RENEGADES


Buy Silver? Read On.

I invest in 1 ounce gold and silver bullion coins minted in the U.S. Maybe you should, too. If for no other reason as a hedge against all the Monopoly money in circulation.
“The demand for American Eagle silver bullion coins has continued to increase throughout calendar year 2015 and remains on a record-setting pace,” (U.S. Mint Spokesman) Stump said. “This demand is a global one and all mints are trying to meet the demand for this precious metal. As of Aug. 24, we have sold 31,283,500 ounces of Silver Eagles. This compares to 27,713,000 ounces for the same period last year. It should be noted that 2014 was a record-breaking year for American Eagle silver bullion — 44,006,000 ounces being sold.”

Long-term increases

“To add further perspective to the demand for silver bullion coins, for the first 22 years of the American Eagle Silver Bullion Coin Program, the Mint would typically sell between 3 million to 10 million ounces per year,” Stump said. “Since 2007, sales have increased nearly five-fold from 9,887,000 in 2007 to more than 44 million last year. The rapid increase in demand for all silver bullion coins has put a severe strain on all global suppliers.”


WE JUST LOST A DEAR FRIEND

Her name was Jessie, and she was a beautiful lab/retriever mix, our son’s dog. While my son, Jessie’s Alpha Male, and his family were the center of her life, I won’t let her passing go without comment.

My wife and I, whom she knew as Nana and Papa, were her best friends. When we moved to Arizona in 2007, we rented a house just across the street from our son. Jessie moved into our lives immediately. She’d just show up unannounced and unescorted at our front door. A loud bark is much more effective than ringing the doorbell. She knew that there were three things inside – treats, lots of love, and lots of attention.

For good reason did we love her so much. That dog was the sweetest, most gentle animal on Earth. I NEVER saw her get seriously angry. Never. She growled once at a dog who continually tried to sniff her rear end and just wouldn’t stop even though Jess was doing her best to get away from this annoying little yapper. Growled. Once.

We were Jessie’s go-to babysitters for nearly eight years, literally many dozens of times, even when we moved to our new home 2 miles away. Nana would take her for an early morning walk on the golf course nearby. She loved rolling around the fairway grass and chasing rabbits. Never caught one, but she always gave a good chase. Once, she tried her luck with two coyotes who suddenly appeared on the scene. One of the coyotes froze in place, and the other started to come at her slowly. Screams from Nana brought her back to safety.

Bedtime was a hoot. Once we got into bed, foom!!!, up on the bed she leaped. 65 pounds of solid muscle. We made her settle at the foot of the bed, but that didn’t last. Come early morning, she’d be laying right between our heads, with a paw resting on one of us. Then at daybreak, the fun started.

First, she began to lick our faces. “Jessie, stop,” Nana or I would yell. She’d jump down off the bed and go into her rise-and-shine act with an unbelievable assortment of noises. Snorting. Woofing. Sneezing. Panting. Licking herself loudly, which could go on for more than 5 minutes. Tail thumping against the wall. Whomp, whomp, whomp. Or her piece de resistance. Banging her tail against the drawer hardware on the nightstand. Clang, clang, clang. What started out as an exercise in exasperation for us ended up as laughter at her creativity in getting us out of bed.

Many more stories, but I will stop. I’m sure most TBP visitors have similar stories about pets they have had in their lives. And I’m sure you felt then just as we feel now when they leave. It really hurts. A lot.

All dogs go to heaven. If we make the cut, Jessie, we’ll see you there.


 

WOULD YOU LIKE SOME THC WITH THAT COOKIE?

IT’S TGIF. LET’S KICK IT OFF WITH THIS HEARWARMING STORY. I LOVE HAPPY ENDINGS. DEDICATED TO OUR DEAR FRIEND FROM COLORADO, BLOTTOMATIK.

A teenager in Colorado died after consuming an entire marijuana cookie that contained 6 servings of marijuana’s active ingredient, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The 19-year-old man had received a marijuana cookie from his friend, a 23-year-old who bought the product from a store. The sales clerk instructed the friend to divide the cookie into six pieces, with each piece containing about 10 mg of THC, the recommended serving size established by Colorado authorities.

At first, the 19-year-old followed these instructions, and ate just part of the cookie. But after about 30 to 60 minutes, he didn’t feel any effects, so he ate the rest of the cookie, according to the report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Over the next few hours, the man showed erratic speech and hostile behaviors. About 2.5 hours after he ate the whole cookie, he jumped off a balcony on the fourth floor of his building, and died from trauma from the fall. Officials determined that marijuana intoxication was the chief contributing factor to the man’s death.

P.S. from SSS: You Stoners in Colorado have a nice weekend. Watch those cookies. Heh.

WOULD YOU LIKE SOME PESTICIDE WITH YOUR WEED?

It just keeps getting “better” (heh) for the legal pot industry.

According to Kristen Wyatt, reporting for the Associated Press, legal and commercial marijuana growers in states like Colorado and Washington must be on the lookout for two things that can quickly wreck havoc on their plants: mildew and spider mites. (The same is also true for illegal growers, of course.) Both pests can create a multi-million headache very quickly for commercial growers if not treated properly.

But there’s a problem. Some growers, including those in states where medical marijuana use is legal, are turning to industrial-strength pesticides to treat their plants. No wait, there are two problems. Marijuana is considered an illicit crop by the federal government, so there is no roadmap on the use of pesticides on marijuana plants. And chemists and horticulturists can’t help much either because marijuana is used in various ways such as smoked, eaten, and as an oil rubbed on the skin. There’s virtually NOTHING available in the scientific community to tell growers how to grow and maintain an illegal crop for sale safely to the general public. Nothing.

Continue reading “WOULD YOU LIKE SOME PESTICIDE WITH YOUR WEED?”

HE LIED, 150 DIED

I am not against the manufacture and sale of psychotropic drugs. These medications have helped millions of people deal successfully with mental disorders ranging from mild depression to severe psychoses such as schizophrenia. What I am against is the increasingly wholesale prescription of these drugs to those under the age of 25, when the brain is still maturing. This must be done very carefully to insure these young patients are, per a Food and Drug Administration warning, regularly monitored for behavioral changes by both the attending physician AND caregiver(s) of the patient.

What do I mean by “wholesale prescription?” Here’s an example. The granddaddy of anti-depressants on the market today is Prozac, a product of Eli Lilly. It first came on the market in 1989. In 2010, 24 MILLION prescriptions for Prozac and its generic cousin (fluoxetine) were written just in the U.S. alone. Wow, from zero to 24 million in just 21 years. And Prozac is no longer the most prescribed anti-depressant; it is #3. The #1 and #2 spots are held by Zoloft/generic and Celexa/generic, respectively. Do you think that these potentially dangerous, to those under 25, psychotropic drugs are being over prescribed? I do. And they are wrecking havoc both here and abroad.

Andreas Lubitz was born in Germany on December 18, 1987 and died by suicide on March 24, 2015. In 2009, at the age of 21, he was diagnosed with severe depressive disorder and treated with psychotherapy to include taking two powerful anti-depressant drugs, Mirtazapine and Cipralex (aka Lexapro). Both of these drugs qualify for the following warning by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, quoted verbatim from its website:

Continue reading “HE LIED, 150 DIED”

SSS SCHOOLS ADMIN ON FRACKING

Good news for frackers.

In mid-May 2015, domestic oil production increased by 300,000 bbl/day over the past 3 months to a grand total of 9.6 million bbl/day. This total domestic production is the highest it’s been since 1970, when domestic oil production started a long, 35 year slide to just under 5 million bbl/day in 2005.

In the 10 years since, the U.S. has added over 4.6 million bbl/day to its production, and fracking has accounted for 90% of that increase. For the math challenged, that’s 4.14 million bbl/day.

So why is domestic oil production increasing when so many predicted a death knell for the fracking industry as the global PRICE of oil plummeted from $110 a barrel to its current level of $60. It’s because the fracking companies still standing can profit from $60 a barrel and not the “conventional wisdom” that they need the global price of oil to remain at or above $80-85 a barrel. Several factors are in play.

—-Half of the NEW fracking wells started in September 2014 have been idled. Lower cost to the companies in energy consumed, equipment purchased or leased, and jobs required.

—-100,000 workers laid off. Huge savings to the companies in labor costs.

—-Less productive wells idled. Production at the best wells ramped up. Yes, this will deplete these wells even faster, but the companies have already identified promising replacements through …….

—-Skyrocketing technology in horizontal drilling, which can now burrow its way through the earth up to 15,000 feet using seismic imaging and a host of other breakthroughs to find what they’re looking for: huge amounts of recoverable oil. And the technology is working very, very well.

—-Bankruptcies. Sorry about the jobs lost or idled, but that’s how destructive capitalism works. The companies left standing are snapping up oil leases and idled equipment at fire sale prices, and …..

—-Institutional investors are watching closely. And they like what they see and have poured over $20 billion into the fracking companies in the past few months. This is precisely the OPPOSITE of what occurred in 1986 when the domestic oil industry collapsed and the banks and investors stampeded to the exits.

—-Finally, a coup de grace has been delivered to the radical environmental groups who have been fighting fracking for years based on spurious allegations that fracking threatens under ground water sources. Two days ago, the EPA released a multi-year study costing nearly $50 million dollars that it does not. The EPA study did not reveal ONE SINGLE INSTANCE of fracking fluids which compromised under ground water. Not one.

Fracking for oil is safe and critical to the economy and national security. Critical. I challenge the anti-frackers who have read these comments to present any case which refutes my analysis and firm support of the fracking industry. It will survive, and it will prosper. Greatly to the nation’s and individual’s benefit.

And I invite Admin to go first.


I DON’T BELONG AT ARLINGTON

And while I am eligible, as a retired member of the armed forces, to be buried in Arlington as my final resting place, I won’t choose that option.

Let me be clear, while I served my country with honor that included two combat tours, I survived. Those who didn’t and perished in the many, and sometimes foolish, wars my country has waged, it is THOSE people who belong there. I do not deserve to share their hallowed ground. Period.

Leave it to the US government to fuck up what should be the easiest decision ever and create rules to degrade what should be one of the most sacred plots of land in the U.S.


Why I Feel Completely Safe

Short and personal comment. From experience.

With all the turmoil going on in majority black cities and towns in America, I feel safe. I live in Tucson, Arizona, which is 60 miles from the Mexican border. Tucson is 47% white, 42% Latino (the vast majority Mexican-American), 5% black, 3% Native American, and 3% other.

42% Latino. That’s huge. Are they a threat during civil unrest? No, and here’s why in one word. Family.

Latinos cherish family. I have lived with them here and in Panama, El Salvador, and Colombia. They embrace their unique culture: their language, their enjoyment of life (boy, those folks can party), their work ethic (they are NOT lazy; that’s a stereotype and total garbage), their music, their art, their literature, their Roman Catholic religion, their food, you name it.

But Numero Uno is family. And if you go into the lower middle class and poorer Latino neighborhoods of Tucson, and some of them are quite dumpy, what do you see? Mom and pop shops all over. Family-owned stuff from restaurants to grocery stores to plumbing companies to, well, you name it. Those businesses, however modest, are THEIR businesses. Are they going to riot and burn those businesses down? Hell, no. That would be an attack on family, friends, and neighbors. Not gonna happen.

So, if you do the math, 95% of Tucson is not a problem, including the Indians, who don’t riot, but rather go on the warpath (I threw that in just to needle Llpoh). That’s my safety net.


IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

As some frequent visitors to this site are aware, I have been the reigning “TBP Thumbs-Down Champion” for about four or five years. My views on illegal drugs are not popular and have been received by, shall we say, less than overwhelming support.

All that changed recently with the article, “LLPOH: Getting Out of Dodge.” One person posted a comment that achieved an incredible 108 thumbs-down, last time I looked. In all my years of visiting this site, I have NEVER seen a comment that broke the triple-digit barrier. But here it is ……

“Wow, what a fucking coward. I guess it is easier to be a chicken shit running away to another country than staying to take a stand. I have absolutely no respect for you.”

The author of that comment went on to post 4 more consecutive comments that went on to a majority of thumbs-down votes. Unfortunately, a 6th comment received a slim majority thumbs-up, which left my record of 10 consecutive majority thumbs-down comments intact. Nonetheless, the initial comment of 108 thumbs-down votes smashes the TBP record by a huge margin.

I therefore declare that person as a “TBP Thumbs-Down Co-Champion.” And the winner is ……………… Stephanie Shepard!!!! Congratulations, Stephanie. You are in rarified company.

Jim, tell the audience what Stephanie has won for this stunning achievement.

 


THE ICE IS MELTING!!!!

Do you think “climate change” will lead to a rise in global sea levels of up to 3 feet, as some climate studies have suggested, by the year 2100? If you do, fine, but it won’t come from melting of the Greenland ice sheet or the Antarctica ice sheet. Verifiable data shows that the Antarctica ice sheet is INCREASING in size, so that’s out of the equation. Let’s take a look at what’s going on in Greenland, where some melting is occurring. Here’s the facts from a variety of sources and condensed in Wikipedia.

“The Greenland ice sheet is a vast body of ice covering 660,000 sq mi, roughly 80% of the surface of Greenland. It is the second largest ice body in the world, after the Antarctic ice sheet. The ice sheet is almost 1,500 mi long in a north-south direction, and its greatest width is 680 mi. The thickness is generally more than 1.2 mi and over 1.9 mi at its thickest point. It is not the only ice mass of Greenland – isolated glaciers and small ice caps cover 29,000 and 39,000 sq mi around the periphery. If the entire 684,000 cu mi of ice were to melt, it would lead to a global sea level rise of 24 ft.

Continue reading “THE ICE IS MELTING!!!!”

I TOLD YOU SO

In October 2013, to be specific. That legalizing marijuana would be a total failure, to be more specific. That was 3 months BEFORE legal marijuana became law in Colorado, and 9 months before in Washington. And I based it strictly on market forces, just as Admin does for his many praiseworthy articles. As usual, I got hammered for my article. Here’s what I said.

Quote. “So let’s look at some market realities about the marijuana business in the U.S. And how these realities stack up against states who have legalized marijuana for personal and/or medical use to make a few bucks.

CULTIVATION. Cannabis cultivation and marijuana production operations are extensive throughout California, particularly in northern California. Outdoor cannabis cultivation is increasing dramatically in the northern region of the state, primarily because of expanded cultivation by Mexican DTOs (Drug Trafficking Organizations); as a result, the area is becoming one of the most significant outdoor cannabis grow areas in the state.

Oops. Not only is marijuana being grown extensively in Mexico, the cultivation here in the U.S. is largely under the control of the Mexican DTOs. I pointed that out two years ago when I cited an example of marijuana cultivation by Mexicans in a U.S. National Forest near Green Bay, Wisconsin (good grief, Green Bay?). And where was the labor coming from? Illegal Mexican aliens. And what do you think is happening in California’s forests, with the help from 2 1/2 million illegals, mostly Mexican, residing in that state?

LABOR COSTS. This one is a no-brainer. For cultivation, harvesting and processing, the marijuana cartels operate on third world labor, in which wages are one-half or less of anything a legal process can establish in the U.S. End of story. No further discussion needed.

MARKET RESTRICTIONS. The states that have legalized marijuana for either medical and/or personal use all prohibit the sale to persons under 21 years of age. That’s MILLIONS of lost customers. Gee, I wonder where the youngsters will get their blow? Same place they get it now.

OVERHEAD. Taxes on marijuana by the states are the biggest factor here, just as they are with alcohol and tobacco (which, unlike marijuana, also deal with federal taxes). And regardless of what type of market the states set up, whether it is largely private or government-controlled or something in between, there will be land purchases, leases, security, property taxes, building maintenance, and a whole host of other costs that are less or even absent for the marijuana networks. And all of these aforementioned advantages for the marijuana cartels leads to ………

PRICE. Here’s where the rubber meets the road. Right now, the average retail price of marijuana is $3,200-$4,800 per pound in the West, $4,800-$6,400 in the Midwest and East, and topped by North Dakota and Hawaii at over $6,500 per pound as the highest prices in the country. These figures come from thepriceofweed.com. Remember, these retail prices reflect what is being charged in the ILLEGAL MARKET, because that is what the market will bear. But those prices are extremely flexible. You can come to places in Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, and California and buy Mary Jane for $500 a pound. That’s retail!!!! Think Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, Tucson, Las Cruces, and El Paso. That’s $31.25 per ounce, compared with the average LEGAL $200 per ounce price at your local state-approved medical marijuana “clinic” in California and Colorado. Those are real world MARKET FORCES that should tell any rational human being why legalization of marijuana will not work.

So what’s the solution to this conundrum over marijuana? In three words, decriminalization versus legalization. To put in it into three more words, fines versus felonies. This is done in several states, such as Ohio and New York. Get caught with an amount of pot that the state defines as personal use, here’s your speeding ticket, so to speak. Pay the fine and off you go. No jail time, no felony on your record, and the fine goes into the state treasury coffers without the ginormous amount of money the states would have spent on this folly of trying to make a few extra bucks, which won’t happen, on legalizing and taxing marijuana. Win, win.” Unquote.

Fast forward to this AP (a very liberal media organization) article, “States could share plenty about legal pot sales,” by Kristen Wyatt published January 3, 2015. From the article …….

“one of the biggest disappointments of the (legal) marijuana markets (is) lower than hoped for tax collections … the effective tax rates are about 44 percent in Washington and 29 percent in Colorado ….. the states assumed users would pay a steep premium to stop using drug dealers and have clean, safe stores in which to buy their weed. But the tax rates have led to a continuing black market, undercutting the TOP ARGUMENT for legalizing it in the first place.” Comment: Heh. I win. Let’s hear it from the simplistic “Legalize it and tax it” crowd now.

“School districts in Colorado and Washington have reported more kids showing up at school with weed. Also, there have been more kids treated at emergency rooms for marijuana ingestions.” Comment: See what I said under “Market Restrictions” above about kids. They’re now getting Mary Jane from both illegal and legal sources, where that shit is now sold in edible products. This doesn’t mean a hill of beans to the pro-pot crowd on this site. Fuck the kids. Marijuana brownies now!!!! Marijuana brownies forever!!!! Right?

There are none so blind as those who will not see.


PEAK OIL, PEAK NATURAL GAS, OR PEAK BS? YOU DECIDE.

“I will drink every gallon of oil produced west of the Mississippi.”
—-1885, John Archbold, partner of Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller. Yikes. Texas, Oklahoma, California, most of Louisiana, and North Dakota are all west of the Mississippi.

“Within the next two to five years, the oil fields of this country will reach their maximum production, and from that time on we will face an ever increasing decline.”
—-1919, Van H. Manning, Director of the U.S. Bureau of Mines. In 1931, the east Texas oil field was discovered and created a glut of oil.

“U.S. oil production will likely peak between 1965 and 1970 and steadily decline thereafter.”
—-1956, M. King Hubbert, Shell Oil geologist and father of the Peak Oil Theory aka Hubbert’s Peak. He was right, until he wasn’t. U.S. oil production peaked in 1970 and bottomed out at 5 million bbl per day in 2008. Today it is 8.3 million bbl per day. Main reason? Hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling.

“Global oil production is 84 million bbl per day. I don’t believe you can get it any more than 84 million bbl per day. I don’t care what Abdullah, Putin or anyone else says about oil reserves or production.”
—-2005, T. Boone Pickens, billionaire oil tycoon. In 2013, global oil production was 90 million bbl a day.

“Peak Oil deniers are blithering idiots.”
—-2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, James Quinn, Chairman Emeritus of the Department of Peak Oil Forensics, University of Pennsylvania. Heh. I made that one up.

Well, in the last decade, it appears that Russian ultra-nationalist Vladimir Putin is one-up on American oil expert T. Boone Pickens. Seems the Russian oil companies may have been whispering oil data in Putin’s ear that was not for international dissemination.

Let’s get real about Peak Oil. The U.S. Energy Information Agency states that there 1.6 trillion barrels of known oil deposits out there on the planet, and energy agencies in other countries, such as France and Russia, agree. That’s nearly 49 years of oil left for everyone on Earth at today’s production of 90 million bbl per day, assuming it is all consumed at the current rate of production, which it isn’t. Some is stored, and some is being replaced rapidly by other forms of energy such as natural gas (see below). Currently, production more than meets demand. The global price of oil is DROPPING.

New and significant deposits are being found all the time. In Russia, a 2.2 billion bbl deposit was found in April 2014 in the Astrakhan region north of the Caspian Sea. It is the largest announced oil find in Russia in 20 years. In Kenya, a 1 billion bbl deposit of light sweet crude was announced in September 2014. The list goes on and on in a variety of other locations such as Angola and Venezuela. Small potatoes you might say, but then there’s this blockbuster ……

“In March of 2009, the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) completed a reassessment of the in-place oil shale reserves in this (western) region and increased their estimate from about 1 trillion barrels of shale oil to 1.525 trillion barrels of shale oil. The Department of Energy (DOE) estimates that about 1.8 trillion barrels of shale oil potentially underlay Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.” The word trillion is not a misprint. The oil is there. And we can get it. At a price, of course.

While Peak Oil supporters argue truthfully that there is a finite amount of oil to be found on the planet, they don’t mention how much, just that it is getting more difficult and more expensive to recover, which is also true. Shell Oil believes there could be 300 billion more bbl of oil in the Gulf of Mexico seabed. That’s huge, but deep sea drilling is expensive. Same goes for the possible 16 billion bbl sitting in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and the trillion-plus shale oil in the West. And you can count on radical environmental activists creating a political and legal firestorm in all cases. National security be damned.

Peak oil supporters also ignore two other huge factors: technology and natural gas. The oil companies are currently working on new hydraulic fracturing processes that will enable them to squeeze out even more oil from fracked wells. As for natural gas, because of its current abundance, due in large part to drilling for oil, it is rapidly replacing fuel oil as a method for heating hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses, especially in the Northeast and Midwest. And how about those tens of thousands of vehicles that are currently burning liquid natural gas (methane) and compressed natural gas instead of diesel or highly refined gasoline. Natural gas has reduced our national consumption of oil by hundreds of thousands of bbl per day and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

The current heavy use of plentiful natural gas will inexorably lead to shouts of “Peak Natural Gas.” Don’t laugh. It’s happened before. In the 1970s, when clueless climate scientists were warning about the Earth getting colder and an impending Ice Age, the federal government “fixed” the problem of dwindling domestic natural gas resources.

It started in 1938 with the Natural Gas Act, when the federal government decided it could regulate the construction of interstate natural gas pipelines under the guise of safety. That morphed into the federal government controlling the wellhead PRICE (uh, oh) of natural gas sent for resale through those interstate pipelines under the guise of cheap natural gas for the consumer. The capstone to this folly was in November, 1978 when the federal government passed the Natural Gas Policy Act, which created 30 (!!!!!) different categories of natural gas sales with varying ceiling prices set by the federal government.

The upshot to all this? Natural gas power plants couldn’t compete with plants using much cheaper coal, so they converted their steam turbines to burning coal. It gets worse. A full 50% of all coal plants operating in the U.S. today were built in the 1970s and 1980s. Did you know that? The result was/is dirtier air (“I love the smell of sulphur dioxide in the morning”) and hundreds of billions of extra tons of carbon dioxide going into the atmosphere, compliments of the geniuses sitting in Congress and the White House.

“If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years there’d be a shortage of sand.”
—-Milton Friedman

I can hardly wait for the next fix to Peak Whatever.

With appreciation to Russell Gold, who contributed some of the information above in his article, “Why Peak Oil Predictions Haven’t Come True – and Probably Won’t,” published in the Wall Street Journal, 29 Sep 14.

A FEW MINUTES OF GOOD READING

Hardscrabble Farmer continues to entertain us with his unequalled prose. I have only one teensy criticism. He didn’t serve bacon in that breakfast he cooked for his family. Relax and enjoy.

——————————

On Sunday morning we were up before first light, something that happens with a lot these days as we head into Autumn. I made the children a big breakfast; creamed chipped beef on toast, fried eggs, roasted potatoes and applesauce from the first harvest of the year. They drank milk from our neighbors farm poured out of half gallon mason jars and I enjoyed watching them fill their bellies with healthy food to start the day.

While they got dressed I got out the tools for the day; chain saws and files, a peavey and fuel cans, hammers and wedges, a maul, an ax, a coil of rope, earplugs and helmets, chains and a breaker bar. I hooked up a well worn pair of kevlar chaps and tossed some plastic bottles filled with water into a bucket. By the time I had finished the children had come outside and were heading out to the sugar orchard with the dogs to help me harvest firewood for the day.

During the busiest part of the Summer we rarely get up into the forested part of the property. As Fall approaches it begins to come back into focus as the site of our hardest work of the year. trees that have fallen or dropped limbs must be cut up into blocks and stacked for splitting. In many places we can make our way in with the tractor or the gator to load up the wood, but in other, like the one we were working on that day are too steep, too bouldered to be navigable by anything other than foot and here each piece must be carried out by hand. This is the kind of work where even the youngest can not only help out, but make a difference that counts.

I had selected two large rock maples for harvest, each one standing deadwood that had gone out of production in the past several years after a century and half of vigorous growth. Dropping a 100 foot tree in a densely wooded lot is a tricky proposition that requires a great deal of thought and planning. The act of harvesting trees of this size is something that takes two or more years of preparation if it’s done in a working sugar bush. The under story must be cleared and the brush pulled into bunny piles- beaver dam looking mounds of saplings and lower branches collected from the cut and placed in depressions to decompose. In the first couple of years they become home to numerous species of wildlife- rabbits, ground squirrels, field mice and nesting birds. As they decompose they fill in the low spots with a rich humus of decayed carbon that feeds the orchard. Smaller trees that are misshapen, too many of any given species in competition with the sugar maples like hemlocks and beech are felled for firewood or boards and removed in advance of the big cuts. If you scope out the proper lean of the tree to come out you can, if all goes according to plan, drop it precisely where you’d like it to fall without doing further damage to the younger trees coming up for replacement, or snapping off branches that get hung up in the canopy creating “widow makers”, dangerous deadwood waiting for stiff wind or time to bring it down with enough force to kill a man.

As the younger kids pulled brush onto the pile I set to work bringing down the maples. The first cuts remove a wedge from the side of the tree where you’d like it to fall, the second relief cut is made behind and above the wedge cut and allows the tree to topple to the forest floor. Even when done properly these kinds of cuts are extremely challenging and pose risks based on the grain of the wood, unseen hollows within the tree and a multitude of factors that simply cannot be accounted for with any degree of certainty. Everyone working in the area removes themselves to a safe difference and watches the top of the tree for signs of lean while I cut. It is one of the few times when I feel apprehension about what I am doing, but some times you have to either fish or cut bait. As they would say these days, the tree ain’t gonna cut itself. As the tree falls the sound builds; the soft snap at the butt where the grain breaks free, the movement of the leaves high up swishing like they would before a thunderstorm- then the crack of branches the displacement of air as the speed builds and the explosive report of 15 tons of carbon connecting with the earth in one final instant. The vacuum of sound that follows is immense. A few stray leaves flutter to the ground, everyone looks to each other as if to confirm that something that big just happened and then smiles break out spontaneously, five sets of white teeth sparkling in the gloamy green of the forest.

I cut the butt end into two eight foot sections for lumber, inch thick boards that will be milled and dried during the Winter for floorboards, cutting boards and chopping blocks. On a tree this size from a sugarbush the entire periphery is marked with tapping scars, dark indents where a hundred years of sap has been drained each Spring, one drop at a time. As the tree grows it not only expands in girth, but ascends upwards carrying the oldest spile marks upwards, sometimes as high as twenty feet. The boards made from these marked pieces are coveted by master furniture builders and craftsman and bring top dollar when they come to market. Above these butts we block the wood into 24″ pieces which my oldest son goes to work on with wedges and sledge hammer, splitting them into four pieces that weigh 150 pounds or more each. The younger children take a keel- a red wax crayon for marking timber- and a stout branch pre-cut to length to mark the trunk and leaders for cutting. I go to work and follow behind them, pushing the blade into the wood, a shower of creamy chips blowing into the leaves and loam.

By noon we have disassembled what took the Sun and the rain and the soil 150 years to make and begin the process of carrying it out of the woods one block at a time.

Our friends stop by later to visit- the younger children have lost interest and at this age its best to let them go- so the husband and my son and I finish up at the splitter and quickly crank out three cords or better before darkness pulls the plug on the day. The women and children are in the house, you can see the golden light of the kitchen spilling out across the granite slabs of the porch before fading away at the edge of the lawn. Inside food is being prepared, conversations run one on top of another in a pitch just under what my chain saw ears find audible and outdoors, exhausted, filthy, and gazing towards the last light in the west we stand together without a sound and regard the pile of split wood that marks our harvest.

When people visit the farm there are a couple of things they always say to us, the most frequently heard comment being, “It must be a lot of work.” I think that they mean it as a compliment and so I take it as one, but what it seems to mean underneath is that we are doing something very few people would ever want to do. We live in one of the most work averse eras in human history, as if rest and relaxation were the panacea of existence. Yes, it is hard work to provide for oneself, to seek out sustenance not in the grocery store but from the soil, to harness energy rather than tap into a source someone else maintains and provides, but it is fulfilling too in a way that no distraction or entertainment could ever approximate. It marks our place in the world as something other than a bystander or spectator, but rather as an integral part of something bigger, something older, something profound.

Later, after our friends had gone and the children were asleep in their beds, my wife and I spent some time as we always do when we’re together, talking about things. After all these years there is nothing as pleasing as to watch my wife smiling and laughing at something I have said, or telling me some story about something she did during her day and being close to each other in our own home with the dogs laying outside the door to the kitchen, fast asleep. By the time we wound things up we were both bone tired and we leaned against each other as we made our way upstairs to a rest that we had earned. I have said to my children that when I die I hope that they cremate me and spread my ashes on the fields, so that I can give back something to the land that has given so much to us. They think I am joking, but I am not. Everything is harvested in its time, energy becomes matter, matter returns to energy and the cycle continues until the end of days. I only hope that what we’ve done while we were here is as valuable as the trees we took down and that somehow we’ve grown as they have, rooted to the land.

WTF Is a Jumping Meadow Mouse, and Who Gives a Sh*t?

I for one am getting sick and tired of reading this ridiculous crap.  See that surname.  Lucero.  See those given names.  Mike (Miguel), Manuel, and Orlando.  Hispanics.  I bet their ancestors have been in the Santa Fe area a long, long time.  No matter.  A fucking mouse is about to disrupt their livelihood.  Save the trees!  Save the bees!  Save the whales!  Save those snails!“For more than a century, the Lucero family has grazed livestock in the majestic landscape near Fenton Lake in the Santa Fe National Forest. They started with sheep and, in the 1920s, switched to cattle.  But that may all come to an end because of an endangered mouse.“You’re taking a lot of heritage away,” said Mike Lucero, as he looks over the creek that cuts through the meadow. He was accompanied by his brother Manuel and cousin Orlando, who have brought their family’s cattle to this spot since they were children.

Last month, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the meadow jumping mouse as an endangered species. Now, the U.S. Forest Service, which oversees the Santa Fe National Forest, is considering erecting a series of 8-foot high fences to protect the mouse’s habitat.

(Comment.  What friggin’ species of cow can jump over an 8-foot fence?  The same ones that jump over the moon?)The Luceros, members of the San Diego Cattleman’s Association and holders of grazing permits with the federal government, say the fences will lock out their cattle — as well as those of other permit holders — from ever returning to the meadow where the livestock graze for 20 days in the spring and up to 40 days in the fall.”
—-Rob Nikolewski, Watchdog.org, July 3, 2014
Actual photo of a Jumping Meadow Mouse.  Not rare in Australia.  Heh.

HELP ME OUT HERE

“Extending aid to the unemployed is not only the right thing to do, it is also one of the best ways to stimulate economic growth.” That has become a frequent talking point whenever the subject of unemployment compensation is discussed.

New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen used that argument during an MSNBC interview. “This is one of the best things we can do to help stimulate the economy, because for every dollar we put in unemployment, it pays back about $1.60. And we know that people who are on unemployment are going to go out, and they’re going to spend that money, they’re going to pay for groceries at their local grocery store, they’re going to buy gas in their car.”
—-from an article posted by PolitiFact.com

PolitiFact.com rated Senator Shaheen’s statement as “Half True.” Well, if it’s half true, that means it is also half false. So I sent Senator Shaheen a simple math test. I was surprised when she replied, and this is one of her answers. Her strong suit is not math.

Help me out here. I’m simply incapable of following the economics and math of sending checks to the unemployed. It may be due to a case of being terminally feeble-minded, but I don’t understand how an unemployed person spending a tax dollar drawn out of a state or federal treasury can magically produce a $1.60 return to the economy. In other words, the taxes YOU paid out of your labor were worth only a dollar, but somehow your tax dollar was suddenly worth $1.60 if the government takes it from you and sends it to someone who is unemployed and spent it.

Think about that. Your taxed labor is worth $1.00, while someone else’s non-labor is worth $1.60. One might say, “Well, you didn’t spend it.” Of course you didn’t. The government took it from you. But if the government lets you keep it and you spent it, is THAT suddenly worth $1.60? I have yet to find anyone who says it is. Oh, one more thing. Are there overhead expenses in handling your tax dollar, such as the salaries of hundreds or thousands of state and federal employess who take dollars out of the tax pile and process them over to the unemployment compensation pile? Yes. Are these overhead expenses part of the magic $1.60 equation? I’ll bet they aren’t. Here’s the new math, and it’s pretty damn close to what Senator Shaheen is claiming.

It gets worse. If you go to some websites, you’ll discover that spending unemployment dollars actually DECREASES THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN POVERTY AND CREATES JOBS, MILLIONS OF JOBS. Don’t believe me? Here’s some quotes from the website of Center for American Progress (CAP) (Footnote 1), and its logic is being used by many high-level federal elected leaders, including Senator Shaheen.

“Over the past few years, unemployment benefits have played a key role in helping unemployed workers pay their bills while they search for a new job. (Ok, I’m with you so far.) There are fewer people living in poverty in the United States because of these benefits. The Census Bureau has reported that unemployment benefits pulled 3.2 million people out of poverty in 2010, on top of 3.3 million in 2009.” Yikes! These statements peg the WTF meter. Then explain how the number of people in poverty has increased from 11% to 14% of the total population over that same time period, according to that same Census Bureau, which I quote as follows.

“The annual poverty rate rose to a rate of 11.3 percent in 2007 and increased from 11.3 percent in 2007 to 13.2 percent in 2009. The 2011 annual poverty rate of 14.0 percent was higher than the 2009 annual poverty rate of 13.2 percent.” So, how could over 6.5 million people be pulled out of poverty by unemployment compensation when nearly 10 million MORE people went into poverty in 2009-2011? Here’s the math that CAP used.

Back to more from these geniuses from CAP. “Unemployment benefits also boost the economy. They provide the biggest bang for the buck of the various kinds of government spending. Over the Great Recession, for every $1 spent on unemployment insurance benefits, the economy grew by $2, since recipients typically spend—not save—those dollars. That spending helps boost local economies as the unemployed can continue to pay their mortgage or rent and put food on the table.” Wow, this one tops Senator Shaheen’s claim of $1.60.

And even more from CAP. “The boost that benefits provide leads to job creation. According to a 2010 analysis by Wayne Vroman (Footnote 2), an economist and senior fellow at the Urban Institute for the Department of Labor, unemployment benefits increased employment on average by 1.6 million jobs each quarter from mid-2008 through mid-2010. Of that increase, nearly 900,000 more jobs existed because of regular unemployment benefits, while two federally financed programs—Emergency Unemployment Compensation and Extended Benefits, which provide additional weeks of benefits after workers have exhausted the standard 26 weeks—were responsible for increasing employment on average by slightly more than 700,000 each quarter.”

Yumping Yiminy, am I going mad? This gibberish says, “The longer you don’t work and continue to draw and spend unemployment compensation, the more jobs you create.” Did you do the math on that statement? I did. There are 8 quarters from mid-2008 through mid-2010. So 8 x 1.6 million jobs created per quarter equals 12.8 million jobs created. FROM UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, for Pete’s sake. Yet the Federal Reserve states that the total number of people employed in the U.S. during that exact same time period went DOWN by 8.7 million.

I just know that there is someone out there in the cyber world who can straighten me out on this. Am I incapable of critical thinking? Were the math and econ teachers in my caveman K-12 and higher education experience all fools? Is this where I’m headed? Some might say I’m already there.

Footnotes.

(1) The Center for American Progress (CAP) is no fly-by-night organization. It is a powerful, well-connected and partisan liberal public policy research and advocacy organization. Its website states that the organization is “dedicated to improving the lives of Americans through progressive ideas and action”. CAP presents a liberal viewpoint on economic issues and has its headquarters in D.C. Its president and chief executive officer is Neera Tanden who worked for the Obama and Clinton administrations and for Hillary Clinton’s campaigns. Its first president and chief executive officer was John Podesta, who served as chief of staff to President Bill Clinton. Podesta remains with the organization as chairman of the board and currently serves as a counselor to President Obama. He was born in Chicago.

(2) “According to a 2010 analysis by Wayne Vroman, an economist and senior fellow at the Urban Institute for the Department of Labor” Did that quote from the article, made by the Center for American Progress, lead you to believe that Vroman works for the USG, specifically the Department of Labor? He does not. He is an employee of the Urban Institute, a so-called “non-partisan think tank” established in 1968 under the Lyndon Johnson administration. It receives 55% of its income from the federal government for “studies.” 100% of the Urban Institute’s employees political contributions went to Democrats, as reported by U.S. News and World Report in 2013. Uh, that’s my definition of non-partisan.