Guest Post by Eric Peters
Tesla has been making electric cars for sixteen years – since 2008, when the first Lotus sports car converted-to-battery-power came out. Since that time, Elon Musk – the company’s principal and founder – has been promising that all the money he’s been taking (italicized to make a point of the fact that Tesla’s business model depends fundamentally on various iterations of coercion) would be used to finance the eventual development of affordable EVs for the masses.
Just wait!
They’ll be here any day now. . .
Kind of like that “breakthrough” in battery technology we’ve been hearing is coming for the past 30 years and counting. And maybe it is coming. The problem is the other half – figuring out how to recharge a battery (any battery) in a couple of minutes, the same amount of time it takes to fill a gas tank – remains a problem. One that won’t be solved unless a way can be divined to transfer extremely high voltage from source to portable storage device (i.e., the battery) in just a few minutes without burning everything to the ground.
Maybe. But is it likely? Is it probable?
Probably not.
So even if you have a battery with a realistic 400 mile range – meaning that’s how far it’ll actually power the EV in realistic driving scenarios – you’d still have to contend with weekly waits of 30-minutes plus to recover a partial charge at what they pie-in-your-face style “fast” chargers. These aren’t as slow as home chargers. But to call them “fast” is another iteration of the etymological abuse so deftly practiced by the Left. And it is the Left that is the driving force behind this pushing of EVs.
Anyhow, Tesla – Musk, himself – promised that EVs would elaborate like other electronic things, such as computers, that were expensive when they first came out but became less so over time as the technology became less expensive and economies of scale came into play.
But there is a hair in the soup that is almost never mentioned – probably because it pricks the proverbial balloon and that would let out all the hot air. It is that electronics didn’t depend on government, as electric vehicles do. There was a market for computers – and VCRs and microwaves – that drove down costs over time. There isn’t much of a market for EVs. They are being made chiefly because there are mandates that induce their manufacture.
These mandates, in turn, drive up the value of Tesla stock. It’s not much of a risk to invest in something the government is pushing. This gives the simulacrum of success. But it’s all false because it’s built on lies.
And now another one’s come true.
Reuters reports that Tesla – that is, Elon – is no longer pretending it will use the money it has been taking for the past sixteen years to finance the development of the “$25,000” EV Tesla and Musk have been swearing on a stack of Satanic Bibles is just around the corner. It was to have been the Model 2 – as contrasted with the company’s least expensive offering, the $38,990 Model 3.
Which is as expensive, almost, as BMW 3 Series sedan (more expensive, when you count the cost of the “long range” battery, without which a Tesla 3 touts a maximum range of 270 miles, which greatly limits how far you can drive because of how often you must stop – and wait.)
“Tesla has canceled the long-promised inexpensive car that investors have been counting on to drive its growth into a mass-market automaker, according to three sources familiar with the matter and company messages seen by Reuters.”
So much for the “master plan” touted by Musk – back in 2006 – that “called for manufacturing luxury models first, then using the profits to finance a “low cost family car.” Now it’ll be luxury-priced models only, which has always been the plan. The real master plan being to undo everything Henry Ford did more than 100 years ago.
And what Ford did was to undo the for-the-rich-only business model that defined the car business before he came along and simplified the car down to its basic components, mass produced them inexpensively and thereby made it possible for the workers who made Model Ts to be able to afford to buy the cars they made. His business model did not depend on subsidies and mandates to prop up the sale of Lincolns – with a promise to eventually use the profits to finance the development of the Model T.
Yet Musk is held up as a kind of latter-day Ford – which is almost as absurd as naming the overweight, battery-powered devices sold by his company after Nikola Tesla, an electrical-engineering genius who would have been appalled by the elitist wastefulness of devices dragging around a third or more of their own weight in batteries to keep them going – but not for long. Tesla – the man – was into the transmission of electricity wirelessly. The antithesis of the tethered devices being sold using his name.
The Reuters piece says that “Tesla did not respond to requests for comment” – but after the story was published, Musk posted on his social media site X that “Reuters is lying (again).” But about what, exactly? Reuters says that Musk “did not identify any specific inaccuracies.”
Apparently, the money Elon has taken in via his grift will be used to finance robo-taxis – a “segment Musk has envisioned as the future of mobility.” Instead of buying cars, you’ll pay to ride in them.
That’s a promise you can believe, too.
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal
-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
I’m against tax credits for EV’s (or most anything), but in the grand scheme of the US government – throwing trillions of dollars at wars and such, Musk’s grift is relatively minor. I like the guy because he doesn’t seem to hate humans. He has a bunch of kids, and he’s not an anti-natalist. The libs despise him – always a good sign. He might not be a free speech absolutist, but he’s as close as they come for someone who does business with the US government.
I’m for tax breaks for everyone, all the time. There’s no such thing as “fair” tax (i.e., theft). Abolish the state.
Forget tax breaks, end all taxation of individuals.
musk is a lying sack of crap. always has been; always will be. he is a con man who fools the masses.
No way, man E-bro is the people’s billionaire.
/s
When George Westinghouse, JP Morgan et al, discovered that Tesla had no electric meter, they pulled the plug on him.
Pun intended.
Eric knocks it out with this article. Exposes Elon’s phoniness.
I know that I am going to get downvoted, but I will say it anyway.
EVs by their nature are best used as city cars with the house as the hub and recharge at night. They are definitely not for everyone. They can still be used to drive out of town, but the longer the trip, the less convenient they are.
When used as city cars, charging times are irrelevant. I never wait for charging my car. I just plug it in at night (every 3rd to 5th night, depending on usage), and it is fully charged in the morning.
EVs are terrible as rental cars, since they have no dedicated charging station at night. They are also terrible for people that travel out of town frequently or in places with extreme weather.
And for people that say they don’t last, mine is 10 years old with 102k miles so far.
You make perfect sense. Fine for the person who doeesn’t take real road trips.
That explains why 94% of people with an EV also have a normal car. Doesn’t seem particularly eco-friendly to need twice as many cars.
You’re welcome.
To use them as city cars you have to live in a city.
No thanks.
So,General, in other words, EVs are fine for people who don’t actually need a car. Got it.
Basically, anyone that can’t install a home charger, is traveling, cares about the environment, wants to tow stuff, a vehicle that doesn’t depreciate massively, cheaper insurance and repair bills, safety, to quickly fill their tank to 100%, greater range on a fill up, or a vehicle that doesn’t lose range over time, doesn’t want a stupid EV.
EVS are a scam to force people into 15 minute cities. The power grid cannot handle millions of cars, trucks and buses charging all day long and the charging time would bring the economy to a halt. How bad will the postal service be when they have to stop and sit there for hours a day charging? You might get your mail in 3 months. Same with your Amazon packages. And what about the winter weather? When it goes below 40 the stupid things stop working. The batteries also burn out quickly and it costs an obscene amount of money to replace them. Most people could not afford this therefore you will be stuck where you are.
Just get a solar powered charger, EV fully charge in only three years!
One of the most inauthentic, wishy washy phonies to have ever come across the world’s stage.
It blows my mind that anyone actually believes this fairytale.
This wouldn’t be an issue if they’d just redesign capacitors. They recharge very fast. The only problem is that they discharge even faster. Add a discharge regulator to your capacitor and your problem is solved. Call it a “flux capacitor” and make it run on garbage!
Next?
Thanks Doc.