Guest Post by Alex Krainer
[Originally published on Alex Krainer’s Substack] Earlier this month I wrote about the Robert v. Austin case filed by a legal team comprising Andrew L. Schlafly, Todd Callender, David Wilson and Lisa McGee (link to article: C0VlD l9 hoax goes to court). The case was profoundly important because it confronted the judiciary with questions that cut to the core of liberty and human dignity. The courts would have to hear evidence and rule about whether individuals who received C19 shots could be regarded as chattel property with no human or constitutional rights.
Petition denied
The question is profoundly chilling and it may seem surreal. One might feel inclined to disregard it as crazy talk, but the law is far from reassuring in this respect. According to the 2013 Supreme Court ruling in the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., gene modified organisms may legally be regarded as synthetic species. Gene modification renders such organisms property of patent holders who own the intellectual property rights over the newly synthesized genes. The implication of that decision is that genetically modified humans could be the property of MRNA technology patent holders.
Continue reading “The system is failing. We’re on our own.”
