Find Madeleine

Find Madeleine

Okay, how about now? Is today too soon?

Let’s Find Madeleine right now.

Yesterday was Madeleine Mccann’s 14th birthday. It took ten years, but those who wish to Find Madeleine can finally discover what likely occurred, insofar as can be determined without power of subpoena.

“Find Madeleine” is the website setup and run by Madeleine’s Fund. Madeleine’s Fund is the “fighting fund” established by Madeleine’s parents and their attorneys.

Here’s what Finding Madeleine says on their home page:

  • There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed.
  • Madeleine is still missing and someone needs to be looking for her.
  • She is very young and vulnerable and needs our help.
  • We love her dearly and miss her beyond words.


The first three points are facts with which we agree. The fourth, well, that’s something that is unknowable to anyone but the Mccann’s.

Yesterday, Madeleine’s parents issued a  statement on the occasion of their daughter’s 14th birthday. The British press and the rest of the clown-car media gave it play while recycling the same facile stories they’ve been running for  ten years.

None of the press, save the original report, seem to have picked up on the admission by retired Detective Colin Sutton (published on May 3, 2017) that Operation Grange was conditioned, being constrained in what it could investigate.

We do not know the precise details of what happened in Praia da Luz. Some think Madeleine went missing a day or so earlier. Some think the “last photo” was doctored. Some think Murat was involved. Some think she was being abused in Praia da Luz. Some think she died as a result. Some think her parents went driving about in a rental car with her corpse a few weeks later or stashed it in a coffin in the church in Praia da Luz.

We are confident, however, that Madeleine did not die in Praia da Luz. Madeleine’s parents did not kill her or contribute to her death, as has been alleged nearly ad infinitum.

They did the only thing that is worse than that.

We believe her parents betrayed her in the most horrible way. They participated in conveying her to an elite pedophile or network.

It is easier to consider the Mccann’s are responsible for killing her than that they consigned their 3-year old daughter to such a horror. It goes against all of what makes us human to believe a parent would betray their child in such a horrific manner. And certainly not two privileged, attractive, white yuppie M.D.’s surrounded by elite media celebrities, the wealthy and powerful.

Many thousands of pages, and entire websites, have been devoted to analyzing this or that sequence or event related to Madeleine.

What we do know is that Madeleine wasn’t abducted by a stranger; she wasn’t abducted at all. Rather, she was taken, secreted and sequestered, as British High Court Justice Hogg has stated. Insofar as she was able, and in the only open court hearing in Britain related to Madeleine’s disappearance, Judge Hogg told us what happened to Madeleine.

It was Judge Hogg who convened that hearing and allowed the transcript to be made public. Judge Hogg could have kept Madeleine’s Wardship a secret in perpetuity. Yet it was Judge Hogg who gave permission for Madeleine’s Wardship to be disclosed to the public.

There was no reason for Judge Hogg to make that hearing public, but she did.

Judge Hogg did not like what she was being asked to do and she wanted it on the public record.

Most importantly, how did Judge Hogg know Madeleine did not die in Apartment 5A?

 

To us, what is most important is what didn’t happen, what is being suppressed, and to know that Madeleine’s disappearance involved state secrets and state actors.

Why?

In previous chapters we have established the following facts:

  • Critical evidence that Madeleine was a victim of abuse by one or both of her parents and one of their vacationing friends was suppressed by British authorities.
  • The Mccann’s deleted their cell phone histories from their phones shortly after Madeleine vanished.
  • Matters related to Madeleine’s disappearance are a matter of British State intelligence and national security and are exempt from FoI.
  • At the initiative of her parents, Madeleine fell under the jurisdiction, custody and secrecy rules of the British High Court Family Division shortly after she vanished.
  • At that time the High Court issued various orders, including allowing the Mccann’s to rifle through confidential police investigatory files at will.
  • The High Court Family Division has the power to issue gag orders to the British press.
  • D-notices are in effect that prohibit the involvement of MI5 in Madeleine’s disappearance from being revealed in the British press.
  • The vast majority of child abductions and abuse cases involve a parent, a relative, or a close friend.
  • Other than multiple contradictory, inconsistent and shifting statements made by the Mccann’s and their vacationing friends, there is not a shred of evidence supportive of their contention that Madeleine was abducted by a stranger.
  • There is no forensic evidence of an abduction, there is no body, and there are no witnesses to what occurred in Apartment 5A when Madeleine went missing.
  • The British Operation Grange investigation has yet to question the Mccann’s abduction by stranger story.
  • Operation Grange has not taken sworn testimony from the Mccann’s or any of their vacationing friends.
  • Operation Grange was precluded from pursuing investigatory paths other than the abduction by a stranger story.
  • A near life-long pedophile, Sir Clement Freud, a part-time resident of Praia da Luz, insinuated himself with the Mccann’s shortly after Madeleine disappeared.
  • Clement and the Mccann’s exchanged dozens of emails and phone calls, none of which have been released or further detailed.
  • Matthew Freud, Clement’s son, hired on the Mccann’s British government-assigned spokesman to his high-powered London PR firm after Clement insinuated himself with the Mccann’s.
  • Matthew’s name and contact information are in Jeffrey Epstein’s little black book.

Given the foregoing, it is utterly indefensible for a legitimate investigation to ignore abuse may have played a role in Madeleine’s disappearance. Yet Operation Grange NEVER pursued this path.

Which means that Operation Grange is a hoax and a fraud. The British government has been actively protecting the Mccann’s and suppressing an investigation into potential abuse for ten years.

We know this because the only scenario the Grangers considers is that put forth by those who are most likely suspect.

Abduction by a stranger scenario is the least probable scenario. It literally rests on nothing.

We must also recognize that critical information is being withheld by the British government, that Madeleine was likely a victim of abuse by one or both of her parents or their friends, and that one or more of them participated in a staged abduction in which the British security services were involved.

Even if one disagrees with the foregoing scenario, it should be evident by now that it has far more validity than the abduction by stranger scenario.

And why do we think Madeleine did not die in Apartment 5A? After all, the best blood hound and cadaver dogs in England found sign of blood and a corpse. “Dogs don’t lie” is the familiar refrain. There are two responses:

  • The dogs were offered and run by the British. We have already established the British to have been involved in a coverup of the Mccann’s. The dogs found what they were supposed to find. They served their purpose which was: to create false narrative for the Portuguese investigators (which they fell for hook line and sinker), to create a public impression that Madeleine was dead; and, to dirty up the Mccann’s enough to make them appear guilty of murder or negligent homicide.
  • But what did not happen? The dogs were not deployed shortly after Madeleine vanished. Rather the Brits waited 3 months to bring them in. Why weren’t they deployed the first week when a trail would be fresh? And why weren’t they deployed at Murat’s home? After all, he was an arguido at that time.

In the next Chapter of “Finding Madeleine” we will document how the two British MI5 operatives (Exton and Helligen) hired by Madeleine’s Fund deliberately fabricated evidence supportive of the tenuous abduction by stranger theory concocted by the Mccann’s and their friends.

The evidence fabricated by Exton and Halligen is two “e-fit” images of a man dubbed “Smithman”. Smithman found his way to Operation Grange. Operation Grange foolishly released the fabricated images in 2013 as a person of interest in Madeleine’s supposed abduction. The images proved to be yet another red herring.

Here’s the fabricated e-fit images:

“Smithman”

Despite having been fabricated, Smithman IS evidence. He is evidence of one of the largest hoaxes ever perpetrated by the British government. Bizarrely, and three years after the Grangers released him and he was subsequently forgotten, Smithman found his way into the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Which is how we got into this mess in the first place. Although we did not set out to do so, when we followed the path to Smithman it led us to Madeleine.

Like the Portuguese, who have likely figured out the whole thing was a sick British game, we stopped paying attention to Madeleine many years ago. But Madeleine came to enter the 2016 U.S. Presidential election in the most bizarre way imaginable. That got our attention. It set us off on what turned into a shocking a six month journey from which we are still recovering.

To Find Madeleine, or to purchase “Finding Madeleine”, please visit us at our home at findingmadeleine.com

Author: Centinel

Just a guy from the neighborhood.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
May 13, 2017 6:27 pm

Two clarifications:

We said that we agree with the Mccann’s statement that there is nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed. We agree with this statement insofar as her disappearance and delivery to her final destination is concerned. Madeleine was and is a prize of inestimable value, ALIVE.

Those to whom Madeleine was delivered would have made it abundantly clear to those who executed the operation that no harm was to come to her.

But that does not mean we believe Madeleine was unharmed after she was delivered to her final destination. Rather, she was likely subject to horrific physical and psychic abuse, as further illustrated in “Finding Madeleine”.

But something else strikes us as very odd about the Mccann’s contention of that no harm has come to Madeleine. The Mccann’s have claimed since May 3, 2007 that Madeleine was abducted by pedophiles for purposes of defilement and abuse.

Just what do they think those pedophiles intended for their daughter?

Or, do the Mccann’s now contend their daughter was taken by a well-intentioned individual who wanted nothing but a cute little girl to shower their love and affection upon? And, if so, why would they think such?

Centinel

The Romulan
The Romulan
May 14, 2017 3:53 am

Jeez, conspiracy nuts.

The kid is long dead. Whatever she was used for or if she was just taken to shut her up after a burglary gone wrong, she’s dead.

She’s not some teenage love doll for some pedophile/s. She’s dead, Jim.

I don’t get the fascination with the case.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  The Romulan
May 14, 2017 10:19 am

@ Mr Romulan

Thanks for your comment.

You have offered a theory that “the kid is long dead” or that she was “used for” something. What is your theory for how that happened? Did it involve a criminal act in which two or more people collaborated in her death or to cover it up? If so, you’ve just offered a conspiracy theory. Which according to you makes you a “conspiracy nut.”

A criminal conspiracy is two or more people collaborating to do something in violation of the law. In the minutes after her mother found her to be missing she exclaimed “they took her” and “the bastards took her”. The next day her mother claimed “a couple” took her. Madeleine’s father was overheard on the phone claiming pedophiles took her.

So, that would be a conspiracy.

There are those who believe the Mccann’s murdered her. That’s two or more people. Another conspiracy.

There are those who believe the child suffered an accident and her parents and their friends collaborated to cover it up. Another conspiracy.

There are those who believe the child died after being given an overdose of sedatives and her parents and their friends collaborated to cover it up. Another conspiracy.

There are those who believe a Belgian or other elite pedophile network placed an order for a little girl and Madeleine filled it. Yet another conspiracy.

There are those who believe she wandered off and was taken by gypsies who have held her since, or murdered her and are covering it up. Yet another conspiracy.

In the book, “Finding Madeleine” (being serialized on TBP), we posit one or both of Madeleine’s parents and some of their friends collaborated with elements of the British govt to deliver Madeleine to an elite pedo or network under color of authority. Yup, it’s another conspiracy.

There are those, such as yourself, who claim she was taken as a result of a botched burglary (despite the fact nothing was missing or out of place in the apartment except for a 3-year old girl) and the burglars have collaborated to cover it up. Another conspiracy.

The only explanation for Madeleine’s disappearance that is not a conspiracy is that she wandered off on her own and drowned in the ocean and her body drifted out to sea, or she fell into a deep well where her body remains despite exhaustive searches to find her.

So, we see that your dismissal of any scenario involving two or more people collaborating to commit an unlawful act is absolutely useless in explaining what happened, other than if she wandered off on her own and drowned in the ocean and her body drifted out to sea.

If we took your criteria for dismissal of any crimes in which two or more people collaborated, I suspect a large majority of those convicted of serious crimes would need to be released from prison.

Every criminal investigator must start off with a theory of a crime. If that theory involves two or more people, then every criminal investigator is a “conspiracy theorist”.

The term “conspiracy theory”, as in your comment, invokes a powerful meme designed to shut down thought. While it works on most, it doesn’t work on all. It seems to have worked on you, even as you posit your own conspiracy theory, for which there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever.

Cent.

Maggie
Maggie
May 14, 2017 7:29 am

Romulan,

I agree with you for the most part, but then a few other abductions/kidnappings that have occurred within my adult memory tickle at the memory keys and I know that on more than one occasion, a lost child has turned up in a nearby home, stumbled upon by accident when a visitor opened a door unexpectedly.

I remember in Oklahoma in the mid-1990s, a kindergarten student was taken from a local school (Choctaw) by a stepfather, angry at being cast out by the child’s mother. They both disappeared, but the man was found in Florida a year later, convicted of kidnapping the little boy from the school. The principal, to his credit, had tried to stop him and was found chained to a tree in the woods nearby.

The man, an immigrant from Central America, claimed to have taken the boy to friends who planned to sell him in South America. I can only imagine what that means from a horrified mother’s point of view.

So, if Madeleine is alive, she’s not fine at all. But, the likelihood they are gonna get her back at this point is slim indeed.