Guest Post by Pat Buchanan
It is worth looking more closely at France because she appears to be at a place where the rest of Europe and America are headed.
As that rail and subway strike continued to paralyze travel in Paris and across France into the third week, President Emmanuel Macron made a Christmas appeal to his dissatisfied countrymen:
“Strike action is justifiable and protected by the constitution, but I think there are moments in a nation’s life when it is good to observe a truce out of respect for families and family life.”
Macron’s appeal has gone largely unheeded.
“The public be damned!” seems to be the attitude of many of the workers who are tying up transit to protest Macron’s plan to reform a pension system that consumes 14% of GDP.
Macron wants to raise to 64 the age of eligibility for full retirement benefits. Not terribly high. And to set an example, he is surrendering his lifetime pension that is to begin when he becomes an ex-president.
Yet, it is worth looking more closely at France because she appears to be at a place where the rest of Europe and America are headed.
In France, the government collects 46% of the GDP in taxes and spends 56% of GDP, the highest figures in the Western world.
And Paris appears to be bumping up against the limits of what democratic voters will tolerate in higher taxes, or reductions in benefits, from the postwar welfare states the West has created.
A year ago, when Macron sought to raise fuel taxes to cut carbon emissions, the “yellow vests” came out in protests that degenerated into rioting, looting, arson, desecration of monuments and attacks on police.
Paris capitulated and canceled the tax.
How do we compare?
The U.S. national debt is now larger than the GDP. Only in 1946, the year after World War II, was U.S. debt a larger share of GDP than today.
In 2019, the U.S. ran a deficit just shy of $1 trillion, and the U.S. government projects trillion-dollar deficits through the decade, which begins next week. And we will be running these deficits not to stimulate an economy in recession, as President Obama did, but to pile them on top of an economy at full employment.
In short, we are beginning to run historic deficits in a time of prosperity. Whatever the economic theory behind this, it bears no resemblance to the limited government-balanced budget philosophy of the party of Ronald Reagan.
The questions the U.S. will inevitably face are the ones France faces: At what point does government consumption of the national wealth become too great a burden for the private sector to bear? At what point must cuts be made in government spending that will be seen by the people, as they are seen in France today, as intolerable?
While a Republican Congress ran surpluses in the 1990s, when defense spending fell following our Cold War victory, Dwight Eisenhower was the last Republican president to run surpluses.
Opposition to new or higher taxes appears to be the one piece of ground today on which Republicans will not yield. But if so, where are the cuts going to come from that will be virtually mandated if U.S. debt is not to grow beyond any sustainable level?
America’s long-term problem:
Deficits are projected to run regularly in the coming decade at nearly 5% of GDP while economic growth has fallen back to 2%.
With taxes off the table, where, when and how do we cut spending?
Or does each new administration kick the can down the road?
The five principal items in the federal budget are these:
Social Security, which consumes 25% of that budget. Yet, Social Security outlays will reach the point this year where payroll taxes no longer cover them. The “trust fund” will have to be raided. Translation: The feds will have to borrow money to cover the Social Security deficit.
Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare and other health programs account for another fourth of the budget. All will need more money to stay solvent.
Defense, which used to take 9% of GDP in JFK’s time and 6% in Ronald Reagan’s buildup, is now down to 3.2% of GDP.
Yet, while defense’s share of GDP is among the smallest since before World War II, U.S. commitments are as great as they were during the Cold War. We are now defending 28 NATO nations, containing Russia, and maintaining strategic parity. We have commitments in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and the global war on terror. We defend South Korea and Japan from a nuclear-armed North Korea and China.
Yet another major item in the budget is interest on the debt.
And as that U.S. debt surges with all the new deficits this decade, and interest rates inevitably begin to rise, interest on the debt will rise both in real terms and as a share of the budget.
Again, is France the future of the West?
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
We will be worse then France because we are taking people in from all over the world. Once white people figure out how much they are getting fucked by these traitors in Washington and by these people of color from all over the fucking world. Then shit is really going to hit the fan.
France has taken in people from all over the world too. Same boat. Paris looks like a third world country.
BB – it is too late. So sorry. Like the Indians should have done, you whiteys should have stopped them at the shore/Rio and never let them in. The thing about maffs is it does not lie, and the maffs are certain: white Americans will soon be the minority.
Oops.
Just to be a pedant, the next decade begins January 1, 2021. The current decade ends December 31, 2020. You probably made the same mistake in 2000. And you probably think noon is 12 pm.
However, it is true that our budget is out of control. No politician dares to address the deficit, because the only solutions are massive tax increases and/or spending cuts. However, we can continue as long as foreigners are willing to loan us the money. Both Russia and China and some European countries are trying to set up payment schemes that avoid the US dollar and the SWIFT payment system. If they succeed, then we are done.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language states “By convention, 12 AM denotes midnight and 12 PM denotes noon. Because of the potential for confusion, it is advisable to use 12 noon and 12 midnight.”
Why not use the 24 hour clock and avoid all confusion, 1200, 2400?
Just to be a pedant, the word “loan” is a noun.
I believe you meant to use ‘lend’.
one can also “loan” an item… and therefore it is not strictly a noun
Better a pedant than a pedo….
It’s slowly starting in the US already, people that can, are moving out of the high taxed dem controlled shitty’s and states.
Problem is the states (like Texas) and city’s they move to will also become dem controlled shit holes and suffer the same fate.
Fucking doomed…………
Maybe that’s part of their scheme to ‘spread the misery’ of Communism.
I have to agree, California is exporting their filth aka infiltration to the states like Texas and Florida to turn them blue. Tennessee is a red state but will be blue due to the influx of CA filth. Illegal immigrants by and large do not vote.
When we refuse to play the game with the tyrants then & only then will the people have any leverage. Read Atlas Shrugged for further details.
The government never has a surplus. Everything the government has it steals from a productive member of society. If it ran a surplus then the taxes would be stopped for a time. But as one can see, there is never any stoppage of taxation or for that matter a lowering of taxation.
There is plenty that can be cut from the US budget. Military could easily be reduced 90% by shutting the over 700 foreign bases and bringing our people home. Welfare- any woman showing up at the office with her first kid unmarried should be required to get Norplant or an IUD. All money cut off for illegals. No more fake refugees either. Reduce immigration by 99%, no more foreigners who will sit on our welfare rolls. Unfortunately none of that is going to happen short of a total collapse.
Military can be reduced, but not by 90%, but I get the point.
Immigration is not so matter an issue of how many, but which.
Do you want illiterate, lazy low IQ welfare Mexicans and Salvadorans? Nope.
Do you want high IQ, high educated, business and tech and family oriented types? I think that may be a very good idea. Take those types and pitch the rest. I would be careful taking lefty Europeans, no matter how skilled, though.