Tag: Fucked up!
Psychological Castration
Via Goodbye America (in a photo)
This boy will grow up to be either a huge homo SJW or the greatest womanizer the world has ever seen.
It’s “for the children”
Via Goodbye America (in a photo)
How to raise a school shooter.
Ethan Wilwert’s mother says her 8-year-old son’s detractors are wrong—not only does he look great made up, we should accept our children for who they are. […]
It’s clear from the photo how talented and happy Ethan is: Dramatic eyebrows, smoky shades of blue around his eyes, and richly plum lips in a pout that reveals just a hint of smile. There is joy in his fabulous, fierce expression. […]
“This kid will grow up to be well-adjusted, self-actualized, and will literally give not one f**k to the remaining insecure misogynists in our culture who will likely toss out insults at this kid from a place of cowardly anonymity,” wrote one online commentator in response to the story.
F YOU DAD.
Ethan’s father is a graphic designer, and while he and Wilwert are no longer together…
Looks like DAD got the jump on that F YOU.
Child psychology experts endorse Wilwert’s encouraging, open-minded parenting.
(((child psychology experts))) Let me tell you about my genderfluidity-accepting mother…. BLAM!
WTF MUSLIM STORY OF THE DAY
Guest Post by
The Death of Freedom
I’m not fan of organized religion of any kind but I’m huge fan of freedom. Freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of association, economic freedom and private property rights. Basically any freedom that doesn’t involve theft of or harm to others and/or their private property, I support. Clearly western world no longer offers any type of real freedom and it has gone completely insane, but in even today’s world where articles in The Onion are often more believable than those in the New York Times, rarely do we an example that demonstrates so clearly and concisely the depths to which western civilization has sunk.
Only in a world run by complete and total lunatics can muslims refuse to deliver beer for religious reasons and win a $240,000 award in court, while a Catholic couple is fined $13,000 for refusing to host a gay wedding on their own private property for their own religious reasons. How much further can this insanity go? Isn’t it time for open revolt yet?
Muslim truck drivers refuse to deliver beer, win $240,000 lawsuit
Star Transport will pay $240,000 to two Muslim employees who were fired for refusing to deliver alcohol, citing their religious beliefs.
An Illinois jury awarded $240,000 in damages and back pay to two former truck drivers who claimed religious discrimination when they were fired in 2009 after refusing to make beer deliveries.
Time To Wake Up
This is NOT a photoshop pic.
Four current stories of our enslavement:
1) Florida man ordered to keep BBQ smell from leaving his yard.
“I can smell it again right now, but I’m on your property,” Graham tells the group. “You’re allowed to have it smell on your property, so that doesn’t count, but when I’m on the street, that’s when it counts.” Graham goes on to suggest that the group move their BBQ on a regular basis in conjunction with wind patterns or purchase a specialized version designed to minimize smoke.
2)
Story here —> http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/backyard-chickens-must-be-registered-in-north-carolina-07262015
CLARIFYING THE MIDDLE EAST POLITICAL SITUATION
America’s non-banks —- The anointed
Another wonderful addition to the TBTF list – and we don’t even know haw many public companies are on the list or who they are!
This will be guaranteed to throw yet more money printing/asset fudging and sucking up productive funds to kick the can of break the bastards up and liquidate then when fail just a few more feet down the ditch of insolvency.
I hate it….
The number of too-big-to-fail institutions gets bigger
Jun 8th 2013 | New York |Courtesy of the Economist
ALTHOUGH the names on the list are supposed to be secret AIG and Prudential, two insurers, this week confirmed they are on it. So too did GE Capital, the conglomerate’s financial arm. These firms, and perhaps others, have joined America’s largest banks and clearinghouses in being designated “systemically important financial institutions” (SIFIs) by the new Financial Stability Oversight Council, a regulatory watchdog [ posters’ note: Another committee the help us out]. What that means in practice is that because they are thought to be significant enough to blow up America’s economy, they should get special attention.
An appeals process against being labelled a SIFI will last for 30 days, but discussions have been going on for years so it is hard to believe minds will be swayed now. The immediate consequence is that the firms will be regulated by the Fed [ poster’s note: Now this is going to be a great addition to the Fed’s obnoxious powers, isn’t it!]
and subjected to tougher capital and operational requirements. Jack Lew, the treasury secretary, said the designations would “protect taxpayers, reduce risk in the financial system, and promote financial stability.” [poster’s note: Count on it doing the exact opposite.]
Others are less enthusiastic. “This is a catastrophe,” says Peter Wallison, a fellow of the American Enterprise Institute, a think-tank, and a former White House counsel. Putting these institutions under the thumb of the Fed will inevitably undermine their ability to innovate, he argues. And joining the group of entities perceived to be too big to fail means they will enjoy an implicit government guarantee. That will put them at a funding advantage against smaller companies, he says, and imply that their products are government-backed, a huge help for insurers in particular.
Firms themselves appear to have mixed feelings about the SIFI label. AIG seems to approve; MetLife, an insurer that has not been designated, thinks that the higher capital requirements it brings could undermine the viability of some products. Much depends on whether SIFIs are now perceived to have an implicit guarantee, and on whether that can be monitised. It also matters how many other firms are designated SIFIs. Lots of financial firms in America are large: there are rumblings about money-market funds, asset managers and private-equity firms. Risk can move around the financial system. The question today is which firms should be on the list. Eventually it might be which to leave off.