“Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who, so far as his power and influence extend, will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man.
We must not conclude merely upon a man’s haranguing upon liberty, and using the charming sound, that he is fit to be trusted with the liberties of his country. It is not unfrequent to hear men declaim loudly upon liberty, who, if we may judge by the whole tenor of their actions, mean nothing else by it but their own liberty, — to oppress without control or the restraint of laws all who are poorer or weaker than themselves.
It is not, I say, unfrequent to see such instances, though at the same time I esteem it a justice due to my country to say that it is not without shining examples of the contrary kind; — examples of men of a distinguished attachment to this same liberty I have been describing; whom no hopes could draw, no terrors could drive, from steadily pursuing, in their sphere, the true interests of their country; whose fidelity has been tried in the nicest and tenderest manner, and has been ever firm and unshaken.”
Samuel Adams
Isn’t this an admission that constitutional governance is a contradiction in terms? Just how many politicians do you think are “people whose manners are universally corrupt?” I’d say every one I ever saw, minus Ron Paul who was isolated, ignored and ostracized by his polar opposites in congress. So we have one politician in 200 years we could rely on to be faithful to the constitution. The truth is the constitution was stillborn. It was a coup against the Articles of Confederation, guaranteed to become tyrannical from the very beginning. To any extent governance can be held to a moral standard is where the governance units are small and diffused not a centralized behemoth with a monopoly of force.
SECEDE!
Which countries would you say are less “tyrannical” than ours, and why?
I don’t do homework assignments for others but to imagine the u.s. is the least tyrannical government in the world is absurd. Are the Swiss having every conversation/tweet/email recorded by their gov’t? Not that I give a shit. My point is that as Americans we should aspire to be free sovereign individuals and not the grateful slave that I suspect you are.