“Lia” and the Electric Car

Guest Post by Eric Peters

At what point does the plug get pulled? Not the one that plugs into the wall. The one that plugs into our wallets – to subsidize the ongoing “purchase” of electric cars?

Air-fingers-quote-marks to emphasize the point.

The subsidies for electric cars were supposed to only be a temporary measure. We were told – as they always tell us, when it comes to this kind of thing – that it was necessary to make nascent electric cars more “affordable” by using the tax code to bribe people to buy them, using other people’s money – because EVs could not otherwise “compete” with non-electric cars.

That this is akin to putting that He Bitch “Lia” Thomas in the pool with women is a thought that never seems to occur to some people. If EVs can’t compete on a level playing field then perhaps there is something wrong with this whole EV business . . . ?

At any rate, people have been buying EVs with other people’s money – the honest definition of a “subsidy” – for more than a decade. These subsidies were supposed to end once a given EV manufacturer reached 200,000 EVs subsidized – er, “sold” – after which the manufacturer would be obliged to actually sell them, at a price necessary to make a profit.

Well, so much for that.

The Biden Thing not only wants to end the 200,000 “sold” limit on subsidies – it wants to increase the bribe to $12,500 per “sale.” A not-far-from-doubling of the original $7,500 per.

This is interesting – because it goes beyond the usual/boring reason.

The federal government has long been in the business of advantaging this business at the expense of that one – and at the expense of all of us. It exists not to serve as a bulwark against threats to liberty but to middle-man endless serial corruption, talking its cut of the money and all of the power involved in the transaction. Everyone knows this. It is old hat. The EV “industry” – which is mostly Tesla – leverages it for its own advantage. So do the other car companies, whenever it is advantageous for them to do so. As back in the early 2000s, when a bankrupted GM used the government to subsidize its failed business.

The free market’s discipline is applied almost exclusively to the businesses too small to be able to afford politicians. It is why it was only small businesses that were “locked down” during the “pandemic” – because (apparently) the “virus” restrained itself from “spreading” at Lowes, Wal-Mart and Home Depot, et al.

That is the usual business.

The interesting business in this case is what the push to dive even deeper into the pockets of people who don’t own electric cars but do pay the taxes used to “help” others “buy” them suggests.

The first thing being that $7,500 isn’t enough to keep the EV conga line going.

The second is implied by the first. It is that the number of people affluent enough to “buy” EVs is dwindling.

If you’re flush – as is true of most who work for the government and the people who are the government, such as the Biden Thing’s secretary of transportation, Pete Buttigieg – it is no great stretch to find the $50,000 or so it takes to “buy” an electric car such as the Tesla Model 3. A $7,500 tax write-off sweetens the pot a little bit, certainly. But it’s probably not critical, as people who can afford $50k vehicles – electric and not – can still afford them even without the tax bribe.

It is why there is a market for luxury-priced vehicles.

If you gander at the demographic profile of the typical EV “buyer” you will find that he is not someone who sweats $7,500 either way. But if the money’s on the table, why not take it? And so, they do.

But it is a limited market – and a $7,500 tax-bribe is not enough to persuade the average American to buy something like a Tesla Model 3 – or even something like a $35,000 Chevy Bolt or Nissan Leaf.

There are only so many Americans who can afford to spend that – even less $7,500 – on any car, electric or not. This was true before the Biden Thing was (s)elected to replace the Orange Man bad. It is much more true now that Orange Man gone – and along with him, about 15 percent of the purchasing power of the average American’s paycheck.

Hence, it is necessary to pay him even more, to persuade him to “buy” an electric car. Otherwise, electric car sales will collapse – and that is something the government cannot allow to happen because electric cars are the vehicle for getting private transportation entirely under its control.

The market – sans subsidy – for cars in the $50,000 price bracket is inherently limited. That limit has probably been reached or close to it, as regards electric cars. But the government has “mandated” that electric cars be mass-marketed.

That it can do, simply by “mandating” it.

But it cannot “mandate” that the masses buy them. Well, it could – but then up comes the problem of the wherewithal. And that the government can remedy – by increasing the tax-bribe to $12,500. That would cut the price – to the “buyer” – of something like a $35,000 Chevy Bolt by almost a third, bringing it down to about $22,000. Maybe the government will simply give every American who wants one an EV? This would indeed make the “purchase” of electric cars much more “affordable.”

But can we afford it?

These EV subsidies are a kind of UBI (Universal Basic Income) variant on wheels. The government pays people not to work – and pays them to drive an electric car. This sounds fine except that someone’s going to have to pay for it. When everyone is getting paid, whom do you suppose that will be?

Such is the nature of the free lunch – and the free ride, too.

-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
starfcker
starfcker
May 2, 2022 6:06 pm

Eric has been on this rant for 5 years. Light on logic, light on fact.fucking Tesla has been completely without subsidy for almost 3 years. The model 3 and model y have been sold almost completely without subsidy. A tax break shouldn’t concern anyone anyway. I’m all for people paying less taxes. In any scenario. Keep it up brother. Tesla won. They opened two new factories in the last month, and now have the capacity to commence to manufacturing the pickup truck and the semi. They’re about to blow out the world. GM is another story entirely. The automotive world’s largest collection of female and minority engineers. Think NASA. Think electric Hummer. The two most important things for milking the most range out of a battery are extremely heavy weight, and the aerodynamics of a brick. Well done General Motors. That one should be a big success.

Ghost
Ghost
  starfcker
May 2, 2022 6:18 pm

Rumor is Tesla might build a plant in Oklahoma, a Right-to-Work state. That should trigger the ‘Tards.

Melty
Melty
  starfcker
May 2, 2022 6:56 pm

Buy the stock once in awhile, but stay away from the car. You miss the point that CAFE standards and shit shift it to the gooberment creating winners and losers as per usual. EVs don’t make a lot of sense except for a beer run car or short distance commuter. Even that is a stretch

The average person say in their 20s or so live in an multi story apartment complex. How are they going to charge at night?

Anonymous
Anonymous
  starfcker
May 2, 2022 6:58 pm

TSLA does get an enormous subsidy … by selling its EV CAFE credits to GM and Ford and Chrysler and … anyone whose CAFE stats don’t square with the agenda being pushed …

Up until about 2 or 3 years ago — maybe even much more recently — those credits were TSLA’s only source of income — much like COST’s only source of income (again, until at least a couple of years ago) was the selling of its memberships.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  starfcker
May 2, 2022 8:04 pm

Get your head out of your ass and your tongue out of Elon’s.

flash
flash
  starfcker
May 3, 2022 4:56 am

Nope. No subsidies here. Just good old hard work and sacrifice …muh free market is reeeeeeeellllll.

Subsidy Tracker Parent Company Summary
Parent Company Name: Tesla Inc.
Ownership Structure: publicly traded (ticker symbol Nasdaq: TSLA)
Headquartered in: California

State/Local $2,166,519,089 28
Federal (grants and allocated tax credits) $339,597,164 82
TOTAL $2,506,116,253 110

Federal loans, loan guarantees and bailout assistance (not including repayments) $466,500,000 2
TOTAL $466,500,000 2
Time Period for State and Local Awards:
Earliest year of data: 2007. Availability of data for earlier years varies greatly from program to program. The majority of the listings for this parent company are for the period since 2014.

https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=tesla-inc

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 2, 2022 7:00 pm

Any one ask perpetually subsidized (f)elon? A wholly subsidized and manufactured product from the git-go.

Besides, only Orca…Sorry!…Oprah can give away cars.

WestcoastDeplorable
WestcoastDeplorable
May 2, 2022 9:35 pm

I’ll keep my 10 yr old Prius Plug-In. Still gets over 8 miles just on EV; enough for most consumer missions. Even w/o plug in power I get up to 60 mpg depending on terrain and how fast I drive.

GerryB
GerryB
  WestcoastDeplorable
May 3, 2022 8:17 am

Around here that 8 miles would not get you to a gas station or any other store. Nearest big box store is about an hour drive one way.

A9racer
A9racer
May 2, 2022 10:27 pm

Sorry, I will never own an electric vehicle. Us fuckin rednecks like our diesel trucks and dirt race cars. Race fuel (113 octane) is running about 17.50/gal, but DAMN! it smells good.

Lia
Lia
May 2, 2022 11:30 pm

Sounds like you need a gig like buttgig has.

Boogieman
Boogieman
May 3, 2022 8:13 am

Just wait about one more year from now. 2014 was the sales explosion for the model S. The batterie technology has not changed from then until now. The batteries have a life of about 8 years. The replacement cost is about $23K to $30K installed. Plus add to that disposal fees and tax your looking at around 32K for the batterie. This is a ticking time bomb. It will be a sweet irony, add to that shortage’s of lithium and you have the potential for some really good times for the Greeny Winnies. It will be epic to watch as the failures come in like a tidal wave

Anonymous
Anonymous
May 3, 2022 8:29 am

When do people charge their cars? Mostly at night. Can you imagine 2 – 3 – 4 hundred cars in a typical apartment or condominium complex all charging their cars at the same time?

Cedartown Mark
Cedartown Mark
  Anonymous
May 3, 2022 12:58 pm

I’ve seen that on jobsites where someone will unplug the power cord that’s charging the electric lift that you’re expecting to use the next day at work to plug their power cord in. Try calling your boss to tell him you can’t come to work today because someone unplugged the power cord to your electric car.