GIGO and the Intelligence of Countries: Disordered Thoughts

Guest Post by Fred Reed

Apologies to the reader. Perhaps I wax tedious. But the question of intelligence is both interesting to me and great fun as talking about it puts commenters in an uproar. It is like poking a wasp’s nest when you are eleven. I am a bad person.

Clearing the underbrush: Obviously intelligence is largely genetic–if it were cultural in origin, all the little boys who grew up in Isaac Newton’s neighborhood would have been towering mathematical geniuses–and obviously the various tests of intellectual function have, at least among testees of similar background, considerable relation to intelligence. Some individuals have more of it than others. For example, Hillary, a National Merit Finalist, scored higher than 99.5 percent of Illinois and can reliably be suspected of being bright. Some groups are obviously smarter than other groups. Mensans and Nobelists are smarter than sociologists. Of course, so are acorns.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)

But knowing that a thing exists and measuring it are not the same thing.

Years back, Marilyn vos Savant had a quiz column in which a question was: “Two bugs in a jar reproduce, doubling their number every minute. The jar is full in an hour. How long does it take to half fill the jar?”

I will speculate, subject to correction, that to anyone who has worked with computers, at least at the register level, the answer is obvious on inspection. I will further speculate that those of equal intelligence, including mathematical ability, but graduates of liberal arts, will have more trouble with it. The nature of a base-two exponential expansion is probably not obvious to someone who has never seen one.

If this is so, it would seem that experience affects the ability to solve problems such as one finds on tests of mental ability. Does this increase constitute an increase in intelligence?

Children in my demographic cohort were steeped, boiled, drowned in problem-solving and manipulation of symbols. The alphabet. Writing. “Mommy Beaver has three sticks and Little Baby Beaver has four. How many….?” Long division. Linear simultaneous equations in two unknowns. Derive the quadratic formula. Division of fractions. Endless word problems: If a tank is three-quarters full when it contains ten gallons, how many gallons….All of this by the eighth grade.

Would this lead to better performance on standardized tests, to include most IQ tests, compared to that of our (imaginary) identical twins raised in the Appalachian backwoods? Whatever the difference, it would be due to experience or, if you like, culture.

Virtuosity in taking tests is similarly affected by experience in taking tests. Like most in my generation, I was subjected to unending tests: an IQ test in the second grade when my teacher thought me retarded (as many readers still do). Some sort of Virginia test. PSATs. NMSQT. SATs. GREs. Marine Corps General Qualification Test. FSEE. And so on.

As I suppose others did, I learned the technique for acing tests. Run through all the questions rapidly, picking the low-hanging fruit, putting a tick mark by those questions not instantly obvious. Run through again, answering those of the tick-markeds susceptible to a minute’s thought, double tick-marking the really difficult ones. Then to the really hard ones and finally, with an eye on the clock and knowing how the tests are scored, eliminate one or two answers on the remaining ones and guess.

People who don’t know this, and try to go straight through, may not even finish.

Among the lumpen-IQatry, the tendency is to regard SATs, NAEP, and so on as surrogates for IQ, and thus for intelligence. This is error. The SATs in particular are not intelligence tests and were never intended to be. Their function was to measure the student’s ability to handle complex ideas in complex normal English, which is what college students used to do. The tests did did this well. The were not intelligence tests as their scores were functions of at least three things, intelligence, background, and experience in taking tests. IQ = f(a,b,c…)

Of course vocabulary is part of normal English. Consequently the famous objection that a ghetto kid would not know the word “regatta,” making the tests unfair, makes no sense. He would also not know “expurgate,” “putrescent,” “turpitude,” or “exponent.” However intelligent, he would not be ready to read university texts.

Today many students take SAT-prep courses which seem to raise scores quite a bit. If so, this largely invalidates the tests and very much works against those who cannot afford or have not heard of the prep courses.

Curiously, people who you would expect to solve problems readily sometimes don’t. When I was maybe sixteen, in its letters columns New Scientist asked, “why does a mirror reverse letters from left to right but not from top to bottom” Obviously a mirror does not reverse letters, but for a couple of weeks readers advanced theories as to why they do. At least one of these involved considerable mathematics. This surprised me since the dim presumably do not read New Scientist.

Now, countries. Equatorial Guineans are said to have a mean IQ of 59. In the absence of demonstration to the contrary, I am perfectly happy to believe that they are not very bright. (The CIA Factbook puts literacy there at 95%. You figure it out.) However, the distribution being symmetrical, more than half of them have an IQ under 60. This is in the realm of serious retardation. A substantial fraction would be below 45. Is this plausible? How can they remember to find their way home at night?

Maybe they have a lot of homeless. Someone should study This.

Oddities abound. For example, purebred Mexican Indians are said to have a (mean) IQ of 83, indicating borderline retardation and suggesting that they should be at very low levels of intellectual achievement. They are. OK. So far, so good.

Colombians are said to have an IQ of 84. They run a modern country with all the credentials of airlines, telecommunications and the like. That one IQ point must be a pretty strong one, with a gym membership perhaps anabolic steroids in the medicine cabinet. Or maybe the scale is phenomenally non-linear. Or something.

American blacks are said to be at IQ 85. Being more intelligent than Colombians, they should certainly be able to run modern countries–unless maybe their one IQ point difference runs backwards. It begins to look as if each IQ point needs to be examined separately for individual behavior. And of course if blacks can run complex enterprises, that they don’t must be due to white privilege or slavery. Gotcha.

Then the Irish, long said to have a mean IQ of 86 (before being promoted to 100, perhaps for good behavior) had a First World European country. We conclude that IQ has no reliable relation to national outcome.

Curiously, in the third century BC the purebred Mexican Indians invented writing and an exponential-positional number system, and made extraordinarily accurate astronomical observations. This would seem peculiar in the mildly retarded, but perhaps these were really smart mildly retarded Indians. Now, in the past, any time I have suggested that Mexicans might have done anything requiring intelligence, I have been assured by commenters that only white Mexicans could have done it. All right, I concede the possibility that only white really smart mildly retarded purebred Indians invented writing. What else could explain it?.

Look, I have a disordered mind. I can’t hello it.

Now, unless we believe that an 83 IQ is sufficient to invent number systems–do we?–something must have drastically lowered the intelligence of those white purebred Indians. What? Since we are all good Darwinians, there must have been strong selective pressures for stupidity. This suggests a very modern organization of society. Here we enter the ghostly realm of genes assumed to exist acted upon by selective pressures that can neither be measured nor shown to have existed to produce effects which cannot be correlated with the pressures that may or may not have existed.

But these are deep waters better left my superiors.

19
Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
BUCKHED
BUCKHED

Damn Fred..reading that gave me a headache. You’re welcome to come to the next philosopher are us meeting here in Charleston .

Neil Dunn
Neil Dunn

So some European explorers arrived, intermingled, and the resulting IQ was lower. These same Europeans could possibly also have been responsible for a lowered recalculated average IQ of those who remained in Europe.

rhs jr
rhs jr

And your point was? FYI: The descendants of S.A. Indians have such a high percentage of European genes that racist speculated that the Spanish killed the men and ravished the women. Unfortunately, the Spanish brought Smallpox that killed about 90% of the Indians; however, the real reason for the high European gene rate was that children with some Spanish genes had a better survival rate. That also raised the Indians IQs.

pyrrhus
pyrrhus

Fred, having done a 360 from claiming that aboriginals are geniuses a while back, has written a fine column, but missed a few salient facts here….In fact, the correlation between average IQ in a country and GdP/capita is an unbelievably high .70….The exceptions, like Qatar, are sitting on a mound of hydrocarbons being produced by Westerners, who pay royalties.When the hydrocarbons run out, it will be back to raising goats, and negligible GDP….Some of the things that puzzle him are doubtless small sample sizes, and the fact that small minorities of whites and asians actually do all the brain work in many countries in South America….Still, it’s progress!

digitalpennmedia
digitalpennmedia

he also failed to take into consideration the minimim intellectual level needed to understand and operate OTHERS technology. In his Columbia example, they have boat loads of oil and had many opportunities to PURCHASE all of those modern items of a more advanced technology whereas the pure mexican indians are poor as dirt and corrupted to no end to boot. Having the tech doesnt mean that they invented or engineered it. The article is a poor argument and poorly thought out by someone writing about intelligence. A one dimensional thinker couldnt possibly understand or do justice to a hypothesis and then go on to test it.

James the Wanderer

I agree, there is a ton of difference between Inventing, Building and Operating. To invent the processes used in oil refining took years and lots of really bright people; the same guy DIDN’T invent atmospheric distillation, vacuum distillation, catalytic cracking, catalytic reforming and all the additives that prevent your gasoline from corroding your engine, coking up the cylinders, clogging off your fuel injectors, burning unevenly (knocking), grabbing water from the air and all the other things a modern gasoline can do. Likewise, the same guys that invented didn’t BUILD the refineries; groups of fairly talented engineers like Kellogg/Brown & Root, Fluor, Jacobs and so on do that. It even takes some talent to operate a modern refinery, but an awful lot of sophisticated design and layout goes into making it possible for a half-dozen high school graduates to control and run a unit that cracks a hundred thousand barrels per day of gunk into gas oils (although frequently the supervision is also engineering graduates).
Most automobile operators can barely put gas in the tank and schedule an oil change.

BB

Well I know I got a high IQ .Just can’t prove it.Fred would argue any dumbass could drive a FedEx truck but apparently that’s not true.For one thing you got to be drug and alcohol free.You got to be in overall good health.You got to have tons of patience with people and traffic .I realize these have nothing to do with IQ so maybe Fred is right But I’m sure I got what it takes.

Montefrio

Not one of Fred’s more coherent pieces, at least not at first. Nevertheless, notwithstanding his inherent pro-Mex prejudice, his point (or what I believe it is) is well taken: our (NW European-biased) IQ tests are skewed unfairly, favoring those of NW European background, as would be expected in a society composed of same until not that long ago. The thing is, see, that I trump Fred by decades (starting for real in ’66) in dealing with Hispanics (speaking their language, I might add) and while I recognize their intellectual gifts (quite different from those of the Anglo-Saxon) am not prepared to concede to them much “equality” in spite of blood relatives with Hispanic ascendance. Some there is, sure, but true equality with respect to useful intelligence is something acquired, not necessarily inborn.

Put in more easily comprehended terms, Amerinds are on the whole not all that “bright” and if any assimilation is to be had, it’s we “white” folks who will have to adapt, because the Amerinds aren’t up to it by nature. Mestizos, well, that’s a kind of intellectual and cultural lottery, but if I lived in the USA, I seriously doubt I’d want to play. We here in Hispanolándia have our own rules by which we must play. Imho Fred needs to learn them and let gringoísmo go, because when all is said and done, “lawdog don’t go down here”. The USA plays by different rules and if you don’t like ’em, lump ’em.

Iconoclast421
Iconoclast421

“If a tank is three-quarters full when it contains ten gallons” then it is metric because that is 50 liters. I aint ever seen no tank that was 13.3 gallons.

Gator
Gator

Haha that was my first thought as well, who would design a car and decide on a 13.3 gallon tank?

Fulton

Chevrolet with my new Cruz Diesel

Annie
Annie

Big difference between smartness, IQ, and common sense. Many people with high IQs have very little common sense because they assume that they know everything.

Llpoh
Llpoh

Common sense does not design jet engines. High IQ does not mean you can change a tire.

Purplefrog
Purplefrog

So how was it that these IQ levels were determined?

Jimmy Torpedo
Jimmy Torpedo

A lot of us here could explain that to you but why should we waste our time when you aren’t even willing to do some basic research on your own?

Dennis Roe
Dennis Roe

What was the IQ of the people who wrote the IQ test?

Jason Calley
Jason Calley

Twelve points lower than they thought they were.

Ozum
Ozum

lol

Discover more from The Burning Platform

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading