Via The Rebel
To mark the centennial of the women’s suffrage movement, we dropped by the Ryerson campus to see how the kids feel about it.
Ryerson kids think we need to “Stamp out Women’s Suffrage”
Via The Rebel
To mark the centennial of the women’s suffrage movement, we dropped by the Ryerson campus to see how the kids feel about it.
Only 1 of the students questioned and asked to explain women’s suffrage – she received a terrible answer but signed the petition anyway.
Obvious none of them knew what it meant.
This begs the argument that if they don’t know what women’s suffrage is then they probably don’t deserve it.
The Cunt’s sneaked it in – right after WWI.
Hell they’re just chattel. I make sure mine mows the lawn and trims, cooks, cleans, laundry, ironing.
Now back to my meds.
I cant speak to the idea of not letting women vote, but I think that anyone who receives ANY sort of government assistance, should not be able to vote. I am not counting social security as part of that, but that would change if/when the social security fund has to be bailed out.
What nigger would vote this down?
These are some surprisingly smart women. Women’s suffrage is, indeed, horrible. I hope this petition succeeds.
When did Canada start looking indecipherable from Calcutta?
What I don’t get is how anyone this stupid can get admitted into a “University”? I guess the standards are a lot lower today than they were when I attended….
Voting has not always been a “universal right” and, at the country’s inception was limited to property owners–those with real “skin in the game”. These restrictions were in place for good reason. It was thought that, if the vote were extended to non-property owners, they would vote for politicians that would promise them “benefits” that were not “earned”.
As the primary method of providing the government with revenue was property taxation, it stood to good reason why only property owners were afforded the franchise (voting) as they paid the bulk of taxes.
Another “sore point” for some in the universal voting franchise was the institution of “literacy tests”. Literacy tests started out as a well-meaning device to insure that voters were literate and understood who and what they were voting for, but eventually morphed into a means to disenfranchise black citizens.
In today’s day and age, there is still good reason to insist on some form of property ownership to exercise the voting franchise (which would include renters, as they also have an interest in property ownership, although of a temporary nature).
Literacy tests should also be reinstated, as an informed electorate is extremely important to the functioning of a representative republic.
Those who are on the public dole should not be allowed to vote. The voting franchise would not be denied to those receiving unemployment benefits, veterans benefits, social security or social security disability benefits, as people receiving these benefits have “paid into the system”, but only those who are receiving welfare benefits. This would remove the impetus for the now-common practice of voting for those who promise to increase welfare benefits on the backs of working taxpayers.
@anarchyst: “Literacy tests started out as a well-meaning device to insure that voters were literate and understood who and what they were voting for, but eventually morphed into a means to disenfranchise black citizens.”
Well today, most of the niggers are illiterate, they have disenfranchised themselves.
I would like to explain it to the cute one. At length.
I just sent a copy to NOW(National Organization of Women)!!! Just maybe they will enjoy it.
You cant have too many exemptions, or any period.
It needs to be really simple. Like that you need to own your own home to vote. Period.
I own my own home.
[img
[/img]