How Trump has made both the trade and budget deficits worse

Guest Post by Paul Brandus

The law finally seems to have caught up with President Trump.

Not lawmen like special counsel Robert Mueller, or the G-men of the Southern District of New York—though they may soon catch up with him, for all I know. No, I’m talking about the law of unintended consequences, which has already overtaken the president in two big areas: economic and fiscal policy

By definition, the law of unintended consequences is when someone takes action on something, and that action has an unanticipated or unintended effect on something else.

That is what has happened to Trump. He took office vowing to eliminate the entire national debt in eight years, but it has only gotten worse, thanks to the skyrocketing budget deficit. In turn—and this is the unanticipated or unintended effect on something else—it has made the trade deficit worse as well. The Census Bureau said Wednesday that the trade deficit for goods soared to an all-time high in 2018: a whopping $891 billion.

Meantime, how big is the national debt? When Trump took office, it was—according to President Obama’s last budget for fiscal year 2017, which ended Sept. 30 2017—$20.24 trillion. Yet by the end of Trump’s first full fiscal year—Sept. 30, 2018—it had jumped more than 5% to $21.51 trillion.

That gargantuan figure has since accelerated: In the first four months of the current fiscal year (through Jan. 31), it has jumped nearly 2.2% more, to $21.09 trillion.

And get this: By fiscal year 2028, which begins Oct. 1, 2027, the debt is projected to be—hold on—$33 trillion.

Trump tied both issues together during his 2016 campaign, telling, in a stunningly ignorant interview with Bob Woodward of the Washington Post, that by simply cutting better trade deals, he could wipe out that debt. At the time, the total U.S. trade deficit with the world was $531 billion—or about 2.5% of the debt.

Trump made it sound like eliminating the debt would be a piece of cake, and yet the red ink continues to gush. What happened? For starters, the president and Republicans—who dominated Congress for his first two years in office—spent big and passed a a tax cut that hasn’t been paid for.

You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to know what happens when the government spends more while taking in less: the deficit goes up. The federal deficit, $665 billion in fiscal 2017, is projected to be $984 billion in fiscal year 2019 (which began on October 1). That’s an increase of 48% in three years. To finance it, we have to borrow more, and guess who our biggest foreign lender is? Hint: It’s a five-letter word starting in “C” and ending in “A.” All this gets added tacked on to the debt, of course, and as the interest piles up, we’ll have to borrow even more. It’s a vicious and costly circle.

In turn, this foreign borrowing makes the trade deficit worse.

“If foreigners buy more government bonds (which is how the Treasury borrows money), that causes an appreciation of the exchange rate,” points out Sherman Robinson, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington. “This makes our exports more expensive abroad and imports cheaper to U.S. citizens.”

Which means foreigners buy fewer of our exports and we buy more of their imports. It’s that simple.

Thus the law of unintended consequences: Trump said his policies would curb both the debt and the trade deficit—but he has only made both worse.

This helps explain why Robinson agrees with the assessment of former Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen that Trump doesn’t know what he’s doing. Asked on the public radio show Marketplace, if the president “has a grasp of economic policy,” Yellen responded, “No, I do not.”

This failure to grasp even basic Econ 101 hasn’t stopped Trump from telling his base—or them believing him—that everything’s going great. He keeps talking about the how the economy is growing like gangbusters. Here, his grasp of reality falls short again: GDP did grow at an impressive 4.2% pace in the second quarter of 2018, but that was then. It slowed to a 2.6% pace by the end of last year, and a recent survey of economists by the Wall Street Journal forecasts a growth rate of 2.0% for the first quarter of this year. We are shifting into a lower gear whether Trump—or his base— believes it or not.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
March 6, 2019 1:10 pm

Apparently, T thought that we actually make something here that China wants.

Just a thought
Just a thought
March 6, 2019 2:08 pm

More bashing. Interesting how the prior administration came away totally unscathed.

gatsby1219
gatsby1219
  Just a thought
March 6, 2019 5:33 pm

TDS

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 6, 2019 2:28 pm

Who cares? It is all fiat money that anyone with a brain knows will someday be worthless-just like a politician’s promises.

Mustang
Mustang
March 6, 2019 2:36 pm

#1. That’s funny Paul, I don’t ever remember President Trump saying he would eliminate the national debt in 8 years.
#2. That’s funny Paul, you failed to mention that when President Reagan cut taxes, government revenue WENT UP!!! mmmmmmmm………..
#3. That’s funny Paul, you did not say one word about the previous administration who DOUBLED THE NATIONAL DEBT IN 8 YEARS!!!!!! mmm mmm…………
#4. That’s funny Paul, you didn’t say one word about how the Obama Administration spent more money than the previous Administration’s from Washington thru Bush!!!!!!! mmmmm…………..
#5. That’s funny Paul, you criticized Trump for trying to rectify the huge trade imbalance but you did not offer one alternative solution!!!
mmmm…………
#6.President Trump is trying to bring back jobs to America. What is your plan to do this??? Do you even care about providing good paying jobs for American citizens??? mmmmmm…………….
#7. Me suspects you are a brain-dead, rabidly partisan, Looney Liberal Democrat. You sure sound like it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
March 6, 2019 3:25 pm

Another non economist.

An economist is someone who believes incentives alter behavior.

It’s amazing to me that these zero sum gamers believe policy is just shifting the private chips into the government pile.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Anonymous
March 6, 2019 4:31 pm

No, a behaviorist is someone who can prove that the right incentive can change behavior. An economist is a weatherman with no workable weather model.

ordo ab chao
ordo ab chao
March 6, 2019 5:50 pm

What an article ! If El Presidente Biggliest Best SAYS he will do it, HE WILL DO IT ! But if not, it is NOT his fault….it’s the demonrats !

annuit coeptis novus ordo seclorum- the ‘official’ government position (until it isn’t) is: WE NEED MORE IMMIGRANTS ! Dr. Schmucky Freud-the smartest government bootlicker that ever walked- said the ‘official’ story is the new gospel, and people better not deny it or they are stoooopid !!

Overthecliff
Overthecliff
March 6, 2019 10:27 pm

Trump needs to be imaginative about how he approaches trade and border issues. Just one little suggestion would encourage the Mexicans to turn caravans around and police the south side of the border. The Border Patrol just needs to slow walk all traffic through the ports of entry and back traffic up to Guatamala. Every truck and car searched until they act. The same could be done with ships from China.

When you grab them by the nuts their hearts and minds will follow. National security concerns you know.