Religion Versus Capitalism

Guest Post by The Zman

A peculiar feature of the West over the last half century or so is the sudden decline in church attendance among Christians. In some parts of Europe, church attendance has declined into the single digits. France and Belgium have church attendance rates of around ten percent and it is mostly among the old. Estonia is at two percent, which makes it the least religious country in Europe, at least until they invite in enough Muslims. Even in the United States, religiosity is in steep decline, especially outside the South.

These declines have not been uniform. Quebec, for example, had high church attendance rates until fairly recent. They also had a relatively high fertility rate. Then all of a sudden, both went into steep decline. Similarly, Poland had very high church attendance rates, even under the yoke of communism, but then it started to fall. As in Quebec, this recent drop in church attendance is with the young and corresponds to a drop in fertility. As David Goldman observed, all over the world, religiosity and fertility follow the same path.

One assumed cause is social cycle theory, where a society goes through a process of birth, life and death, with falling fertility and religiosity in the late phases. Another explanation is that one causes the other. That is, when women get jobs instead of getting pregnant, church attendance falls. Alternatively, the drop in church attendance causes a drop in fertility, as other traditional modes of life also decline. Still others argue that multiculturalism crowds out both religion and normal family life, causing the decline of both.

A better, less popular explanation for both the decline of religion and the drop in fertility is the spread of what we call capitalism. In the two examples of Quebec and Poland, the drop in fertility and religiosity both coincided with their inclusion into the global economy starting in the 1990’s. Quebec was not communist, but somewhat disconnected from the emerging global economy, until the independence movement was defeated. One result of that process was the greater integration of Quebec into the global economy.

Poland, of course, was in the Soviet Bloc until the collapse of the Soviet Union. It was then quickly and suddenly integrated into the emerging global economy. Poland joined the West and then stopped going to church and stopped making babies. Polish church attendance dropped from 80% to 40% in a generation. The fertility rate in 1980 was 3.0 and by 2000 it had dropped to 1.37. The opening of Poland to capitalism and the global economy corresponded with the closing of Polish churches and the Polish womb.

If you think about the nature of capitalism, in theory at least, and the nature of religion, it is not hard to see the conflict. Capitalism not only assumes certain things about people, it imposes them. The marketplace is a competition to attain informational asymmetry between the buyer and seller. The seller wants the buyer to over value the good or service, while the buyer wants the seller to undervalue his product or service. It is only in this way that either can expect to make a profit from the transaction.

In a system where the highest good is a profit, then all other considerations must be secondary. Lying, for example, is no longer strictly prohibited. The seller will no longer feel obligated to disclose everything to the buyer. The seller will exaggerate his claims about his product or service. Buyers, of course, will seek to lock in sellers into one way contracts based on information unknown the other seller. The marketplace, at its most basic level, is a game of liar’s poker, where all sides hope to fool the other.

Religion, in contrast, also assumes certain things about people, but seeks to mitigate and ameliorate them. Generally speaking, religion assumes the imperfection of man and sees that imperfection as the root cause of human suffering. While those imperfections cannot be eliminated, the negative effects can be reduced through moral codes, contemplation and the full understanding of one’s nature. Religions, outside of some extreme cults, are not about altering the nature of man, but rather the acceptance of it.

Further, religion is a closed system, while the marketplace must be open. In order to be in the sect, one has to adopt a certain lifestyle and a certain set of beliefs. Most of all, the person has to be accepted by the other members. The marketplace, in theory, is open to everyone and the participants cannot exclude new entries. An ethos based on extreme openness cannot peacefully coexist with a system based on exclusivity. Not only has religion died in the West, but so have social organizations like fraternal orders.

Now, to be precise, what we call capitalism is closer to what prior age would have called corporatism or even fascism. The West is not living in an age of free markets and open competition. Instead, it is in a period of tightly controlled markets that are ruled by state protected oligopolists. Finance is controlled by a relatively small number of major banks and technology is run by a handful of global giants. Healthcare is a government controlled monopoly. The neo-liberal order is a global public-private partnership.

Since this arrangement lacks natural legitimacy, libertarians have been brought in to create a civic religion based around worship of the marketplace. It is why otherwise sensible people can support internet censorship by “private” entities. People have been condition to accept whatever private business does as morally legitimate. This new religion in support of the neo-liberal order, like all secular religions, is covetous and intolerant. It has to anathematize and marginalize any alternative religion.

The rise of this new fusion of capital and state authority, centered in Washington, does track with the decline of religion, fertility and local institutions. Whether you call it globalism, neo-liberalism or neo-conservatism, all of these terms describe the same system of rule by a corporate-government partnership. It is hostile to religion, both explicitly and implicitly, particularity Christianity. Faith in the marketplace is inimical to faith in God. When man loses that, he loses the will to go on and fertility rates plummet.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Aodh Macraynall
Aodh Macraynall
May 3, 2019 9:08 am

Well said, but the problem I have with this is the confusion of fascism with corporatism. Capitalism has evolved into a system where the government is controlled by the corporations, rather than the corporations being controlled by the government. Who is able to most effectively lobby congress and other politicians? Was Obama asked to help write that most egregious piece of legislation we call the Affordable Care Act? Who was it that said, “We have to pass it to find out what’s in it?” I’m sure the insurance companies knew exactly what was in it. How do you think that’s going to work out? I do not know the exact amount of participation individual parties had in writing this law but the evidence seems to indicate the insurance companies bravely took the task on themselves. The problem is not with “muh free market.” There is no such thing. The problem is who has power and whom are they using it to benefit? If you don’t believe me, tell you what, you go lobby congress for your own version of affordable care or maybe to get rid of the Affordable Care Act. We’ll see just who runs things in ‘Murka.’ Better yet, you ‘bleeve’ in ‘duhmokursy’ so much, get you a consensus on what to do about some piece of legislation that doesn’t benefit some consortium of corporations and let’s see just how much fukkin ‘freedumb’ you got.

You're All Diseased
You're All Diseased
  Aodh Macraynall
May 3, 2019 1:58 pm

CORRECT!
Jordan Maxwell has been telling us about these facts for decades, i.e. governments are corporations, and we are all employees, aka slaves.

Also there’s this;
People in the US are ‘Tools of Corporatists… Used as Cheap Labour’ – Author
https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201903021072895956-us-people-tools-labour/

The blind who will not see
The blind who will not see
May 3, 2019 9:11 am

Inimical?
I’m neither genius nor dullard and gotta look that one up.

You shall have no other Gods but me.
Including the free market system.
Sayeth the Lord.

Stucky
Stucky
May 3, 2019 3:11 pm

“Not only has religion died in the West,”

hahahaha That’s pure unadulterated bullshit. Is Zman a Joo?

I know one place where religion is increasing!! Do you?

Answer
TheBurningPlatorm!

SamFox
SamFox
  Stucky
May 3, 2019 6:23 pm

Most of the article IMO is horse doo. People wrecked capitalism. Capitalism is not inherently bad or evil on it’s own. It’s the best system going if practiced honestly, without greed & lust for power. Capitalism is not meant to be an avenue for power & control. It’s meant to give everyone a fair & honest shake.

As is true of ALL human endeavors, capitalism IS fraught with weaknesses. The largest & most critical weakness is human nature. Look at the great opportunity the US Founders gave the new nation of their day & the growth that would come later. Why are there problems with our Constitutional Republic & religion, capitalism?

All the failings & problems with human endeavors are rooted in the sin [the alienation from Nature’s God] that besets humanity.

When a lady asked “What have you given us?” Benjamin Franklin replied, “A republic madam. If you can keep it!” Why are we losing what the Founders gave us? What IS the primary problem???

Alienation from Nature’s God came from the disobedience of Adam & Eve. We inherit our proclivity to disobey from them. As mankind spread through the earth after Adam & Eve, that desire to disobey grew into all kinds of what I’d say are sinful deeds. {Sin defined as missing the mark. The mark was originally to obey God & walk with Him.]

So where does the greed, self centeredness & the lust for power that have wrecked religion, free market capitalism & our Constitutional Republic, come from? If not from within people, then where?

Religion? Same answer. Plus a rejection of our Creator God, Elohim, His Son Yeshua & Their written Word, the Bible.

Jesus did NOT come to start a new religion called Christianity. He came to restore relationship with our Creator. Note the lack of rules & regs in the New Covenant writings. There are moral standards in those writings, but not ‘religious’ ones based on some kind of law. We are told primarily to Love God with all our being & to love our neighbor as ourselves. Shucks Homer, we can’t even seem to get that right. Why?? Sin…our natural bent. A bent that is actually unnatural. We were never meant or created to disobey, steal, covet & so on. That is why Father God gave Adam & Eve a conscience. They didn’t listen to it…

Disregard your conscience at your own peril. Don’t ask me how I learned that. 😉

Agree or not, no problem for me. 🙂

SamFox

PS. I know this is a rough draft that needs work. Time constrains me. I can hear a lot of ‘thank God’s’ on that one. 😉

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  SamFox
May 4, 2019 1:36 am

Capitalism is actually a Biblical concept.

Austrian Peter
Austrian Peter
May 3, 2019 9:13 pm

A most excellent discourse thank you and very insightful. Perhaps a read of this little book will help expand on your ideas:

Jaz
Jaz
May 3, 2019 10:30 pm

I hear politicians and business people always saying: “we need growth” to which I say: no, we do not.
Commercialism in it’s many forms has made debt slaves out of most people.
The high cost of just living day to day with the constraints of payments and ‘keeping up with the Jones’ has smothered almost all of the good traditional things.

Jumbled And Ground
Jumbled And Ground
May 4, 2019 12:32 am

This piece presents some solid insights, and also several contradictions, mixed with correct definitions (like, the U.S. lacks real markets/competition), and incorrect ones. Here’s a good example:

“The West is not living in an age of free markets and open competition. Instead, it is in a period of tightly controlled markets that are ruled by state protected oligopolists.” This sounds right based on what we can all see going on around us.

In the very next paragraph it says: “Since this arrangement lacks natural legitimacy, libertarians have been brought in to create a civic religion based around worship of the marketplace (but you just said there wasn’t a market and said there are “controlled markets” and “state protected oligopolies” – both anethema to libertarians). It is why otherwise sensible people can support internet censorship by “private” entities.”

Maybe the definition of a Libertarian has become as muddled as the piece rightly claims the definition of Capitalism has become? Real, mises/rothbard/lew rockwell Libertarians don’t “worship” the marketplace. They are mostly pro-property rights, and pro-individual liberty – things which real markets spring forth from. Libertarians are completely against the natural illegitimacy of the “controlled markets” and “state protected oligopolies” the piece calls out.

“Sensible people” MIGHT support internet “censorship” at privately owned websites because you either have property rights or you don’t. If not, then a “sensible person” could use the power of the State to make a Church post pornographic pictures, for one example, on it’s website (against the church morals and will) and call it censoring if they wouldn’t – it’s a hypothetical, but anything goes if there are no property rights. It leads to all sorts of bad ends and overall chaos.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
May 4, 2019 1:25 am

What a load of bullocks. And Zman doesn’t even know what a Libertarian is.