Guest Post by Rand Paul
No one wants to repeal ObamaCare more than I do. As a career physician, there are few in Congress who have as much firsthand experience on all sides of the health care debate as I do. I’ve voted for repeal. I’ve sponsored my own Repeal and Replace plans.
But I’ve also led the fight to stop and block “ObamaCare Lite” plans offered in both houses of Congress this year. These have been plans that have spent nearly as much money as ObamaCare, that left most of the taxes and regulations in place, and basically failed to honor our promise of repeal.
Unfortunately, they’re back again, and I must add to the list of ObamaCare Lite plans to oppose the new Graham/Cassidy bill that was introduced last week in the Senate.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
In all ways, this bill is also ObamaCare Lite. In no way is it repeal the way we promised. I will oppose this bill as I did the other fake repeal bills, and I urge those who want repeal to do so, as well.
Make no mistake – Graham/Cassidy keeps ObamaCare funding and regulations in place. Oh, it rearranges the furniture a bit, changes some names, and otherwise masks what is really going on – a redistribution of ObamaCare taxes and a new Republican entitlement program, funded nearly as extravagantly as ObamaCare.
Graham/Cassidy doesn’t repeal a single ObamaCare insurance regulation. All of the Title 1 rules, the Essential Health Benefit rules, all of them – they’re still in place here.
States may grovel on bended knee for some relief to the federal government, with no guarantee of success and no permanent solution beyond the current administration.
I believe the president and HHS Secretary would WANT to do the right thing on state waivers, but I’ve already spent the better part of the year arguing with an army of bureaucrats and lawyers in the administration trying to get them to do something President Trump and I AGREE should be done – loosening up the rules on joining group plans. This would be a huge change for Americans and a big fix for our system – yet they can’t get it done. The idea disappears into the Swamp. I’m afraid even the minor waivers of regulations envisioned here would do the same.
This bill is also set to spend us further into debt. Even the bill’s authors and proponents, using what I’m sure are rosy numbers, admit that their ObamaCare Lite bill will spend 90 percent of what we currently spend on ObamaCare. Other estimates are closer to 95 percent. Either way, did anyone go out to vote so we could repeal only 5 or 10 percent of ObamaCare? I didn’t.
Graham/Cassidy won’t fix our health care problems, and it will become a permanent drain on the treasury – one that is already $20 trillion in debt, with a $700 billion deficit next year.
Repeal of ObamaCare, if we did it “root and branch” as some suggested in their campaigns, would have saved over a trillion dollars in spending over 10 years. Instead, we are left trying to save crumbs while leaving the system largely intact.
I won’t do it. I know many of my colleagues are getting desperate to say they “did something,” and I can sympathize with that. They figure most people aren’t paying attention, and the press conference where they said they did something would carry them through the elections next year.
But I’m worried. I’m worried about what happens when premiums continue to go up double digits (and they will). I’m worried about what happens when the system continues its downward spiral, but this time it is “GOP/TrumpCare” that gets blamed. And they will.
I’m looking ahead past the next election, to the day of reckoning when the bills are due, and we are out of money, because we did the wrong thing for the wrong reasons.
Graham/Cassidy keeps a trillion dollars in taxes and spending and redistributes it. And, somehow, people are looking to call this “federalism.” I wish it were, but that’s just not the case.
Their sales pitch is, “If you like your ObamaCare, you can keep it.” That’s nice, but I don’t like it, I don’t want to keep it, and I don’t want to keep paying for it. So how about we all keep our word and get rid of it?
To my colleagues, I say, “No thanks.” This bill is no better than the last attempt and should receive no more support. It should not pass. I’ll vote no, and I’ll fight to stop the newest ObamaCare Lite plan.
Anything that weasel Graham thinks is good, must be bad.
I can’t find it now, since Denninger’s site seems to have been emptied of its archives, but he wrote a good piece a while back about how Rand Paul proposed legislation that not only didn’t get rid of the fake bills (invoice the consumer $10,000 for something that insurance would settle in full for $2,500), it actually codified and gave legal safe harbor to that fake-billing practice.
Graham-Cassidy gets rid of the obscene, novel and qualitatively different legal theorem that the national government can force an individual to purchase a product solely because that individual is alive. The individual mandate is unprecedented in American law and should be disgorged as soon as possible before its ongoing existence becomes part of a legal rationale for its supposed constitutionality.
Rand Paul truly is a man with no answers. You aren’t leading if nobody is with you. Kentucky, next time this cuck stands for election, do the right thing. Voting against a bill that gets rid of the bongocare mandates, is, voting to keep the mandates. Key to cutting insurance companies down to size is removing their ability to tax, with the IRS as their enforcement arm. Paul is pushing straight repeal. Fair enough. But he got his vote, and lost, 45-55, just a month or two back. I’ve sat on a few charity and civic boards over the years, and I’ve had to deal with people like Rand. You give them a vote on their ideas, they get crushed, and the next month, they want to vote again. They can’t let it go. They never change anybody’s mind. But they sure waste a lot of everyone’s time. Democracy doesn’t work unless votes mean something. Fuck you, you effeminate midget.
Tweets by Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) – Twitter
https://mobile.twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/910611636687425536
This is from Politico, as left leaning as it gets. I like everything listed here. So remind me again what the arguments against this are? Rand Paul, you’re a worthless Fruit Loop. Graham-Cassidy Health Care Bill: What you need to know
http://www.politico.com/interactives/2017/graham-cassidy-health-care-bill-what-you-need-to-know/?lo=ap_d1
If you get down to the truth of it, nobody has any damn idea what to do and everybody is unwilling to admit it.
Getting rid of the mandate without fixing anything else is just going to dig a deeper financial hole, and by doing so republicans would be putting their stamp of approval on it. It is not a smart play from any angle. I therefore expect this to pass!
Republicans aren’t voting for Graham-Cassidy. They’re just voting for Obamacare repeal.
Apparently no one cares what the bill actually does.
Looks like another on of those “you gotta pass the bill to see what’s in it” kind of deals.
On the one hand, I can see McCain is either bought off by Big Medical / Big Pharma, or he is cynically calculating that failing to repeal ObamaDontCare leaves the Demoncrats on the hook for the inevitable collapse it will cause. Either way, he’s a tool / snake / POS for ignoring the suffering of the middle class (the poor don’t pay ObamaDontCare premiums but get the coverage, the rich have their own medical care self-funded).
Whether Rand is a tool or not, at least he’s trying to get ObamaDontCare repealed in its entirety. I can’t see that as a “successful” strategy in a chamber full of sellouts, but kudos for at least trying.
The collapse will solve the problem – all the sick and infirm, those dependent on medcare to survive, will die. Those healthy enough to survive without interventions will live for a while. And those who are rich enough to pay for their own needed health care – will be eaten by the hordes of hungry uninsured.