Guest Post by Mark Crispin Miller
Another reason why the 94th Academy Awards, though not a big hit with the global audience, was VERY good for Pfizer and BioNTech, the evening’s criminal sponsors
Suffering through the Oscars Sunday night, I thought the segment “In Memoriam”—the annual montage reviewing “those who’ve left us” this past year—was just another tasteless moment of “woke” self-regard, like nearly every other moment in that painful spectacle (which pulled the second-lowest ratings in the ceremony’s history on TV). It took me a few days to see that it was not gratuitously tasteless, but tasteless quite on purpose, so as to serve the same infernal propaganda narrative that Hollywood, and (it seems) nearly everybody in it, have been flogging since “the virus” first emerged over two years ago. That even (or especially) “In Memoriam” would be deliberately corrupted to maintain that narrative is not at all far-fetched, since this year’s Academy Awards—just like most TV news—was “brought to you” by Pfizer and BioNTech, which have so much to hide, and therefore use their advertising dollars to ensure that what they have to hide stays out of sight, and out of mind.
This brings us to that other moment Sunday night—the one that grabbed the world’s attention, when (as I don’t have to tell you) Will Smith attacked Chris Rock right there on stage, or seemed to, for disrespecting Jada Plunkett Smith’s shaved head. See, she has alopecia, as all the world now knows; and, as it just so happens, Pfizer is releasing a new alopecia drug—the first such drug!—which will now sell to millions, “our free press” having, all this week, run many helpful stories (or one story) about what alopecia is, and how hard it is to treat, etc. Continue reading “How “In Memoriam,” on Oscar night, was used to sell us even more “vaccines””
