Telecom Fiasco Proves “Uncomfortable Truth” of U.S. Cyber Security

From Birch Gold Group

Today’s wars aren’t only being fought with bombs and bullets; cyber warfare is quickly becoming the new weapon of choice. But the U.S. isn’t prepared to handle this new threat like politicians would have you believe, meaning Americans (and your bank accounts) could be sitting ducks.

Case in point, a recent security snafu involving WikiLeaks and U.S. telecom giant Cisco stands as firm evidence of the growing cyber security risk facing the American public. It seems like our leaders are failing to properly defend us.

Here’s what you need to know about this evolving situation, and how you can protect your financial security from future cyber threats.

What We Know So Far

Government documents recently released by WikiLeaks reveal that federal agencies were aware for years of serious security vulnerabilities in Cisco hardware — used in countless systems across the country and in nearly every industry — without notifying the company. As a result, dangerous cracks in our country’s cyber security infrastructure went unfixed, and Americans were unknowingly put at risk.

Had federal officials told Cisco about the vulnerabilities, the problem could have been promptly fixed. Instead, the information was only revealed because WikiLeaks dug it up.

Cisco has now worked out a temporary solution to the problem, and is in the process of remedying it completely. But what message is the U.S. government sending if they know about a major cyber security threat and do nothing? More importantly, what does it mean for the security of you and your wealth?

Trading Americans’ Safety for Cyber “Firepower”

Judging from recent events, it appears the U.S. may be falling into a familiar pitfall with cyber security, as it has in other areas: Focusing too much on offensive measures, while neglecting the crucial role of strong defensive measures.

It’s cliché, but true… The best offense is a good defense.

However, government officials have little interest in cyber security defense. They’re more concerned with offensive cyber technology that benefits them, not defensive technology that keeps Americans safe.

Officials themselves have admitted that at least 90% of the government’s cyber efforts are offensive rather than defensive.

Joseph Menn’s report on Reuters explains further (emphasis ours):

“That a major U.S. company had to rely on WikiLeaks to learn about security problems well-known to U.S. intelligence agencies underscores concerns expressed by dozens of current and former U.S. intelligence and security officials about the government’s approach to cybersecurity.

“But the secret part of the U.S. intelligence budget alone totaled about $50 billion annually as of 2013, documents leaked by NSA contractor Edward Snowden show. Just 8 percent of that figure went toward “enhanced cyber security,” while 72 percent was dedicated to collecting strategic intelligence and fighting violent extremism.

“Departing NSA Deputy Director Rick Ledgett confirmed in an interview that 90 percent of government cyber spending was on offensive efforts and agreed it was lopsided.”

Meanwhile, countries like Germany are building armies of “cyber soldiers” to keep their citizens safe. Why is the U.S. not doing the same?

The Only Guaranteed Way to Protect Your Savings?

In this day and age, everything is connected to the internet. That’s what makes cyber warfare so dangerous: Attackers can target any part of our lives. And the banking industry is an especially attractive target.

In fact, just last year, $81 million was held hostage by hackers in a “digital heist” at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

And the financial risk from cyber-attacks is growing so strong that some of the world’s biggest insurance companies, including AIG and NAS, are now offering additional coverage options exclusively for cyber-related damages.

But there is only one fail-safe method to keep your wealth safe from cyber threats: Don’t expose it to those threats in the first place.

How are you supposed to do that?

You can protect your wealth from exposure by holding some of your savings in real, physical assets, such as precious metals — nothing digital, “hackable,” or even remotely connected to the web.

If your savings are exposed to today’s expanding cyber threat, this may be the right time to move some of it to a place where hackers can never touch it.

Birch Gold Group helps Americans protect their savings with physical gold and silver. Clients can purchase precious metals for physical possession, or move their IRA or 401(k) into a Precious Metals IRA. To learn more, request a free Info Kit on Gold – there is zero cost and zero obligation to you. All you need to do is enter your details at www.birchgold.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
April 13, 2017 11:07 am

With my luck, I’d buy a bunch of gold and hide it in the basement only to find out when I need it that I’d bought a bunch of tungsten covered with gold.

Fiatman60
Fiatman60
  Iska Waran
April 13, 2017 11:46 am

Iska – Have it assayed or authenticated as a condition before purchase!! Since your paying a premium over spot anyways – get the authentication as part of the purchase.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Iska Waran
April 13, 2017 12:36 pm

Stay away from the 400 oz bars (contract delivery gold) and you should be safe.

FWIW, all of the faked 400 oz bars were found and it is thought none of them actually made it to the normal retail market (gold stores and such).

If you suspect some of your 400 oz bars is a tungsten filled fake, you can easily confirm its purity by simply drilling a small hole in it and looking at the drilling remains: Tungsten is silver colored and gold is dark yellow colored, visibly quite identifiable.

Fiatman60
Fiatman60
April 13, 2017 11:56 am

Cisco knew of these problems for the last 15 years!!….. Government knew too, but needed that security flaw to covertly spy. I was in this industry for 33 years, and the shit that went on(still), was absolutely mind boggling.

Jarhead John
Jarhead John
April 13, 2017 4:52 pm

I prefer gold plated Latinum from Quarks…

General
General
April 14, 2017 3:00 am

If you are really worried about fake gold, buy platinum instead.

Platinum is very dense and nothing matches it’s density except osmium I think, which is even more expensive.

My stockpile is embarrassingly small, but my goal is to have 1/3 silver, 1/3 gold, and 1/3 platinum.