Call off the bee-pocalypse: U.S. honeybee colonies hit a 20-year high
You’ve heard the news about honeybees. “Beepocalypse,” they’ve called it. Beemageddon. America’s honeybees are dying, putting honey production and $15 billion worth of pollinated food crops in jeopardy.
The situation has become so dire that earlier this year the White House put forth the first National Strategy to Promote the Health of Honey Bees and Other Pollinators, a 64-page policy framework for saving the nation’s bees, butterflies and other pollinating animals.
The trouble all began in 2006 or so, when beekeepers first began noticing mysterious die-offs. It was soon christened “colony collapse disorder,” and has been responsible for the loss of 20 to 40 percent of managed honeybee colonies each winter over the past decade.
The math says that if you lose 30 percent of your bee colonies every year for a few years, you rapidly end up with close to 0 colonies left. But get a load of this data on the number of active bee colonies in the U.S. since 1987. Pay particular attention to the period after 2006, when CCD was first documented.
As you can see, the number of honeybee colonies has actually risen since 2006, from 2.4 million to 2.7 million in 2014, according to data tracked by the USDA. The 2014 numbers, which came out earlier this year, show that the number of managed colonies — that is, commercial honey-producing bee colonies managed by human beekeepers — is now the highest it’s been in 20 years.
So if CCD is wiping out close to a third of all honeybee colonies a year, how are their numbers rising? One word: Beekeepers.
A 2012 working paper by Randal R. Tucker and Walter N. Thurman, a pair of agricultural economists, explains that seasonal die-offs have always been a part of beekeeping: they report that before CCD, American beekeepers would typically lose 14 percent of their colonies a year, on average.
So beekeepers have devised two main ways to replenish their stock. The first method involves splitting one healthy colony into two separate colonies: put half the bees into a new beehive, order them a new queen online (retail price: $25 or so), and voila: two healthy hives.
The other method involves simply buying a bunch of bees to replace the ones you lost. You can buy 3 pounds of “packaged” bees, plus a queen, for about $100 or so.
Beekeepers have been doing this sort of thing since the advent of commercial beekeeping. When CCD came along, it roughly doubled the usual annual rate of bee die-offs. But this doesn’t mean that bees are going extinct, just that beekeepers need to work a little harder to keep production up.
The price of some of that extra work will get passed on to the consumer. The average retail price of honey has roughly doubled since 2006, for instance. And Kim Kaplan, a researcher with the USDA, points out that pollination fees — the amount beekeepers charge to cart their bees around to farms and pollinate fruit and nut trees — has approximately doubled over the same period.
“It’s not the honey bees that are in danger of going extinct,” Kaplan wrote in an email, “it is the beekeepers providing pollination services because of the growing economic and management pressures. The alternative is that pollination contracts per colony have to continue to climb to make it economically sustainable for beekeepers to stay in business and provide pollination to the country’s fruit, vegetable, nut and berry crops.” We have also been importing more honey from overseas lately.
But rising prices for fruit and nuts hardly constitute the “beepocalypse” that we’ve all been worried about. Tucker and Thurman, the economists, call this a victory for the free market: “Not only was there not a failure of bee-related markets,” they conclude in their paper, “but they adapted quickly and effectively to the changes induced by the appearance of Colony Collapse Disorder.”
IS…thanks for providing this info. It is uplifting to get good news in the face of Armageddon pushed by media.
The CCD business just seems to be another case of pushing a ‘disaster’ upon the public, while behind the scenes there is a group waiting to benefit from the gov’t largesse. In the case of CCD, I don”t know of a group waiting to get rich over CCD – but I don’t know much on the subject.
Bee all that you can bee.
They didn’t give ’em enough vitamin Bee
Beekeepers had the wrong BEE attitude was all.
I just found the article but did not verify any of the data.
I know that I’ve not noticed any drop in honey bee activity around my house. I know a guy who keeps bees right in his yard. He says there is a bee keeping club here and many people keep bees at home right in the city. None of them have experienced any CCD problems and they don’t know of anyone who has. I’ve asked the bee keepers that display at the county fair and they don’t have any issues either.
@OldeVirginian.
LOL!!!
Thanx fer the giggles.
This post has created quite a buzz.
It does just drone on and on.
These fuckin’ puns are unBEElievably bad …. and the asshole voting them down is a BEEatch!!
This does not appear to be the most current data. How about some 2015 data?
US Honeybee Losses Soar Over Last Year, USDA Finds
May 26, 2015 | 32,947 views
“Indeed, the latest numbers from the USDA show that honeybee losses are, in fact, continuing to climb. From April 2014 to April 2015, losses of honeybee colonies hit 42 percent, which is the second highest annual loss to date.3 This percentage is down from 45 percent in 2012-2013, but remained well above the three prior years’ annual measurements.”
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2015/05/26/honeybee-losses.aspx
@IS, numbers can be faked and misrepresented so easily, please see employment, unemployment, vaccinations, GDP or any other number of lies we are told everyday.
Without seeing the UNDERLYING methodology and data collection for these “numbers” I have NO way to know if they are just counting one small area’s and extrapolating across the entire country/world, after all that is the way MOST of our reporting is done these days.
For instance, when the Globull Warming meme was getting truly fired up, most of the “scientific” outposts/collection/data sites changed WHERE their thermometers were located. They also removed more than half the spots/thermometers keeping data. WHY?
Why? Because without skewing the methodology they could not control the outcomes or the meme.
I think this is the same.
Bayer and Monsanto, to name two of the biggest, have MUCH, MUCH, to lose if people ever wake up and demand they stop their for-profit death marches.
So, we get “reports” like this. Just like the “safety” reports for lifelong drugs that only follow people for 2 or 3 months, it is bullshit.
We are bombarded with lies that are presented as truth, the vast majority choose to take the easiest path and believe.
So it goes….
No money, no honey baybee
As a beekeeper I can assure he author that the difficulties with maintaining honeybees is greater than ever. There was zero mention that the number of beehives in the U.S. is a result of the increase in the number of beekeepers who are primarily urban people who have decided to keep one or two hives. The author failed to mention that 40% of total hives were lost in 2013.
The author has no idea about the process of splitting a hive.
The research surrounding CCD is continuing to be skewed by both Shell and Monsanto. I just listened to the lies presented by the speaker on behalf of Shell at a meeting.
CaptD, thank you for chiming in!
The true believers in man and science are so slow, and painful, to wake up.
Good luck to you, we need more like you!