The Confidence Game – The Next Crisis

Guest Post by Martin Armstrong

Confidence-wideThe outcome always depends upon confidence. It is what you believe that counts rather than the facts. When Credit Anstalt went belly-up in 1931, why did an obscure bank in Austria set in motion the 1931 Panic and Sovereign Debt Defaults that made a recession into a Great Depression?

credit-anstalt

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

The answer was found in the name. One of the owners was the Rothschilds. When people heard the Rothschilds went bust, they began selling all the banks because if they went down, everyone else surely would. They were the Goldman Sachs of the day.

Hoover - Loose Cannon

I suggest reading Herbet Hoover’s Memiors from 1931. This is a confidence game. Just because QE appeared to work before does not mean it will work a second time. The middle-class lost money and their living standards were sharply reduced. Retail investment in equities has not yet returned to even 50% of 2007 levels. Most people who lost their homes were those who could never have bought one before. Yes, the middle-class who borrowed more against their house were put under stress. Home equity loans dried up so industries like selling pianos dropped by more than 50% since people borrowed using home equity to fund expensive things like a piano.

Fed v Congress

Energizer-BunnyThe difference this time is the fiscal budget. Back in 2007, the Fed only had to worry about its policy and the contracting economy. The problem they created is that government just keeps going like the Energizer Pink Bunny – it never stops spending regardless of the level of interest rates.

The Fed cannot neutralize the Fiscal spending of government. This is deeply entrenched. Just look at the table below on the annual deficits since 2007. This has increased about 364% since the 2007 crisis began.

Government has become addicted to cheap interest rates. If rates go back just to 5%, we are looking at a fiscal deficit explosion the Fed cannot overcome.

US Deficits 2007-2016

The crisis has to hit before a politician would ever act. Once the crisis begins, you cannot restore confidence. The whole thing will have to play out. Moreover, the crisis in Europe helped to send capital to the USA easing the economic pressure here. This is why the USA is holding up the entire world economy right now and a stiff wind will blow over the European banking system. I seriously doubt that anyone can stop the next crisis and whatever they do will then be seen as a failure.

glassDuring the late 1970s, the IMF held gold auctions trying to stop its advance. The first auctions in 1975-1976 caused gold to drop by 50%. However, the continued auctions had no effect and they were seen as a validation of the bull market that could not be prevent. We are looking at the same type of collapse in confidence this time around. The same fundamental act can have different interpretations. It is the glass half full or half empty.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
CCRider
CCRider
April 29, 2017 8:57 am

Once confidence is lost it’s extremely hard to get back. At that point awake people will want tangibles; real shit you can hold or hug. If you own a hunk of gold or a farm or a 1963 Vette Stingray you own the kind of wealth ‘They’ have to steal, not by subterfuge and chicanery as in currency manipulation but outright like the armed robbers they truly are-much harder to do. And the natterings of a lying old cunt like Yellen will just be so much foul air, like a lingering fart. I just pray the confidence loss extends past the banksters and their ersatz money but to their pimps who enable it all; the federal government.

WE DON’T NEED THOSE PEOPLE-THEY NEED US.

Suzanna
Suzanna
April 29, 2017 9:50 am

I suggest we tell the rapacious bankers to take their
debt owed and shove it. And somehow prevent them
from selling everything we own out from under us.

CCRider
CCRider
  Suzanna
April 29, 2017 1:05 pm

I really think it will come down to the military. I’m a big fan of repudiation. It’s the single way out for the best interests of average Americans. But the reaction will be (at least) 2 fold. 1st the federal government’s credit rating will nose dive and it will be much more difficult for them to borrow money going forward, which among other orgasmic delights will be the inability to finance war. The other is for the banksters to call in their collateral and start stealing our assets. For example, both major U.S. gold repositories, Fort Knox and (I believe) West Point are military bases. Both will have ultimate say in who walks off with the gold. Or, perhaps some foreign power siphoning off water from the Great Lakes. What will the Navy/Coast Guard do about it? I felt pretty good with generals like Zinni, Pace and Taguba and Adm Fallon. Not so much with Mc Chrystal and Petraeus. The currant batch? Who knows?