Guest Post by Martin Armstrong
I can confirm that I was told to be a good boy and the government would hand me millions of dollars a year to put out studies to support whatever. They tell you what the conclusion is to be and you then write a report that they can claim some expert has derived this as if it is really impartial. They would not let anyone even speak at the Paris Climate Conference who disagreed with them. There are over 31,000 scientists who have stood up and said this is a hoax.
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
The words “climate change” are meaningless…just like the words “racist” (ebonics “rayciss”) and “racism”. The climate change zealots sound like Charlie Brown’s school teacher to me.
“The left also champions environmentalism and yells about global warming, but allows companies to continue to spew out CO2 as long as they pay a tax.”
M. Armstrong
Note: I love CO2
So do trees.
You mean my government elected representitives have conspired and paid people with tax payer funds to lie to us the great unwashed ? Oh the horror LOL ! The real question is : Has our government reps ever conspired to tell us the truth about anything ? NO ! Plausible Deniability is a duck and cover for lies !
Until all elected officials know that any time it is discovered that their actions are not 100% honest and supporting the American people’s interests .They can and will be held to account by the people of their district and will be punished severely up to and including a public execution and their family will be stripped of all wealth gained by their actions . Lies and coverups will continue to be SOP !
“public execution”??
If you support capital punishment, then you DO trust your government.
Didn’t anyone else find it odd that pretty much all the media stopped saying global warming and switched to saying climate change.
Which is why when ‘climate change is used, ask if they are referring to Natural Climate Change or Global Warming Climate Change.
Liberals know that 50% of American voters are too stupid to recognize that the wool is being pulled over their eyes.
Not odd at all, the msm tells a lie until everyone figures out it’s bullshit then they just make up a new lie.
I like boat guys idea. Usually I would be against bringing someones family into the mix but in the case of the lawyers/politicians that seem to have no conscious or remorse stripping them and their family of EVERYTHING might get their attention.
Has he published anything in a peer-reviewed jourrnal?
And I believe his degree is in Journalism; how does that make him a “scientist”?
http://www.uscentrist.org/platform/positions/environment/context-environment/john_coleman/the-amazing-story-behind-the-global-warming-scam
Through self study and correspondence courses at Penn State (all while he was working on television full-time) Coleman obtained Professional membership status in the American Meteorological Society
Peer-review….don’t you mean ‘pal-review’.
Mr. McGoo, peering.
Anytime you see someone crying “peer review,” just remember this is a meaningless ‘appeal to authority’ logic error. Peer-review as done today is glorified proof-reading, and even then they let an embarrassing amount of crap thru. Also keep in mind, the climate-apocalypse academic crowd (hockey stick boy, the East Anglia email scammers, etc) set this up along time ago, reviewing each other’s papers in a giant circle-jerk to craft the appearance of “consensus.”
Geez Wabbit,
I wonder if Galileo Galilei was ‘peer-reviewed’ ?
Galileo started in medicine.
Hi all.
Most stupidest interview I have seen in a long time. Of course, there is no consensus except that 99,98 % of publishing scientists on topic of climate change agrees human activities are the dominant driver in climate warming.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0270467617707079?utm_source=Additional+thoughts+about+the+scientific+consensus+on+human-caused+climate+chang&utm_campaign=Journal+Article&utm_medium=email&
But really, it does NOT MATTER. Since vast majority of humanity does not give a rats ass.
Best,
Alex
I see you qualified your ridiculous statement about 99.98% of scientists with the word “publishing”. Now go ahead and admit that you mean “scientists whose opinions have been ‘published’ in mainstream media outlets”. While you’re at it, you may as well admit that the figure, 99.98%, was pulled right out of your ass.
Yeah, when you see “consensus” used as an authoritative tool used to support the climate BS, you know they really dont have a clue what actual “science” is about
As far as “climate change” goes, what’s the longest period of a worldwide stable climate that is known to science?
We’ve had a number of warm-ups in last several thousand years that have been documented to some degree. The Medieval Warm Period lasted approx 300 years, and allowed humans to make some the biggest leaps forward in architecture, technology, and art, outside of the 20th century, which was also relatively stable. The Roman Warm period was pretty good, and it lasted about 600 years… so this was probably the longest one in recorded history. But here’s the key takeaway: human civilizations flourish during warm periods and suffer catastrophic collapses w/ new empires rising to power, and severe weather disruptions & crop failures during times of cold. This should present a warning to modern times, as we are likely entering into a new cold dip. Prepare.
Destroyed? Hardly. Coleman does not hold a degree in climatology or any related discipline, nor has he studied or conducted any research in that field; he merely parrots arguments advanced by others.
I think Global Warming/Climate Change is just the cover story, our Government has been working on weather modification for many years.
I’m sure we’ve all seen the Chemtrails, like tic-tac-toe in our skies.
But with any experimentation they don’t know exactly what might happen, so they put out the cover story about Global Warming, mainly to cover their asses.
Eventually they critiqued it to Climate Change so they could cover any extreme weather conditions that might inadvertently be created.
The Earth isn’t getting any hotter, but it feels hotter to us because we’re all pussies, and have become acclimated to the comfortable 75 degrees of Air Conditioning over the last 40 or 50 years…
_______________________________________________
You hear the term “climate change” associated with nearly EVERY story on the Weather Channel these days. I am sure this man is as disgusted with what has happened with his creation as so many other entrepreneurs have been over the centuries.
Trump has been in office long enough for us to question why he hasnt done anything about how funding only goes toward studies that show man man climate change.
When the “activists” captured the “climate journals”, “Peer-reviewed” became a sick joke. Or didn’t you read any of the East Anglia emails?
Alexander Ac has a short memory, and hopes you do too. When “respected climate scientists” resort to hiding data, “adjusting” datasets to show what they want them to, and pressuring journals to deny publication to papers by “climate deniers” JUST SO THEY CAN CLAIM no “peer reviewed” papers have been published that deny global warming, SCIENCE is not present. ACTIVISM is.
Global warming is not occurring, so the activists had to change the terms of the debate to “climate change”. Notice that they are NOT claiming we should burn MORE fossil fuels to prevent the next ice age!
99% of ACTIVISTS may agree that climate change is a problem; the rest of us would do well to be wary of their lies.
It is a KNOWN FACT that 77.29% of statistics are made up on the spot.
The Sun has been heading to a Grand Solar Minimum Phase since about 1998 and the Earth has been cooling. The next Mini-Ice Age has begun (slowly the first couple decades) but the winter of 2019 should make it so obvious that Al Gore the faux-Climatologist has screwed his own Chakra that he will become as infamous as Al Capone the Chicago Business Organizer. PS: TPTB want the Useless Idiots to be so unprepared that 5 billion freeze and starve to death.