The Private Space Race

Guest Post by John Stossel

The Private Space Race

This week, American astronauts returned to earth. Their trip to the space station was the first manned launch from the U.S. in 10 years.

By NASA? No. Of course, not.

This space flight happened because the government was not in charge.

An Obama administration committee had concluded that launching such a vehicle would take 12 years and cost $36 billion.

But this rocket was finished in half that time — for less than $1 billion (1/36th the predicted cost).

That’s because it was built by Elon Musk’s private company, Space X. He does things faster and cheaper because he spends his own money.

“This is the potential of free enterprise!” explains aerospace engineer Robert Zubrin in my newest video.

Of course, years ago, NASA did manage to send astronauts to the moon.

That succeeded, says Zubrin, “because it was purpose-driven. (America) wanted to astonish the world what free people could do.”

But in the 50 years since then, as transportation improved and computers got smaller and cheaper, NASA made little progress.

Fortunately, President Obama gave private companies permission to compete in space, saying, “We can’t keep doing the same old things as before.”

The competition then cut the cost of space travel to a fraction of what it was.

Why couldn’t NASA have done that?

Because after the moon landing, it became a typical government agency — overbudget and behind schedule. Zubrin says NASA’s purpose seemed to be to “supply money to various suppliers.”

Suppliers were happy to go along.

Zubrin once worked at Lockheed Martin, where he once discovered a way for a rocket to carry twice as much weight. “We went to management, the engineers, and said, ‘Look, we could double the payload capability for 10% extra cost.’ They said, ‘Look if the Air Force wants us to improve the Titan, they’ll pay us to do it!'”

NASA was paying contractor’s development costs and then adding 10% profit. The more things cost, the bigger the contractor’s profit. So contractors had little incentive to innovate.

Even NASA now admits this is a problem. During its 2020 budget request, Administrator Jim Bridenstine confessed, “We have not been good at maintaining schedule and … at maintaining costs.”

Nor is NASA good at innovating. Their technology was so out of date, says Zubrin, that “astronauts brought their laptops with them into space — because shuttle computers were obsolete.”

I asked, “When (NASA) saw that the astronauts brought their own computers, why didn’t they upgrade?”

“Because they had an entire philosophy that various components had to be space rated,” he explains. “Space rating was very bureaucratic and costly.”

NASA was OK with high costs as long as spaceships were assembled in many congressmen’s districts.

“NASA is a very large job program,” says Aerospace lawyer James Dunstan. “By spreading its centers across the country, NASA gets more support from more different congressmen.”

Congressmen even laugh about it. Randy Weber, R-Texas, joked, “We’ll welcome (NASA) back to Texas to spend lots of money any time.”

Private companies do more with less money. One of Musk’s cost-saving innovations is reusable rocket boosters.

For years, NASA dropped its boosters into the ocean.

“Why would they throw it away?” I ask Dunstan.

“Because that’s the way it’s always been done!” he replies.

Twenty years ago, at Lockheed Martin, Zubrin had proposed reusable boosters. His bosses told him: “Cute idea. But if we sell one of these, we’re out of business.”

Zubrin explains, “They wanted to keep the cost of space launch high.”

Thankfully, now that self-interested entrepreneurs compete, space travel will get cheaper. Musk can’t waste a dollar. Space X must compete with Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin, Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and others.

The private sector always comes up with ways to do things that politicians cannot imagine.

The government didn’t invent affordable cars, airplanes, iPhones, etc. It took competing entrepreneurs, pursuing profit, to nurture them into the good things we have now.

Get rid of government monopolies.

For-profit competition brings us the best things in life.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
MethodicalMan
MethodicalMan
July 29, 2020 2:58 pm

“This week, American astronauts returned to earth”

Uh, that would sure be news to them.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
July 29, 2020 5:29 pm

Gobbledeegook

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
July 29, 2020 5:41 pm

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard a government employee (I churched with many of these people in Alexandria Va.) say if it wasn’t for government lots of things would not have been invented/improved. I assume they are talking about college labs that come up with lots of things funded by daddy government.

theOtherDan
theOtherDan
  Glock-N-Load
July 29, 2020 10:47 pm

you mean like oh i don’t know – google (netscape originally) faceblob, cell phones cheaper than landlines when there were really no cell towers to speak of? and Oh what everyone is demanding… self driving cars?… you mean those things?
‘sarc’ off

Glock-N-Load
Glock-N-Load
July 29, 2020 5:43 pm

I once told a government employee…”Good enough for government work”. He said that was a misnomer(?). What it means is government work is exceptional and only a small fraction of work is good enough for government work.

Auntie Kriest
Auntie Kriest
July 29, 2020 7:00 pm

I love the idea of megalomaniac sociopaths and psychopaths having launch and orbit capabilities and also being able to contract to whomever they want.

NO chance someone or private organization wouldn’t want a private satellite or vessel to cause a little “frolic” in the heavens. Could never happen. No way.

hardscrabble farmer
hardscrabble farmer
  Auntie Kriest
July 29, 2020 7:59 pm

The very idea that the government would permit some megalomaniac douche canoe start launching rocket ships into space willy-nilly when you can’t enter a 7/11 without a mask is so far beyond ludicrous it’s not actually fathomable.

Harrington Richardson
Harrington Richardson
  hardscrabble farmer
July 29, 2020 8:56 pm

Real life James Bond villains coming to a world near you.

Call me Jack
Call me Jack
  Auntie Kriest
July 30, 2020 5:01 pm

There are plenty of people that i wouldn’t trust with a pocket knife.Many of them are politicians and government bureaucrats. Governments have killed far more of THEIR OWN PEOPLE than private enterprise ever has

MrLiberty
MrLiberty
July 29, 2020 8:00 pm

Obviously John is yet another wannabee libertarian who gets a hard-on whenever space travel is promoted….so however it happens is fine with him.

Of course missing from the story is that regardless of who built the rocket and for however much “savings,” EVERY PENNY he received was first STOLEN from the general public supposedly because stealing and paying for space travel is something the Constitution authorized the federal government to do.

Musk is a parasite and a crony-capitalist. But if it came down to investors and private voluntary donations to fund a trip to space, he and everyone else “competing” wouldn’t get farther than a few rocket tests at best. Government theft is the only thing truly funding any of it.

Call me Jack
Call me Jack
  MrLiberty
July 30, 2020 5:03 pm

We should cancel space exploration and invest the savings in “vibrant diversity”.

Voltara
Voltara
July 29, 2020 8:09 pm

But it’s taken Musk 18 years to get two men into low Earth orbit. So it’s obviously very difficult.

So how come in the 60’s, before the invention of the pocket calculator, NASA was able to launch 6 successful missions to the moon including transporting a folding dune buggy which ran on lead-acid car batteries? That alone would have been more payload than Musk’s rocket could carry and only into low earth orbit.

How come the 100% effective Apollo technology was dumped completely and replaced with the space shuttle which could only reach low earth orbit and was obviously far less reliable and far more expensive?

How come “journalists” never bother to ask why space exploration was so much easier in the 60’s?

If you have a couple of hours, read Dave McGowan brilliantly covering these points and hundreds of others. Any while you’re there check his take on 9/11 and the Boston bombing. You won’t read better journalism:

Wagging the Moondoggie

Call me Jack
Call me Jack
  Voltara
July 30, 2020 5:06 pm

The Space Shuttle served the nations need. That need was to launch “vibrant diversity” into low earth orbit.Women and minorities got to be called “astronauts”. The Shuttle Pilots referred to them as cargo

Long Time Lurker
Long Time Lurker
July 29, 2020 11:04 pm
SeeBee.
SeeBee.
  Long Time Lurker
July 30, 2020 4:55 pm

All those Astronauts must have been MK Ultra subjects.

SeeBee
SeeBee
July 30, 2020 2:42 pm

“That’s because it was built by Elon Musk’s private company, Space X. He does things faster and cheaper because he spends his own money.”

Can Stossel really be that stupid?