CALIFORNIA IN 2016

Via Knuckledraggin

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
23 Comments
Russia Is Strong
Russia Is Strong
May 31, 2015 2:31 pm

How appropriate for CA to resemble a giant vagina by 2016 …given its heavy dependence on porn flick productions.

robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
May 31, 2015 2:42 pm

Looks more like a hairy schmuck to me. Anyway, I doubt that much water will remain in Southern California or Lake Meade by the end of 2016 especially if Hoover Dam is destroyed by Obama’s Chosen Immigrants or a very deserved earthquake allowed by God for the porn industry and Liberals in general (ref Edgar Cayce and Joe Brandt). .

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
May 31, 2015 4:02 pm

These women come from all places in the USA although most are local girls from the valley.
Back in the day when El Coyote attended these places of carnal worship, a young lady said, oh, you work in aerospace? I used to work in aerospace until they closed the Lockheed plant in Burbank…the (Hispanic) churches want to close us down..
What is that date on your tatto for? I asked another young lady. It is my son’s birthday, she said.
Another young dancer dedicates a song for an absent man she loves.
A young man throws a pile of bills onto the dance floor, I ask the dancer if he is her boyfriend, she says, no.
I hear a scrap of a comment by a black dancer, ..I met him at a (sex) party.
Another relates, we were dancing with our friends and got thrown out of that (Ventura Blvd)bar for ‘lascivious behavior’
A beautiful woman approaching 40 is talking non-stop to an older man who listens attentively to her description of her hairbrushing routine. She is sitting and absentmindedly pulls at the fronds growing out of her fleshy crotch.
A crowd gathers at the platform of a tiny dancer. Another woman grouses about the pedophiles eager to watch the slender waif.
A voluptous young girl, naturally beautiful, dreams of getting out of dancing. She says she has an interview for a job at Nordstrom.
A girl who looks like a girl out of place with her wavy hair and hooked nose but a tremendous ass smiles at my complimenting her major asset. Where are you from? Philly, she says.

bb
bb
May 31, 2015 6:51 pm

I am in California on a regular time schedule it seems. Northern California is in great shape.Plenty of water. Southern California is headed for some serious problems if it doesn’t start raining soon.I would not want to be in that part of the state when the tap water goes dry.They will probably end up taking water from the farmers.

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
May 31, 2015 9:02 pm

bb has it back-asswards.

The farmers have been taking it from everyone, mainly the U.S. taxpayers at large, for the past 80 years. Those taxpayers include competing farmers in the midwest and southeast that do not get subsidized water, but have to compete with CA farmers who pay $30 a foot at the outside for water that costs north of $400 a acre foot, at minimum and often much more, to divert, store, and pipe to them, often over the Tehachapi mountains…. and they are still pumping their groundwater into depletion.

The farmers use 80% of the water, often to grow water-guzzling and/or low-value crops that would be much more easily grown elsewhere… like in places where we now pay “price support” subsidies to farmers to NOT GROW the same crops.

Makes the same kind of sense every other socialistic gimme program in this country makes- pay people to either not produce, or pay them to produce what is not needed or what could be produced more cheaply and efficiently by someone else, somewhere else.

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
May 31, 2015 9:04 pm

Or, really, 113 years, since the Reclamation program was promulgated by Congress in 1902.

Stucky
Stucky
May 31, 2015 9:29 pm

I quick googled “water guzzling crops” … found this …

“Rows of almond trees now cover nearly 1 million acres in California, many of them on previously virgin hillsides or in pastures or desert with little rain or local water. Since each tiny nut requires a gallon of water, almonds are consuming 1.07 trillion gallons annually in the state, TWENTY PERCENT MORE more than ALL California families use indoors.”

Wow. But, I absolutely love my almonds … we must go through 15 pounds a year. So, I am contributing to the water shortage. But, like I said, I love my almonds and I don’t care. Force Californians to shower less often. Leave my nuts alone!

Stucky
Stucky
May 31, 2015 9:33 pm

It seems alfalfa is even worse ….. 1.7 TRILLION gallons annually

Top 10 in pictorial format here —> http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Water-Use-California-Crops-Drought-302987411.html#

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
May 31, 2015 9:38 pm

Alfalfa is MUCH worse, if only because it is of such little value. If you’re going to be a welfare farmer, could you at least grow stuff that could recoup SOME of the money your water cost the rest of us?

Bea Leaver
Bea Leaver
May 31, 2015 11:19 pm

Stucky- Nobody is going to mess with your nuts. Nuts will be grown somewhere in the world to supply the demand so you will always have your nuts…………question is how much will your nuts cost you?

bb
bb
May 31, 2015 11:43 pm

Chicago , those farmers have legal rights to that water. So yes they will end up taking water from farmers.

starfcker
starfcker
June 1, 2015 5:57 am

Chicago
Two points. First, if california were serious they would stop dumping all their water in the ocean. Because it’s an emergency, you know? Second, water used (not wasted, used) growing food is a wonderful thing. Because dirt plus water equals…….food. YAY

starfcker
starfcker
June 1, 2015 6:03 am

So if anyone has it ass backwards, in this case it’s you. From the big shitty of chicago, take a drive in any direction. All you see is one thing. King corn. The most subdidized crop on the planet. Glass houses, you know? But I’m ok with that. It’s food.

Thinker
Thinker
June 1, 2015 9:29 am

Stucky, you could always switch to peanuts. Not only are they mostly grown in the U.S., but they require only a fraction of the water almonds take. They’re slightly more nutritious and cost less. AND they’re legumes, so they fix nitrogen in the soil, improving it over time. They’re not as “cool” because they haven’t had million-dollar marketing campaigns like almonds and pistachios, but it’s time for the nut-shaming to end.

Rise Up
Rise Up
June 1, 2015 9:43 am

starfcker says: So if anyone has it ass backwards, in this case it’s you. From the big shitty of chicago, take a drive in any direction. All you see is one thing. King corn.
—————-
How do they get corn to grow in Lake Michigan? (due east of Chicago).

Stucky
Stucky
June 1, 2015 9:46 am

Thinker

Peanut butter, noodle soup, and pork and beans …. that’s what sustained me in my senior year of college (I graduated with zero debt). So, I tend to not like those things so much any more.

Ms Freud is convinced that 9 almonds a day are good for her …. and me. So I eat ’em to keep the peace. lol

Trader Joe’s sells Sunflower Seed butter …. it’s delicious and cheap. I go through one jar per month.

Rise Up
Rise Up
June 1, 2015 9:57 am

Stucky, try this:

[imgcomment image[/img]

Rise Up
Rise Up
June 1, 2015 9:57 am

[imgcomment image[/img]

Stucky
Stucky
June 1, 2015 10:12 am

Rise Up

Well …. TJ’s also carries Almond Butter (not that brand though) …. we do buy it 2-3 times a year. Almond butter is a little too dry.

What I love doing is grinding a bunch of almonds in my Vita Mix … to make a coarse flower. Then I’ll melt some butter (or coconut oil), toss in my veggies, and coat with the now almond flour, and saute a few minutes. Absolutely delicious. No one ever complains, regardless of which vegetable I use …. but, it’s especially delicious with asparagus.

underfire
underfire
June 1, 2015 10:20 am

I’ve farmed and ranched in the Klamath basin of northern Calif and southern Oregon for decades. Here’s the irony, there’s a glut of alfalfa. There’s thousands of tons in this area alone that can’t find a market, It’s the same in Nevada.

It gets a little more complicated than that, like hay exports having trouble leaving the ports, dairymen feeding more corn, which is also in a glut and is cheap. But it remains that there is too much alfalfa in the west at this time.

dc.sunsets
dc.sunsets
June 1, 2015 10:47 am

underfire,

Your description is another brick in the wall of overcapacity, overcapacity everywhere.

This is the open result of too much credit availability. No one ever seems to go out of business, even when they should.

When fuel and generators appear endlessly available, it may seem sensible to build row upon row of greenhouses in Fargo ND to grow roses, and if the market for roses collapses because of a glut of them, as long as the fuel still appears limitless it may seem to make sense to try to make up the per-unit losses by expanding production (yes, I’m kidding, sort of.)

When the (credit) fuel does finally run out, and the generators cough their last and the lights and heat fail (it’s January in Fargo at the moment, stay with me) then all those rose bushes will wither and die.

We are living in a world stuffed to the gills with too many greenhouses. It will be truly catastrophic when the credit bubble finally goes tits-up.

starfcker
starfcker
June 1, 2015 12:16 pm

Rise up, they grow it on the islands in lake michigan, the corn islands. They are secret, don’t show up on most maps. They have bunch of special barges they tow around. that’s where popcorn comes from. King popcorn, I mean. Are you buying any of this? I got more.

Chicago999444
Chicago999444
June 2, 2015 12:52 pm

Stfkr, corn growers are being subsidized to grow corn for ethanol, another egregiously uneconomical and destructive use of public money that not only encourages agricultural monocultures that destroy topsoil and make us dependent on yet another fragile, brittle system that does not work without copious fossil fuel supplies that may come up seriously short of system requirements in not long, but is, worse, turning high density fossil fuels into lower-density ethanol. As one Iowa farmer remarked, we’ll burn up the last 6″ of midwestern topsoil in our gas tanks…. and wreck our cars while we’re at it. Ethanol and other “biofuels” are Net Energy Frauds that give back much less energy that is used to produce them.

Meanwhile, dairy farmers in WI are paid to NOT produce milk, and lavishly. I wish I got paid $150K a year to NOT GROW anything on a farm I inherited and never worked an acre of in my life. I would like me that kind of free money. Where’s MINE? Some of these dairy farmers are known to me personally… or were- I’ve lost contact with most.

And farmers in the wet, warm, boggy deep south states, which are ideal growing things like rice or cotton, are paid similar lavish subsidies to NOT grow these crops, so they can be grown in CA with steeply subsidized water.

As I said, every socialistic gimme in this country only promotes and rewards waste and misallocation of resources on a massive scale, and promotes practices that are extremely destructive and would stop immediately once it became obvious how uneconomical they are.