Guest Post by Kurt Schlichter
America’s elite – that collection of puffed up mediocrities who until recently held the undisputed command of the heights of our politics and culture – is in crisis. Its unbroken track record of failure has finally stirred the rest of America from its coma. The normals are now hella woke, and the elitists are being hella rejected. Unused to accountability, the elite is in a tizzy over the way people are not only blaming it for its myriad failures but are taking concrete steps to restrict its power. It’s not just electing Donald Trump. It’s ignoring the media, ignoring Hollywood stars, and ignoring the cabal of “experts” who presume to tell us how to live.
And it’s about time.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
The best thing about being a member of the elite is that you really don’t have to do anything to become one. You can be born one – no matter how dumb or drug-addled you are, if you’re a Kennedy you’re elite regardless of how many times you blow the bar exam. Or you can become one by getting into the right school – remember, a Harvard degree does not mean you did well at Harvard. Everyone at Harvard does well – an “A” is a participation trophy. It’s getting in that matters, and getting in depends, in significant part, on who you are. Elite mom and dad, welcome to the Ivy League.
The elites, having been called out for their failure, are now trying to rebrand themselves as “experts.” It’s important to distinguish “elites” from “experts.” Elites want to be seen as experts because an expert is assumed to actually know something and to have some sort of technical skill. To be elite, you just have to be accepted as elite. That’s why elitists fudge the terms; they want the credibility of being experts without actually having to do what a real expert does.
Take, for example, the notorious New Yorker cartoon of the passenger on the plane electing himself pilot. The point, which the elitists think is brilliant, is that the running of government should be left to the experts without the participation of you people. Of course, pilots are trained in detailed technical skills and, critically, are accountable for their performance. If they fail, they get fired – or worse. [Insert Kennedy pilot joke here] If an elitist fails at an important job, she gets nominated for president. See the difference?
The point they want to make is that we should submit to their “expert” (really, elite) guidance, since we are unfit to determine our own destiny. Yet, when piloting this country over the last couple decades, these elites have flown the plane straight into the ground. Real experts are held accountable, but elites never are. Their landing is always soft – it’s never the elites who suffer while the normal prosper, only the other way around. The elitists always win – that’s why they are called “elite.”
Remember, whenever anyone tells you to blindly give up your input and rely on an “expert,” you stand a good chance of being scammed. Take a doctor. Doctors have a hard skill. They go through a lot of training. And medical malpractice kills about 98,000 people per year. Doctors are experts, but they are not perfect. No expert is. Nor are they perfectly disinterested technicians. A lot of doctors are terrible people – the worst divorces lawyers deal with are doctor divorces. Don’t confuse expertise with morality.
Like all humans, experts are self-interested. That’s why some doctors complain when their patients read up on their symptoms in Google. “Gosh, these peons are presuming to gain access to my secret knowledge – how dare they!” Yes – thanks to technology, much of what doctors do (which is maintain and use knowledge – many never touch a scalpel) can be done by normals on line. You have a symptom and you go to Web MD and often it answers your question – “Eww, that weird lump is a sebaceous cyst, not melanoma.”
The same with lawyers – go to LegalZoom to create your routine limited liability company and you’ll do it for a third of the price of the lawyer who merely changes the names on the last routine limited liability company formation documents he prepared. Trying a case is different – you probably want a technical expert who has done it before. But a lot of legal knowledge is not only accessible but employable by regular citizens; the laws restricting the practice of law to those with a license may protect some people from harm, but it also ensures we lawyers can restrict supply and thus justify our outrageous fees. Remember, a lot of “expertise” is not skill derived from experience but merely access to information. And when everyone has that access, well, the guilds get really protective of their turf.
The expert technocracy model of governance also depends on the underlying assumption of a disinterested, objective technician class that will protect others’ interests before its own. But the notion that a particular expert is disinterested and somehow only concerned with objective facts is simply silly. As a trial lawyer, I absolutely know the other side is always going to hire some “expert” to say exactly what needs to be said to help its case. We litigators regularly refer to experts as “whores” – it’s just assumed. Now, smart lawyers try to get honest experts – I’d much prefer to hear early that my client’s case has problems. But there are surprisingly few smart lawyers – again, simply because you are in an expert caste does not mean you are not a half-wit.
The simple fact is that when people push for government by expert, the experts they want running things will always – every single time – happen to have exactly the same policy preferences as the people pushing them. “Leave climate science to the experts!” Yeah, and in a shocking turn of events, the experts we are supposed to defer to feel the solution to climate change is to give more money and power to the people demanding “Leave climate science to the experts!”
And then there’s the problem of incompetent experts. This is especially true in the media, where the internet has made the journalistic gatekeeper model obsolete. These hacks are panicking, and trying to claw back their authority by labeling dissent “fake news” – that is, when they aren’t themselves publishing outright lies and propaganda they imagine we’ll buy into. Talk about, as Peggy Noonan aptly put it, being patronized by our inferiors.
You would think that if you presumed to tell the rest of us what to think that you might first ensure that you actually know stuff. But then, being elite means never having to actually accomplish anything, like knowing stuff. For example, Judd Legum, a senior apparatchik at ThinkProgress.org – the popular leftist political site best known for stuffing two questionable assertions into one web address – went on with Hugh Hewitt, who asked him a series of pretty basic questions about government and foreign policy. Well, it was pretty ugly. What he didn’t know was … extensive. I’d liken the segment to the Bataan Death March but Judd would probably not get the reference. He’ll have to check Wikipedia, just like everyone else. But then, if everyone else can do what Judd does, why do we need him and his ilk?
Experts aren’t what they used to be – that is, experts. “Experts” tell us that by an act of sheer desire, Dave can transform into Diane. That’s crazy. We try to outsource our moral judgment to “ethics experts” and end up with nutballs telling us infanticide is cool. The experts told us how there was an ice age coming. Then acid rain. Then ozone depletion. Then global warming. Then, when it didn’t actually get warmer, global climate change. Yet, somehow we are expected not to notice this litany of wrong and to just submit to the guidance of people who are literally never right.
Sure, if I had a brain tumor, I’d want a skilled neurosurgeon to take it out – though note how Dr. Ben Carson’s demonstrated track record of competence at that hard skill has earned him zero respect from the left, demonstrating that their alleged regard for expertise is simply another scam. But while I would rely on my doc for the technical work of cutting and slicing, his expertise does not apply to the other key issues involved – like whether I want to accept the consequences of the surgery on my quality of life. Questions that relate to our preferences and morals are not the province of experts. Nor should decisions regarding the principles and policies of our government be delegated to the technical experts charged with carrying them out.
We are American citizens. We can decide for ourselves what kind of nation we want to live in. That’s our decision. Experts? Well, you can provide advice, and then you can carry out our instructions. But don’t presume to do any more than that. You work for us, not vice versa.
F….m
My second grade teacher’s observation is still on the mark: “An expert is a has-been drip under pressure.”
The way I heard it from my second grade teacher was, “X in mathematics is unknown and a spurt is a drip under pressure”. That was a time when the idiom “drip” meant an unsavory person. Like, “What a drip!” a girl talking about a guy to her girl friend.
The problem that experts (primarily although not exclusively on the left side of the political spectrum) suffer from is a lack of humility.
Humility is an aspect or part of our moral compass that allows us to remain curious and to pursue “expertise” in our field in an _objective_ (and I mean that in the broadest sense) fashion.
With humility, knowledge becomes facts or direction tempered by wisdom. Without humility, knowledge becomes assertion backed by arrogance, conceit, and self-righteousness.
This is why places like TBP are important. STM’s ensure humility is practiced by all regardless of one’s field of expertise. No one is too smart to be criticized or mocked. It’s why liberals do not last here…
As I like to say, even for all-world universal geniuses like Da Vinci and Einstein, the ratio of what they knew to what they did not know is 1:infinity.
As the collective knowledge of the West has increased, its collective wisdom has taken the opposite turn.
The times they are a changin.
the sad thing about a smart ass is who made him that , a jack of all trades master of none the world is full them,
We must return to being a Meritocracy with Civil Service Exams etc or we will become as screwed up as Africa. The EPA, NASA, NOAA, Dept of Ed, etc are loony bins run by liberals who couldn’t park a bicycle straight. The “Go” for Challenger was given by a Harvard Expert who disregarded the warnings of real scientist. The government schools were destroyed after 1964 by Education Experts and everything they have tried to fix their mess since then has only made things worse. Experts bragging about their colleges and their degrees are just dogs sniffing each other.
Exactly. After years and years of affirmative action, equality of outcomes, cronyism, whatever you want to call it, competency in all aspects of government-run and directed systems – justice, education, energy, welfare, ,economic policy, etc., etc. – is highly questionable. It’s at the point where it can’t be covered up any more, and more than explains their current state of self-destruction.
@RHS
They’ve already made a documentary about it! It’s called IDIOCRACY!
Hewitt’s guest didn’t do badly.
And Hewitt sure hasn’t lost any of his smugness since I stopped listening over 10 years ago.
I read it, what could he have said to “do badly”? Seemed bad enough for a supposedly informed person.
Its got electrolytes.
Damn, it’s a real pisser being a “deplorable”. I should have deferred to an expert like HiLIARy.
“A man’s gotta know his limitations!” –Harry
The hypocrisy of the left from Hollywood to Ivy League and from Wall Street to Capitol Street is well documented . It merely requires you to think for yourself with critical path thinking skills ! Something the left has programmed out of all facets of our society as much as they can and those who refuse to accept it are declared persona non grata !
I will continue to follow the voice of reason between my head and heart ! If the likes of Pelosi , Obama & Clinton think it’s good I know it’s bad , if they want it restricted or banned “stock up” and if it’s considered bi-partisan it is evil and stupid and bad for our country ! Past results are good indicators of future results especially when all involved in the decision are full of shit !
Cops are protection “experts”. Gun control would not exist without them. We are supposed to leave our defense needs up to them. Only complete fools would do so.
The word “expert” is a fine example of Gramscian Marxist nonsense in practice.
There are really only ‘experts’ in hard sciences, and none in human affairs.
Someone might specialise in a field of human endeavour, but they aren’t an ‘expert’ because there is no unified body of knowledge and, more importantly, agreed-upon ends of those human endeavours.
The Progressives of the early 20th century used that word to establish a cultural hegemony over the masses – “don’t think for yourselves; we technocrats are the experts.”
‘Expert’ connoting infallible decision-maker or public-policy driver.
It is time for those people who wish to take back their freedoms to openly refuse to use the word ‘expert’ unless speaking of an actual rocket scientist, and to reserve ‘specialist” for those poseurs in fields of human endeavour who wish to enslave the rest of us (teachers, urban planners, statisticians and geographers claiming to be ‘climate scientists,’ etc., etc.)
There are varying degrees of expertise, and no true “expert” in any field.
An example: In the army, while supervising and training a company of Chemical Corps soldiers in the use and application of C-4 and detonating equipment and supplies in relation to their ground-based napalm ordinance, another combat engineer and myself were referred to as “subject matter experts.”
Were we true experts in our field? Very debatable, but we were both leaving the army and were thus available to do the training.
Did we keep them safe in the training and use of dangerous materials in which we had a lot more experience than they did? Absolutely.
The word expert conotes status.
Listen to NPR sometime. Axioms are manifest and non debateable.
“No swriously debates global warming”
“Its a given that Russia hacked the election, no one debates that, the question becomes what to do about it.
These people are just pure evil authoritarians.
Of course it is a bit of a trick question. No one could be smart enough to do what these lefty morons think they can do with regard to micromanaging companies and the economy. At least many people on the right sort of understand that.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/09/congressional-black-caucus-to-re-hang-anti-cop-police-as-pigs-painting-in-capital-citing-constitution/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social
Country needs.to split Commies to the left the rest to the right. Or the other way around. If not there will be a fight. Best wishes is when the economy truly heads south