LINDSEY GRAHAM, THE UNINVITED GUEST

Guest Post by Ann Coulter
Why does Sen. Lindsey Graham have a seat at the table on immigration? Are Jorge Ramos and Vicente Fox unavailable?

Graham’s claim to fame is: 1) having twice negotiated a voluntary surrender for the GOP on immigration; and 2) winning 0.00 percent of the vote when he ran for president two years ago.

You could run for president on the platform that we should kill babies and eat them, and you’d get more votes than Lindsey Graham. Who designated this most remote of back-benchers, thoroughly rejected by the American people, as the principal negotiator on Trump’s central campaign promise?

Graham’s thought process seems to be: We had an election, I ran for president; literally no one voted for me, so my views should prevail over the guy who won an Electoral College landslide.

The Answer Is Always More

Guest Post by The Zman

One of the more entertaining bits of black humor on Steve Sailer’s blog are the stories he posts about how every problem can be solved with more immigration. No matter the problem, someone will have a reason why the solution to it is more immigration. It’s as if our elites have a bizarre form of Tourette’s, where any stimulation causes them to blurt out lines from Emma Lazarus. When the lunacy of their claims is pointed out, the response is usually just a blank stare, suggesting their enthusiasm for open borders is involuntary.

Continue reading “The Answer Is Always More”

Trump: In Immigration Debate, Race Matters

Guest Post by Patrick J. Buchanan

President Trump “said things which were hate-filled, vile and racist. … I cannot believe … any president has ever spoken the words that I … heard our president speak yesterday.”

So wailed Sen. Dick Durbin after departing the White House.

And what caused the minority leader to almost faint dead away?

Trump called Haiti a “s—-hole country,” said Durbin, and then asked why we don’t have more immigrants from neat places “like Norway.”

With that, there erupted one of the great media firestorms of the Trump era. On Martin Luther King Day, it was still blazing.

Continue reading “Trump: In Immigration Debate, Race Matters”

MLK Day And The State of The Promise

Guest Post by Joe Guzzardi

It is important to reflect on our history as we enter times of great turmoil. This Monday is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, in which we celebrate the life of Reverend King Jr and the many Black Americans that joined him on the road to civil rights.

King’s historic 1963 “March on Washington” was officially named the “March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.” But today, corporate America shuts out college educated Blacks from high paying jobs in favor of cheap, imported labor, a disgrace to King’s memory which we celebrate today.

Continue reading “MLK Day And The State of The Promise”

UNCOLA QUESTIONS: Contesting the real consequences of ideologies and orthodoxies:

Well, it looks like the vagina-hat-wearing folks who advocate for middle-aged cross-dressing she-males sharing bathrooms with our daughters is upset by the word “shithole”. Now, Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) has objected to the term “chain migration”.

Have you ever noticed how the mainstream corporate media and Political Left, in the shameless pursuit of power, insincerely and hypocritically use language to enforce their orthodoxies and control the free speech and actions of their political opponents?

What is the best way for this tactic to be effectively fought?

The only methods I can think of right now are words, votes, or bullets.  Are there other ways?

Continue reading “UNCOLA QUESTIONS: Contesting the real consequences of ideologies and orthodoxies:”

On Immigration & Citizenship

Guest Post by Kevin Lynn

I read with great interest an article in the October Harper’s entitled A Sport And A Passport. The author presented to the reader a partial transcript of an interview conducted by Swiss authorities that was part of process to gain Swiss citizenship.

You see, the process of getting a Swiss passport differs from the United States in some of the most remarkable ways. For instance:

  • Foreigners with no direct blood ties to Switzerland through either birth or marriage must currently live in the country for at least 12 years before they can apply for citizenship. Years spent in the country between ages ten and 20 count double.
  • The applicant must have knowledge of a national language (The four national languages of Switzerland are German, French, Italian and Romansh) to a minimum spoken level of proficient and written level of very proficient.
  • Applicants for naturalization must have a “C” residence permit to apply for a Swiss passport. Previously they could apply with various permits, but no longer. A non-European Union person can apply for a C Permit only after being a resident in Switzerland for 10 or more years.
  • Applicants cannot have benefited from social welfare assistance three years before applying or during the naturalization process.
  • The State Secretariat for Migration will closely examine whether an applicant has integrated into the Swiss way of life, is familiar with Swiss customs and traditions, complies with the Swiss rule of law, and is not a security threat.

Continue reading “On Immigration & Citizenship”

The No State Solution

Guest Post by The Zman

One of the reasons our rulers are cracking down on speech is that even the most tepid debate will lead to uncomfortable questions. Just look at a public discussion of immigration. You cannot get into the discussion unless you agree that immigration is always good. The reason for that is no one in charge ever wants to address the one question that is never asked, which is, how many? How many immigrants should we take? Should Germany take a million Arabs or ten million? How about 100 million?

Continue reading “The No State Solution”

What the RAISE ACT Means For Immigration And The Environment

Guest Post by Alex Hagen-Frederiksen

On August 2nd, President Donald Trump unveiled a bold new immigration bill alongside Republican Senators Tom Cotton (Ark.) and David Perdue (Ga.) at the White House. The bill, known as the Reforming American Immigration for Strong Employment Act or “RAISE,” proposes that the United States cut down on immigration by at least 50 percent by the next decade, including limiting the entrance of refugees to 50,000 per year. The bill would also eliminate a “diversity lottery visa” program as well as the ability to sponsor visas for extended family members or adult children.

Continue reading “What the RAISE ACT Means For Immigration And The Environment”

Shipwrecked in the Sands of Time: Lessons from History

By Doug “Uncola” Lynn via TheBurningPlatform.com

Today, across the globe, there remains a clash of cultures as ancient as religion; as violent as tides crashing upon the shores of nations; islands separated within seas of humanity.  Ongoing wars rage on in the middle-east as democracies fight theocracy, and waves of Islamic immigrants flood onto the shores of western nations like tsunamis.  Although oil and water will not mix well, there are those who perennially hope to try; and, if history serves as any right measure, the blending will continue to roil and boil like ships on fire in perilous ports.

Will the captains in the Western nations lead us safely on our journey?  I think not. To know where we’re going, we must first understand where we are, and where we’ve been.


Continue reading “Shipwrecked in the Sands of Time: Lessons from History”

A five year ban on immigrant welfare is going to backfire, probably badly

Hat tip Starfcker

Via Hot Air

Another night of rallying the base produced plenty of cheers for President Trump when he returned to Iowa yesterday. And one of the loudest outbursts of support came when he made a rather incendiary proposal, seemingly out of the blue. Under a new piece of legislation he would be pushing Congress to adopt, new, legal immigrants to the United States would be ineligible for “welfare” for at least five years. (NBC News)

President Donald Trump said in a speech here Wednesday night he would soon introduce legislation that immigrants to America should not receive welfare for at least five years.

The new measure will stipulate that “those seeking admission into our country must be able to support themselves financially and should not use welfare for a period of at least five years,” Trump said as the crowd of thousands at the campaign-style rally exploded into extended applause.

The president also said that “those coming into our country must embrace our values” and he renewed calls for a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, saying publicly what he reportedly had said privately to fellow lawmakers — that the wall would include solar panels.

It’s not hard to imagine why the President would toss out this particular bit of red meat to fire up certain segments of his base and it’s a theme which he brought up regularly on the campaign trail. It’s also highly problematic on a couple of fronts.

Continue reading “A five year ban on immigrant welfare is going to backfire, probably badly”

THIS DAY IN HISTORY – Coolidge signs Immigration Act of 1924

Via History.com

On this date, President Calvin Coolidge signs into law the Immigration Act of 1924, the most stringent U.S. immigration policy up to that time in the nation’s history.

The new law reflected the desire of Americans to isolate themselves from the world after fighting World War I in Europe, which exacerbated growing fears of the spread of communist ideas. It also reflected the pervasiveness of racial discrimination in American society at the time. Many Americans saw the enormous influx of largely unskilled, uneducated immigrants during the early 1900s as causing unfair competition for jobs and land.

Continue reading “THIS DAY IN HISTORY – Coolidge signs Immigration Act of 1924”

Your Choice–A Green America Or A Brown America

Guest Post by Ann Coulter

VDARE.com note: Demographer James Johnson and MSNBC’s Melissa Harris Perry have used the term “browning of America” to celebrate the demographic transformation of the country.  It was the title of a cover story (above) in Time as long ago as April 9, 1990. This was discussed here the last time the MSM freaked out over Ms. Coulter using it.

In celebration of Earth Day this Saturday, let’s review how the Sierra Club sold its soul and screwed the Earth for a $100 million donation. They must hate themselves for it, so why shouldn’t we hate them, too?

After Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act began dumping millions of Third-Worlders on the country, the Sierra Club talked of little else besides reducing immigration.

In 1970, the club adopted a resolution complaining that the country’s growing population was polluting the “air, water and land”—to the point that “our very survival (is) threatened.”

Continue reading “Your Choice–A Green America Or A Brown America”

Level of Migration to the United States

Infographic: Level of Migration to the United States Not Unprecedented | Statista
You will find more statistics at Statista

Contrary to popular perception, the levels of migration to the United States are far from unprecedented. The absolute numbers have never been higher. But put into relation to the overall population, the percentage share in 1910 (14.7) was higher than it is today (13.5). In 2015 some 43 million people were living in the United States who were born abroad.

The term foreign-born refers to people residing in the United States who were not U.S. citizens at birth. This includes naturalized citizens, lawful permanent residents (LPRs), certain legal nonimmigrants (like persons on student or work visas), refugees or asylum seekers and also persons illegally residing in the United States.


THIS DAY IN HISTORY – Immigration act passed over Wilson’s veto – 1917

Via History.com

With more than a two-thirds majority, Congress overrides President Woodrow Wilson’s veto of the previous week and passes the Immigration Act. The law required a literacy test for immigrants and barred Asiatic laborers, except for those from countries with special treaties or agreements with the United States, such as the Philippines.

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the United States received a majority of the world’s immigrants, with 1.3 million immigrants passing through New York’s Ellis Island in 1907 alone. Various restrictions had been applied against immigrants since the 1890s, but most of those seeking entrance into the United States were accepted.

Continue reading “THIS DAY IN HISTORY – Immigration act passed over Wilson’s veto – 1917”