By James Grundvig, American Media Periscope
Total. Media. Blackout. This should come as little surprise for mainstream media outlets not covering the potentially seismic, landmark petition set in front of the nine Justices on the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”). But with “national emergency” language added to the second submission of the petition it begs the question relating to the alternative news outlets, such as Zero Hedge, Unz.com, Breitbart, and The Gateway Pundit failing to cover this story—as of this writing Monday at 12 noon—that resides in the public domain
While all four of these new news outlets have done a phenomenal job covering the election coup of 2020 and the ongoing theft and irregularities in the 2022 midterm elections, why hasn’t anyone of them—or all of them—pounced on this story. It’s a petition that has the potential to rewrite the history of American politics like few other cases.
Brunson v. Adams, Et Al.
On October 20, 2022, the first submission of the petition, Supreme Court Case #22-380), “Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner, v. Alma S. Adams, Et, Al.,” dives into the matter and conflicts in its petition.
The petition is for a Writ of Certiorari, which is “the primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari. This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review.”
U.S. Government Waiver
Interestingly, last Wednesday, November 23, the U.S. federal government via its General Solicitor, Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Counsel of Record, waived its “right to file a response to the petition…” on the eve of Thanksgiving holiday.
This means the ball is in the Supreme Court to act post haste. Since this isn’t a typical case per se before SCOTUS, no oral arguments will be heard. Instead, only four (4) Justices need to vote for the petition to be analyzed in case and constitutional review, according to several sources.
If the petition gets a green light from the Supreme Court, then the Justices will vote on whether to grant in favor of it or against it. Those implications are enormous. More on the potential fallout from the petition later.
Opening Statement of the Petition
Starting from the 2nd paragraph, the petition reads [emphasis ours]:
“This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States.
“In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions.
“These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.”
The ensuing five (5) pages lists the names of the “Parties to the Proceedings,” all 388 of them in the U.S. Congress, the Senate, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and former Vice President Michael Pence.
The petition goes on to list cases, Article I, Section 3 of the Utah Constitution, jurisdiction, statutes, rules, proceedings, statements of the case, and Supreme Court Rule 14(F) Provisions.
Brunson Conclusion:
In the end of the 18-page petition, Brunson arrives at his conclusion [emphasis ours]:
“This petition is set forth in the interest of justice in protecting Brunson’s right to petition for a redress of grievances against the Respondents, and ensuring his right of due process against the encroachment of the doctrine of equitable maxim, and charging the Respondents who failed to investigate the allegations of a rigged election by having them removed from office without further delay.”
What is at Stake?
At the core of the petition is the argument that Brunson’s right to due process to a filed complaint that came after the January 6, 2021, hurrying by both houses of Congress to certify Joe Biden as president of the United State, but that 388 members of public office blocked the 10-day review process for the complaint to be heard or evaluated on its merit.
What does that mean? Here are some questions to consider as this petition moves through each one of its final stages with the Supreme Court.
Vote in Favor
If the Justices vote in favor of the petition:
- Will the U.S. Marshals and Secret Service remove the 388 members?
- If removed, will they be replaced by qualified U.S. military officers to carry on the business of the United States of America in continuity-of-government maneuver?
- Will the removed members be indicted and tried for treason or a lesser offense?
- Will both the 2020 and 2022 elections be disqualified and replaced with a secure election at some point in 2023?
Vote Against
If the Justices vote against the petition:
- Will the anyone of those nine Justices, or all of them, be arrested for treason for not carrying out its legal duties?
There are lots of questions to be answered. But since its now being heard before the Supreme Court as a “national security” issue, we expect the answers to and the which way the petition breaks—in favor of or against—to reach a conclusion swiftly.
A vote in favor of the petition, and the “Belligerent Occupants” in Washington, D.C., will be cleansed from our current corrupt government.
Meanwhile in the Biden regime, as a result of a critical report against Joe Biden, the shadow regime is now looking to replace Kamala Harris as vice president.
Wouldn’t that serve as the cherry on the cake?
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
The Supreme Court will decline to hear the case, and just like that, it goes away. Count on it. The Supreme Court members are all part of the same elite clubs as those who are in government. There’s no chance they’ll act against their own.
Auntie remembers when the great state of Texas had “no standing” before the highest court. How does that work again?
They just don’t give a damn because the USSA is living under a “captured” government and shall do whatever the hidden overlords want.
One of Seven specific jurisdictions that are the courts purview.All the rest are either outside their jurisdiction or actuall were decided 200 years ago!!
All the gun law bs has ALREADY BEEN DECIDED!
So,Stari-decisis exists or it doesn’t!…which is it?
How is that not ABDICATION??
It’s dereliction of duty. Maybe treason.
Ruling in favour of the Bransons would bring down the government and perhaps save the union, which would be far too good to come true. If we’ve learned anything these last few years it’s that the entire system is corrupt, top to bottom, including the judiciary. The Dems got away with the 2020 election steal in large part because of the Supreme Court; they were too cowardly to enforce the law. To think they suddenly developed a backbone is wishful thinking. But it’s fun to think about.
It’s not that funny..
The law that never was redux…The US government is a criminal organization. Expect nothing else and you’ll never be disappointed.
“…….. It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.”
This is bonkers. The Supreme Court isn’t going to do this.
More hopium…will dissipate like a fart in the wind. Rule of law and justice died and rotted away in this world a long time ago. I’m in the last chapters of my life and have to admit I’m looking forward to the day when I go to His Kingdom. A place where no man rules over others. Now that’s Heaven in my book
It was done once before:
The case is Brunson v. Alma Adams, et al. Congresswoman Alma Adams’ (D-NC) name appears on the title of the case because the 385 defendants are alphabetized. It’s now listed on the Supreme Court site as Docket No. 22-380.
There were an unprecedented amount of fraud claims in the 2020 election, emanating from many different states. More than 100 Members of Congress – all Republicans and led by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) – asked for the electoral process to be paused. Citing precedent from a past presidential election, those patriotic, and Constitutionally correct legislators called for the formation of a commission to investigate the fraud claims before certifying the election.
385 Members of Congress failed to uphold their duty to defend the Constitution, by refusing to form a commission to investigate the unprecedented amounts of fraud. In essence, Brunson is arguing that those Representatives and Senators were guilty of dereliction of duty; committed treason by aiding and abetting an enemy of the United States (the fraud and election rigging); and further notes that the US Court system has long held that “FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING,” which means that a fraudulent election is not a legitimate election.
There is absolutely precedent for what Ted Cruz and the other lawmakers were requesting.
In 1876 there were intensely disputed allegations of fraud in the Rutherford B. Hayes-Samuel Tilden presidential race. To resolve the allegations of fraud, Congress appointed a commission of five US Senators, five US Representatives, and five US Supreme Court Justices. Their task, which they carried out, was to investigate and resolve the allegations of fraud, so the actual winner of the election could be determined.
That actually happened. The Republic survived. They delayed the electoral process and didn’t certify the results until after the investigation was concluded. Tilden had 184 electoral votes when the process started, and Hayes had 165. To be declared the winner, one of them needed 185 votes for an Electoral College majority. There were 20 outstanding electoral votes between the states of Florida, Oregon, Louisiana, and South Carolina.
All of those votes ended up being awarded to Hayes, due to fraud in those four states – and Hayes became President.
Congress ignored this legal precedent in 2020 and many of them simply jumped around and told us it was the “safest and most secure election ever.” That was a lie, obviously. Brunson’s lawsuit accuses every Member of Congress of treason for not defending the Constitution, because they didn’t pause the electoral process to carry out an investigation.
Does that include Pence?
Yep.
Ha ha ha.
That’ll be fun.
Because SOME iteration of this shit is going to happen.
The “deadly wound” will be healed, and the man will come back into power.
And the world will marvel.
That is a good angle to your Trump is the anti-christ dangle Red…didn’t think of it that way.
I might believe this action could lead to the truth
coming out and justice prevailing about the obviously
stolen 2020 elections if we didn’t live in a fully corrupt
3rd world shithole.
But we DO live in a fully corrupt 3rd world shithole.
Ammo up. Only we the people can fix this.
There are no heroes from DC riding to the rescue.
They gave it to Hayes in return for ending Reconstruction. The 1876 election was contested over White supremacy (which wasn’t a term of abuse then) in the Southern states. Reconstruction was Federal occupation, and the imposition of black politicians, who then as now were Federal catspaws.
Tilden won more votes, but Republicans raised enough trouble to overturn the results. The commission failed to award the election to Tilden, but Democrats agreed to accept Hayes in return for the withdrawal of Federal garrison forces in the Southern states, ensuring White supremacy. One of the monuments removed by octoroon Mitch Landrieu in New Orleans commemorated the local participants in the struggle to restore White supremacy in 1876.
All horseshit nothing will come of it.
It will keep the attorneys involved adequately paid for twelve month or so.
And that’s it.
Just CONSIDER the possibility that this is all happening according to a carefully crafted script.
Consider it.
Shit starts to make sense in a hurry when you do that.
Everybody is being played.
Everybody.
The masses can’t accept that we’re living in a giant scripted soap opera, they have to believe in writing their congresscritter and voting as being proof of good citizenship, instead of just a dumb prole working on a tax plantation for their elite rulers. So they keep hoping for another political savior, every collapsed election just ramps up the hopium for another 2 yrs and endless billions poured into the Uniparty political coffers.
World’s slickest racket and the proles never figure it out.
Didn’t that ancient carpenter in sandals say not to put faith in men?
Everything is scripted, bro. There is no such thing as coincidence.
Cohencidence
that’s another story entirely.
Death to the schlocks !
I didn’t finish reading it as it has as much chance of happening as getting a glass of ice water in hell.
Nothing will happen unless, they want it to.
The pyre is built, it is just waiting on a spark.
Is this the spark? Who knows, but putting Lincoln in the white house set off the last one. And they knew what they were doing that time also.
Writ of certiorari
Fake and gay.
Super gay. Like Richard Simmons, Liberace-level gay.
Why do you say that Marc?
Do you mean it is a head fake?
It exists and has been used by the same court?
WHAT IS A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
The definition, application, and examples of this legal term
By Robert Longley
Updated on January 31, 2021
In the U.S. court system, a “writ of certiorari” is an order (writ) issued by a higher or “appellate” court to review decisions made by a lower court for any irregularities in legal process or procedures.
https://www.thoughtco.com/definition-of-writ-of-certiorari-4164844
A ‘WRIT OF CETITORARI?’ was used to start the Federal allowed and fundered murder of close to 70 million babies?
“EXAMPLE OF CERTIORARI GRANTED: ROE V. WADE
In its landmark decision in the 1973 case of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ruled 7–2 that a woman’s right to have an abortion was protected by the due process of law clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
In deciding to grant certiorari in Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court faced a thorny legal issue. One of the Court’s rules for granting certiorari requires that the appellant, the person or persons appealing the case, have “standing” to do so—meaning that they would be directly affected by the Court’s decision.
By the time the lengthy Roe v. Wade appeal finally reached the Supreme Court, the appellant, a Texas woman (“Jane Roe”) who had sued after having been denied the right to have an abortion under Texas law, had already given birth and surrendered the child for adoption. As a result, her legal standing in the case was uncertain.
In granting certiorari, the Supreme Court reasoned that because of the lengthy appeals process, it would be impossible for any expectant mother to have standing, thus preventing the Court from ever ruling on abortion or reproductive rights issues. Feeling the law involved merited review, the Court granted the petition for certiorari”.
KEY TAKEAWAYS: WRIT OF CERTIORARI
• A writ of certiorari is a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal from a lower court.
• The word certiorari comes from a Latin word meaning “to be more fully informed.”
• The act of “granting certiorari” means the Supreme Court agrees to hear a case.
• Certiorari must be requested by submitting a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court.
• The Supreme Court grants only about 1.1% of the thousands of petitions for certiorari submitted each term.
• Denying a petition for certiorari has no effect on the lower court’s decision or the laws involved.
• Granting a petition for certiorari requires the affirmative votes of at least four Supreme Court justices”.
Remember this is the court that reversed a WRIT OF CERTIORARI that was used to shove Roe vs Wade down our throats…ironic if they used a WRIT OF CERTIORARI to fire 388 traitors…and it is all about ‘IMMUNITY’ they granted themselves…that is their only defense.
Maybe they are immune to treason? We will find out soon.
Thanks for the information Mark. I will keep the hopium.
Soooooo ‘Writ of Certiorari’ is not fake and gay…and the monkey has no comment?
Look closer……
Otherwise your Constitutional explanation is spot on!People are most UNSERIOUS about serious thing nowadays….
Donkey,
Now there is a left handed word of encouragement.
Whatever this really turns out to be just the FACT these 388 traitors were served with subpoenas and are being called out for who they really are is encouraging.
I’ll tell what else is encouraging the 388 traitors have a headstrong, opinionated, know it all government Solicitor General who is unpopular with all 9 of the Supremes and evidently she made the decision on her own to put the 388 entire defense solely on IMMUNITY!
Now we know one another long enough to know you’re a ‘Big Picture’ guy always looking for short summaries…and I’m a detail ‘Wonk investigator’ spending hours digging for details.
Here is some wonk:
https://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html
Here is another wonk tidbit. The 42 year old Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar recently lost a case 9-to 0 against the government that could have been augured in the governments favor…but she did it ‘her way’ and pissed them all off…so there is that.
WHY ROBERTS AND KAVANAUGH GOT SO FURIOUS AT BIDEN’S SOLICITOR GENERAL
Elizabeth Prelogar dared to challenge federal courts’ power while arguing before the justices. They were not pleased.
crop=4000%2C2667%2Cx0%2Cy0&width=1280
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/12/supreme-court-biden-immigration-masks-debt-relief-elizabeth-prelogar.html
Now, as I have said the Supremes may be using this potential checkmate move against the 388 to ensure there is no court packing attempt during the Lame Duck Congress’s time left…and/or to get more security/protection for their families…and less threats.
Remember this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa6_Jma-3xY
Mark,
I don’t mean to put your comment down. I’m tired of wishing and hoping. I see much pain ahead no matter what. I do very much appreciate all of your additions to TBP. If you hadn’t told us about this, I would not have known. It would certainly be a shock the world event if the 388 were summarily excused from duty.
I would prefer “summarily executed for dereliction of duty”.
Donkey,
I didn’t see it as a put down buddy…the Platform is full of people who are part of the minority of Americans who actually know the real history of scripted False Flags, demonic deceptions, fake facades, propaganda, brainwashing, dumbing down etc. etc. etc.
That is why I hang here!
If you are not skeptical, jaded, untrusting, and a deep dive investigator (on your own – or seek out deep dive investigations) at this point you are just another sucker being led around by the invisible ring in your nose and the invisible tag in your ear.
I don’t know how this case is going to end or what is really going on behind the court/government curtains…but it has remarkable components to it…and I believe spiritually overturning Roe vs. Wade (and this court did that) was a massive spiritual game changer!
Now I’m going to come at everything from a prophetic supernatural point of view…including this. The fact this court on June 24th stopped the Federal sanctioned murder/sacrifice of babies made in the image of God was past tremendous and the enemies hair is on fire over that…I’m just hoping God is going to pour some gasoline on their heads!
God the Father, his Son Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit are in complete and total control. All the prophecies will be fulfilled…I’m just doing my best to understand them clearly and in their exact timing.
You’re one of the very best, Mark.
Look up how many cases each year for which SCOTUS denies cert.
Cert will not be granted to this case.
Hate to black pill ya’, bruh , but if’n you be expecting SCROTUM to shit in their own comfy nest, you are going to be YUGELY disappointed.
Deep Shekels runs this show…ne’er forget and you’ll ne’er be disappointed.
https://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/
Sounds like some flat, hollow, soulless Reagan/Eighties movie soundtrack radio hit:
“Supreme Court Rocks America”- with those awful, artless syndrums way too far out front in the mix, all cacophony and soyed-down talentless plastic passion, signifying accelerating societal decay.
Welcome to terminal velocity at the bottom of the slippery slope.
.
When your grasp has exceeded your reach
And you put all your faith
In a figure of speech
You’ve heard all the answers
But the questions remain
Grab a hold of that fistful of rain
.
.
And if California slides into the ocean
Like the mystics and statistics say it will
I predict this motel will be standing until I pay my bill
.
.
She tells him she thinks she needs to be free
He tells her he doesn’t understand
She takes his hand
She tells him nothing’s working out the way they planned
She’s so many women
He can’t find the one who was his friend
So he’s hanging on to half her heart
He can’t have the restless part
So he tells her to hasten down the wind
Then he agrees he thinks she needs to be free
Then she says she’d rather be with him
But it’s just a whim
By which she hopes to keep him on the limb
I preferred “land of confusion” by genesis . It’s video on MTV had political puppets of Ron and Nancy Reagan I believe.
Yes, I saw this a couple of weeks ago, and at this point people have been baited thinking things will ‘happen’ not sure how many times now we’ve been played..in the what 21 years since 911…all you can do is prepare as best you can.
Never quit, never give up, never surrender, never lose hope…and always remember through God all things are possible.
First Corinthians 1:26-31 NIV (for easier understanding)
Brothers and sisters, think of what you were when you were called. Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were of noble birth.
### But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. God chose the lowly things of this world and the despised things—and the things that are not—to nullify the things that are, so that no one may boast before him. ###
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God—that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption. Therefore, as it is written: “Let the one who boasts boast in the Lord.”
### This is where people should realize that God The Father, Jesus Christ, and The Holy Spirit ( The Great Triune God) are in control, not man. I imagine the Caesers of Rome never thought their empires would die. Personally I see these people that believe they are in control are actually spinning quicker and quicker on a collision course, and unfortunately it will be ugly. This present unpleasantness has been going on for a while, all the warning signs ignored by the majority, now it is going to be showtime.
If your strategy is failing, change your tactics.
Sun Tzu covered the importance of terrain in The Art of War, and institutions, like the SCOTUS, is part of the terrain, high and sunny ground that they occupy. Can you guess what he says about taking on an entrenched enemy on his own ground when you are outnumbered?
There is no way to compel an enemy to use his own forces to engage himself.
It is wasteful, demoralizing, and leads only to defeat.
GATEWAY PUNDIT FAILING TO TAKE IT ON???
The question is?
WILL SCOTUS TAKE THIS ON?
The Four Brunson Brothers Are Suing Biden, Harris, Pence And 385 Members of Congress for Refusing to Investigate Whether ‘Enemies of The Constitution’ Rigged The 2020 Presidential Election
AMERICAN THINKER
November 30, 2022
IS THIS THE SUPREME COURT CASE THAT WILL DRAIN THE SWAMP?
By Paul Dowling
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/11/is_this_the_supreme_court_case_that_will_drain_the_swamp.html
STATE OF THE NATION
Two weeks
To flatten the case
Never quit, never give up, never surrender, never lose hope…and always remember through God all things are possible.
If SCOTUS doesn’t take it up, what will be your thoughts?
1776
That it wasn’t from God.
The court allowed it in the conference process as a tactical threat to stop the Lame Duck Congress from packing and overriding their power/voices (for the rest of their lifetime appointments) and or/plus to ensure more security at their homes, and no more threats to them and their families from the 388.
It could just be a threat to remind the 388 they have a checkmate move…that was already used once before…when Congress followed through on their oath and investigated election fraud.
Maybe more Jan 6th False Flag evidence will break before 1/6/23?
A lot can happen inbetween now and then.
“A lot can happen in between now and then.” Yes it can, and most likely, you’ll become even more of a pathologically stupid, DumbFuck cultist.
Now now now Bowling for THOT’S…good luck making that spare…
Now THAT is some big thinking. The big boys sure know how to play the game if all that is possible. What a crazy place. I just want a boat named “Miss Bliss”.
388 needs to be a meme,poster,bumper sticker, flag ,t-shirt ….MAKE people ask you what it means!
GNL,
Looks like the Supremes are holding it over their heads to protect themselves? Pretty good blackmail or last ditch checkmate move.
SUPREME COURT: BRUNSON V. ALMA S. ADAMS; ET AL., CASE SUMMARY AND TIMELINE
December 12, 2022 by Steve Beckow
“The Supreme Court, which asked the Brunsons to speed up their submission, is said to be holding it in reserve to counter Congress’ threats to reform the court; thus, the choice of the significant date of Jan. 6 (date of capitol arrests) as their conference date, which could see them issue their decision”.
Through God, yes. Courts and politics? Broken reeds.
Hearing meeting is on J6 2023.
The demons are mocking us.
Are you serious?
Donkey…the court took the case on Thanksgiving Day the 24 (after helping the Brothers get it ready in time in an unusual way – listen to one of the interviews)…and put the date it has to be heard on – on the anniversary Jan 6th.
Interesting.
My goodness. For sure that’s a message.
The Justices are very learned and clever. They will come up with some BS that will leave both sides wondering what just happened and the case will disappear.
It won’t even get that far; Roberts will unzip and pee all over the papers, then walk away.
Roberts will get a text with a clip of him on Pedo Island
and there goes the necessary 4th vote.
It seems naive to believe the way to prove the whole system is corrupt is by expecting the corrupt system to act in a non-corrupt manner and convict itself of corruption
Their not reporting on it because it’s DBA. Dead Before Arrival.
NOT GOING ANYWHERE.
The die is struck…we’re going down and it’s going to be Biblical…place your head between your knees.
High on their own supply. Tilt at the windmills fellows. Good on you for standing up, but the tall poppy loses its head. The communists made certain the courts knew the country would burn if they heard any of the multitudinous suits brought over the theft of the presidential election in 2020. Exactly (to my knowledge) zero of the cases were heard.
Courage is always scarce and given a face saving way to avoid conflict, avoid it we will. The court is under no obligation to hear any case and they’ve already proven themselves adroit at avoiding serious decisions.
One can hope to be wrong.
Hope is not in order here. We want a distance between us and “they”…
and Do Not Comply, can be the new motto. No need to be rude about it,
don’t go away mad…just go away, another motto. Go Amish? Just don’t
open a butcher shop.
Eat a dick, you Cuckservative Inc liar, you grifting mutt.
https://the-quash.captivate.fm/episode/a-scotus-case-floating-around-will-not-remove-385-congressmen
here is one that is nearly as important & they have accepted it –who should draw electoral boundaries,state legislatures or courts?
Without a doubt Tampa!
TIM CANOVA: SUPREME COURT CONSIDERS CASE SEEKING TO OVERTURN 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
By Jim Hoft: Published December 13, 2022 at 6:50pm
While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election. In contrast, a little-known case that appeared recently on the Court docket could do just that. The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.
The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.
It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for Justices, and thereby open the door to packing the Court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.” In addition to such institutional threats to the Supreme Court, several Justices and their families have been living under constant threats to their personal security since the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Perhaps these institutional and security threats have provided powerful incentives for the Court to put Brunson v. Adams on its dockets as a shield to deter any efforts by the lame duck Congress to infringe on the Court’s independence. Or perhaps conservatives on the Court are serious about using the Brunson case as a sword to remove public officials who they believe have violated their constitutional Oaths of office by rubber-stamping Electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of serious allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference.
Moreover, recent weeks have brought a cascade of news suggesting the likelihood of an impending constitutional crisis that could be difficult to resolve without the Court’s intervention. It is now clear that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was colluding with social media giants Twitter and Facebook to censor news of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election – a most egregious First Amendment violation intended to rig the election outcome and perhaps to install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government. Meanwhile, the January 6th committee may soon send a criminal referral to the Justice Department to arrest President Trump even though his reinstated tweets are a reminder that he was not calling for insurrection but for peaceful protest on January 6th. More recently, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was reportedly working with Big Tech to censor election critics.
Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit. When they break the Constitution — the supreme law of the land — to rig an election, the only recourse may be the Supreme Court or military tribunals.
As the Brunson lawsuit argues, all of Congress was put on notice prior to its January 6th vote by more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations.
Moreover, the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was required to submit a report on foreign threats to the 2020 Presidential election by December 18, 2020. That deadline was set by executive order and by Congress itself. When December 18th came and went without ODNI submitting its report, Congress should have started asking questions and investigating. In fact, DNI John Ratcliffe announced on that day that the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies he was overseeing had found evidence of foreign election interference but were split as to its significance and whether such breach of national security was sufficient to overturn the outcome of the election. And yet there was no action whatsoever by Congress, no inquiry and no investigation. Instead, Congress approved the possibly fraudulent election results on January 6th without asking any questions of the DNI and the Intelligence Community.
When the results of the 1876 presidential election were in doubt, Congress created a special Electoral Commission made up of five House members, five Senators, and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate. In contrast, in early 2021 Congress had nearly two weeks to investigate before the January 20th date of the Presidential Inauguration. Had Congress waited even just one more day to January 7th, they would have received the long-awaited ODNI report reflecting a split in the Intelligence Community and the DNI’s own conclusion that the People’s Republic of China had interfered to influence the outcome of the presidential election. As Dr. Barry A. Zulauf, the Analytic Ombudsman for the Intelligence Community, concluded at the time, the Intelligence Community shamefully delayed their findings until after the January 6th Electoral College certification by Congress because of their political disagreements with the Trump administration. This paints a picture of collusion and conspiracy involving members of Congress and U.S. intelligence agencies to coverup evidence of foreign election interference and constituting the crime of High Treason.
The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen, merely that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.
The fact that the Brunson case has made it to the Court’s docket suggests profound concerns about a lawless January 6th Congressional committee, politicized federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies, and major constitutional violations intended to overthrow an elected government by manipulating the outcome of the presidential election.
* The writer is a Professor of Law at the Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law in Fort Lauderdale where he teaches Constitutional Law. For faculty bio:
Nigga please!
SCOTUS will decline this case despite being very conservative leaning. This isn’t because of any diabolical or conspiratorial reason but because of the simple fact that Brunson has no standing. There are other serious and irreparable flaws in the case as were noted in the decision by the court of appeals, but the simplest reason for it to be tossed is the issue of lack of standing. You are being lied to by any source which ignores this. Those who promote this and should know better are out to get you excited and/or riled up just to get clicks or cash from you.
Don’t believe me? Ask yourself this: If there is any validity to this why is Brunson pursuing this pro se, aren’t there any attorneys who would take this? Aren’t there any who do have standing who would pursue this (Trump isn’t shy about litigating and would have standing). This is a fantasy and a waste of the court’s time.
Your pathological STUPIDITY is incontestable and irrevocable. Moreover, you’re dishonest liars, equal to the forces of Statist, Globohomo tyranny. Given that you flagrantly ‘carry water’ for BatShit swill, never honestly revisiting your failings of
Q-Tarded idiocy and cultist delusion. At best, you’re worthlessly STUPID, DUMBFUCK LIARS & GRIFTING mutts. At worst, you’re all fedgov entrapment operatives. The smart money is bet on both possibilities.