empire resentment chilled with the icy duality of peak ethnocentrism served in all the finest Parisian cafes by an African waiter. If it weren’t for you pesky Americans!
He’s right about the end though.
That was some much appreciated and well delivered elitist snark right there, D.V.
I enjoyed it as well.
Pretty sure you were born looking that way.
“Physiognomy bats first” – HSF
Thanks, Fedbot. I’ll take that as a compliment.
You would.
His daughter/son must be dating an African hence the realisation.
“ a prominent and brilliant French intellectual: a historian, a demographer, and an anthropologist”
He’s a frenchie