The Scary Timing of October 31, 2016

by Uncola via TheBurningPlatform.com

Earlier this week I posted an article regarding the Saturday, March 4th, 2017 wiretapping allegations that were Tweeted by Trump. In that essay, I mentioned the timing of the Obama Administration’s two FISA requests to surveil Trump, including one which was approved in October 2016; and I wondered regarding Hillary Clinton’s knowledge of the matter:

Given the recent wiretapping allegations made by Trump, the timing of Hillary’s Halloween Tweet regarding Trump and the Russians now appears to be a very frightful coincidence….

What then, did Hillary know, and when did she know it?

Beginning  at the 4:50 mark in the video below, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential Campaign Manager, Robby Mook, claims Hillary’s October 31, 2016 Tweet regarding Trump and the Russians was in response to an article posted by Slate Magazine that day:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLNFzj36T-c

At the 5:16 mark, Mook says:  “We need to get the facts!”

OK. Here are some facts:

By my count, according to Hillary Clinton’s Twitter feed, on Halloween, October 31, 2016, she had 33 total Tweets which included 6 retweets.

Her Tweet # 15 for that day occurred at 11:51 AM and was the first Tweet of the day where she mentioned Russia’s “confirmed” election hacking:

U.S. intelligence has confirmed the Russian government is directing cyberattacks against the U.S. to influence the outcome of our election.

 

 

 Hillary’s Twitter feed then runs forward, time-stamped, and in order.   In her Tweet # 24 on that terrifying Halloween day, Hillary links to a Slate.com article written by Franklin Foer.

The time of this Retweet on her feed is 2:41 PM.

 

 

At 2:43 PM, Hillary (or someone on her team) Retweets the following from the author of the article, Franklin Foer:

I just reported: Donald Trump has a secret server…it connects to Moscow.

 

 

Sounds pretty sure of himself, doesn’t he?

But the article, entitled “Was a Trump Server Communicating With Russia?”, is time-stamped at 5:36 PM.

 

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Does the fact that Hillary first Tweeted on Halloween morning something that wasn’t posted until later that afternoon make it a “smoking gun”?

If I am not mistaken, Hillary was campaigning in Ohio that day and Trump was in Michigan.  Trump Tweeted only 6 times on Halloween and he made no mention of Russia.

Does Hillary’s Twitter feed timeline show her collusion with the Deep State in hacking the election against Trump?

According to Wikipedia, Slate magazine has its offices in New York City; and the author of the Slate piece, Franklin Foer, resides in Washington, DC; both in the Eastern Time zone.

Twitter is located in San Francisco, so, if the timestamps on Hillary Clinton’s Twitter feed is set to Pacific Time, then the above timeline may prove nothing.  But, is that likely?  What about Franklin Foer’s Twitter time-stamp(s)?  I don’t Twitter, so I really can’t speculate as to the accuracy of Twitter Timing, or the variables involved with any individual account settings and options.

To be fair, if there was any collusion it may have been merely with Slate magazine and not the Deep State.  Or, it could have been, simply, the harmless result of the Clinton Campaign being notified beforehand by Slate magazine regarding the forthcoming article that was about to be published that afternoon. I wonder if Trump was notified ahead of time?

Now, about that Slate magazine article which seemed so destined to frighten the American citizenry on that foreboding Halloween day: Therein, the following terrifying tale was told:

In late July, one of these scientists—who asked to be referred to as Tea Leaves, a pseudonym that would protect his relationship with the networks and banks that employ him to sift their data—found what looked like malware emanating from Russia. The destination domain had Trump in its name, which of course attracted Tea Leaves’ attention. But his discovery of the data was pure happenstance—a surprising needle in a large haystack of DNS lookups on his screen. “I have an outlier here that connects to Russia in a strange way,” he wrote in his notes. He couldn’t quite figure it out at first. But what he saw was a bank in Moscow that kept irregularly pinging a server registered to the Trump Organization on Fifth Avenue.

All of this is especially interesting in light of the recent WikiLeaks Vault 7 revelations and the program entitled UMBRAGE whereby American intelligence agencies are now known to have the ability to mimic internet hacks from other countries:

The CIA’s Remote Devices Branch‘s UMBRAGE group collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques ‘stolen’ from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation.

With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the “fingerprints” of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from.

 

Ironically, Mother Jones Magazine also published an article about Trump and the Russians that very same, horrifying, Halloween day at 6:52 PM:

 

 

­­­­­­­­­­­­In this article, we read the following frightening fiction:

In June, the former Western intelligence officer—who spent almost two decades on Russian intelligence matters and who now works with a US firm that gathers information on Russia for corporate clients—was assigned the task of researching Trump’s dealings in Russia and elsewhere, according to the former spy and his associates in this American firm. This was for an opposition research project originally financed by a Republican client critical of the celebrity mogul. (Before the former spy was retained, the project’s financing switched to a client allied with Democrats.) “It started off as a fairly general inquiry,” says the former spook, who asks not to be identified. But when he dug into Trump, he notes, he came across troubling information indicating connections between Trump and the Russian government. According to his sources, he says,there was an established exchange of information between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin of mutual benefit.”

So, why did all of this break on that very frightful and fateful Halloween, just eight days before the Presidential Election of 2016?

Well, consider that Hillary Clinton was smack in the middle of her SECOND Weiner Scandal on that horrible Halloween; except this one did not involve a White House intern’s haunting blue and ghostly white-splattered dress jumping out of nowhere.  No, on Friday, October 28th, 2016, it was the Headless Horseman, James Comey, who delivered a nasty letter to Congress regarding Hillary’s missing e-mails that were discovered within the engorged hard-drive hidden beneath Anthony Wiener’s overheated laptop that sprung to life like Ichabod Crane’s reanimated pumpkin.

What started on Friday later began on Monday.

However, Monday delivered a different kind of Halloween.  An All Hallows’ Eve more sinister and serious where masks were torn away and the long knives came out instead.

Scary times, indeed.

 

Author: Uncola

I am one who has found the road less traveled while remaining a whiskered, whispering witness to the world. I hope what you just considered was worth the price and time spent. www.TheTollOnline.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
March 10, 2017 8:48 am

You do better reporting than any of the mainstream media outlets.

This is EXACTLY the kind of journalism that the Founders intended when they speak of the “free press” whereas the MSM is nothing but a mouthpiece for the establishemnt in order to maintain status quo.

Awesome work.

Francis Marion
Francis Marion
  hardscrabble farmer
March 10, 2017 10:01 am

Yep. What the farmer said.

norman franklin
norman franklin
March 10, 2017 9:08 am

What did he know and when did he know it ? That is a phrase I haven’t heard for eight years. Sadly we will probably start to hear that all the time now. The mainstream media would just as well crash the country. than do their job in an unbiased manner. These quislings truly hate america. The time can’t come soon enough when they are tried convicted and hang. Nice job digging up the smoking gun on Hildabeast.

RiNS
RiNS
March 10, 2017 10:59 am

Well done Uncola.

You have succeeded and followed the meander to where the mainstream doesn’t care to run. Why is it that a blogger with shoestring budget, in 2017, needs to lay out these facts in timeline and make a quite compelling case of collusion. Going where so many in MSM refuse to tread. Last night I turned on my listening device to catch a bit of CNN. Watching those shows gave me a new appreciation about why people flail themselves. Sometimes, I seems, a fella needs to be whipped to make sure that he still bleeds.

The MSM whinges about Fake News. Yet their airtime is filled not with news but rather speculation about news that could or could not be fake. Last night there was breaking news that indeed a Server at Trump Tower was under surveillance. Wiretapped. Trump tweets and bypasses media last weekend and this is where we are at six days later. This after adamant denials by Comey, Clapper and Hayden released for last Sunday spin.

[imgcomment image[/img]

Only logical conclusion. Everything on TV is fake.

All that money and airtime and the only thing Don, Anderson, Erin and Wolf were blathering about was the Russians. The Russians did this and Vlad the Impaler did that. Yep the biggest leak this week in the history of the CIA and instead of talking about that we have wall to balls coverage of news that we don’t even know is fake. Whatta fucken’ joke! And yet still they seem genuinely shocked when out In Real World there is stratospheric levels of contempt directed by Mainstreet at them.

What Trump and Assange did this past week was a masterstroke of persuasion as defined by Scott Adams. The media has spent years building this narrative and now it all lays in ruins in a ashen heap. They are now being forced to shit on the floor in house that they built.

They fucken’ deserve it!

[imgcomment image[/img]

Not too long ago I would have been tempted to throw something at the TV. Not now. It is evident now that battle for control of narrative is entering and some say pivotal phase. The subversives that abound on blogosphere living in places such as Burning Platform have for years done battle only to be dismissed as unequal by the MSM. Not worthy of comment by that Professional Class of Journalists. Then along comes Trump, the DNC and Podesta emails, and now Vault 7. The game has changed and the field remade. The Deep State knows it.

Watching that video the other day and what struck me wasn’t the words emanating from Mook but rather the smile on his face. I couldn’t help but think that somewhere just off camera was someone holding a gun pointed at his head.

[imgcomment image[/img]

He may think that he is immune but that “Let Them Eat Cake Attitude” didn’t work for Marie and won’t work for him. The dumbfuck seems to forget that the Donald is the Prez and not his Pant Suit Whore for George. Trump is taking names and no prisoners

As for CNN they suck. They are really fake news. If they want to repair their ratings time to dispense with the charade. Days go and patience fades and I am not getting any younger.

Dispense with the bullshit.
Give Erin all the coverage.

[imgcomment image[/img]

Tired of lookin’ her cleavage.
Time to show us some Tits.

RiNS
RiNS
March 10, 2017 2:05 pm

Weird that the smile was the persuasion technique that was being used. I think this man’s “duping delight” will be as short lived as the road to Moscow in Fall of 1941.

[imgcomment image[/img]

A Fake smile cast for Fake news interview given. Seems more than appropriate for what happened this week.

I posted the Mook video on another thread here on TBP but added nothing as commentary. I suppose I needed to stew a bit on the words. Should be posting some of this stuff as a stand alone but these days would rather indulge in humour and rhymes in the threads. Middle inning relief.

Then today I see that you wrote what is a much better directed and focused piece on the topic. Still for life of me I cannot understand the ambivalence of many with the events of this week. A seismic shift in narrative took place and still many seem uninterested in going to the show.

But Mook’s smile will be, I think, short lived.

The pyre is set.

[imgcomment image[/img]

The ship ready to sail.

I find it no surprise really, that like Jim, I am getting burnt out. It won’t be too long for the match to get lit over something likely seen as insignificant. When that happens people will question why and then I will think back to that smile.

The election of Trump is for me Stalingrad because like the Russians with their backs to the Volga, the Deplorables made their stand and won. In the initial aftermath of win fate still hung in the air. Not now. The Battle of Kursk has been fought. Trump’s twitter and Assange’s leaks have overcome the Mechanized Forces of the Deep State and their lackeys in MSM. Now on their back foot it will I hope be a steady march to Berlin.

That is the story this week.

For shame that most of the media failed to cover it but glad that you did!

[imgcomment image[/img]

Card802
Card802
March 10, 2017 4:51 pm

Uncola, your article and investigative work is astonishing.

Gator
Gator
March 11, 2017 2:43 am

Very good work. Its amazing what you can find with a little digging. Its a lot harder for these shitweasels to get away with this kind of thing, because everything you put out on the internet is easy to look up if you take the time. I was curious about the time, and you have inspired me to do a little exploring as well. To answer your question about twitter, I found this: http://www.adweek.com/digital/tweet-timestamps/ (I don’t twatter either).

Using what i read there, I went all the way down her nauseating twitter feed to find the one you were discussing. When I did that, it popped up as 1151, like you had said. I live in the same time zone that she was visiting when she posted the tweet, so it was posted at 1151 central time, or 1251 eastern. Which means it was about 5 hours before this article Mook claims she was referencing when she made her original claim. So, since she obviously WASN’T referencing an article that hadn’t been released yet, where did she get this information?