Will Obama’s ‘Good War’ in Afghanistan Continue?

undefined

Last week, as the mainstream media continued to obsess over the CIA’s evidence-free claim that the Russians hacked the presidential election, President Obama quietly sent 300 US Marines back into Afghanistan’s Helmand Province. This is the first time in three years that the US military has been sent into that conflict zone, and it represents a final failure of Obama’s Afghanistan policy. The outgoing president promised that by the end of his second term, the US military would only be present in small numbers and only on embassy duty. But more than 8,000 US troops will remain in Afghanistan as he leaves office.

When President Obama was first elected he swore that he would end the US presence in Iraq (the “bad” war) and increase US presence in Afghanistan (the “good” war). He ended up increasing troops to both wars, while the situation in each country continued to deteriorate.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

Why are the Marines needed in the Helmand Province? Because although the foolish and counterproductive 15-year US war in Afghanistan was long ago lost, Washington cannot face this fact. Last year the Taliban controlled 20 percent of the province. This year they control 85 percent of the province. So billions more must be spent and many more lives will be lost.

Will these 300 Marines somehow achieve what the 2011 peak of 100,000 US soldiers was not able to achieve? Will this last push “win” the war? Hardly! The more the president orders military action in Iraq and Afghanistan, the worse it gets. In 2016, for example, President Obama dropped 1,337 bombs on Afghanistan, a 40 percent increase from 2015. According to the United Nations, in 2016 there were 2,562 conflict-related civilian deaths and 5,835 injuries. And the Taliban continues to score victories over the Afghan puppet government.

The interventionists in Washington continue to run our foreign policy regardless of who is elected. They push for wars, they push for regime change, then they push for billions to reconstruct the bombed-out countries. When the “liberated” country ends up in worse shape, they claim it was because we just didn’t do enough of what ruined the country in the first place. It’s completely illogical, but the presidents who keep seeking the neocons’ advice don’t seem to notice. Obama – the “peace” candidate and president – has proven himself no different than his predecessors.

What will a President Trump do about the 15 year failed nation-building experiment in Afghanistan? He has criticized the long-standing US policy of “regime-change” and “nation-building” while on the campaign trail, and I would like to think he would just bring the troops home. However, I would not be surprised if he accelerates US military action in Afghanistan to “win the war” once and for all. He will not succeed if he does so, as the war is not winnable – no one even knows what “winning” looks like! We may well see even more US troops killing and being killed in Afghanistan a year from now if that is the case. That would be a terrible tragedy.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Middle-aged Mad Gnome
Middle-aged Mad Gnome
January 9, 2017 6:20 am

The clear theme in this Turning is the internal conflict, not any external threat. RP as a predictable Trump naysayer assists our internal enemies with articles like this, the objective being to erode confidence in Trump. In doing so Paul works on the same side as McConnell and Graham, just using a different method.

TampaRed
TampaRed
  Middle-aged Mad Gnome
January 9, 2017 7:48 am

Is Ron Paul entitled to state his opinion?
Perhaps he is using this as a shot across the bow to Trump?Trump will tell the regular anti America,anti war crowd where they can go.Trump might actually listen to Ron Paul as he is pro US
but also anti interventionist.
Unless we are committed to total war we are not going to win or even stabilize Afghanistan so why should we stay there?

Suzanna
Suzanna
  TampaRed
January 9, 2017 5:57 pm

poppies

Stucky
Stucky
  Middle-aged Mad Gnome
January 9, 2017 9:09 am

Middle-aged Mad Gnome

Is your real name John McCain?

Regardless, you really are mad … as in fucken batshit crazy. Go away, troll.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Stucky
January 9, 2017 9:45 am

Maybe he just needs more education in the real world as it really is.

Something he may find here if he’s open to it.