Capitalists vs. Capitalism

Guest Post by John Stossel

Capitalists vs. Capitalism

It’s bad enough when leftists smear capitalism. I hate it more when capitalists do it, too.

I’d hoped for more from the world’s current richest man, Jeff Bezos.

I love the service he created. Amazon lets me buy Christmas gifts right from my couch. Its prices are so low that the Fed chairman says Amazon probably lowered America’s inflation rate.

Entrepreneur Jeff Bezos is a hero. He created lots of jobs and better service, and he and his investors pay billions in taxes.

So I got angry when I saw Sen. Bernie Sanders’ opportunistic fundraising letters condemning Bezos because some of his workers are eligible for food stamps. “In ten seconds,” whined Sanders, Bezos makes “more money than the median employee of Amazon makes in an entire year.”

Well, at least Bezos will stand up for himself and the free market system that created his wealth, right?

At first, he did. Amazon called the criticisms “inaccurate” and “misleading.” It’s not the company’s fault that some workers qualify for handouts. More people would collect them if Amazon did not hire. By creating jobs, Bezos gives workers better choices.

But the anti-capitalist media don’t report that. They called Amazon a “sweatshop” and “cutthroat corporate jungle.”

So Amazon, to my disappointment, caved.

The company announced it would pay all its workers at least $15 per hour. MSNBC anchors grinned with glee.

Of course, the higher wage will be good for workers who still have jobs.

But what progressives don’t understand is that entry-level workers will be shut out. Poor people’s lives are made worse when laws meant to protect them price them out of jobs.

Those unhired workers are just as real, even if they’re harder to see.

My recent video on this features a restaurant manager who understands that she only got the opportunity to work because when she was a teenager, her boss could pay her much less. Had a higher minimum wage existed then, her labor would not have been worth it to the restaurant, and she would never have gotten a chance to work her way up the ladder.

“Minimum wage jobs are an entry-level job to get someone some experience,” says California restaurant manager Merv Crist. “Raise that high enough, you cut people out of the market completely!”

That’s not compassionate. Yet progressives talk as if a higher minimum wage lifts everyone.

At least Amazon is just one company, and Bezos just one CEO. If he wants to pay his workers more, fine. Amazon will attract better job applicants.

Beginners, kids, the disabled, etc. will still have other choices. They can get jobs elsewhere. Bezos was still a man to like.

But then Amazon announced that it would lobby government to force everyone to pay what Amazon pays!

This entrepreneur I admired turns out to be just another craven opportunist.

Bezos knows a higher minimum wage will hurt his competitors more than it hurts him. Amazon has a lead in automation. He’s already replacing some workers with robots.

I suppose Bezos is just being clever: He’ll use government to handcuff his rivals — and then pat himself on the back and pander to progressives who believe a higher minimum wage spreads money with no ill effects.

If American politicians are dumb enough to think they can raise wages by force, maybe a CEO has a fiduciary responsibility to his investors to pander to those politicians.

Bezos has done this before.

Amazon didn’t just announce it would build a second headquarters. It started a competition to see which politicians would squeeze their taxpayers most. One city council even voted to grab land to create a new town called Amazon, Georgia, if the company moved there.

That city should be grateful it wasn’t chosen. Now taxpayers in New York City and Arlington County, Virginia, will subsidize Amazon’s jobs.

This is not good for taxpayers or capitalism.

Politicians shouldn’t pander to companies, and companies shouldn’t pander to politicians. We need separation of shopping and state.

Bezos should stick to innovating, not scheming with politicians.

Sometimes the worst enemies of capitalism are capitalists.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
42 Comments
22winmag - Unreconstructedsouthernerbygraceofgod
22winmag - Unreconstructedsouthernerbygraceofgod
December 19, 2018 1:24 pm

Breakup Amazon!

I’m dumbfounded by Stossel’s position on Amazon.

Ghost Who Walks
Ghost Who Walks
December 19, 2018 1:28 pm

Bezos is not stupid. He knows what the results will be. Bezos and Sanders! Both engaged in a typical “hit ’em with a left; hit ’em with a right gambit. (((They))) understand what will happen to America. Thanks, (((guys)))!

flash
flash
December 19, 2018 3:17 pm

Stupid consumer units. This is just how capitalism works. The free market rewards those who are willing to work the hardest and sacrifice the most. If you can’t compete in the free market, well that’s just your own damn fault.

comment image

https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=amazoncom

bigfoot
bigfoot
December 19, 2018 3:27 pm

Stossel for President!

steve
steve
December 19, 2018 4:22 pm

We subsidize Bezos through the postal system. The post office moves his stuff at costs above the rate charged. New York/Arlington VA are going to subsidize him at the expense of local taxpayers? The 10th richest guy hardly needs the dough. BTW, richest man? Not even close. Rothschilds are suspected of having as much as $ 200-500 Trillion. After all, they’ve been raping the world longer than we’ve been a country.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  steve
December 19, 2018 4:29 pm

You would be amazed all the things that get subsidized. Amazin is just one of the squillions.

I mean, half the population gets subsidized. So do many farmers. SS and medicare recipients. Automakers. Etc etc etc. And it is a big reason why the US is swirling down the toilet. As are almost all “advanced economies”.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  steve
December 19, 2018 4:33 pm

By the way Steve, your comment about the Rothschilds is A grade moronic. Seriously. The entire net worth of the world is estimated at $250 trillion. Get a clue before you spout off.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 4:42 pm

That the lamest excuse for corporate welfare I’ve ever heard Red-Ass. Affirmative action did you no favors in the cognitive perception department.

Ellington Coyotington
Ellington Coyotington
  Anonymous
December 19, 2018 4:57 pm

“cognitive perception department”

Is that your department at U of Ph or are you now making up fake sciences? Admission to an Ivy League School takes more than affirmative action, it takes competition and testicular mental fortitude. Are you an affirmative action coal-tard baby?

Ellington Coyotington Momma's Baby Daddy
Ellington Coyotington Momma's Baby Daddy
  Ellington Coyotington
December 19, 2018 5:26 pm

Cognitive perspective Taco Breath. . And you’re welcome to believe any bullshit you want. don’t make it so. Red-Ass got the ride.

Black Kid Admitted to All 8 Ivy League Schools Isn’t What Media Claims
If there were no affirmative action–and he was compared to everyone else–he probably wouldn’t have gotten admitted into a single Ivy League school.

Black Kid Admitted to All 8 Ivy League Schools Isn’t What Media Claims

Ellington Coyotington
Ellington Coyotington
  Ellington Coyotington Momma's Baby Daddy
December 19, 2018 5:46 pm

Say it ain’t so , LLPOH.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Ellington Coyotington
December 20, 2018 7:27 am

EC – it ain’t so.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Ellington Coyotington Momma's Baby Daddy
December 20, 2018 7:20 am

That kid was highly qualified. The author of that crap is clueless. SATs of 2250 = 750 each test = top 1%. Got into all 8? Luck of the draw. Got into some? A dead certainty.

That was a moronic post.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Anonymous
December 19, 2018 5:18 pm

Anon – you imbecile. That you think I was suggesting there be corporate welfare is indicative that your momma had a serious alcohol and drug issue when pregnant with you.

I guess you missed the bit where I said the welfare system, including subsidies to automakers, etc., was a big reason the US is screwed. The only thing I might consider subsidizing would be your next batch of Depends.

BL
BL
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 5:02 pm

Loopey-Last figure I saw for Rothschild family wealth was 110 Trillion but I saw a figure of 150 Trillion in a article that I would not take as gospel.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  BL
December 19, 2018 5:13 pm

BL – you should look to more credible sources. The Rothschilds control banks with very large assets, but their actual personal net worth is nowhere. And seriously nowhere, near the numbers being tossed around. Do you seriously think they own have the entire world’s net worth? Double the entire net worth of the US?

Do not double down on stupid.,

Llpoh
Llpoh
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 5:21 pm

Should read “nowhere nearthose numbers” above. As a family, they are obviously very wealthy. But suggestions of $150 trillion, $250 trillion, $500 trillion are beyond fanciful. The entire world is worth only $250 trillion, and I suspect govt owns the lion share of that.

BL
BL
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 5:33 pm

Loopey- You are such a dumbshit lately, the Rothschilds own the fukkin banks, governments, and half of the world’s wealth. Get over it.

Tell ya what Loopey, why don’t you write a article WITH LEGIT LINKS and prove we are wrong.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  BL
December 19, 2018 7:34 pm

BL – seriously, how dumb are you. Ok, smart guy, what banks do they own? Please provide a list. All the banks in the world do not have $100 trillion in net assets, much less be worth that amount. They own govts? Please provide some evidence of that. They own half the world’s wealth? You got any you know actual data on that? Stock holdings? Land holdings? Sound of fucking crickets.

You really disappoint me. I am amazed at how stupid you really are.

There are something like 500 Rothschilds. You and the other imbeciles are suggesting each has worth as much as $1 trillion. That is total insanity. You are a patsy. There is one born every minute.

The market value, heavily overpriced, of ALL the public companies, including ALL the major banks in the US is around $30 trillion. Get it?

You morons make other morons look like Isaac Newton.

BL
BL
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 7:49 pm

Loopey- Can you answer this question, who owns the Fed? You’re in the weeds bud.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  BL
December 19, 2018 7:58 pm

Not the Rothschilds. There are lots of Feds – 12 – whose board is govt controlled. Each Fed bank is “owned” by member banks, but the shares cannot be bought and sold. They receive dividends from their ownership, but do not have any management control over the board.

Are you stupidly suggesting that the Rothschilds own all the banks in the US, and hence own the Feds? Please name ONE US bank that the Rothschilds owns. Just one. Uh-oh. I will await your answer on that.

BL
BL
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 8:16 pm

Llpoh- You are SERIOUSLY embarrassing yourself up in here. Here is a small clue, Rothschild banks (Citigroup, BOA etc.) are the major share holders In The Fed. There are only three countries, Cuba,Iran and NK who DO NOT have Rothschild -owned central banks.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  BL
December 19, 2018 8:42 pm

BL – so, you say that Rothschilds own BOA? You are dumb as a rock. And parrotting that shit about them owning the state banks of virtually every nation is imbecilic. It is patently false, demonstrably false, and is just a fairy tale. Here are the major shereholders in BOA – you could look this shit up yourself but you are too stupid, and hell, facts mean nothing to you.

“Mutual Fund and Institutional Stockholders
The largest shareholder of Bank of America stock is an institutional investor, Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway, with 679 million shares held, or just under 7% of the company. Following close behind is mutual fund operator The Vanguard Group Inc., with a reported 673 million shares as of a 2018 SEC filing, amounting to 6.72% ownership. As might be expected, a Vanguard mutual fund, the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (“VTSMX”) fund held 241,462,140 shares of Bank of America stock (~2.5% of the company) as of Oct. 2018. Other large financial companies, State Street, BlackRock and Fidelity each own between 3-4% of BAC shares.”

I had no idea Buffet is a Rothschild. And John Bogle, Vanguard founder, who I met a few times, is a Rothschild, too. He never mentioned that. State Street, Black Rock are Rothschilds owned? Hahahahaha! What a maroon you are.

You are so full of shit. You spout this shit out as truth, and real FACTS prove you an idiot.

What say next time you spout this conspiracy shit you add a little actual facts to go with. So far, you do nothing but make claims that are easily disproved.

Talk about being a sheep. You can be led around by your nose.

BL
BL
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 8:52 pm

Llpooh-Warren buffet….haha…..bloodline actor. Yeah and Trump really owns all that real estate, not just Trump branded for the mob. Sure Loopey, who is the imbecile?? Believe in the illusion fuktard….it’s ok with me.

steve
steve
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 7:59 pm

Here’s the banks they own. Quite an impressive list wouldn’t you say?

http://humansarefree.com/2013/11/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled.html

Homes? They’ve got a few..
https://family.rothschildarchive.org/estates

Most look like this.
https://family.rothschildarchive.org/estates/51-chateau-de-pregny

And you don’t think they have $Trillions? WTF?

Llpoh
Llpoh
  steve
December 19, 2018 8:52 pm

Steve – posting lists of stuff with no data attached is some stupid ass shit. You are an A grade moron. The Fed is on the list. And I have already addressed as to how they do not own the Fed. Member banks own the Fed, and lists of owners of the member banks is easily available. Plus, the owners have no voting rights, cannot buy or sell shares, and the board is govt appointed. Yet you, dumbass that you are, sy that the Rothschilds own it. You beleieve everything you read?

Re the homes, big deal, even if they do own them. Who knows if it is true – it is a list with no attribution, data, facts attached.

I am going to make a list that shows Bugs Bunny owns every bank in the world. Please post it as the truth. That is what you and Believerinanydamnthing have done.

Admin needs to administer an IQ tests. You dolts are become ever more numerous.

starfcker
starfcker
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 9:00 pm

Don’t start fucking off, dude. I’m pretty sure Bugs Bunny does own a lot of the banks. And if you call me out, I will find the proof.

starfcker
starfcker
  starfcker
December 19, 2018 9:02 pm
starfcker
starfcker
  starfcker
December 19, 2018 9:06 pm

?

Llpoh
Llpoh
  starfcker
December 19, 2018 9:13 pm

Star – very funny. I knew bugs owns the world.

I love it when you bash these imbeciles with facts, and they come back with “Rothschilds control Buffet”. “Mob controls Trump.”” Rothschilds controls Bogle”. No evidence whatsover.

These people would buy a big pile of catshit if the internet said it was really gold.

BL
BL
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 11:22 pm

Loopey and sidekick- We will be waiting for that article proving we are wrong about the Rothschild’s wealth. Not holding our breath for it to actually happen.

Llpoh
Llpoh
  BL
December 19, 2018 11:37 pm

BL – already proved:
1);Showed they cannot have $500 trillion. Or $250 trillion. Or any absurd number like that.

2) Showed proof positive they do not own BOA. Can show the same on any other public bank.

3) Described how the “ownership” of the Fed is member banks, which have no voting rights and cannot buy or sell Fed stock, and even if they could the Rothschilds do not own US banks. Showed how it is impossible for any group to own the Fed, as it is govt controlled.

You, on the other hand have provided exactly zero proof of your claims – because you cannot prove a lie. Best you can do when caught in a lie is then say, “Well, the Roths control Buffet! Screech!” “The mob controls Trump! Howl!” “The Roths control govt! Sob!” No names, no facts, no instances can you give. Not one.

So, I have already proved my case. You on the other hand have presented exactly zero. Because you have exactly zero. Yo mama dropped you on your head too much, and the opiods are destroying the few IQ points you have left.

BL
BL
  Llpoh
December 19, 2018 11:56 pm

Yet again you have proved NOTHING, your info as to the ownership of the Fed is completely WRONG and both you and Star could not find your own ass with both your hands and a map.

Please get on Amazon and order the book, “Big Oil and Their Bankers: The Four Horsemen and The Eight Families”by Dean Henderson. It will help deliver you from your confusion.

sidekick
sidekick
  BL
December 20, 2018 1:12 am

Blow me

AnarchoPagan
AnarchoPagan
  Llpoh
December 20, 2018 10:22 pm

Think of the world as a giant corporation that produces about $70 trillion of profit annually (global GDP). What would be a reasonable estimate for market cap? $700 trillion maybe?

Llpoh
Llpoh
  AnarchoPagan
December 20, 2018 11:05 pm

But it produces nothing like that in profit. Might as well claim profits are a gazillion a year.

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
December 19, 2018 9:39 pm

Stossel’s problem is that he is always too busy cheering on what he THINKS he should support as a “libertarian” to understand that what he is generally cheering on has little or nothing to do with the free market, or libertarianism. Amazon is just another government-assisted crony capitalist operation. All that “easy money” Bezos has had access to came from the crony capitalist Federal Reserve while they were destroying America and the value of the dollar. All those wonderful “perks” that localities around the country have been shoveling his way, were first STOLEN from hard-working taxpayers. All those mom and pop stores that cannot survive the Amazon onslaught, were first beaten down with permit costs, property taxes, school taxes, operational regulations, zoning regulations, labor regulations, tariffs on imported goods, and so, so, so much more. Indeed, he has operated in an environment of minimal taxation that he surely has exploited like ever good capitalist should, but the harm done to his competition by government is the hallmark of crony capitalism and the fundamental purpose of modern government. Sadly, such honesty about Amazon would upset Mr. Stossel, so he avoids any discussion. Better to sound like a “libertarian” than to do the critical thinking that might expose one as little more than just another big-government libertarian-wannabee.

starfcker
starfcker
  MrLiberty
December 19, 2018 10:49 pm

Great comment, Mr. Liberty. I agree with all that

pyrrhus
pyrrhus
December 19, 2018 9:54 pm

Bezos is kind of a creep who takes government money–but he’s way better than Zuckerborg or Google.. and hasn’t gone overboard on censorship.

nkit
nkit
  pyrrhus
December 19, 2018 11:03 pm

Yeah, thank God the Washington Post would never censor..that dog (Bezos) doesn’t deserve a bone..

TampaRed
TampaRed
December 20, 2018 1:06 am

good short article here from armstrong economics about the fed vs other central banks–
this states something that i’ve heard other places also,that the fed has to raise rates to save pensions–
he later goes off on larry summers,then concludes w/his usual braggadocio–

The Central Bank War – Nobody Notices