A Malicious Indictment Mitch Should Toss Out

Guest Post by Pat Buchanan

A Malicious Indictment Mitch Should Toss Out

So weak is the case for impeachment that the elite in this city is demanding that the Senate do the work the House failed to do.

About the impeachment of President Donald Trump she engineered with her Democratic majority, Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday: “It’s not personal. It’s not political. It’s not partisan. It’s patriotic.”

Seriously, Madam Speaker? Not political? Not partisan?

Why then were all eight House members chosen as managers to prosecute the case against Trump, who ceremoniously escorted the articles across the Capitol, all Democrats? Why did the articles of impeachment receive not a single Republican vote on the House floor?

The truth: The impeachment of Donald Trump is the fruit of a malicious prosecution whose roots go back to the 2016 election, in the aftermath of which stunned liberals and Democrats began to plot the removal of the new president.

This coup has been in the works for three years.

First came the crazed charges of Trump’s criminal collusion with Vladimir Putin to hack the emails of the DNC and the Clinton campaign and funnel them to WikiLeaks.

For two years, we heard the cries of “Treason!” from Pelosi’s caucus. And despite the Mueller investigation’s exoneration of Trump of all charges of conspiracy with Russia, we still hear the echoes:

Trump is Putin’s poodle. Trump is an asset of the Kremlin.

All we want, and what the American people deserve, is a “fair trial,” Democrats and their media collaborators now insist. But can a fair trial proceed from a manifestly deficient and malicious prosecution?

Consider. In this impeachment, we are told, the House serves as the grand jury, and Adam Schiff’s Intelligence Committee and Jerry Nadler’s Judiciary Committee serve as the investigators and prosecutors.

But the articles of impeachment on which the Judiciary Committee and the House voted do not contain a single crime required by the Constitution for impeachment and removal. There is no charge of treason, no charge of bribery or “other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

So weak is the case for impeachment that the elite in this city is demanding that the Senate do the work the House failed to do.

The Senate must subpoena the documents and witnesses the House failed to produce, to make the case for impeachment more persuasive than it is now.

Not our job, rightly answers Mitch McConnell.

The Senate is supposed to be an “impartial jury.”

But while there is a debate over whether Republicans will vote to call witnesses, there is no debate on how the Senate Democrats intend to vote — 100% for removal of a president they fear they may not be able to defeat.

Consider Trump’s alleged offense: pressing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Burisma Holdings and Hunter Biden.

Assume Zelenskiy, without prodding, sent to the U.S., as a friendly act to ingratiate himself with Trump, the Burisma file on Hunter Biden.

Would that have been a crime?

Why is it then a crime if Trump asked for the file?

The military aid Trump held up for 10 weeks — lethal aid Barack Obama denied to Kyiv — was sent. And Zelenskiy never held the press conference requested, never investigated Burisma, never sent the Biden file.

There is a reason why no crime was charged in the impeachment of Donald Trump. There was no crime committed.

Not political, said Pelosi. Why then did she hold up sending the articles of impeachment to the Senate for a month, after she said it was so urgent that Trump be impeached that Schiff and Nadler could not wait for their subpoenas to be ruled upon by the Supreme Court?

Pelosi is demanding that the Senate get the documents, subpoena and hear the witnesses, and do the investigative work Schiff and Nadler failed to do.

Does that not constitute an admission that a convincing case was not made? Are not the articles voted by the House inherently deficient if the Senate has to have more evidence than the House prosecutors could produce to convict the president of “abuse of power”?

Can we really have a fair trial in the Senate, when half of the jury, the Democratic caucus, is as reliably expected to vote to remove the president as Republicans are to acquit him? What kind of fair trial is it when we can predict the final vote before the court hears the evidence?

It is ridiculous to deny that this impeachment is partisan, political and personal. It reeks of politics, partisanship and Trump-hatred.

As for patriotic, that depends on where you stand — or sit.

But the forum to be entrusted with the decision of “should Trump go?” is not a deeply polarized Senate, but with those the Founding Fathers entrusted with such decisions — the American people.

In most U.S. courts, a prosecution case this inadequate, with prosecutors asking the court itself to get more documents and call more witnesses, and so visibly contaminated with malice toward the accused, would be dismissed outright.

Mitch McConnell should let the House managers make their case, and then call for a vote to dismiss, and treat this indictment with the contempt it so richly deserves.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
old white guy
old white guy
January 17, 2020 7:53 am

There are not very many intelligent people left in America, if there were this farce would have been over before it began.

Sionnach Liath
Sionnach Liath
  old white guy
January 17, 2020 10:42 am

I have not been asked by the Senate for my advice; however, if I were to be asked, it would be simple:

“Judge not, and ye shall not be judged; condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned… Luke 6, 37.

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
  Sionnach Liath
January 17, 2020 11:03 pm

This quote might be more appropriate for our Congress:
“You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out his desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, refusing to uphold the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, because he is a liar and the father of lies. “

CCRider
CCRider
January 17, 2020 8:06 am

This is good shit. Anything that exposes politicians as the lying, devious maggots they all are rubs democracy in the faces of the voting sheep. I say pour it on. And if it dumps Trump on his ass it will only serve to hasten the day we puke this rot up and maybe have a serious discussion of natural rights.

flash
flash
January 17, 2020 9:17 am

I AM WOMAN, HEAR ME ROAR” Nancy – Never Drunk Before Noon -Pelosi

comment image

comment image

Minnesota ‘Teacher of the Year’ kneels during anthem at college football championship: ‘A very respectful protest
comment image?ve=1&tl=1

Woman Caught On Camera Walking Naked Through Miami International Airport
https://miami.cbslocal.com/2020/01/15/woman-caught-on-camera-walking-naked-at-miami-international-airport/

comment image

comment image

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  flash
January 17, 2020 9:50 am

As an aside, why do liberal women cut off their hair or have extremely short hair? It’s weird.

Iska Waran
Iska Waran
  Vixen Vic
January 17, 2020 10:48 am

Because they hate men and think that making themselves repulsive to men will deny men pleasure. Of course, most of them are repulsive with or without hair.

Bakka Janai
Bakka Janai
  Vixen Vic
January 17, 2020 5:41 pm

First, are you sure they are women? Second, If not, are you sure you are allowed to refer to their sex as women, anyways? Just sayin that you are walking on shaky ground…

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  flash
January 17, 2020 11:20 am

Helen Ready “I Am Woman” (In my opinion, a suck-ass song.)

Fakenit
Fakenit
  Vixen Vic
January 17, 2020 12:44 pm

Couldn’t agree more Vic. Women’s libbers have won, and the prize is they get to go to party’s alone and spend Christmas alone. Congrats to you dumb asses.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Fakenit
January 18, 2020 2:57 am

Yes, I haven’t met an “invincible” woman yet. Have you?

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
January 17, 2020 9:47 am

Democrats supporting support for the Constitution is hypocrisy beyond measure.

Buzz
Buzz
January 17, 2020 11:50 am

Every DemocRAT Senator that swore the oath to tell the truth lied about telling the truth. Dems cannot help but lie, it is in their DNA (Dems Never Accurate).

Groundcrew
Groundcrew
January 17, 2020 2:31 pm

Disgust is not a strong enough word for the skating that is going to occur because the prosecutor leading the charge against the FBI… is Comey’s daughter.

The wonder of it all
The wonder of it all
January 17, 2020 4:11 pm

Do we view this as the dissemination of our country. Sure hard to believe that anyone intelligent can rationalize this action.

Bakka Janai
Bakka Janai
January 17, 2020 5:38 pm

As an ordinary US citizen and in country veteran of the Vietnam Conflict, I want to know how the law firm of Perkins-Coie of Seattle gets off peddling money for the Clinton campaign to pay for the Steele Dossier produced with Russian collaboration and how Marc Elias, the political representative of the Perkins-Coie law firm gets off from any repercussians as he was directly involved in this matter with the DNC. It’s time that the Attorney General look into this law firm which is directly responsible for transactions of money for the Steele Dossier. The real swamp in DC is in the Law Firms, who make the swamp work efficiently.

Vixen Vic
Vixen Vic
  Bakka Janai
January 18, 2020 3:39 am

Perkins-Coie is DS and DS is mostly Democrats or globalists. At this point, they’re untouchable. Let’s hope that changes.

Coalclinker
Coalclinker
January 17, 2020 11:07 pm

If this charade of U.S. Government doesn’t end soon, then we will all live long enough to see the storming of Congress by the Military and their wholesale arrest for Treason. I think it’s a lot closer than what most would even dare to entertain.