Is It Really All Our Fault?

Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan

Is It Really All Our Fault?

As Middle America rises in rage against “fast track” and the mammoth Obamatrade deal known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, The Wall Street Journal has located the source of the malady.

Last Monday’s lead editorial began:

“Here we go again. In the 1990s Pat Buchanan launched a civil war within the Republican Party on a platform targeting immigration and trade. Some claimed Pitchfork Pat was the future of the GOP, though in the end he mainly contributed to its presidential defeats.”

But, woe is us, “the GOP’s Buchanan wing is making a comeback.”

Now it is true that, while Nixon and Reagan won 49-state landslides and gave the GOP five victories in six presidential contests, the party has fallen upon hard times. Only once since 1988 has a Republican presidential nominee won the popular vote.

But was this caused by following this writer’s counsel? Or by the GOP listening to the deceptions of its Davos-Doha-Journal wing?

In the 1990s, this writer and allies in both parties fought NAFTA, GATT and MFN for China. The Journal and GOP establishment ran with Bill and Hillary and globalization. And the fruits of their victory?

Between 2000 and 2010, 55,000 U.S. factories closed and 5 million to 6 million manufacturing jobs disappeared. Columnist Terry Jeffrey writes that, since 1979, the year of maximum U.S. manufacturing employment, “The number of jobs in manufacturing has declined by 7,231,000 — or 37 percent.”

Does the Journal regard this gutting of the greatest industrial base the world had ever seen, which gave America an independence no republic had ever known, an acceptable price of its New World Order?

Beginning in 1991, traveling the country and visiting plant after plant that was shutting down or moving to Asia or Mexico, some of us warned that this economic treason against America’s workers would bring about political retribution. And so it came to pass.

Since 1988, a free-trade Republican Party has not once won Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois or Wisconsin in a presidential election. Ohio, the other great Midwest industrial state, is tipping. The Reagan Democrats are gone. Who cast them aside? You or us?

Since the early 1990s, we have run $3 billion to $4 billion in trade deficits with China. Last year’s was $325 billion, or twice China’s defense budget. Are not all those factories, jobs, investment capital and consumer dollars pouring into China a reason why Beijing has been able to build mighty air and naval fleets, claim sovereignty over the South and East China seas, fortify reefs 1,000 miles south of Hainan Island, and tell the U.S.

Navy to back off?

The Journal accuses us of being anti-growth. But as trade surpluses add to a nation’s GDP, trade deficits subtract from it. Does the Journal think our $11 trillion in trade deficits since 1992 represents a pro-growth policy?

On immigration, this writer did campaign on securing the border in 1991-92, when there were 3 million illegal immigrants in the United States.

But the Bush Republicans refused to seal the border.

Now there are 11 million to 12 million illegal immigrants and the issue is tearing the party apart. Now everybody is for “secure borders.”

We did urge a “moratorium” on legal immigration, such as America had from 1924 to 1965, to assimilate and Americanize the millions who had come. The Journal Republicans called that xenophobia.

Since then, tens of millions of immigrants, here legally and illegally, mostly from the Third World, have arrived. Economically, they consume more in tax dollars than they contribute.

Politically, most belong to ethnic groups that vote between 70 and 90 percent Democratic. Their children will bury the GOP.

Consider California, which voted for Nixon all five times he was on a national ticket and for Reagan in landslides all four times he ran.

Since 1988, California has not gone Republican in a single presidential election. No Republican holds statewide office. Both U.S. Senators are Democrats. Democrats have 39 of 53 U.S. House seats. Republican state legislators are outnumbered 2-to-1.

Americans of European descent, who provide the GOP with 90 percent of its presidential vote, are down to 63 percent of the nation and falling.

By 2042, they will be a minority. And there goes the GOP.

Lest we forget, the “Buchanan wing” also opposed the invasion of Iraq while the Journal-War Party wing howled, “Onto Baghdad!”

“Unpatriotic Conservatives,” we were called in a cover story by a neocon National Review for saying the war was unnecessary and unwise.

Now, a dozen years after the “cakewalk” war, GOP candidates like Marco Rubio and Bush III are trying to figure out what it was all about, Alfie, and what they would have done, had they only known.

Our agenda in that decade was — stay out of wars that are not our business, economic patriotism, secure borders, and America first.

The foreign debt and de-industrialization of America, the trillion-dollar wars and the chaos of the Middle East, the shortened life span of the Party of Reagan, that’s your doing, fellas, not ours.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
generalTsaochicken.
generalTsaochicken.
May 19, 2015 8:26 am

H ross perot got my vote

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
May 19, 2015 9:18 am

“Does the Journal regard this gutting of the greatest industrial base the world had ever seen an acceptable price of its New World Order?”

Yes.

Dutchman
Dutchman
May 19, 2015 9:41 am

It’s not going to be the same country. I really believe we have lost the US.

It’s not just the 30,000,000 illegal Mexicans, or the 70,000 Somali’s here in Minnesota, or the largest Hmong population in St Paul, or the Kurds in Nashville.

These people have to hustle their ass just to survive, and to learn the US welfare system.

They are going to grow up and expect the state to take care of them. Since our schools don’t teach real history or the constitution they won’t be exposed to that either.

I’ll call them: Casual citizens. Hey stuff is pretty good here, who really cares about the constitution or the bill of rights?

Mark
Mark
May 19, 2015 11:04 am

With the shipping of jobs over seas, The U.S. has relied on development to fill the gap. And immigration is part of that.

You need more houses and schools. Do any of these so called economist even recognize that development has limits? Ok, so you’ve built all the houses , schools and hospitals that the land can hold. Now what do people do for jobs?

Here in Jackson Hole it’s obvious what is going on. The public schools want more Mexicans because they have lots of babies. Or at least more then the natives. Half the students are now Mexican. Without them Jackson would require half the teachers and half the school size. Hey, but Jackson gets to tax property of multi millionaires that only live here a few weeks out of the year. Who have someone pick up all their mail and do things that would make the State of Wyoming and Federal government think they live here 6 months and 1 day.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 19, 2015 12:04 pm

Problem is, milking the stored wealth of the american middle class was the funding mechanism for developing the ‘global ecomony’. Still plenty of american wealth, but it gets more and more concentrated in the hands of the untouchables, the traitors who csused all the problems in the first place.

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 19, 2015 12:12 pm

Where are all the pinheads and intellectual cowards who were calling buchanan a tool? Stucky, you seem willing to scrap, curiously absent on refuting buchanan. I get stirring the pot, but attacking someone who’s been saying this is the problem, and this will be the result, correctly for 25 years doesn’t help. TE, never at a loss for words or venom, have at it. Bust him up, tell us how stupid he is, inquiring minds want to know.

Stucky
Stucky
May 19, 2015 12:21 pm

Anonymous

I don’t respond to cowards who hide behind “Anonymous”. Blow me.

But, for the record, I agree with Buchanan more than I disagree with him.

starfcker
starfcker
May 19, 2015 12:59 pm

Sorry stuck. My bad, didn’t notice I’d gone coward. Blow me deserved, in this case. Carry on.

yahsure
yahsure
May 19, 2015 4:51 pm

Ross was right about that sucking sound as jobs have been leaving the country for years.Soon with TPP, Many more will leave as sources of new slave labor are found in third world countries in Asia.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
May 19, 2015 7:42 pm

I agree with both Buchanan & his sister on immigration and trade. We’ve let these political wolves into our hen house and they’ve ruined our country. If they pass the TPP it’s all over for “local” control (I mean country level) because the treaty trumps individual country laws, including immigration.
What do they call this in it’s true form….treason?

Llpoh
Llpoh
May 19, 2015 8:19 pm

The case Buchanan is making is somewhat true, but he is intentionally misleading re some of the numbers.

Re manufacturing jobs “going overseas”, the generally accepted number as of 2011 was that the US had lost around 2 million mfg jobs to overseas nations. Not 7 million. YES, mfg jobs declined by 7 million, but not all went overseas. A simple test of this is multiply 7 million by say $150k = more than a trillion. Each mfg worker produces around $150k in goods. The US did not lose a trillion per year to China, it lost $350 million. So divide 7 million by 3 and you get roughly 2 million jobs lost. I have looked at this from a number of perspectives, and the calcs always come back to 2 million.

The US lost 2 million mfg jobs to China and others, and around another 750k jobs such as accounting, sevice jobs, etc. But not 7 million. Still, 2 million s not inconsequential. But out of a workforce of 160 million, it is not a caastrophe in and of itself – so long as the rest of the economy is functioning. Which it is not.

Additionally, Buchanan makes no allowance for the fact that mfg is dying due to becoming increasingly efficient. It will never again be a major employer, with or without the impact of jobs flowing overseas. Mfg jobs, even without the foreign impact, will dwindle until they represent no more than 3 or 4 per cent of the population. Mfg s NOT the answer, and anyone who says so is either lying or is an idiot.

Also, Buchanan ignores the impact of debt. A lot of foreign purchases are being made on borrowed money. That is truly a bad idea. Further, if borrowed money is excluded from the dalcs – ie if the US were not borrowing to buy, then there would be no loss in US jobs – excluding borrowed money, US jobs are exactly where projections would have them – mfg in the US is 13 percent of GDP today – same as it always has been.

It makes for a great stòry. But it is not exactly as Buchanan is telling it. He is hiding some facts. What a surprise.

Yes, it is really all our fault.