After an unexplained delay, journalist Bari Weiss has dropped the third installment of THE TWITTER FILES: The Removal of Donald Trump. Parts 1 and 2 can be found here and here.
The new drop reveals that Twitter employees did not believe former President Trump had violated Twitter’s policies.
“I think we’d have a hard time saying this is incitement,” wrote one staffer in an internal message, adding: “It’s pretty clear he’s saying the ‘American Patriots’ are the ones who voted for him and not the terrorists (we can call them that, right?)…”
Another staffer agreed, writing: “Don’t see the incitement angle here.”
“I also am not seeing clear or coded incitement in the DJT tweet,” wrote Anika Navaroli, a Twitter policy official. “I’ll respond in the elections channel and say that our team has assessed and found no vios”—or violations—“for the DJT one.”
Read the entire thread below:
Continued;
3. 7:44 am: “To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th.”
4. For years, Twitter had resisted calls both internal and external to ban Trump on the grounds that blocking a world leader from the platform or removing their controversial tweets would hide important information that people should be able to see and debate.
5. “Our mission is to provide a forum that enables people to be informed and to engage their leaders directly,” the company wrote in 2019. Twitter’s aim was to “protect the public’s right to hear from their leaders and to hold them to account.”
World Leaders on Twitter: principles & approach
6. But after January 6, as @mtaibbi and @shellenbergermd have documented, pressure grew, both inside and outside of Twitter, to ban Trump.
7. There were dissenters inside Twitter. “Maybe because I am from China,” said one employee on January 7, “I deeply understand how censorship can destroy the public conversation.”
8. But voices like that one appear to have been a distinct minority within the company. Across Slack channels, many Twitter employees were upset that Trump hadn’t been banned earlier.
9. After January 6, Twitter employees organized to demand their employer ban Trump. “There is a lot of employee advocacy happening,” said one Twitter employee.
10. “We have to do the right thing and ban this account,” said one staffer. It’s “pretty obvious he’s going to try to thread the needle of incitement without violating the rules,” said another.
11. In the early afternoon of January 8, The Washington Post published an open letter signed by over 300 Twitter employees to CEO Jack Dorsey demanding Trump’s ban. “We must examine Twitter’s complicity in what President-Elect Biden has rightly termed insurrection.”
12. But the Twitter staff assigned to evaluate tweets quickly concluded that Trump had *not* violated Twitter’s policies.“I think we’d have a hard time saying this is incitement,” wrote one staffer.
13. “It’s pretty clear he’s saying the ‘American Patriots’ are the ones who voted for him and not the terrorists (we can call them that, right?) from Wednesday.”
14. Another staffer agreed: “Don’t see the incitement angle here.”
15. “I also am not seeing clear or coded incitement in the DJT tweet,” wrote Anika Navaroli, a Twitter policy official. “I’ll respond in the elections channel and say that our team has assessed and found no vios”—or violations—“for the DJT one.”
16. She does just that: “as an fyi, Safety has assessed the DJT Tweet above and determined that there is no violation of our policies at this time.”
17. (Later, Navaroli would testify to the House Jan. 6 committee:“For months I had been begging and anticipating and attempting to raise the reality that if nothing—if we made no intervention into what I saw occuring, people were going to die.”)
18. Next, Twitter’s safety team decides that Trump’s 7:44 am ET tweet is also not in violation. They are unequivocal: “it’s a clear no vio. It’s just to say he’s not attending the inauguration”
19. To understand Twitter’s decision to ban Trump, we must consider how Twitter deals with other heads of state and political leaders, including in Iran, Nigeria, and Ethiopia.
20. In June 2018, Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei tweeted, “#Israel is a malignant cancerous tumor in the West Asian region that has to be removed and eradicated: it is possible and it will happen.”
Twitter neither deleted the tweet nor banned the Ayatollah.
21. In October 2020, the former Malaysian Prime Minister said it was “a right” for Muslims to “kill millions of French people.” Twitter deleted his tweet for “glorifying violence,” but he remains on the platform. The tweet below was taken from the Wayback Machine:
22. Muhammadu Buhari, the President of Nigeria, incited violence against pro-Biafra groups.“Those of us in the fields for 30 months, who went through the war,” he wrote, “will treat them in the language they understand.” Twitter deleted the tweet but didn’t ban Buhari.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
LOY BRUNSON AND THE SUPREME COURT CASE OF THE CENTURY – Part 1 and 2, December 8, 2022
Posted on December 10, 2022 by Eliza Ayres
RED, WHITE, AND BLUE
Here are the interviews – yes they are long but super revealing and detailed:
https://sunnysjournal.com/2022/12/10/loy-brunson-and-the-supreme-court-case-of-the-century/
An interview with Loy Brunson who, together with his brothers, filed a court case that was accepted by the supreme court against 388 members of the House of Representatives and Senate.
The Brunson Brothers are suing the members of Congress, Vice President Pence, the resident Biden and Kamala Harris of dereliction of duty and a breach of national security.
Congress refused to investigate the possible election interference and fraud. They are maintaining the Congress members have violated their oath of office. They want the immunity to be stripped from these representatives who have violated their oath of office. If the court agrees, these individuals can be removed from their office and not allowed to take office ever again, 388 members of Congress, Pence, Biden and Harris.
This is major.
SUPREME COURT DOCKET
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=%2Fdocket%2Fdocketfiles%2Fhtml%2Fpublic%2F22-380.html
THE LAWSUIT
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf
Suggested letter format to flood the 9 lawyers in black dresses with:
MAILED TO:
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543
Attn:
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor
Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Associate Justice Elena Kagan.
Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett
Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch
Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh
Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson
RE: Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al
No.: 22-380
Dear Justices,
This letter is to express my support of the above-referenced case. I am concerned that the United States of America has experienced a national security breach and a violation of every citizen’s greatest power in a Republic; voting. I ask that you stand against the adherence of foreign and domestic enemies and uphold the supreme law of the land by granting this petition. You truly are in a position that represents a court system greater than the world has ever seen.
I, along with many others, seem to be witnessing our nation captured and I am left to wonder if it might be by some of these very respondents. I pray for the right and just outcome and I am grateful for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Name:_______________________________________ Date:________________________
Chaos feeds off retards sending protest emails.
Snide, cheap insults are water off a ducks back…I always consider the source.
Plus it’s not a ‘Protest’ letter it’s a ‘Support letter’ to five of them who have the power to make a real RESET.
This will only succeed if God is in it…if He is…it will…but there are other circumstances that favor it.
This court overturned Roe Vs. Wade…They received countess letters of SUPPORT on that issue!
Two of the Supremes have been publically threatened by a Senator.
Another Juctice had specific and horrific death threats to her children and had to flee her home and hide as her and her family were under siege.
Another one was about to be murdered in his home and they barely stopped the loon…while the other two branches did nothing…and many of the people listed on this suit encouraged the threats…actually they are the threats in the broader sense.
The Lame Duck Congress is plotting to make a run and pack the court and completely water them down for the rest of their lives, and all 9 know it.
388 traitors have been served with subpoenas, and their current government lawyer is a known idiot, who has already gone her own way on another case and received a 9 to 0 complete rebuke by the entire court. It seems she may be the one who decided to put 100% of the 388’s defense on IMMUNITY.
That may be fatal…is there immunity for Treason? We will soon know.
There is absolutely precedent for what Ted Cruz and the other lawmakers were requesting. In 1876 there were intensely disputed allegations of fraud in the Rutherford B. Hayes-Samuel Tilden presidential race. To resolve the allegations of fraud, Congress appointed a commission of five US Senators, five US Representatives, and five US Supreme Court Justices. Their task, which they carried out, was to investigate and resolve the allegations of fraud, so the actual winner of the election could be determined.
That actually happened. The Republic survived. They delayed the electoral process and didn’t certify the results until after the investigation was concluded. Tilden had 184 electoral votes when the process started, and Hayes had 165. To be declared the winner, one of them needed 185 votes for an Electoral College majority. There were 20 outstanding electoral votes between the states of Florida, Oregon, Louisiana, and South Carolina.
All of those votes ended up being awarded to Hayes, due to FRAUD in those four states – and Hayes became President.
The case was taken on ‘Thanksgiving Day’ by the court…with significant encouragement to get it in as early as possible from the court to the Brothers in a rare direct way, and the court went out of their way to advise the Brothers how to correct mistakes they had made.
The court decided to make the conference ruling by January 6th…an interesting date.
Mark-May The White Horse Prophecy save this republic!!
BL,
HA!
If .22 wasn’t lost in space he would be all over this!
No matter what they do…think of the Checkmate power this gives the Supremes over the 388 until the 6th.
Maybe they are using it to negate any lame Duck moves or more threats against them?
388? Is this a Siboleth?
HA!
Congress on Jan. 6th after finding out there is no immunity for treason!
No one @twitter intervened to stop the Israel bashing, but orange man bad…reeeee
That’s how you know the Deep Shekels’ fag trolling psysop is working.
I love how all these people constantly express their American values!……oh,wait…