Another Government Ponzi Scheme Starts to Crack – Do You Depend on It?

Another Government Ponzi Scheme Starts to Crack – Do You Depend on It?

By Nick Giambruno

Government employees get to do a lot of things that would land an ordinary citizen in prison.

For example, it’s legal for them to threaten and commit offensive, rather than defensive, violence. They can take property from others without their consent. They spy on anyone’s email and bank accounts whenever they please. They go into trillions of dollars in debt and then stick the unborn with the bill. They counterfeit the currency. They lie with misleading statistics and use accounting wizardry no business could get away. And this just scratches the surface…

The U.S. government also gets to run a special type of Ponzi scheme.

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary a Ponzi scheme is:

[A]n investment swindle in which some early investors are paid off with money put up by later ones in order to encourage more and bigger risks.

In the private sector, people who run Ponzi schemes are rightly punished for their fraud. But when the government runs a Ponzi scheme, something very different happens.

It’s no secret that the Social Security system is effectively one giant Ponzi scheme.

Actually, I think it’s worse. That’s because the government uses force and the threat of force to coerce people into it. People don’t have the option to opt out. They either pay the tax for Social Security or someone with a gun will show up sooner or later. I imagine Bernie Madoff’s firm would have lasted a lot longer had he been able to operate this way.

This whole practice is particularly egregious for young people. They have no chance at collecting the future benefits the government has promised to them. But they’re hardly the only people that are going to be disappointed in the system, which will eventually break down.

There are simply too many people cashing out at the top and not enough people paying in… even with the government’s coercion. That’s a function of demographics, but also the economic reality in which there are fewer people with quality jobs for the government to sink its fangs into. I expect both of those trends to increase and strain the system.

Actually, it’s already starting to happen.

Recently, the government announced that there would be no Social Security benefit increase next year. That’s only happened twice before in the past 40 years.

You see, the government links Social Security benefit increases to their own measure of inflation. If the government says “no inflation” then there are no benefit increases. It’s like letting a student grade his own paper.

So it’s no surprise that the official definition of inflation is not reflective of the real increases in the costs of living most people feel.

Medical care costs are skyrocketing. Rent and food prices are reaching record highs in many areas. Electricity and utility costs are soaring. Taxes, of course, are going nowhere but up.

But the government says there’s no shred of inflation. In actuality, it amounts to a stealth decrease in benefits.

One reason for this is that they constantly change the way they calculate inflation so as to understate it. Free market analysts have long documented this sham. If you take a global view, it’s easy to see that fudging official inflation statistics is standard operating procedure for most governments.

Incidentally, governments and the financial media don’t even understand what inflation is in the first place.

To them, inflation means an increase in prices. But that is not at all how the word was originally used. Inflation initially meant an increase in the supply of money and nothing else. Rising prices were a consequent of inflation, not inflation itself.

It’s not being overly fussy to insist on the word’s proper usage. It’s actually an important distinction. The perversion of its usage has only helped proponents of big government. To use “inflation” to mean a rise in prices confuses cause and effect. More importantly, it also deflects attention away from the real source of the problem…central bank money printing.

And that problem shows no signs of abating. In fact, I think the opposite is the case. The money printing is just getting started.

At least this is what we should prudently expect as long as the U.S. government needs to finance its astronomical spending, fueled by welfare and warfare policies.

As long as the government spends money, it will find some way to make you pay for it – either through direct taxation, money printing, or debt (which represents deferred taxation/money printing).

It’s as simple as that.

Like most other governments that get into financial trouble, I think they’ll opt for the easy option…money printing.

This has tremendous implications for your financial security. Central banks are playing with fire and are risking a currency catastrophe.

Most people have no idea what really happens when a currency collapses, let alone how to prepare…

How will you protect your savings in the event of a currency crisis? This video we just released will show you exactly how. Click here to watch it now.

The article was originally published at internationalman.com.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
21 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
October 23, 2015 2:05 pm

A shame our founding fathers couldn’t have thought about this sort of thing and written some provisions in the Constitution to prevent it.

Tator
Tator
October 23, 2015 2:26 pm

I start collecting SS in three months. It will take me ten years (if it lasts that long) to get back what the rat bastards stole from me. I would have doubled that amount if I could have kept it and invested it like my other income.

Maggie
Maggie
October 23, 2015 2:56 pm

I miss Mattiepants from Florida.

Winston
Winston
October 23, 2015 2:56 pm

LMAO Well if the founding fathers would have written it into the document, the fucking assholes in charge would ignore it at this point anyhow…..

starfcker
starfcker
October 23, 2015 3:49 pm

International man? International fag. I love social security. If they would just stop putting foreigners on there that didn’t pay in, and end the disability scams, it could go on for a long, long time, doing exactly what it’s supposed to do. Medicare and SSDI are what’s breaking social security.

starfcker
starfcker
October 23, 2015 3:53 pm

If you started working 40 years ago, the US population has risen 50% in that time. Demographic problem? Really? Put america back to work, stop importing welfare trash, and the social security administration won’t know what to do with all the money.

starfcker
starfcker
October 23, 2015 3:55 pm

International fag’s take on counterfeiting and inflation are spot on, I give him that

David
David
October 23, 2015 5:51 pm

How could the founding fathers ever have imagined how venal the current politicians or how greedy and stupid the current voters could be.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
October 23, 2015 6:55 pm

Tell us something we don’t already know. This piece rates a big fat ZERO.

TE
TE
October 23, 2015 8:09 pm

@Star, my gawd you are a true believer.

The MATH can’t work!

EVER!

It is financially IMPOSSIBLE, and it doesn’t matter how many foreigners, or black babies, are born.

When ONE illness, or 10 years of payouts is MORE than what you pay in over a LIFETIME, the freaking math will NEVER work.

PENSIONS are fiscally, mathematically, IMPOSSIBLE.

And it doesn’t matter a freaking lick about anything else.

Cripes.

Social Security isn’t a “promise,” it was a way for the Central Banks, politicians, government unions and the lucky elite to steal money from the poorest workers this country has.

And then buy votes from us all to continue enriching themselves.

Worked so well that now even the productive believe that unicorns fly.

Nah, can’t be mathematically impossible, that’s not it, it’s the fault of the “others.”

For gawd’s sakes man, pull you head from your ass and figure it out that everything you believe is an intentional LIE.

fear & loathing
fear & loathing
October 23, 2015 8:15 pm

the best deal is to die the day before you retire, uncle sam is a big winner, your heirs once again are losers, flim flam from the get go

rhs jr
rhs jr
October 23, 2015 8:18 pm

Starfighter is so right again. The Feds use SS as a General Welfare fund: I made 3 trips to my Tallahassee SS office before I collected it and each time the waiting room was crammed with 3 out of 4 adults BLACK females with kids. I assume they were applying for SSD for Mental, Behavior or Emotional Disability for their kid(s). Even so, SS is chump change compared to Medicaid and the official General Welfare.

fear & loathing
fear & loathing
October 23, 2015 8:25 pm

the greatest scam ever invented. trust fund my ass, and jimmy carter fixed it so it would be solvent. it was a loser by design in the name of compassion. like the federal reserve once all the wealth bled dry it dies by design. everything FDR stated became a lie in short order. the supreme court had to make obamacare a tax just like in ’37. wish i would live long enough to see the angry masses take out their wrath on DC, we will have our very own Bastille Day.

gm
gm
October 23, 2015 8:29 pm

they have taken a chunk outta my checks since 1978 , im 49 started working when I was 12 years old . paid a bunch into the system and yet at the payout rate If I retire at full retirement they will pay off what I paid in in 5 years . how can that possibly be self sustaining ?
Altho on the other hand if they get their NWO and get everybody all 7 billion that would explain it . until the retirees get to this point ? PONZI give me my fucking labor dollars back and let me decide the course of my life .
Maff id hard or something another

fear & loathing
fear & loathing
October 23, 2015 8:41 pm

hard to be forced into retirement when you are self employed yet it happens. so i arrive early at SSN office to sign up, to my surprise 70% of the others were between 20 and 50. me an a couple of old codgers, appeared to be a great place to pick up young women and their mothers, my mother considered it charity so never made a claim, which in her case would have been true since she never put a dime into the program. i dated a girl in the early 60’s who received SSN since her father left, not dead just moved on. wake up call. that is why the government calls it an entitlement. birth is qualification. if you are breathing you are eligible. when i farmed, farmers were exempt, how it works now i do not know.

Tex
Tex
October 23, 2015 11:05 pm

My solution to SS: you can draw out only 5 times as much as you put in. Cut off all those who didn’t put very much in but want to get out much more.

Lysander
Lysander
October 24, 2015 1:32 am

I put into SS as a employer/employee because I was an owner/operator. I’m “retiring” when I’m 62, unless they raise the age limit up in the meantime. My real retirement from the Teamsters cannot be drawn before the age of 65. However, there’s a problem with that. The Central States Teamster Pension Fund is in deep do-do. They pay out $3.45 to retirees for every $1 they collect from workers. They are talking about cutting existing retirement payments back, and raising the age you can retire in order to collect full bene’s, severely cutting current member’s health and welfare, and all that jazz. It ain’t pretty.

I’m in the New England Pension Fund, and I got the feeling that the way Central goes, so will New England. I’m thinking it will be like the book Catch 22. By the time I’m just about to draw my pension, they’ll raise it a couple more years. What a bummer, but that’s the way the cookie crumbles.

COME ON Sweet Meteor Of Death! SMOD2016!!!

ASIG
ASIG
October 24, 2015 3:46 am

I’ve been collecting SS for 8 or 9 years now, I don’t depend on it but I’ll take it. I’ll use it to pay my taxes.

Anonymous
Anonymous
October 24, 2015 9:52 am

FWIW,

Most government (State, city, etc.) and private pension funds are going to crash as well.

I think you’ll see them start failing before the SS system does since when the difficulties hit SS will end up with a needs based qualification with those still able to support themselves ineligible for it or only eligible at a very reduced rate.

I’m more interested in how those other pension and retirement funds will be dealt with when they start going down.

TE
TE
October 24, 2015 5:09 pm

It is so nice when people understand math!

I blame the teachers. Over and over and over they say stupid shit like, “math is hard.” Which then convinces us all that math is actually hard. The mind believes what you tell it to believe. Tell yourself enough that “math is hard,” and you will shut down your own ability to learn it.

Math is EASY, English is hard.

In one it is based on dozens of languages, areas, usages, over centuries. The other goes back thousands of years and has not changed one iota. What is “hard” about that?

What the fuck does that prove?

All the promises of the past 70/100 years are going to eventually go away. I’m planning on working until the day I die. What kind of life is it to sit and watch tv between doctors visits and trips from the pharmacy anyway?

Really satisfying, soul-satisfying life requires DOING. Thinking everyman is entitled to work for 20-30 years and then sit back and let “others” do the actual work is insane. That is for the lucky few, not the common masses.

Unlike so many other Americans, I think this is exactly as it should be. My labor has already been stolen, I’ll be damned if I’m going to let “them” steal my contentedness and peace by walking around feeling entitled and owed.

We bitch a lot around here about the “entitlement” mindset. Damned if I understand how feeling that I am “owed” social security isn’t that exact same thing?

As for those lucky enough to be getting it now, good for you. Better you than those that never worked a day in their miserable lives. I don’t begrudge you your good fortune. And that is the funny thing, so many of the lucky ones don’t even realize how very lucky they are. My father, and many others, fall squarely into that category. He, at least, sends some of it to charities and tries to be altruistic. Better than nothing I guess.

jamesthewanderer
jamesthewanderer
October 24, 2015 11:36 pm

More damn lies – using the FedGov as a redistribution channel only makes sense to a Statist. Everyone else realizes that putting the FedGov in charge of ANYTHING makes it more expensive, less flexible, less useful and prone to corruption in every form.

You’d do better by putting the money on the horses (assuming you know anything about horse racing) and putting that week’s winnings (if any) in a farm mortgage. At least you have a CHANCE with that scheme, and SSec is a Ponzi by any measure, and we all knows who win Ponzi games – and it ain’t the marks!