David Stockman on Why the Great Labor Arbitrage is Coming to an End…

Guest Post by David Stockman

When it comes to Keynesian central banking, it might well be said that if you paint by the numbers you are stuck with the brush. That is to say, the Fed has turned its 2.00% target into an economic holy grail and therefore does not dare risk a rebound of the 40-year high inflationary pressures that remain directly in the rearview mirror.

Yes, the inflation gauges have cooled considerably since the 9% CPI (Consumer Price Index) peak of June 2022, but the Fed is not yet remotely out of the woods. In fact, when the inflation tide is viewed through the more stable and reliable lens of the 16% trimmed mean CPI, which peaked at a somewhat lower 7.2% level in 2022, the year-over-year (Y/Y) gain at 3.7% in January was still barely halfway back to the sacrosanct 2.00% goal.

Indeed, the annualized three-month rate of change in the trimmed mean CPI has rebounded to 4.0% already, while the annualized rate for January came in at a red hot 5.7%.

So, as much as the boys and girls on Wall Street insist on getting their juice, the paint-by-the-numbers crowd in the Eccles Building (Fed HQ) is not nearly there yet.

Y/Y Change in the 16% Trimmed Mean CPI, April 2020 to January 2024

For avoidance of doubt, just recall the horrific charts of 1967 to 1982. Back then the good folks in charge of the Fed were not even explicitly in the Greenspanian monetary central planning business but still had to generate four recessions during that span in order to get the inflation genie back in the jar.

To be sure, the twentysomething traders on Wall Street, who are braying ever more insistently for initiation of the next rate cut cycle, undoubtedly confuse the 1970s with the 1790s. It’s all an ancient blur in their minds, apparently.

The graybeards working toward their pensions in the Eccles Building, however, are not quite so nonchalant. They recall the triple peak of inflation from that era and undoubtedly still have the chart on their dashboards. The thundering central bank failure implicit in three inflationary surges (red bars) and four recessionary contractions (white areas) in just over a decade nearly destroyed the Fed’s open-ended remit as the nation’s unelected monetary politburo, to say nothing of its credibility on both ends of the Acela Corridor (New York and Washington, D.C.).

Y/Y Change in the CPI, 1967 to 1984

Therefore the current gang in charge is not about to flinch on their “higher for longer” call until they can see clearly the whites of those 2.00% inflationary eyes.

We don’t expect this prayed-for condition to be attained any time soon. That’s because the truth of the “lowflation” mirage of the last several decades cannot be buried indefinitely, nor even for much longer.

We are referring, of course, to the fact that there was a whole lot of inflation from the Fed’s madcap money printing even before it pulled out the stops on its printing presses in response to the so-called COVID-crisis in March 2020. But most of that came out in financial asset prices and in the real estate sector, bubbles that Wall Street pronounced to be a swell thing.

At the same time, most of the rest was temporarily exported to the rest of the world via the Fed’s flood of dollar liabilities, which were compliantly scooped up by mercantilist central banks in China, the petro-states and elsewhere in the rapidly mushrooming low-cost global manufacturing supply chains.

The chart below is not simply striking evidence that the 1.8% average inflation rate during the first two decades of this century was an aberration; it is actually the smoking gun!

Index of US Unit Labor Costs, 1970 to 2020

The Fed had grotesquely inflated the US economy during the 1970s cycles shown above and had been merely content to slow the further rise of these drastically higher price levels by the aforementioned 2.0% per annum during the later 1980s and 1990s. This occurred even as Mr. Deng was converting Mao’s ossified Communist economy into a manufacturing powerhouse by dint of a red hot capitalist style printing press at the People’s Bank of China and several hundred millions of newly-minted industrial workers flushed out of the rice paddies and subsistence villages of China.

American industry and wage workers had no chance. Thanks to the pro-inflation policies of the Fed both before and after Greenspan — save for the short interval of “Tall Paul” Volcker’s rescue of the American economy from the inflationary abyss — unit labor costs by the year 2000 were 235% higher than they had been in 1970 and by the eve of the pandemic crisis in March 2020 were actually up by 310%.

Of course, the soaring purple line in the chart above wasn’t supposed to matter according to the Keynesian economists running US economic policy. If America’s trade deficit got too large owing to massive offshoring and mushrooming trade deficits, surplus countries abroad like China were supposed to experience exchange rate appreciation and thereby an offsetting reduction in their competitive cost advantage.

Alas, that assumed printing-press money in the US would be countered by sound money abroad. Fat chance!

Foreign central banks printed stride for stride and then some with the Fed under what is best described as the “dirty float.” So doing, they bought up trillions of unwanted dollars, expanding their own money supplies as they did so, thereby keeping their trade surpluses intact and showering their export industries with cheap credit and capital.

So offshoring never slowed down. The exchange rate corrections and rebalancing of trade accounts never happened.

There is no mystery, therefore, about the cause of the great labor arbitrage and resulting offshoring of America’s industrial economy over the last 40 years. To wit, the objective condition of the global economy and internet linkages of producers and consumers everywhere on the planet meant that the US needed a sustained period of cost deflation to purge the inflationary excesses of the 1970s and after, not the pro-inflation policy that the Fed actually conducted.

For want of doubt, the chart below tells you all you need to know. Shortly after the turn of the century, the manufacturing wage gap between the US and China was 22X and even by 2015 it was still in the 5X range. And yet, the foolish Keynesian academics in the Eccles Building saw fit to essentially contend that still more inflation was the key to prosperity, a la their 2.00% target.

Nevertheless, the great labor arbitrage is now drawing to a swift close, in large part because China has completely drained its rice paddies. That is to say, as a matter of demographics and the legacy of its one-child policy, the Red Ponzi labor force peaked in 2015 and is now shrinking and will be shrinking as far as the eye can see.

Accordingly, wage costs are rising rapidly in China because even the Red Ponzi has not found a way to repeal the laws of supply and demand. Accordingly, the wage gap has narrowed to less than 20% and will likely disappear entirely before the end of the current decade.

The Great Labor Cost Arbitrage, 2000 to 2025

The underlying truth is that the Great Labor Arbitrage was a one-time event, not a permanent condition of the global economy. There are simply no more Chinas left on planet earth or even the nearby solar system.

And that gets us exactly to the Fed’s impending monetary Waterloo. It was able to print with relative impunity during the 1990 to 2020 period because the one-time export of the US industrial economy caused an utterly aberrant split screen deformation of the domestic price level.

To wit, the merchandise goods coming back into the US economy from offshore production were priced at levels far below the hideously inflated level of domestic production costs. As a result, the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) deflator for durable goods (black line) actually declined by nearly 40% between 1995 and early 2020. That reflected not only the surging import share of durable goods, but the fact that on-margin imports set the price of domestically produced goods as well.

PCE Deflator: Durable Goods Versus Services, 1995 to 2020

There has never been anything like this sweeping deflation in the modern economic era. It was literally a freak of economic history, beyond any plausible avenue of continuation or replication.

By contrast, the PCE deflator for services, which are largely produced domestically and therefore within the Fed’s realm of influence, rose by more than 85% during the same period.

In annualized terms, therefore, the durables index declined by 2% per annum for a full quarter-century while the services index rose by 2.5% per year. It was a pure statistical anomaly and gift of dumb luck to the Eccles Building that the resulting overall PCE deflator rose, on the math, at 1.85% per annum.

And yet, and yet. The Keynesian pointy heads at the Fed declared this spat of dumb luck to be a “lowflation” problem requiring aggressive and sustained operations of its printing presses. In effect, they were looking a gift horse in the mouth and pretending it was an ogre.

Needless to say, with Chinese wages and costs rising rapidly and the arbitrage gap nearly closed, there is not a snowball’s chance in the hot place that the black line in the chart above will take another 40% dump lower. Not in a million years.

And that means, in turn, that the yawning gap in the above chart between goods deflation and services inflation will not recur. As it happens, the underlying services inflation is still in the +5% Y/Y range and will dominate the topline price level going forward far more heavily than it did during the aberrant era of 40% durables deflation.

Accordingly, the “lowflation” excuse for money printing is now deader than a doornail.

The fact is inflation isn’t and won’t be contained even at the Fed’s specious 2.00% target. And the last two decades have proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that aggressive money printing does not spur domestic investment and productivity, and therefore overall economic growth either.

What it does do is inflate asset bubbles on Wall Street because ultra-low interest rates purportedly justify higher price-to-earnings multiples. And that’s been the excuse all along for taking the Fed’s balance sheet from $300 billion when Greenspan was hit with the Black Monday meltdown in October 1987 to a peak of $9 trillion a few months back.

Alas, financial asset bubbles aren’t indefinitely sustainable either. They actually rang the bell on Wall Street Thursday when NVIDIA brushed up against a market cap of $2 trillion, representing 30X sales of chips that enable the likes of Google’s generative AI to render portraits of black people dressed as Vikings.

Even the Tulip Bulb Mania of 1637 never went that crazy.

Y/Y Change in CPI for Services, 2011 to 2024

Editor’s Note: The truth is, we’re on the cusp of an economic crisis that could eclipse anything we’ve seen before. And most people won’t be prepared for what’s coming.

That’s exactly why bestselling author Doug Casey and his team just released a free report with all the details on how to survive an economic collapse. Click here to download the PDF now.

As an Amazon Associate I Earn from Qualifying Purchases
-----------------------------------------------------
It is my sincere desire to provide readers of this site with the best unbiased information available, and a forum where it can be discussed openly, as our Founders intended. But it is not easy nor inexpensive to do so, especially when those who wish to prevent us from making the truth known, attack us without mercy on all fronts on a daily basis. So each time you visit the site, I would ask that you consider the value that you receive and have received from The Burning Platform and the community of which you are a vital part. I can't do it all alone, and I need your help and support to keep it alive. Please consider contributing an amount commensurate to the value that you receive from this site and community, or even by becoming a sustaining supporter through periodic contributions. [Burning Platform LLC - PO Box 1520 Kulpsville, PA 19443] or Paypal

-----------------------------------------------------
To donate via Stripe, click here.
-----------------------------------------------------
Use promo code ILMF2, and save up to 66% on all MyPillow purchases. (The Burning Platform benefits when you use this promo code.)
Click to visit the TBP Store for Great TBP Merchandise
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
charles zilich
charles zilich
April 19, 2024 5:13 pm

Gold Has Set Historic Highs this Year as the Federal Reserve Has Reported Historic Losses
‘According to Federal Reserve data, for the first time in its history, the Fed has been losing money on a consistent basis since September 28, 2022’ [unrealized losses not included]

Gold Has Set Historic Highs this Year as the Federal Reserve Has Reported Historic Losses

The Black Swan Rears Its Head: The Fed Has Negative Capital Using GAAP Accounting

The Black Swan Rears Its Head: The Fed Has Negative Capital Using GAAP Accounting

For the First Time in History, the Fed Is Reporting Billions in Losses Weekly; It’s Still Paying High Interest Income to the Mega Banks on Wall Street

For the First Time in History, the Fed Is Reporting Billions in Losses Weekly; It’s Still Paying High Interest Income to the Mega Banks on Wall Street

The Banks: “Unrealized Losses” in Q4, Securities Held by Banks, Bank Failures, and the Dropping Bank Count
https://wolfstreet.com/2024/03/10/the-banks-unrealized-losses-securities-held-by-banks-

U.S. Money Supply Is Doing Something It Hasn’t Done in 90 Years, and It May Signal a Big Move for Stocks
https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/04/30/money-supply-90-years-signal-big-move-for-stocks/
The Money Supply Fell for the Fifteenth Month in a Row as Full-Time Jobs Disappear
https://mises.org/mises-wire/money-supply-fell-fifteenth-month-row-full-time-jobs-disappear
Money Supply Huge Dropoff 1870 to 2021 [note 1933 and 2021 ]
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fqt8XuvWYAYC_c8?format=jpg&name=small

Lowell
Lowell
April 19, 2024 9:05 pm

Blah, blah, blah. When the time is right they will just move the goalposts once more.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Lowell
April 20, 2024 6:43 am

Eventually they will run out of real estate, it is only a matter of not if, but when.

'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug
  Lowell
April 22, 2024 4:00 pm

I read half way and intended to comment, “Blah, blah, blah.” I see you took care of that. Nice to get a confirmation every once in a while.

Anonymous
Anonymous
April 20, 2024 6:42 am

Stockman is generally spot on, which is why both parties hate him.

Daddy Joe
Daddy Joe
  Anonymous
April 20, 2024 11:54 am

Anon, Yes, Stockman is very insightful in this article. In a nutshell he says that the West (esp the USA) was spared the effects of inflation due to the discrepancy of Chinese labor vs American labor from about 1995 to 2020. American labor cost was 22X Chinese. That gap has closed rapidly since 2020 so that now Chinese labor is about 80% of American labor. This will never happen again because the farms and rice paddies have been drained of humanity and transferred to manufacturing jobs. Thus, inflation is here to stay because laborers worldwide are demanding a living wage. Free ride is over; buy real goods and PMs while you can–it all goes up from here.

'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug
  Daddy Joe
April 22, 2024 4:02 pm

If you are correct in your assessment of what Stockman meant, you should be his editor, or ghost writer. Your direct writing style is much more to my liking.

Rifles are the Cure
Rifles are the Cure
April 20, 2024 1:02 pm

Gee,The giant sucking sound Ross Perot warned of 32 years ago is finally ending?!
Fucking Idiot Clinton voters.
But at least all the Wall Street M&A hyenas had their wildest dreams come true!
They got the gold, and we got the shaft.

Anonymous
Anonymous
  Rifles are the Cure
April 21, 2024 7:41 am

It was the Ross Perot voters that gave us Clinton as he took votes from HW Bush. Not that HW ‘NAFTA’ Bush would have been much better, but certainly better than Slick Willy and even GW Bush.

'Reality' Doug
'Reality' Doug
  Rifles are the Cure
April 22, 2024 4:03 pm

I voted for Ross Perot. I have absolutely no regrets. The morons that say, “Don’t throw your vote away!” I hate those morons.