Pro Tip: Mentally Replace All Uses Of “Conspiracy Theorist” With “Iraq Rememberer”

Submitted by CCRider

Guest Post by Caitlin Johnstone

I watched the film Official Secrets the other day, which I highly recommend doing if you want to rekindle your rage about the unforgivable evil that was the Iraq invasion.

Which is a good thing to do, in my opinion. Absolutely nothing was ever done to address the fact that a million people were murdered with the assistance of government lies just a few short years ago; no new laws were passed mandating more government transparency or accountability with its military operations, no war crimes tribunals took place, no new policies were put into place. No one even got fired. In fact we’ve seen the exact opposite: the people responsible for unleashing that horror upon our species have been given prestigious jobs in government and media and the US government is currently collaborating with the UK to set the legal precedent for charging under the Espionage Act any journalist in the world who exposes US war crimes.

The corrupt mechanisms which gave rise to the Iraq invasion still exist currently, stronger than ever, and its consequences continue to ravage the region to this very day. The Iraq war isn’t some event that happened in the past; everything about it is still here with us, right now. So we should still be enraged. You don’t forgive and forget something that hasn’t even stopped, let alone been rectified.

Apart from the howling rage surging through my veins during the film, the other thing I experienced was the recurring thought, “This was a conspiracy. This is the thing that a conspiracy is.”

And, I mean, of course it is. How weird is it that we don’t use that word to describe what the architects of that war did? Conspiracy is defined as “a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.” From the secret plan between the NSA and GCHQ to spy on and blackmail UN members into supporting the illegal invasion which is the subject of Official Secrets, to the mountain of other schemes and manipulations used by other government bodies to deceive the world about Iraq, it’s absolutely insane that that word is never used to describe the conspiracy within the Bush and Blair governments to manufacture the case for war.

The engineering of the Iraq war was a conspiracy, per any conceivable definition. So why isn’t that word reflexively used by everyone who talks about it?

Easy. Because we haven’t been trained to.

The use of the word “conspiracy” is studiously avoided by the narrative managers of the political/media class who are tasked with the assignment of teaching us how to think about our world, except when it is to be employed for its intended and authorised use: smearing skeptics of establishment narratives. The pejorative “conspiracy theory” has been such a useful weapon in inoculating the herd from dissident wrongthink that the propagandists do everything they can to avoid tainting their brand, even if it means refraining from using words for the things that they refer to.

This is why the word “collusion” was continuously and uniformly used throughout the entire Russiagate saga, for example. It was a narrative about a secret conspiracy between the highest levels of the US government and the Russian government to subvert the interests of the American people, yet the word “conspiracy” was meticulously replaced with “collusion” by everyone peddling that story.

Syria narrative managers on Twitter have been in meltdown for a week ever since the Rolling Stone podcast Useful Idiots featured oppositional journalist Max Blumenthal talking about the US-centralized empire’s involvement in the Syrian war and its pervasive propaganda campaign against that nation. The entire site has been swarming with high-visibility blue-checkmarked thought police demanding the heads of the show’s hosts Matt Taibbi and Katie Halper for giving this evil “conspiracy theorist” a platform to say we’re being deceived about yet another US-led regime change intervention in yet another Middle Eastern nation.

Narrative managers use the “conspiracy theorist” pejorative to shove skepticism of establishment narratives into the margins of political discourse, far away where it can’t contaminate the mainstream herd. Whenever you see a dissenting interpretation of events getting too close to mainstream circles, as with Blumenthal appearing on a Rolling Stone podcast, Tulsi Gabbard saying on national television that the US government has armed terrorists, or Tucker Carlson interviewing Jonathan Steele about the OPCW leaks, you see an intense campaign of shrieking outrage and public shaming geared at shoving those dissident narratives as far into the fringe as possible by branding them “conspiracy theories”.

My suggestion then is this: whenever you see the label “conspiracy theorist” being applied to anyone who questions an establishment narrative about Syria, Russia, Iran or wherever, just mentally swap it out for the term “Iraq rememberer”. When you see anyone shouting about “conspiracy theories”, mentally replace it with “Iraq remembering”. It makes it much easier to see what’s really going on: “Oh those damn Iraq rememberers! Why can’t they just trust their media and government about what’s happening in Syria instead of indulging in Iraq remembering?”

Powerful people and institutions secretly coordinating with each other to do evil things is the absolute worst-case scenario for the rest of the population; it is precisely the thing we fear when we allow people and institutions to have power over us. We need to be able to talk about that worst-case scenario occurring, especially since we know for a fact that it does indeed happen. Powerful people do conspire to inflict evil things upon the rest of us, and we do need to use thoughts and ideas to discuss how that might be happening. We are not meant to think about this, which is why we’re meant to forget about Iraq.

The Iraq invasion was like if a family were sitting around the dinner table one night, then the father stood up, decapitated his daughter with a steak knife, then sat back down and continued eating and everyone just went back to their meals and never talked about what happened. That’s how absolutely creepy and weird it is that the news churn just moved on after a conspiracy within the most powerful government in the world led to the murder of a million human beings, and now we’re all somehow only supposed to care about Trump’s rude tweets.

Never forget the Iraq war conspiracy, no matter how hard they try to make you. They did it before, they’ve done it again in Libya and Syria, and they’ll continue to attempt it in the future. When you sound the alarm about this they will call you a conspiracy theorist. All they’re really saying is that you’re one of those annoying pests who just won’t shut up and forget about Iraq.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
CCRider
CCRider
December 6, 2019 9:33 am

The OPCW false flag is a huge story THEY will avoid like the plague THEY are. Like Caitlin points out, burying stories that screw with their narrative is one of their go-to tricks to divert attention. This morning’s cbs show started with all of the big wheels standing and cheering the merger of cbs and viacom. Gail, Tony, Noah, Steven and the rest of the sellouts cheering their corporate masters. It would have more authentic if they were on their knees with their mouths open. Then they get on with the ‘news’: a shooting in Miami that happened yesterday, the same uber story they ran last night, a story about a wife killing her husband last month and gail lobbing softballs at mike bloomberg. But not one word about this obvious and verifiable false flag. Remember why Trump lobbed in those missiles? Because Ivanka cried. Just how big an asshole do you have to be to have believed that?

This is just as big a deal as the epstein bullshit story. Don’t let it die.

'mouse No. 9
'mouse No. 9
December 6, 2019 9:41 am

Hmm.
Conspiracy theorist pejorative.
A label.
A name one’s opponent calls someone who doesn’t buy into the agenda narrative.
A weak defamation to pigeonhole someone who questions, at great risk to themselves, and fights the popular tide.
Comparable synonyms:
Nazi, white supremacist, racist, bigot, homophobe, Islamophobe, mysoginist, antiSemitist, denier,
…there are many.

Conspiracy theorists.
Don’t bite their finger.
Just look to where it is pointing.
Then consider, and re-evaluate.

Courageous souls, apart from the herd, open minded and willing to question or doubt the lies, and those who perpetrate them.

Seeking first, The Truth.
Revealing discoveries, due to research while assembling proofs as evidence.
Then perhaps searching for the motives.
Then, the responsible conspirators.

Motive usually involves gains of power, money, and loyalties.
-Regardless of the carnage left behind in the wake of their immoral actions.

I’d substitute conspiracy theorist with non-gullible truth seeker.

Those who claim debunked have their own closed minded willingness to support the agenda herd, and doubt those who would seek to consider alternative explanations.
These types have their own motive, or are incapable or unwillingness to think critically.

A quick gauge, when sizing up a debate opponent:
“Who killed _____ ?”
Their answer will reveal their stance, in most any consideration of who is really behind the evil that is deceiving and manipulating the minds of people around the world.

Southern Sage
Southern Sage
December 6, 2019 10:04 am

Allow me to explain the Iraq War. A nest of Neo-Con traitors (Israeli agents and idiots like Rumsfeld and Cheney) led a befuddled dry drunk, Bush, to implement an Israeli plan to destabilize the Middle East for Israel’s benefit. Oil played a minor role for creeps like Cheney but the Zionists were driving the bus. These vicious bastards deliberately lied and ice picked several serious opportunities to resolve this without war and without destroying Iraq. Bush the father vehemently opposed the war behind the scenes and he knew exactly who was behind it.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Southern Sage
December 6, 2019 11:08 am

Sage, do you think 911 was done as blackmail example, if the neocons plans weren’t obeyed?

CCRider
CCRider
  Southern Sage
December 6, 2019 12:31 pm

Excellent perspective. I remember baby bush being asked how he could reject his father’s advice and he answered that he asked a higher authority. So God wanted him to kill innocent people. Imagine the crust on that stupid bastard.

Pequiste
Pequiste
  Southern Sage
December 6, 2019 7:33 pm

Poppy Bush was all rah-rah-rah for the NWO:

As former head of the Culinary Institute of America, he knew what was coming many years before.

He was against the Gulf Wars 1 & 2?

Poppycock.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
December 6, 2019 11:36 am

All of Caitlin Johnston’s conspiracy theories have been debunked. /sarc
Seriously, “fact checker” means fact denier.

Billybob
Billybob
December 6, 2019 12:06 pm

For evil to succeed, all it needs is for good men to do nothing.
—Martin Luther King Jr.

Origins of this concept are numerous because time after time good men have averted their attention.

In 1770 the Irish statesman and philosopher Edmund Burke wrote about the need for good men to associate to oppose the cabals of bad men. The second sentence in the excerpt below is listed in multiple quotation references and shares some points of similarity to the saying under investigation, but it is clearly dissimilar: 4

No man, who is not inflamed by vain-glory into enthusiasm, can flatter himself that his single, unsupported, desultory, unsystematic endeavours are of power to defeat the subtle designs and united Cabals of ambitious citizens. When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.

Today the public is “busy”watching a “reality show”charlatan engaged in mock battle with media adoring fake liberals distracting the off track everyman,who changes the channel to see Kardashian TV or sports.

Sheeple are not ”distracted” they are off track and devoid of values.

Question Mark
Question Mark
December 6, 2019 1:23 pm

C’mon Caitlin! Who you gonna believe, the government or your lying eyes?

Jdog
Jdog
December 7, 2019 12:21 pm

When it comes to conspiracy theories, there are basically two types of people. Those who understand human nature, and that conspiracy is very real and very common. And complete idiots.