Bloomberg May Run For President After Becoming “Frustrated” With Race Gone “Haywire”

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 01/23/2016 14:45 -0500

 

If you enjoy the circus, then this presidential campaign is for you.

In the last nine months, we’ve witnessed the unlikely rise of not one, but two dark horse candidates to the top of the polls and we’ve also had the pleasure of looking on as a dizzying array of GOP candidates engaged in a series of soapbox free-for-all debates that at times devolved into pure comedy.

Bernie Sanders, a far-left socialist running on a platform that includes such pipe dreams as free college for everyone, has emerged as a real threat Hillary Clinton on the Democratic ticket.

On the Republican side, Donald Trump has managed to pull off an unlikely transition from the boardroom to the ballot box, on the way to whipping large swaths of the electorate into a nationalistic frenzy.

Meanwhile, Clinton is under investigation for possibly throwing around state secrets on a private e-mail server and Ted Cruz may not even be eligible to hold office.

Well just in case things needed to get any more entertaining, it now appears billionaire and former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg is going to insert himself into the race as an independent candidate.

Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is taking early steps toward launching an independent campaign for president, seeing a potential path to the White House amid the rise of Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Bernie Sanders,” AP reports, adding that “the billionaire media executive is said to be concerned by Trump’s lasting hold on the Republican field and is worried about the impact of Sanders’ campaign on Hillary Clinton’s bid for the Democratic nomination.”

In other words, Bloomberg is afraid that America may well end up having to choose between becoming i) a socialist “paradise” or ii) a nation run by a brazen real estate mogul with absolutely no filter and not much in the way of experience to suggest he’s fit for the job.

Apparently, Bloomberg will almost definitely run if Bernie Sanders wins the Democratic ticket and either Cruz or Trump prevails on the GOP side.

“Mike Bloomberg for president rests on the not-impossible but somewhat unlikely circumstance of either Donald Trump or Ted Cruz versus Bernie Sanders,” said Edward G. Rendell, the former governor of Pennsylvania and a past Democratic National Committee chairman. “If Hillary wins the nomination, Hillary is mainstream enough that Mike would have no chance, and Mike’s not going to go on a suicide mission.”

Underscoring our assessment of the campaign to date, The New York Times says Bloomberg “has grown more frustrated with what he sees a race gone haywire.”

“At a dinner party late last fall at the home of Roger C. Altman, an investment banker and former deputy Treasury secretary, Mr. Bloomberg delivered a piquant assessment of Mrs. Clinton as a presidential candidate,” The Times writes, adding that “in the presence of Mr. Altman, a longtime supporter of Mrs. Clinton and her husband Mr. Bloomberg described her as a flawed politician, shadowed by questions about her honesty and the continuing investigation into her email practices as secretary of state.”

“The fact is Hillary Clinton is behind in Iowa and New Hampshire. That should scare a lot of people — and it does,” one advisor said.

While commentators are so far divided on the effect a Bloomberg run would have on the Democratic and Republican tickets, one thing is certain: Hillary Clinton has the most to lose. Voters who are fervently pro-Trump or pro-Sanders probably wouldn’t be swayed. However, for voters who prefer a more “mainstream” candidate but who aren’t satisfied with Clinton, Bloomberg might well be a welcome addition to the race.

“Even a victory by Mrs. Clinton in the Democratic primaries might not preclude a bid by Mr. Bloomberg, his associates said, if he believed she had been gravely weakened by the contest,” The Times continues. Alan Patricof, a financier and longtime donor to the Clintons who is also friendly with Mr. Bloomberg says it would be “a terrible thing for the Democrats” if Bloomberg were to run as an independent.

Trump concurs. Bloomberg “would take a lot of votes away from Hillary,” he told ABC last week.

Here’s a bit more color from AP:

Bloomberg, one of the richest people in the United States, has previously toyed with presidential runs, but concluded ahead of the 2008 and 2012 campaigns he could not win.

 

The former mayor is largely a social liberal — he fought for same-sex marriage in New York and is pro-abortion rights — and implemented a number of health reforms in New York City, banning smoking in public places and instituting calorie counts on menus.

 

He has also become arguably the nation’s most vocal proponent of gun control, using his fortune to bankroll candidates across the country who clash with the National Rifle Association.

 

But liberals have found fault with his cozy ties to Wall Street and his unquestioned support for the New York Police Department, which drove down crime during his tenure but engaged in tactics that a federal judge later ruled discriminated against minorities.

And from The Times:

Mr. Bloomberg, 73, has already taken concrete steps toward a possible campaign, and has indicated to friends and allies that he would be willing to spend at least $1 billion of his fortune on it, according to people briefed on his deliberations who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss his plans. He has set a deadline for making a final decision in early March, the latest point at which advisers believe Mr. Bloomberg could enter the race and still qualify to appear as an independent candidate on the ballot in all 50 states.

 

Mr. Bloomberg would face daunting and perhaps insurmountable obstacles in a presidential campaign: No independent candidate has ever been elected to the White House, and Mr. Bloomberg’s close Wall Street ties and liberal social views, including his strong support for abortion rights and gun control, could repel voters on the left and right.

As for how Trump would react if Bloomberg does indeed put his name in the hat, the GOP frontrunner says the former mayor is “a great guy” and a “friend.”

Check back in March to see how quickly that rhetoric dries up if Bloomberg becomes the second billionaire vying for America’s top elected office.

Apparently, Bloomberg is already polling fifth…

Embedded image permalink

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
36 Comments
robert h siddell jr
robert h siddell jr
January 23, 2016 3:17 pm

I’m still underwhelmed by Democrat non-choices: A kindly old deranged hard-line Communist great-grandfather, the stupidest member of a Communist Crime Family & Harpy, and one of the Communist Elite Godfathers. Well, they still have Biden, Pelosi, Gore, Kerry, etc.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
January 23, 2016 3:23 pm

Sensetti ought to be confused, health conscious Bloomberg or race conscious Trump?

Southern Sage
Southern Sage
January 23, 2016 3:39 pm

Ha! Bloomberg! I would vomit if I wasn’t laughing so hard. This dwarf freak with his anti-gun nonsense has the same chance as a fart in a whirlwind. That said, he will pull votes from the Democrats, so let him sagging ass run. It really is the most amusing show in town!

B
B
January 23, 2016 3:41 pm

Bright side of this race? Jeb Bush spending more than anyone else and getting 3%- Priceless!

kokoda
kokoda
January 23, 2016 3:43 pm

Bloomberg – just another POS liberal that wants to control our lives.

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 23, 2016 4:32 pm

Hillary like to rope off reporters and keep students locked in class rooms during appearances.Expect the same from the 1% Bloomberg

ottomatik
ottomatik
January 23, 2016 4:40 pm

He will run if it’s Donald vs. Bern. In other words, if the Oligarchs are not properly represented, he will ride in to save the day, for the Oligarchs.
Priceless.

Sensetti
Sensetti
January 23, 2016 4:50 pm

His anti gun stance would prove to be an unconquerable mountain!

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 23, 2016 4:51 pm

Imo the Dems will try and push through legislation to give all illegals and transient immigrants O flying in from Syria the US vote.The WH knows they are hated for their corruption,lies thievery,and sees this as their only hope not only to stay in power but keep from being prosecuted for all of the above plus treason and murder.

David
David
January 23, 2016 5:33 pm

Questions about Hillary’s honesty? Hahahaha. I get that those who want her to steal for them and the weak minded feel they have to pretend that they believe she is not a complete psychopath, but really, is there anyone with an IQ above room temperature who thinks she is at all honest?

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 23, 2016 5:35 pm

Yet another reason to vote for Trump.

Thinker
Thinker
January 23, 2016 6:27 pm

Admin: If Trump, Clinton and Bloomberg all run, there is a possibility that one candidate doesn’t get enough electoral votes. That would throw the election into the House of Representatives.

Now THAT would be very 4T!

po'boy
po'boy
January 23, 2016 7:18 pm

Authoritarian frustrated with chance of non mainstream authoritarian winning election. He needs to get fucked.

Jackson, pondering tripping up Trump,
Jackson, pondering tripping up Trump,
January 23, 2016 7:19 pm

ottomatik came close to nailing it and Administrator showed how a three-way race might play out.

One way or another the elites are going to prevent Donald Trump, a populist presidential candidate, from being elected and becoming the next President of the United States.

My question to you all is, “What do you think is the most likely way the establishment will stop The Donald?

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
January 23, 2016 8:10 pm

a bullet
hanging chads
nigger eruptions
nuclear cocktail
Russian coup d’etat
an aide or supporter found dead or in a compromising position
manipulated stock market crash used as an excuse to suspend election
engineered race riot which race baiters will use to demand a black winner
outbreak of war in the Caucasus which will preclude trading horses midstream
Venezuela revolution forces millions of refugees to head to USA, pitting Trump against world opinion

starfcker
starfcker
January 23, 2016 9:11 pm
Bea Lever
Bea Lever
January 23, 2016 9:27 pm

Jackson- That is the $64,000 question. Care to predict?

SSS
SSS
January 23, 2016 10:09 pm

“If Trump, Clinton and Bloomberg all run, there is a possibility that one candidate doesn’t get enough electoral votes. That would throw the election into the House of Representatives.”
—-Admin

Quite true. Now, instead of the name Trump, insert the name of whoever is the Republican candidate for president. The House is overwhelmingly Republican. That’s your winner in Admin’s scenario.

Vote Cruz/Fiorina.

ottomatik
ottomatik
January 23, 2016 10:22 pm

It seems likely that if Bloomberg ran he would split the Dem base and pilfer from Bern. Are Trump supporters going to bail and vote Bloomberg, seems highly unlikely to me. What an embarrassment for the Dems, they must really be fucked, desperation is in the air.

Westcoaster
Westcoaster
January 23, 2016 10:27 pm

Thing about Sanders is, he’s not all that anti-gun and he frequently states the NRA gives him a D-. So at least he’s on their scoreboard, most Dems aren’t. He’s liable to draw some moderate Gop’ers, but the real power he has behind him are Millennials. And they’re hard to measure. But Sander’s crowds have equaled or surpassed Trump’s while Hillary can’t draw flies. Even when 6 people showed up to greet her at a small airport last week, guess what? She ignored them!

http://www.thenewscommenter.com/news/video-just-six-people-greet-hillary-in-texas-and-she-ignores-them/465879

gilberts
gilberts
January 24, 2016 12:19 am

Who cares? Nobody likes Bloomberg. I wouldn’t vote for him as dogcatcher, let alone resident. This is just a vanity project from a man who thinks his personal opinions matter to 320,000,000 other people and who is willing to waste his money trying to force those opinions up 320,000,000 asscracks.

Back in PA Mike
Back in PA Mike
January 24, 2016 8:15 am

SSS Cruz / Fiorina??? A goldman tool and a former NSA bitch? No fucking way!

Bullock
Bullock
January 24, 2016 8:55 am

Cruz/Fiorina LOL, let the bombs start dropping. Cruz isn’t even eligible, but in bizzaro land does it really matter.

B
B
January 24, 2016 11:18 am

This is a good example of what is wrong with the system, too much money involved. It can be hijacked by any billionaire. A 3rd party run by Bloomberg, just one man, could split the vote and effect the election thus negating the wishes of the people. Are Trump and now Bloomberg the new face of politics? Will the populace be left with choosing between competing billionaires, or competing candidates supported by Big Money? It sure looks that way. The future of “Grass Roots’ politics looks grim.
Change the rules so that $5.00 is the maximum amount allowed by any individual, Corporation or any other entity. That way, everyone has equal “free speech”. Money has almost completely destroyed our electoral system. Bernie, like him or not, may be the last true “Grass Roots” candidate we will see in a long, long, time.

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
January 24, 2016 12:40 pm

For the first time since 1964,I am thinking of sitting out this election. Firmly convinced that Dem victory would be the last nail in the coffin of the Republic. Not sure Rep victory would be any different.

As a whole we deserve what we get.

ILuvCO2
ILuvCO2
January 24, 2016 1:05 pm

“If Trump, Clinton and Bloomberg all run, there is a possibility that one candidate doesn’t get enough electoral votes. That would throw the election into the House of Representatives.”
—-Admin

So THAT is how they will make their boy Jeb! President.

hotter than a scotch bonnet pepper enema
hotter than a scotch bonnet pepper enema
January 24, 2016 2:23 pm

sanders. bloomberg. trump. 2 1/2 eskimos.

oey vey, my shekels!

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
January 24, 2016 2:44 pm

Why is it that only snowbirds and frostbacks running? Oh, throw in Palin, another Eskimo pussy that’s mighty cold.

Sensetti
Sensetti
January 24, 2016 3:57 pm

It’s not gong to be a three way race. Trumps already pulling 20% of Registered Dems his way and that number will only go up once he starts eviscerating the Democratic nominee. Trumps polling 48% in Florida, wow, home of Rubio, Bush, Carson, and Huckabee, that speaks volumes.

NickelthroweR
NickelthroweR
January 24, 2016 4:29 pm

Greetings,

The problem with these elections is that they do not benefit us in any way. I propose that since money is free speech, that we be allowed to auction off our votes. Why spend all that money on advertising that I ignore when I will gladly sell my vote to the highest cash bidder.

With every office from president to dog catcher up for bids, I should do fairly well come November.

Rainstorm
Rainstorm
January 24, 2016 4:37 pm

No matter your stripe, one must admit this is an exciting election cycle. We need the break-up of the sclerotic major political parties and a major third-party candidacy will facilitate the process.

EL Coyote
EL Coyote
January 24, 2016 4:52 pm

NickelthroweR says: Why spend all that money on advertising that I ignore when I will gladly sell my vote to the highest cash bidder.

Sensetti might buy your vote for Trump for $1. Unless your one of them high class whores..

On a serious note, there was a rumor that EPN bought votes for his election to president of Mexico.
You and Poynton amaze me for your willingness to cheapen the Great Whore.

Muck About
Muck About
January 24, 2016 4:52 pm

I think it would be a truly great blast in the ass if this screwed up mess resulted in a hung electoral college forcing the House of Representatives to elect a President!

Probably would be the best outcome, considering there is no one worth voting for in the current (or foreseeable) future.

MA

AKAnon
AKAnon
January 25, 2016 5:02 pm

MA says “Probably would be the best outcome, considering there is no one worth voting for in the current (or foreseeable) future.” So then we can blame Congress for the result? So what else is new?

Anonymous
Anonymous
January 25, 2016 6:54 pm

Fox just explained Dems are hopeing Bloomberg will equally dividevote throw the vote for prez to the house to decide-hahahaha