It’s been almost 100 years since America’s 1% had this much wealth

Via Marketwatch

A study puts wealth inequality in a historical perspective

It’s not fashionable to wear flapper dresses and do the Charleston, but 1920s-style wealth inequality is definitely back in style.

New research says America’s ultra-rich haven’t held as much of the country’s wealth since the Jazz Age, those freewheeling times before the country’s finances shattered.

“U.S. wealth concentration seems to have returned to levels last seen during the Roaring Twenties,” wrote Gabriel Zucman, an economics professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

Zucman said all the research on the issue also points to large wealth concentrations in China and Russia in recent decades. The same thing is happening in France and the U.K., but at a “more moderate rise,” the paper said.

In 1929 — before Wall Street’s crash unleashed the Great Depression — the top 0.1% richest adults’ share of total household wealth was close to 25%, according to Zucman’s paper, which was distributed by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Those rates plunged in the early 1930s and continued dropping to below 10% in the late 1970s, findings show. Rates have been on the rebound since the early 1980s, and are currently close to 20%.

It’s become especially hard to measure the full extent of riches these days. “Since the 1980s, a large offshore wealth management industry has developed which makes some forms wealth (namely, financial portfolios) harder to capture,” the paper added.

Other researchers have said the Great Recession increased income gaps. The top earners’ income dropped by 4%, but the bottom household’s income dropped by 20%.

Unemployment rates have been seriously sliding from the Great Recession’s 10% jobless rate in 2009 to 4% in February — that was just off a 49-year low last fall of 3.7%.

Still, millions of Americans live paycheck to paycheck; the recent federal government’s partial government shutdown forced some federal workers to food pantries, and cast a harsh light on Americans’ lack of savings.

The new study attempts to put numbers behind F. Scott Fitzgerald’s lines about the very rich being different.

But it isn’t going the next step to say if a stock-market collapse is just around the corner. Indeed, scholars have been working for decades chronicling and debating all the causes the Great Depression.

The paper is another spotlight on the issue of income inequality, something that’s been on the minds of academics, politicians, billionaires and even credit-ratings agencies. Late last year, Moody’s said the growing gaps in wealth could cause it to downgrade the rating on the federal government’s bonds.

Other researchers have also drawn parallels between the present and the past. The Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning Washington D.C. think tank, estimates that America’s top-earning 1% took in 22% of all national income. The organization said in 1928, 23.9% of the country’s income went to the top 1%.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Ned
Ned
February 12, 2019 7:24 am

Unemployment rates have been seriously sliding from the Great Recession’s 10% jobless rate in 2009 to 4% in February — that was just off a 49-year low last fall of 3.7%.

The unemployment rate is rigged to give a false positive.

lgr
lgr
February 12, 2019 7:56 am

This dovetails with Michael Snyder’s post yesterday about taxing the wealthy, and new liberal socialist political support and wide acceptance of that idea.
Wealth disparity is more intense, it seems, for the struggling middle class.
So, too, the article on Gen X’s bleak financial future. All Generations are feeling it, except the elites.

Far too many are feeling screwed; frustrated, wanting just being able to work and earn a decent living.
We just can’t seem to get ahead, and save for a promising future. Against the Wind, horsies.

We see those doing the screwing, and the vast amount of exorbitant wealth and control, (monopolies),
and the Envy has ramped up considerably.
If for nothing else, than because it bodes so bleak for OUR kids and grandkids futures.

Nevertheless, soaking the rich, to try and equal things out, will be almost impossible to implement,
and probably not a successful solution.
I’ve always believed that they pay a few more zeroes before the decimal in taxes to start with, but do they really?
I bet many find tax shelters, havens, and ways to hide vast wealth in ways the common man just doesn’t have
access to. Foundational wealth and such, that Wip has often railed about.

It seems they can pay for and afford a much stronger level of security around their castle walls than we can.
Literally and figuratively.

The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer.
Hence the popular cry: You got. I ain’t. Gimme.
This will probably not end well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJiX7I21v70

Anonymous
Anonymous
  lgr
February 12, 2019 9:39 am
Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
February 12, 2019 9:44 am
Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Anonymous
February 12, 2019 10:28 am
Ned
Ned
February 12, 2019 9:19 am

comment image

lgr.
lgr.
  Ned
February 12, 2019 9:31 am

I live to tell jokes that elicit reactions like this picture. Would love to know what was really said there.

That pic makes for a good Caption This, and the overlaid one here is a doozie.

Though seen before, it’s a good one, even if cynical and probably truthful, Nedster.

Ned
Ned
  lgr.
February 12, 2019 10:32 am

“even if cynical and probably truthful…..”

It is true. The Reagan administration promoted the theory/concept of “trickle down” economics. Although it’s not the first time it’s been tried. This is based on the “horse and sparrow” theory. If you throw some oats on the ground the horse can get most of them but not all of them because of the blunt way that his mouth is shaped, he cannot pick up every single oat. So what he can’t pick up the sparrow comes along and gets the ones left over because his beak is pointed. In economics, this is only a theory promoted by the wealthy of course. Paul Craig Roberts was assistant secretary of Treasury when this occurred and can and did testify that this did not work out so well for the sparrows. He called it “voodoo economics”. People can say what they want about PCR, but he’s not wrong on this one.

This theory was attempted again by Trump and has such proven false again. The selling point for the tax cuts would be that if you gave these cuts to the top 1% that they would invest in more expansion of their operations at home, i.e. American soil, bring back jobs from overseas offshoring of the jobs, hence trickle down and the result would be a rising middle class again. DIDN’T HAPPEN!

The current evidence shows that most of the savings of the tax cuts was recycled into the institutions stock share buy backs. GM just announced it’s closing some operations here at home and relocating offshore. Trump Tweeted in response that “GM should give back the bailout money (corporate welfare [my words] ) that was given to them in the past”. Then there’s the retail apocalypse. Many, many other examples too many to list. Selling trickle down economic theory to the mass sheep is a classic bait and switch. Trump could have just given 20% tax cut to the rich and 20% tax cut to everyone else, but instead he gave all 40% to the top wealth class of the social strata. 20% + 20% = 40%, what’s would be wrong with that? It still results in the same amount in the federal budget. But he gave it ALL to the oligarchs. Now how is a fair distributed tax cut socialism? It’s not.

This policy was pursued before the wall. Why? We definitely need a wall on the southern border, but why tax cuts for the rich first and then wait for the mid terms to take a vote on the wall? In which part of the social strata does the lack of the wall affect? The middle class and poor, not the rich. Notice there are no rich people in favor of the wall. I voted for Trump, but the cognitive dissonance by some of his present followers is misguided for sure. It’s time to wake up to the orange Judas goat.

mark
mark
  Ned
February 12, 2019 3:05 pm

Is this a path to make them stop laughing???

Is an American Neon Vest spark, flame, fire, explosion even possible?

I really don’t know.

NEON VESTS REDUX
Seething Frog
Published on Feb 10, 2019

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86aGHWbq3XY