On The Threshold of War

I would like to think that the “carnival-barking Trumpster” is still having to “play to the CRIMINAL State” operatives still in key positions because he has yet to “solidify” enough power/control to “take them out” without himself/family being “taken out”. Whatever, I think that a huge pile of reeking dog-doo is about to get sucked in to the ventilation system of the whole “United SNAKES CORP, D[e]C[eit]” complex for all of everybody’s “senses” to “experience”.
I have absolutely no idea of the outcome, but . . . a big-ass WAR has been the int’l financial [D]elites/PTB (Psychopaths That Bugger) ultimate/final historical method of DISTRACTION to [quietly] “exit, stage left” to their remote digs from which they fund ALL the belligerents and . . . then the REBUILD with fiat currencies – “FUNDED” into circulation on the “AUTHORized sigs of the pleb borrowers while the coupon/interest amt remains UNfunded, of course.

A good rule of thumb is to never attack unless you have a 3 to 1 advantage. Russia’s Putin knows that the Russians in Syria don’t have the numerical advantage here and so has been doing his best to make things as difficult as possible for the US or any one else that wants to attack. Getting Turkey on their side was one of those things. If the US/NATO cabal can’t use Turkey as their base of operations or use their airspace to transit to Syria then they are left with Jordan or carrier based operations (Israel is obviously out since that would enrage the Muslim hordes).

I’m not sure Jordan wants to be used as a base for a US invasion more than they already have in Southern Syria so my bet would be the sea. That gives the US limited options since they don’t want to put very expensive assets like carriers into harms way. looking at from that stand point would assume that ship/sub based tomahawk missiles will be used again with about as much effect as before and maybe some long range stealth bombers/fighters. They will probably target Assad this time and his base of support in hopes of getting rid of him and throwing the country back into chaos.

I doubt that the Russians will shoot back unless directly attacked and have to say that their restraint is amazing so far. Also don’t forget the Iranians who have (or are about to have) Russian S400 anti-Aircraft systems that are top of the line. If they move those into Syria it would be game over for this exercise in saber rattling. If I was Russia though I’d use this as an opportunity to expand in Ukraine as a way to distract the war mongers from Syria as they have the strength there to go head to head with the US/NATO as well as the nuclear threat to keep them at bay.

Greetings,
I suspect it would go something like this:

1. Missiles, missiles, missiles! While the USA spent gobs of cash on hard assets like aircraft carriers & F35’s, the Russians have spent their money on anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. The US has paraded these assets around the world such that belligerents have all the info necessary to take them out when the time comes. To paraphrase Napoleon: Don’t fight the same enemy too many times or you’ll give away all your secrets.

It will most certainly be difficult to maintain our 800 military bases worldwide when no ship dares leave the protection of our coast. Our fleet, minus the subs, would be bottled up no differently than the German fleet was bottled up in WWI with sailors ready to mutiny if told they are going out in the open ocean. This will also be true of our slow moving transport fleet of aircraft.

2. Land War! Once it isn’t possible to sail or fly around anymore, our isolated servicemen will find themselves facing off against Russia’s tank force consisting of 22,000+ battle tanks. Perhaps our allies do have better tanks but they have few of them. Take, for example, Great Britain. Great Britain has 230. France and Italy have fewer than 500. If nothing can fly because of advanced missile technology then Europe will have to face the Russians at a severe disadvantage in armor. Given that they’ve had unlimited immigration from places that hate them, Great Britain would probably need that armor at home. 5th Column anyone???

3. Cyber War! Most of us wont know anything about what is coming because we will be sitting in the dark. Everyone now has their cyber armies so we’d probably lose electricity and banking for a brief period of time. Of course, 98% of internet traffic is carried on cables and I can only imagine that the transatlantic cables that carry data would all be cut further isolating us from any news outside of the official story. Get to know a Ham operator if ya wanna know what is going on.

4. In the end, a warlike man will turn on himself. The most dangerous animal is a wounded animal and there is no telling what Uncle Sam would do once he could no longer lash out at people 10,000 miles away. The best case scenario I can imagine is that we end up like Cuba with the worst case being the reincarnation of Pol Pot. There are other scenarios possible but people would become very preoccupied trying to keep what they already have working once the Asian supply chain is lost.